Comments Phila has made

  • Nothing is grounded

    Hayes' comment about "the post-modern abyss, in which nothing is grounded in the divine or universal," is - in addition to being oversimplistic at best - a bit to close too calling dissenters and skeptics "dirty hippies" for my taste.On Richard Rorty, RIP posted 2 years, 5 months ago 5 Responses

  • Brooklyn

    I like Waterfalls Cafe, on Atlantic Ave at Henry. Excellent, cheap Middle Eastern food.

    Don't know if you like classical music at all, but Bargemusic is nice...chamber music performed in a barge moored at the foot of the Brooklyn Bridge, with a glass wall facing Manhattan. I enjoyed going even when I didn't care for the composers.

    The Museum of the Moving Image is fun, too (it's in Astoria, though).On Brooklyn bleg posted 2 years, 8 months ago 18 Responses

  • Respect?

    The idea that you respect Gregg Easterbrook - who is one of this country's shoddiest and most dishonest mainstreamers of anti-environmentalist disinformation - is staggering.

    If you were more familiar with his MO, I doubt you'd be surprised by anything he fails (intentionally or otherwise) to realize.On A sensible way to view them posted 2 years, 8 months ago 6 Responses

  • Iain Murray

    The CEI hack Iain Murray has some great new talking points too, as I described hereOn It's a frenzy posted 2 years, 10 months ago 9 Responses

  • Logic for Dummies

    Rule #1 -- if nuclear power really makes no economic sense, you don't have to blog on it.

    Yes. Because any idea that makes no economic sense will simply vanish into thin air. It won't be subsidized by taxpayer dollars, or promoted by people who stand to make a profit from it at the expense of society and the environment.

    No one needs to blog about intelligent design, either. After all, it makes no sense!

    As for finding uranium, don't be so pessimistic! You never know what you'll find beneath melting glaciers.On No nukes is good nukes posted 3 years, 5 months ago 62 Responses

  • Oops

    Fraudulent, that is.On Easterbrook accepts global warming posted 3 years, 6 months ago 8 Responses

  • It's worse than that...

    Easterbrook's quotes from the 1990s are uterly fraudelent. The NAS urged immediate action in its 1991 report; in context, "no evidence" referred to "imminent rapid change" (i.e., runaway global warming). The rest of the report specifically says that waiting for more research before taking action is a bad idea.

    There are other problems, too...I detailed 'em here.On Easterbrook accepts global warming posted 3 years, 6 months ago 8 Responses

  • Underwhelmed

    Jensen says, "You do what it takes."

    Yes, but what does it take?On Against hope posted 3 years, 7 months ago 3 Responses