Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Climate-Risky Business

Investors petition SEC to require companies to disclose climate risk

Posted at 6:09 AM on 18 Sep 2007

Activists, investors, and activist investors have teamed up to try to compel the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to require publicly traded companies to disclose their climate-change risks. Under current law, the SEC requires companies to detail potential risks to investors in their annual and quarterly reports to the agency. The activists, armed with a petition, are seeking an "interpretive" release from the agency clarifying that climate risk, and the risks and benefits that could come from domestic climate legislation, should already be part of a company's financial reports. "This is about an investor's right to know," said a spokesperson for the California state attorney general. "Existing SEC rules, we believe, clearly require companies to disclose the risks and benefits to their operations presented by climate change." On Friday, the attorney general of New York state sent subpoenas to five energy companies seeking similar information about whether they properly disclosed climate-related risks to investors. Now if only we could get businesses to care about the concerns of non-investors too, we'd be set.

sources:  Reuters, The Washington Post, The New York Times

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (3 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

All the docs from the filing

...can be found here, if you are so inclined:

http://environmentaldefense.org/sec

Climate risk disclosure

Great idea!

Bong Hits 4 Jesus
Climate Risk Disclosure

This is a  great approach.to require more reporting on incalculable  indicators so that the under employed and ultra rich lawyers like Edwards can file lawsuits "in the defense of the public" and put job generating companies out of business.  And if palnts need to be green house gas neutral than this would mean no more gas statiuons, new car dealers, electricity plants,
Just image a mexican restaurant trying to calculate the amount of green house gases generated by each bean burrito.  But, who need s jobs for the working man, when this appraoch will genereate lots of work for planners. environmentalists and of course our favorites - lawyers.
Onward to a world of reports and lawsuits. And of course lamenting the loss of jobs over seas.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks