Comments Catmoves has made
- As we are aware, figures do not lie...but liars do figure. If Monsanto, or any other agricultural or food supply giant starts crying poor mouth, we might tell Mr. Obama that "No, sir, they do not really need a federal government bailout. They're just jealous of the car makers good luck." I have been wondering for some years now why our government (you know, those people we overpay to protect us) has not ordered an investigation into "Disinformation (that) comes daily from powerful industrial agricultural companies whose profits depend entirely on the sale of chemicals, genetically modified (GM) seeds, and food processing." With the surprising medical information piling up slowly but surely, why haven't we been protected by our government mounting an investigation? Is it possible the extremely large increases in people coming up with things like diabetes, RLS, heart conditions, lung problems, flus and so many more physical problems, causing anyone in our government to wonder why? Glib answers like automotive exhausts, fast food, sugar. etc., etc., don't pass muster. Tell us, oh, great wise ones, what's going on with our food?On Ecological farms: the only real way to feed an increasingly hungry world posted 1 week ago 11 Responses
- Oh, David. Let me say something in reply to this: "And needless to say, I hardly think that majorities being able to pass bills constitutes creeping fascism." The rule of the vast, unthinking majority can lead directly to fascism and the destruction of an individual's rights and even their existence. A rough quote: "One man is a great thinker. A group of men are a mob that cannot and will not think." When majorities alone are in charge passing laws any country is on the knife edge of falling into revolutions. Our forefathers did not want this country to become a democracy. They wanted a Representative government so that those citizens with opposing views would be heard and their well being considered. This is really non-arguable if the history of our country's founding is studied. And being a fair and equable fact, it has led to things such as gay rights, women's vote, equality in so many things. A further thought: consider the great men of science and art who walked down a lonely road and found out that the universe did not revolve around the earth, that the human eye can be deceived by certain juxtapositions into believing the artist has rendered something perfectly logical while the work itself is a lie, that innocents are hurt in witch hunts and that the earth is not flat.On One reason Congress might consider scrapping the filibuster posted 1 week ago 9 Responses
- Thank you, Ann Cooper and Kate Adamick. I'm well aware that big farming and food supplying are gigantic businesses here. So big, that I am reminded that we can live without gasoline if we have to, but the same cannot be said about food. For my part. I'm getting sick and tired of hearing about profits for the shareholders, when I know that statement isn't the driving force. I'd describe it as more of a "how much can I put in my pocket?" syndrome.On A parable on the National School Lunch Program posted 1 week, 5 days ago 5 Responses
- Grey is right. We fought a horrible war against our mother country for the right of Citizens to control the country they live, not some authoritative ruler or tsar to make decisions for us. Many bills were scanned more ridgedly when they were philibustered against. And the people got the chance to tell their representatives what they wanted. It should frighten every single American when someone wants to take that right from us.On One reason Congress might consider scrapping the filibuster posted 1 week, 5 days ago 9 Responses
- I don't think I could agree with you less. Taking a shot at Bill McKibben is not going to do a single thing to get BO to focus on the issue. Using a balky Congress to defend The One? Oh, shame on you. Here's some points: 1. B. Obama in the leader of the Democrat Party. 2. Both houses of the Congress are controlled by Democrat votes. 3. The leader of the party needs, then, to lead the party. 4. Having basically ignored this issue during the "honeymoon" period, our leader has failed his chance to be really effective where climate change is concerned. 5. He seems even less interested now. You also state: "He (Bill McKibben) says Obama is 'not particularly focused' on climate (while linking to coverage of an Obama speech dedicated to climate)." May I point out that one more speech from B. Obama is no longer likely to interest the American public? I've seen it written in more than one place. The public is giving him his due as an orator, but the grade is F as far as being able to get action from a recalcitrant Congress. Making excuses is not really anything like making progress, now is it?On Is Bill McKibben right to be angry with Obama? posted 1 week, 5 days ago 37 Responses
- I agree that the Federal elected officials are our target in order to get action that will help protect the American consumer. And I can't think of anyone in a better position to "put the heat on" than Tom Philpott. How about it? Will you start the loyal opposition?On Why the USDA has no business overseeing conditions on factory farms, and more posted 1 week, 5 days ago 17 Responses
- The "group of researchers" may constitute Michelle and her kids for all we know. (I wonder why she is even mentioned here? Someone making brownie points?) And although I have recognized that college sophomores and white rats score virtually identically on maze tests, I have no intention of relying on the rats to predict, nor explain any rational human behaviour. This kind of article, purporting to be "scientifically" based should be relegated to the Sunday newspaper fillers. I will point out that at one time tobacco was simply a mild drug that anyone should be able to avoid using continually. The manufacturers killed that off by adding chemicals to keep users hooked. (Oh, yeah, our government came to the "rescue" by spending billions of our dollars when all that would have been needed was to prevent that from happening.) Now, the same sort of thing has happened to our foods. The conglomerate food processors have given us smaller and thinner shelled eggs (your grandmother would have looked at one of graded "large" eggs and sniffed. And she would have been correct to say "that's a small egg". But that downsizing isn't all. Now the giant "farmers" are giving us irradiated foods and hybrids that carry only a part of the nutrition we really need to sustain ourselves. So we eat more, the clothing manufacturers are happy (at least those in China) the "government" and "special interest" groups are avoiding the logical step of testing this garbage we are being sold as nutritious and we grow obese. Want something to think about? Diabetes was, a few years ago, an affliction that was minimally taking its toll. Today, there is a subculture of millions of people suffering and dying because of its sudden growth. Sugar seems to have taken the upper hand in this, but as it reacts in different ways depending on with what it is mixed we can't say it is the cause of diabetes. There are no known studies underway about this problem. For those interested in a bit more chemistry, the food you give your dogs and cats from those cans and bags is primarily chemically manufactured. As we are aware, cats and dogs are carnivores. (They are not herbivores nor omnivores.) That title alone tells us that their bodies are designed (and function best) when they have meat to eat. Giving them chemically altered vegetables and fruits is not what Mom Nature planned for them. Think about what we are doing to our defenseless pets.On Scientists claim junk food is as addictive as heroin posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 18 Responses
- "Remember, the government got into the game in the first place for lack of healthy bodies to fight wars." Now where did you find this out? Mysteries, mysteries, mysteries. Or perhaps that is just another opinion? My personal belief is that schools should get their act together as a single unit. They need to fire some of the dead weight administrators and become a body responsible to parents and non-parents alike. Where is it written that education availability is a special area that can be abused by students and parents alike? When did we decide that childless homes should pick up the bill for our breeders kids? When did Administration grow so large that their salaries, in toto, would outstrip what we pay teachers in these schools? Americans (and others) today want the best as long as someone else pays for it. Maybe it is time to "change" the way it is operated today. After all, "if it is IS broke, fix it".On Is privatization the answer to the school lunch mess? posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 13 Responses
Having read and researched the Van Jones mistake, I find this article stating Van Jones to be a victim of character assassination, but a "victim" of his own actions, including his own personal beliefs, to be a fiction of imagination. He is no hero, but rather a bigoted and elitist man.
President Obama did well in accepting his resignation.
On On eve of Senate showdown and COP15, the climate movement locks in posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 2 ResponsesUm Abdullah, in her hot clothing, with no education and a state that enforces hatred against another state, is pushing it uphill.
This article, really a push piece for Mrs. Obama, fails to point out that she was (and may still be) ignorant of how things grow. It fails to point out that her "garden" was a flacks idea to make her look good to the American public. It doesn't tell us how much taxpayer money she spent getting the disasterous "garden" to grow, nor who had to be hired and how much that cost, to fix her screw up. I am sure she is a personable woman and wants to promote her husband in any way she can. That isn't a fault, considering how many men and women do NOT support their spouses today.
But the article is full of writing that only seems to exist to let us know how wonderful Obama is, how evil the Israeli defenders of their homeland are and how much nicer it would be if we helped this country's Arab detractors destroy it.
Please, Grist, play fair as you did when I first found you years ago. Back the true issues and don't try to cover up intent with puff pieces.
Just sayin'
On Growing hope and fighting hunger on the Gaza Strip posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 2 ResponsesLiked your phrasing.
But if our schools do not teach nor (apparently), do not open their pupil's eyes (no pun intended) to the great men who created this country and served her, then what hope have we for these same teacher's explaining a rather obscure guy who lived in the woods a couple hundred years ago?
It's a shame, but there's that ugly ole reality showing up again.
On Thoreau, Walden and civil disobedience in the age of climate change posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 10 ResponsesMassachusetts is heavily Democratic. The kind of tactics you describe seem to be deployed when a citizen with a real concern wants to speak as shown by other "Town Hall" meetings.
I guess it's easier to jail 'em than to listen to 'em.
On Thoreau, Walden and civil disobedience in the age of climate change posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 10 ResponsesI'm leaving. Wretching is coming.
On How Barack Obama is like Marvin Gaye posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 3 ResponsesNot one single about the real future facing the U.S. Just accept it or get "skull-F**ked". How sad there is not one, single word about what the truth of twenty years from will be. A once proud nation kneeling down to its overlords and begging for "more".
Political strategists are far from even being able to guess, let alone predict, what horrors the present administration has in store for them ... and us. Combine BO with GB and you have disaster for the America we loved and cared for and success for the one worlders who are doomed to failure. The roses are available. Smell them please.
On Netroots Nation frustration and the impediments to progressive change posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 13 Responses"...no one cares how it gets done...." That, sir, is precisely how our once great nation got into the problems that beset us now.
"Just do it" implies "Do NOT think of long range effects, just satisfy me now." It's how BO got elected, so the shallowness of listening to political lies is shown once again.
On Alaska legislature rebukes Palin, but Alaskans may still lose posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 3 ResponsesTasermans Partner, the unhappy relationship here is that government paid for milk is dumped willy nilly down storm drains, in irrigation ditches and on perfectly good crop lands. No, it doesn't "sweeten" that land, either.
You bet it has to do with ecology.
And it behooves all of us to be aware of the dangers involved in mega corporations controlling any of our foods.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 4 months, 1 week ago 47 Responses"HERE: "I come to you, not as an economist, but with a deep understanding of small and minority-owned businesses and as someone who has experience with consumer behavior." (emphasis added)
"HERE: "The thing that concerns me and many of the 95,000 business members of the National Black Chamber is that any legislation Congress enacts must consider the impact that costs will have on small and minority-owned businesses, their ability to create jobs and the impact on the communities that they serve." (emphasis added)"
These quotes do NOT indicate anyone purporting to be speaking for an entire community.
However, ""The benefits do not meet the costs... especially for urban communities and let me speak for the African-American community since I am African-American." seems to fill your bill perfectly.
It seems that part of your thinking has lead you into a trap whereby you can find racism in anything that someone you apparently don't care for writes or says. Chill out, chum.
On Racism allegations mar Senate hearing on clean energy economy posted 4 months, 1 week ago 33 Responses"A liberal outpost in red Texas...." and this means what?
Senior Editors need to scan very carefully when apprentice writers are at work. There are other faux pas, but such a prime example needs to be recalled.
On The 15 most sustainable U.S. cities posted 4 months, 1 week ago 28 ResponsesCouldn't agree with Matther more.
It is becoming more and more evident that putting the fox in charge of the hen house is standard methodology with the current administration.
And do we really want to put Big Agriculture and its chemical approach to our food any further along the road to domination? I'm sick of thin shelled getting smaller daily eggs from our factories. I'm sick of overly salted foods just so Big Agri will have longer shelf life for its second rate food. I'm sick of meat rated "choice" that is almost "cutter and caner" level. I'm sick of all the damned chemicals taking the place of meat in my pet's food.
I'm getting kind of sick of the FDA, too.
And I'm getting sick of all the dang Czars (Tsars) being created by a man who does not see what he is doing.
He needs to start listening to the American side of things, not some foreign country's idea of what we should be and do.
On Monsanto's man Taylor returns to FDA in food-czar role posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago 14 ResponsesOh, yes. Here's a woman who doesn't care too much about the environment, who is anti white men, who is a blatant racist and dislikes being analysed by people "beneath" her.
We should hope she gets to be a Supreme Court Justice?
I gotta get me some of that weed y'all are smoking.
On Enviros back Sotomayor for Supreme Court posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago 4 ResponsesLooks like Ignacia Moreno is just one more pay off from BO to a huge company that supported him.
I thought he stood for change?
On EPA attorneys criticize Obama nominee posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago 2 ResponsesI hear you, Aquaken. I'm with Paul Krugman, too. And , yes, I am Democrat.
I also find Kate Sheppards style of writing reminiscent of the irresponsible attacks of newspapers in the 1800's and 1900's. It's snide, it's condescending and it's wrong, wrong, wrong.
Insulting another person's beliefs is NOT the way to change them.
Aha! Maybe she's really a Republican in our midst? Wouldn't surprise me. Are you, Kate?
On Conservative activists wage war on Republicans who voted for climate bill posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesGrist to join with the Democrat Party's hacks on Move On? Those people who are responsible for loading the voting booths with people not Americans? Doesn't anyone object to that organization? Please, please read about them. Google awaits.
Grist seems to be a willing consort to the lowest bases of our party.
I vote firmly against anything to do with Move On.
On MoveOn asks members whether it should launch major campaign to strengthen climate bill posted 5 months ago 8 ResponsesI find it difficult to understand why Grist would put such a poor, amateurish hodge podge together other than to create enmity among the only two political groups now capable of electing a President? This should be a time of uniting, not dividing.
If a person's political stance is of such importance that shallow, personal attacks are the modus operandi of Grist, then perhaps its purpose should be more deeply inspected by those of us of the Democrat Party.
In these trying times, I would suggest we all remember E Pluribus Unum.
On Analysis of Waxman-Markey vote from around the web posted 5 months ago 3 ResponsesPoor quality betrays lack of substance. Calling names betrays childishness. Trying to be funny and failing betrays lack of education. I think I'll go have a hot fudge sunday.
On Lowlights from the House climate debate posted 5 months ago 3 Responses"Universal Feeding school lunch program"?
Philadelphia wants to feed the world's school children?
Oh, BTW, whatever happened to kids taking their lunch to school in brown paper bags? Those bags Moms used to fill with nutritious and wholesome food? At very low cost. And sharing your lunch with kids who had "forgotten" theirs?
Now, it seems, the nanny society doesn't think moms and dads should work and supply breakfasts and lunches to their kids. Hey, folks, if you can't afford to feed them, just stop getting preggers.
Do we ever have any statistics supplied on the households who "can't afford" to feed their own children? Bet it would be interesting.
On Philly's universal school lunch program lives on -- for now posted 5 months, 3 weeks ago 3 ResponsesA China made $45,000 car? Gee whiz, Batman, they can't even make a $20 lamp without having it recalled. For funsies, maybe they'll let me know when hell freezes over?
On Our peak oil future? Electric vehicle startup unveils Chinese-made, $45K 'economy' car posted 5 months, 3 weeks ago 9 ResponsesI sincerely hope this a misprint: "Latin American...." I hope she is an American, even born in the USA.
But I will never favor her being seated on the court, because this lady wants to take our guns away from us. And I have serious doubts about her really serving our conservationist aims.
On Obama Supreme Court pick has small but solid record on environmental rulings posted 5 months, 4 weeks ago 4 Responses"Jaw dropping things" come from the lips of Democrats, too. It seems that David Roberts reporting is neither balanced, nor fair. And before you ask, please note I am a registered Democrat.
What the author needs to remember is that BOTH parties will need to work together in order to get real action on energy and climate. Creating enemies through derision is not the way to success.
On The week in fruitloopery: jaw-dropping things Republicans are saying about climate and energy posted 6 months ago 4 ResponsesI cannot believe that such a potentially deadly and serious issue is being reduced to party politics on your pages. You who are guilty of this may hang your heads in shame. The subject is way beyond your puny politics.
As for Dash RIPROCK III, perhaps he might get someone to edit his/her copy. He/she is an embarrassment to the movement.
If he/she is using English as a second language, then the editors should help this person out.
On House Republicans bring strange theories and wacky witnesses to climate hearings posted 7 months, 1 week ago 22 ResponsesAuntiegrav
American business is built on consumerism. Although I agree with you about stopping this nonsense, we have an entire industry built on "get it now, pay for it later."
And don't get me started on credit cards.
But I do want more police. To protect my plastic flamingos.On An interview with California environmental adviser Terry Tamminen posted 2 years, 6 months ago 8 ResponsesCoal
I'm sure you are right about coal being a dire threat to us all. But on the other hand (you've read Terry's book) coal doesn't give off any bad things when it is just sitting there. Your car DOES. On An interview with California environmental adviser Terry Tamminen posted 2 years, 6 months ago 8 Responses
Oceans
I thought I might point out to you that Terry is an accomplished skin diver and well aware of the part our oceans play in this scenario. Get his book. You'll see it in there.On My presidential platform calls for clean air and no war. What about yours? posted 2 years, 6 months ago 23 Responses
Terry Tamminen
"...gutters that catch, direct and store all that water!" The cities in Australia all have many homes equipped with storage tanks that catch rain water. It's used, primarily, for laundry and watering gardens and grass. Unfortunately Brisbane, and much of the rest of the country, is undergoing the most severe drought it has ever seen. Years of drought.
Bullet proof glass roofs? I'm not an architect, but I would guess the support for this kind of roof, plus the solar panels, would mean an entirely new kind of construction. And the cost would be astronomical.
I refer the other parts of your post to the late John F. Kennedy:
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country".On My presidential platform calls for clean air and no war. What about yours? posted 2 years, 6 months ago 23 ResponsesWalmart "greening"
Strange how quickly both big business and the general public forget. Not too many years ago, Walmart offered their shoppers a choice of paper bags (which will disinterate in landfills) or plastic bags (which apparently will never, ever disintegrate) when checking out. Very quietly and without any fanfare WallyWorld did away with the choice. I also understand that plastic bags take more energy to create being petroleum based. I see nothing wrong with WalMart buying land and growing replaceable trees in order to go back to the paper bags. And thus offer a little real help in their "greening" program. Oh, I forgot. They might have reduce their annual dividend by a hundredth of a cent. Shame on me.On In working with Wal-Mart, activist Adam Werbach is abandoning his principles posted 3 years, 4 months ago 9 Responses