Comments hakpenguin has made
What a weak rebuttal
I'm surprised a PhD from A&M would offer such a weak rebuttal of the Doyle Op-Ed. If the guy has a weak scientific argument, why would a PhD say "look at all the scientists on the IPCC report" instead of just taking one of his claims and providing the scientific evidence to debunk it? That's what I want to see. I need to understand why the increased CO2 volumes in the historical ice core samples FOLLOW the temperature profile! Show me the science model that follows that historical evidence and how the same model predicts warming based on CO2 increase BEFORE the general temp increase ... and you might have a bunch more believers in this effort.
There are a host of scientists that don't buy into the IPCC findings; let's argue about the science on these posts and editorials!On Debunking the 'water vapor' nonsense posted 2 years, 8 months ago 35 Responses