Comments Jamie has made

Of meteors and metaphors...

Why not something involving a meteor? If global climate change continues unchecked, we're looking at an extinction-level event. We haven't had one of those since that big ol' meteor crashed into the Earth and wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago...

There was nothing the dinosaurs could do about that meteor, but the one we're dealing with here is of our own design, and we are (in theory) bright enough to deal with it. Maybe we need to call in a metaphorical Bruce Willis and his team of drillers to deal with this latest "meteor."On No more canaries in coal mines, please posted 2 years, 6 months ago 31 Responses

Hmmmmm......

Interesting stuff, Dave. I completely agree that the "dissolve thyself" stance is unrealistic for any activist in regards to a company like Walmart, and can be counter-productive to genuine engagement towards anything positive. So, if we have to (ugh) accept the fact that Walmart exists, and will likely continue to exist for at least a while, what's the best way to deal with them?

To start, I'm not convinced that it has to be a zero-sum game. I don't see why an environmentalist or other activist can't praise Walmart for their efforts towards sustainability while still denouncing their cold-hearted labor practices. Why we can't acknowledge the importance of an enormous leader in American business moving towards green ideas, while still denouncing their role in urban sprawl and the Paving Of America. Why we can't applaud the way Walmart rushed badly needed supplies into the Gulf Coast (before the genuises at FEMA made it in), while still raising an outcry when they dig up an ancient burial ground in Hawaii so they can put up yet another store. And yes, I realize we have to accept their existence and growth, but we don't have to accept the pace and direction of that growth.

I've never thought that coming from a polarized, black-and-white view of the world was the best way to achieve anything. It's the best way to feel outraged and appalled, but it may not be the way to create positive change. Are we more interested in making the world a better place or sticking it to the man? The two are not mutually exclusive, but it takes more than sticking it to the man to move ahead. Words like "naive" and "sellout" raise their ugly heads in my mind when I even type the words "applaud" and "Walmart" in the same sentence, but I think I can deal with them.

One could do a lot worse than Walmart as a symbol for modern America, and I think it is important to engage them in a dialogue, whether it be about sustainability, labor practices, community planning or whatever. I realize that in some cases it will be ineffective, and may even be manipulated by Walmart for their own ends, but we have to try, and keep trying.

All the while, we should also be focusing our efforts on systemic changes - both in the halls of Washington D.C. and in the streets of America - that will eventually curtail our national obsession with "growth" and "progress," regardless of how unsustainable. We also should be sure to support our small family farms and internet-sock stores - they're important, too, Dave, if for nothing else than as symbols of how things can be done differently than the Walmart Way.

In my ideal future, Walmart would some day go away not because they were evil, but because they became irrelevant to American life. Dare to dream... On What to do about Wal-Mart posted 4 years, 1 month ago 5 Responses