Comments madrad has made
Correction
sorry I said "does support renewables" in the last sentence, i meant "doesn't"On AEP demands 45 percent rate increase for Ohio posted 1 year, 3 months ago 11 Responses
Hmmm
Good piece, I'm just skeptical of a few things here. First, I'm unsure whether or not McCain will support a Cap and Trade, obviously if he became president I would hope he does, but I'm skeptical of that.
If however, I go along with your assumption that he would support a Cap+Trade, then the renewables that McCain "doesn't support" would economically be the better option than the coal. By raising the price of the coal, the effect would obviously be the acceleration of renewable energy development.
Worst case scenario of course would be that McCain doesn't support cap and trade and then does support renewables. On AEP demands 45 percent rate increase for Ohio posted 1 year, 3 months ago 11 Responses
Can't Believe I'm Bothering
Antarctica warming
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/image ...
-------------------------------------------------THIS one really does the trick..
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/myths/m ...
there goes your "cooler decade", 17 of the warmest years happened in the last 20.
------------------------------------------------
but what about 2000-2007?http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/01/unc ...
all the "experts" commenting on ICECAP are well established deniers who have links to big oil. you can match them up
here: http://icecap.us/index.php/go/experts
with here: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/6/26/11550/9864
here: http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=5 ...
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1 ...
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1 ...
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1 ...
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1 ...
for your elementary school education..
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/myths/i ...
If the IPCC isn't your cup of tea for GW analysis, theres always
So if the IPCC is not your cup of tea, the following scientific organisations also endorse the consensus:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Environmental Protection Agency
NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Physics
National Center for Atmospheric Research
American Meteorological Society
State of the Canadian Cryosphere
The Royal Society of the UK
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
The Academies of Science from 19 different countries all endorse the consensus. 11 countries have signed a joint statement endorsing the consensus position:
Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias (Brazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academie des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Additionally, the Academies of Science from another 8 countries (as well as several countries from the first list) also signed a joint statement endorsing the IPCC consensus:
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Oh and even George Bush acknowledges it's a problem...you know you're behind the curve when you're behind Bush. So pull your heads out of the sand and quit making fools of yourselves.On 'Global warming stopped in 1998'--Only if you flagrantly cherry pick posted 1 year, 4 months ago 170 Responses
