Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Spare the Ozone and Despoil the Riled

EPA may soon approve toxic alternative to ozone-depleting pesticide, despite criticism

Posted at 7:11 AM on 26 Sep 2007

To replace the toxic, ozone-depleting pesticide methyl bromide -- a favorite of stubborn U.S. berry growers -- the U.S. EPA is reportedly set to soon approve an alternative that doesn't deplete ozone but is "one of the more toxic chemicals used in manufacturing" according to opponents, including six Nobel Prize-winning chemists. Even though the replacement pesticide, methyl iodide, is injected into soils and not applied directly to crops, health advocates, including 54 scientists and physicians who wrote a letter to EPA head Stephen Johnson about their concerns, worry about "pregnant women and the unborn fetus, children, the elderly, farmworkers, and other people living near application sites" who could be at risk from exposure to the pesticide. California, which is doing its own review of the chemical, classifies it as a carcinogen. "It's extremely toxic," said Glenn Brank of California's Department of Pesticide Regulation. "We are concerned about whether or not this can be used safely." Studies have shown that chronic exposure to methyl iodide can harm the central nervous system, lungs, skin, and kidneys. But just think of the berries!

source:  Associated Press

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (2 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

two wrongs

At the risk of oversimplifying things, it seems that the fact that methyl iodide is carcinogenic ought not be used as a rationale for continued use of ozone-depleting methyl bromide, particularly when there are any number of certified organic berry producers doing quite well without either.

Shoot for zero wrongs?

I don't think anyone's suggesting that, wilderness; I think the idea here is not to use either, and to force berry farmers to find a pesticide that doesn't do horrible things, to the ozone layer or to people.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks