Comments bobclive has made
Politico's journalistic malpractice
Ever wonder why it was a crime to print the bible in ENGLISH.On Beltway paper runs two of the dumbest stories of the decade on climate science posted 1 year ago 18 Responses
Ignoring climate change will cost U.S. big bucks,
Models, models, models more models even more models.
The term used for models is RIRO, RUBBISH IN RUBBISH OUT.ITS THE DATA THAT COUNTS.
CLIMATE CHANGE, WHAT CLIMATE CHANGE.
To be able to see signs of global warming linked to CO2 you need two things (1) accurate CO2 data and (2) accurate temperature data. There is accurate CO2 data but only since 1958 at Mauna Loa, as for temperature, well there are thousands of high quality rural weather stations throughout the world and especially in the US and the northern hemisphere that have long histories and NO UHI bias. These stations are totally uncontaminated and provide temperature data from a totally natural environment like Mauna Loa does for CO2.
What do warmers such as Hanson/Giss do, well, they compare data from a highly UHI contaminated urban city weather station with CLEAN data from a neighbouring RURAL station. They then Use some secret algorithm put all the data through a computer which then gives them the result in degrees C. The odd thing is that the result always shows a steep rising temperature trend when the neighbouring RURAL CLEAN data shows only a flat or a slightly rising temperature trend.
Would it not have been more logical to have discarded the contaminated data from the Urban stations and used only the clean data from the Rural sites. I believe the answer to this is that this method would not allow the fiddling of data.
Bad data + good data = very good data, because it shows rising temperatures this is called Hansonisation.
Good data from rural weather stations = NO link between CO2 and temperature rise and we don`t want that do we. .
On Ignoring climate change will cost U.S. big bucks, says group posted 1 year, 6 months ago 5 ResponsesEarly warning signs at the Global Warming Café
To be able to see signs of global warming linked to CO2 you need two things (1) accurate CO2 data and (2) accurate temperature data. There is accurate CO2 data but only since 1958 at Mauna Loa, as for temperature, well there are thousands of high quality rural weather stations throughout the world and especially in the US and the northern hemisphere that have long histories and NO UHI bias. These stations are totally uncontaminated and provide temperature data from a totally natural environment like Mauna Loa does for CO2.
What do warmers such as Hanson/Giss do, well, they use station pairs and compare data from a highly UHI contaminated urban city weather station with CLEAN data from a neighbouring RURAL station. They then Use some secret algorithm put all the data through a computer which then gives them the result in degrees C. The odd thing is that the result always shows a steep rising temperature trend when the neighbouring RURAL CLEAN data shows only a flat or a slightly rising temperature trend.
Would it not have been more logical to have discarded the contaminated data from the Urban stations and used only the clean data from the Rural sites. I believe the answer to this is that this method would not allow the easy fiddling of data.
The Hanson method,
Bad data + good data = very good data because it shows rising temperatures, this is called Hansonisation.Good data from RURAL weather stations = NO link between CO2 and temperature rise and we don`t want that do we.
On The Climate Policy Paradigm has reached its endgame posted 1 year, 6 months ago 21 ResponsesPour Some Sugar on Swede
I believe Brazil is one of the few places in the world that is capable of producing sugarcane from two harvests per year, even Brazil cannot produce enough bio-fuel for its own needs without cutting down the rainforest.
So Brazil exports bio-fuel to satisfy the euro green fanatics and imports oil in its place.
The US grows grain for bio-fuel instead of food, because of this folly millions are starving to death in the third world.
You would have thought these fanatical environmentalists would have learned from past mistakes like the DDT fiasco, which has caused hundreds of millions of deaths in the third world over the last 30 years, but fanatics never do learn by there mistakes or they would not be fanatical. On Swedish company will vend verified sustainable ethanol posted 1 year, 6 months ago 9 ResponsesThe Eye of the Storm
London's Urban Heat Island: A Summary for Decision Makers.
The urban heat island is caused by the storage of solar energy in the urban fabric during the day and release of this energy into the atmosphere at night. The process of urbanisation and development alters the balance between the energy from the sun used for raising the air temperature (heating process) and that used for evaporation (cooling process), because the cooling effect of vegetated surfaces is replaced by impervious engineered surfaces.
The strength of the urban heat island is measured by the `urban heat island intensity', which describes the maximum difference in temperature between urban and rural locations within a given time period. The highest values of the urban heat island intensity, in the region of 6-8oC, are often reached between about 11 o'clock at night and 3 o'clock in the morning (Figure 2). This is why the urban heat island is often referred to as a nighttime phenomenon. UHI intensities are also greater in summer than winter because of contrasts in the amount of energy received from the sun, which is absorbed by the urban surface during the day and released at night. The urban heat island keeps London warmer in winter - this can be seen in how spring occurs earlier in London and snow settles less often.
Has there been any significant warming since the end of world war2, I think not,the London study shows 6-8 degrees C UHI warming because of population growth and urban development, Tokyo shows similar, so does Sao Paulo, Budapest, shows 3-4 degrees c
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
The total population increase in the 18 years (1967-1984 was 739,591 and the annual mean maximum temperature in the same period became warmer by 1.7 degrees C. The annual mean maximum temperature attained lt`s peak in the year 2000. It is interesting to observe that the urban population was also the highest in that same year.
Hong Kong Urban Heat Island,
After analyzing the data, PolyU researchers found that there was an average temperature difference of 7° to 8°C between urban and rural of areas of Hong Kong in a winter night, and the maximum difference could be as high as 12°C. On a summer night, 0.004 degrees C says Peterson.
http://www.polyu.edu.hk/cpa/polyu/hotnews/details_et.php? ...
These urban city examples are spread widely over the planet, what does Hanson allow, 0.004C, How do you stop Hansonisation, drop the urban stations and use only rural, easy peasy.
Average Global temperature, what average global temperature, global warming what global warming.
Averaged temps across the state of North Carolina,
There has been no long-term trend in the state's annual temperature history since 1895
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/o ...
http://www.climateaudit.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/br ...
On Global temps may drop this year but, alas, world still warming posted 1 year, 6 months ago 132 ResponsesThe Eye of the Storm
Max,
Record Monthly High and Low Temperatures in the United States,
HIGH LOW
Jan 1936 1954
Feb *1963 1985
March 1954 1906
April 1898 1945
May 1896 1945
June 1902 1907
July 1913 1911
Aug 1933 1910
Sept 1950 1926
Oct 1917 1917
Nov 1906 1954
Dec 1939 1924
Only about 0.8% of monthly highs after 1960 does not appear to show any substantial AGW warming.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762182.htmlOn Global temps may drop this year but, alas, world still warming posted 1 year, 6 months ago 132 Responses
The Eye of the Storm
Over the last century, Tokyo temperatures have increased five times as fast as global warming,'' said Takehiro Mikami, a professor of climatology at Tokyo Metropolitan University. While the world's average mean temperature has increased by one degree Fahrenheit since 1900, Tokyo's has increased by 5.2 degrees.(have they actually increased by 1 degree F, I wonder)
The findings parallel recent research by NASA scientists using satellites to monitor Mexico City, Atlanta and dozens of other growing metropolises around the world. They found that cities tend to have temperatures far warmer than the surrounding landscape, in many cases up to 10 degrees warmer. Often the heat changes the weather itself, causing more storms downwind of cities, the scientists found.
Might this have something to do with population growth in urban areas.What did the Peterson study find, No significant UHI warming, just 0.004 degrees C, mmm.
By the way, over 90% of the hottest months in the US temperature history occurred prior to 1960, I can see some sort of trend in those figures like CO2 increasing and temperatures remaining flat, that is unless they get Hansonise.On Global temps may drop this year but, alas, world still warming posted 1 year, 6 months ago 132 Responses
There is no proof that CO2 is causing global warmi
Warming Trend: PDO And Solar Correlate Better Than CO2.
If this correlation showed CO2 as the driver RC would have a field day, a very interesting read and the graphs speak for themselves,
Joe D'Aleo, an AMS Certified Consulting Meteorologist, one of the founders of The Weather Channel and who operates the website ICECAP took it upon himself to do an analysis of the newly released USHCN2 surface temperature data set and compare it against measured trends of CO2, Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and Solar Irradiance. to see which one matched better.
It's a simple experiment; compare the trends by running an R2 correlation on the different data sets. The result is a coefficient of determination that tells you how well the trend curves match. When the correlation is 1.0, you have a perfect match between two curves. The lower the number, the lower the trend correlation.
http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/double-wh ...On There is no proof in science, but there are mountains of evidence posted 1 year, 6 months ago 78 Responses
Alas, Alaska
Just FOOD(seals) for thought,
Fossils show us that seals existed during the Miocene era, about 20 million years ago.
Polar bears have existed for at least 130,000 years.
Now err I believe there has been warmer periods over the 130,000 year existence of the Polar bear, and that warmer period obviously did not cause the extinction of the afore mentioned bear or its food, the seals. Scientists estimate that there are between 20,000 to 25,000 polar bears and counting.
My understanding is that three bears were recently drowned in a storm, a couple had a fight and the sea ice in the Arctic was less dense in the 1930-40`s than now. These greenies don`t like to go back too far, only to the late 1970`s.
I think the logic of these Greenies is somewhat flawed, what about the grizzly.
On Alaska legislature looking for polar-bear skeptics posted 1 year, 6 months ago 159 Responses