Comments greenfyre has made

  • Llogan Irrelevant / misleading / lie much? Llogan "which are rapidly proving incorrect. " NOT: This Year's Model http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6Un69RMNSw The Climate Models Have it Right http://www.desmogblog.com/debunking-joanne-nova-climate-skeptics-handbook-part-3-climate-models-have-it-right Ice Core Studies Confirm Accuracy of Climate Models http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/newsarch/2008/Sep08/icecore.html Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap3-1/final-report/default.htm Myth: Models are unreliable http://skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm The 16 Climate Models http://moregrumbinescience.blogspot.com/2008/09/16-climate-models.html =========================================================== Llogan "The IPCC's absence of a mention of greenhouse gases" That would explain this: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf 2.3 Chemically and Radiatively Important Gases ................................................ 137 2.3.1 Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide .............................. 137 2.3.2 Atmospheric Methane ......................................... 140 2.3.3 Other Kyoto Protocol Gases................................ 143 2.3.4 Montreal Protocol Gases ..................................... 145 2.3.5 Trends in the Hydroxyl Free Radical .................... 147 2.3.6 Ozone .................................................................. 149 2.3.7 Stratospheric Water Vapour ................................ 152 2.3.8 Observations of Long-Lived Greenhouse Gas Radiative Effects .......................................... 153 ======================================================================== Llogan "confirmed by the Wegman Commission" Despite the cronyism in the stacked Wegman panel, the best they were able to do was note that Mann should have used better statistics, it made absolutely NO difference in the results http://www.realclimate.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_hockey_stick_is_broken and how about you properly reference your absurd claims?On Is John Broder embarrassed to have a baseless hit job on Gore under his byline? posted 3 weeks ago 25 Responses
  • Llogan Are you joking? The 'Petition Project' remains thoroughly debunked as utter nonsensehttp://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2009/07/12/what-if-the-oregon-petition-names-were-real/ , as does Inhofe's Fraud (aka the Senate minority page) http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/denier-vs-skeptic/denier-myths-debunked/not-sparta-inhofe-and-the-400/, and the Manhatten Declaration http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/denier-vs-skeptic/denier-myths-debunked/the-heartland-institute/, and Bellamy http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2008/11/08/david-bellamy-victim-but-of-who/ and all of your other silly lists, and the misleading and/or bogus claims about scientific opinion http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/04/survey_climate_scientists_agre.php http://climaticidechronicles.org/2009/01/21/new-poll-shows-most-earth-scientists-agree-on-global-warming/ Please learn to use a search engine.On Is John Broder embarrassed to have a baseless hit job on Gore under his byline? posted 3 weeks ago 25 Responses

  • Science and scientists

    1. In science everyone and everything is always open for serious, thoughtful questioning;

    2. Your track record as a scientist should always count for zero, each and every piece you produce must stand or fall on it's own merit;

    3. It is axiomatic in the sciences that in time you will impede the field in direct proportion to the extent to which you once contributed.
    On NYT's Revkin gives Inhofe a pass posted 1 year, 11 months ago 66 Responses

  • Fuel savings

    Twenty years ago when it was clear climate change was a critical issue (ok, I'm a biologist ... it was clear to me and my peers) I got rid of my aging Chevy Sports Van and replaced it with walking, a bicycle, and public transit.

    If it is perspective that you are after put that on the graph when comparing fuel savings.

    And please refrain from using the word "need" in reference to what is for 90% of the urban population an outrageous luxury ... it is so insulting patronizing to the huge proportion of the population that do not indulge themselves in that way, never mind the majority of the globes population who are being made to pay for our indulgences.On When is a Tundra a better buy than a Prius? posted 1 year, 11 months ago 47 Responses

  • The Road

    As we are in the process of discovering Climate Change can move very rapidly with results that would suit his narrative demands quite nicelyOn A short review of Cormac McCarthy's recent book posted 1 year, 11 months ago 7 Responses

  • Bailo

    Note how Bailo's post is utterly devoid of any actual information at all?

    IF Bailo had anything of substance to offer s/he would post references to legitimet, credible science that differ from the posting or out and out refute it. Instead we get the standard denier slinging of epithets without any substance.

    A favour please? Spare us.

    Thx for the article jmgOn Physical chemist on climate change posted 2 years, 1 month ago 6 Responses