Comments NedRoscoe has made
Phoney Petitions?
The original purpose of the petition was to show that there is not a consensus on global warming. A consensus is neither necessary nor sufficient to prove that the earth will be warmer in the future, that the change in temperature is or will be anthropogenic, or that the force of government should be used to rectify the situation.
One should also look at the "Doctors for Disaster Preparedness" society to see what the Oregon Institute of Science & Medicine people and their colleagues discuss in addition to global warming: malaria, hormesis, and the effects of funding upon research.
What if the consensus isn't always right? On How a phony petition attacking global warming science gained a life of its own posted 3 years, 2 months ago 7 Responses