by Andrew Dessler

  • Arguing about the Kyoto Protocol

    It’s time to move on 7

    Posted 3 years ago It's time for everyone to move past the Kyoto Protocol.

    For those not familiar with the details, Kyoto imposes specific emission-reduction targets for each industrialized country over a five-year "commitment period" of 2008-2012. Targets were defined for total emissions of CO2 and five other greenhouse gases: the required emission reductions were 8 percent for the European Union and a few other European nations; 7 percent for the United States; 6 percent for Japan and Canada; and zero (i.e. hold emissions at their baseline level) for Russia and Ukraine. If all nations met their targets, the total emission reduction from these… Read More

  • Tipping points

    Should we worry about sudden climate shifts? 4

    Posted 3 years ago We hear a lot about climate "tipping points" in the news. You may very well be wondering what a tipping point is and whether it's something to be concerned about.

    To understand a tipping point, imagine that you're sitting in a canoe and you start to lean your body over one side. The canoe will slowly rotate (I think the nautical term is "list") as you lean ever further -- until, that is, you lean just far enough, and suddenly the canoe flips over, sending you into the water. You've just encountered a tipping point.

    The worry is that the… Read More

  • Advertisement
    Advertisement
  • On greenhouse gas intensity

    It’s a poor indicator of progress on global warming 11

    Posted 3 years ago A recent news article about the Stern Report contained the following gem from a Bush administration spokeswoman:

    The statement from spokeswoman Kristen Hellmer said the United States is "well on track to meet the president's goal to reduce greenhouse gas intensity of our economy 18 percent by 2012."

    This statement makes it sound like the Bush administration is taking on the problem of climate change head-on, with an aggressive program to reduce emissions.

    But it ain't so. Read More

  • Where can you find the "truth" about global warming?

    It ain’t a Senate website 1

    Posted 3 years ago I listened with great interest to the audio recording of the SEJ panel discussion described in David Roberts' recent blog post.

    Much of the argument there can be distilled down to one simple question:

    Where can I find credible answers to scientific questions about climate change?

    Here's the scientific community's answer: look to the peer-reviewed scientific literature. A strong consensus there is the closest thing we have to well-founded knowledge, and it is entitled to substantial deference in policy debates. And if a reporter wants to write about what the "scientific community" thinks, this consensus is what they should… Read More

  • Planning for the long term

    An interview on planning for climate change 0

    Posted 3 years ago An interview I recently did has been published in the newsletter of Caisse des Depots, a state-owned financial institution that performs public-interest missions on behalf of the French government. Also quoted in the interview is Patrick Criqui, Director of the Energy and Environmental Policy Department of the Grenoble LEPII. You can get the full newsletter here (PDF). It's all about the problems posed by the long timescale climate change operates on, and is definitely worth reading.

    Here is the interview: Read More

  • What's the link between hurricanes and global warming?

    Cleared up once and for all 9

    Posted 3 years ago The answer depends on the exact question you're asking. Here is my view of the scientific consensus on a range of questions:

    1) Did global warming cause Katrina? Or Rita? Or any single storm?

    As far as I know, there exists not a single peer-reviewed article that connects global warming with the increased ferocity of any single storm. The commonly used dice analogy provides a good explanation of why the case is so hard to make. Assume the weather is determined by rolling a six-sided die, with a six corresponding to a massive hurricane. Now assume that by adding greenhouse… Read More

  • Lessons from Katrina about global warming

    It’s about risk 12

    Posted 3 years ago No, the lesson is not that Katrina was caused by or made worse by global warming. There is, at present, no evidence that Katrina was meteorological payback for our ongoing emissions of greenhouse gases.

    Rather, the lesson of Katrina is about risk.

    The possibility of a large hurricane wreaking havoc on the Louisiana coast has been known for years. Everything from infrastructure damage to long-term flooding of New Orleans to the enormous refugee problem was foreseen in excruciatingly accurate detail.

    We also knew the things we could do to reduce the impact of a killer hurricane.… Read More

  • Page 14 of 14 pages « First  <  12 13 14

The Basics

  • Name: Andrew Dessler

My Profile Page

Advertising Policy