Comments ClaudeB has made
Clifford, that's the point. The idea was to reduce SO2 and NOx levels. If, by substituting their fuel source, they reduced overall emissions at the lowest cost possible for them, that's exactly the point. The economy is all about incentives and profit is the biggest of all.
On Did Waxman-Markey's ancestors really deliver on their promises? posted 5 months ago 10 ResponsesA slight typo
The Winter Games will be held in 2010, not 2012 as stated in the second paragraph of the story...On Canadian athletes urge Olympic committee to fulfill eco-promises posted 9 months, 3 weeks ago 8 Responses
I'm pretty agnostic, but...
When it comes to renewable energy, I'm pretty agnostic, whether it's hydro (large and small), wind, solar, geothermal or biomass... as long as it's done correctly to mitigate the impacts on the populations and the biosphere.
And as a Quebecois, I'm well aware of them. 20 years ago we took a lot of heat in the US for building large reservoirs and thousands of miles of 735kV power lines. More recently, the deployment of wind farms in the Gaspé peninsula were faced with opposition and backlogs from overbooked turbine manufacturers.
Have we made the right choices then? For one thing, we don't have to make the same kind of decisions you're faced with in the next decade. On A choice of primary energies: renewable electrons win the gold posted 1 year, 3 months ago 58 Responses