by Brian Beutler

Waxman vs. EPA

What will the House Oversight Committee chairman turn up next? 2

Posted 1 year, 10 months ago Henry Waxman is trying to get to the bottom of the EPA's refusal to allow California to regulate greenhouse gases more strictly than the federal government does. Ryan Grim at Politico has the details:

In the letter, Waxman, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee gives a hint that the investigation will likely soon escalate to subpoenas. "In prior investigations, the Committee has allowed counsel representing the agency to be present during transcribed interviews. In this case, since your own conduct is being examined, this accommodation would not be appropriate, although counsel employed by the agency… Read More
Omnibus spending bill passes Senate 0

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago And I guess that's all I have to say about that. Read More
Advertisement

Advertisement
A 'staffer' speaks

Republicans oppose EPA mandate 1

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago David Freddoso of National Review learns from a Republican staffer:

Actually, the Department of Energy already produces numbers on greenhouse emissions, even state-by state numbers. But these are based on voluntary reporting and reliable estimates and formulas -- there is no "mandatory reporting."

So I would not panic, but this does appear to be a change for the worse. Congress is already making a bi-partisan war on America's energy producers and consumers (i.e., everyone) with the Energy Bill they will pass today. It is only a matter of time before climate alarmism adds still more to the already expanding burden… Read More
Not the bill to take home to mother

Nuclear subsidies likely to stay in omnibus spending package 2

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago The Senate is debating the wide-ranging $500-plus billion omnibus spending package right now. Most of the points of contention are extremely important -- FOIA, defense spending -- but for the purposes of this site, a bit off-topic. It failed its most recent cloture vote on the question of war-funding (Republicans, of course, want more), and minority leader Mitch McConnell has basically promised it won't pass unless the Democrats cave. So if when that happens, I'll let you know. I'll also let you know if I hear (or am sent) any statements about the energy provisions, but for now, here's… Read More
The U.S. Congress, always willing to be shilling

The terrible omnibus bill 4

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago Rumors began circulating late last Friday -- as the Senate was passing the much-weakened energy bill -- that some terrible provisions had made their way into the omnibus spending package, which will likely face votes in both bodies by the end of the week.

Now comes word from Friends of the Earth that "the omnibus spending bill expected to come before the House of Representatives tonight and the Senate tomorrow directs $20.5 billion in loan guarantees to nuclear power and $8 billion to the coal industry, with language that includes potential subsidies for the production of coal-to-liquid fuels." Read More
Omnibus spending package

Another terrible bill? 0

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago I'll cover the debate over the omnibus spending bill here tomorrow. It's being held until at least then, as the Senate deals with FISA shenanigans, which you can view for the next several hours on C-SPAN 2. Read More
Energy woes

Final roll call of votes on the weakened energy bill 0

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago Here's the official roll call (the names won't be up for a few minutes yet). A bittersweet day, to say the least. Read More
Energy woes

Weakened energy bill passes 1

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago The bill passes 86 to 8. Again, I will post the full Roll Call when it's posted on the Senate website shortly. Read More
Energy woes

Roll Call on the energy bill 0

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago Roll call is still going on, and the thing has gone way over the top. For whatever reason, when Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) was called, and voted no, it rang in my ear. So I went and checked, and sure enough, she's switched her vote. Not sure what animated her. The Michigan thing? Not being able to say she supported a CAFE bill because of its renewable energy requirements?

Others may have switched. I'll post the full roll call when it's up. Read More
Energy woes

Domenici supports watered down energy bill 0

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago Ranking Republican on the Energy and Natural Resources committee Pete Domenici (R-NM) just stated strong support for the bill, after voting to kill the much better version. Domenici is as responsible as any single person for blocking the renewable energy provisions in the version of the bill sent up from the House. He deserves maximum raspberries today. Read More