Comments Staale has made
I'm European too, Jonas...
...but I haven't a clue what you're on about saying "Stalinist" is the height of fashion in the adjectives department over there. Could this trend possibly be limited to certain compulsively ironic segments of the university population? (Not meaning to knock university education - I have one myself - just puzzled, that's all).
Sharon - thank you! I'm a regular reader of your blog, and very much appreciate your mix of ethical/spiritual concerns and the entirely practical.
As someone who currently resides in "the South", I see every day incomprehensible contrasts between the super wealthy and the desperately poor, often living within metres of each other (separated only by a some golf course and a few feet of concrete, barb wire-clad wall). Charitable acts by the rich - guiltily, grudgingly, absentmindedly or at a whim - sometimes make all the difference between life and death.
Things are quickly making a turn for the worse here, too, as fuel and rice prices continue to climb. Most of the food in the supermarkets comes from the US, so we're also at risk if supply discontinuities in the US should ever occur.
Lately I've seen some LNG taxis, and even a few electric police cars in the richest parts of the city, but none of this will amount to anything if oil prices continue to rise, dragging food prices with them. All transport trucks are old, and fuel efficiency hardly makes the list of priorities when it's still topped by "must have four wheels, an engine that runs and preferably a windscreen".
There are probably millions of people in this city just scraping by, "feeding" themselves on less money per week than I'd pay for a coffee and bagel at Starbucks, and I don't know how they will be able to continue to find food as prices keep rising. Charity will indeed be put to the test.On Coming to terms with the reality of a world of refugees posted 1 year, 6 months ago 12 Responses
Is 450 ppm even the number to aim for?
No quibbles about the thrust of the post - coming at the problem both from a climate science and a "peak stuff" angle is probably very wise. Just wondering about the target number indicated in the title - I've recently heard several speakers question the wisdom of the 450 aim, in light of recent developments such as the accelerated melting in the arctic, decades ahead of predictions by the climate science community.
For example, Bill McKibben at www.350.org argues that aiming for 350 ppm would be much more prudent, and in a recent two-part interview with Jason Bradford of The Reality Report (hosted at Global Public Media), Phillip Sutton (co-author with David Spratt of Climate Code Red: The Case for a Sustainability Emergency) argues that 320 ppm should be our goal (download Part 1 and Part 2 of the interview as mp3). Since we're already decades past both of these figures, this would involve pulling CO2 out of the atmosphere.
Clearly, this is not politically possible just at the moment. Even so, it was only just a year ago that Bill McKibben's Step it Up events very rapidly moved the boundaries of what was politically possible, i.e. what politicians were willing to state as policy goals, and within a very short while, most of the major US presidential candidates were talking 80 by 50. Of course, we've yet to see this translating into concrete action that actually slows down (let alone reverses) emissions trends...On What is the impact of peak oil and peak coal? posted 1 year, 7 months ago 10 Responses
Ray of hope?
I subscribe to the consistently informative (though usually not too cheerful) podcast "Radio Ecoshock", and a recent episode featured the speaker Paul Hawken at the Long Now conference earlier this year. I can't remember his exact words, but he said something to the effect that looking at the science and the news, he cannot help feeling pessimistic, but at the same time, looking at the immense taxonomy of volunteer groups working for social justice, he cannot but feel optimistic.
This was a very uplifting presentation - he outlined what he sees as the greatest movement in history - millions and millions of people all working for essentially the same goal: to stop conditions where "the future is stolen and sold to the present", e.g. in the form of short-term profits at the expense of environmental degradation.
Hawken explores what he sees as a gradual awakening taking place, where this movement is gaining self-awareness. He likens this to the human immune system, which is strengthened by improved communication among its components (not that I have any science background with which to assess the aptness of his analogy...). As we gradually come to realize the myriad ways in which human rights, poverty, environmental issues, fairness and equity are interconnected, we begin to coordinate our efforts and pull in the same directions. Hawken doesn't claim to know what will happen, he's only reporting what he's seeing, but in doing so, he manages to inspire and give hope.
Hmm... I'm not really doing justice to his talk, so I'll just stop here and instead point you to his actual talk. Hawken is part of the team that developed and runs the site WiserEarth, which is a portal for all the various organizations he talks about. Do check it out!On High drama leads to compromise at climate conference posted 1 year, 11 months ago 18 Responses
Barack?
I might be wrong, but isn't he all for liquifying coal? Last time I heard, that's about the most polluting fossil solution there is. He seems like a nice guy, but perhaps he needs better environmental advisors?On Polls point to yes posted 2 years, 7 months ago 5 Responses