Comments kenshin has made

  • failure to understand the political landscape is the real irony for an activist. the author is right, we need to show support for climate change legislation. some of the comments to this article in general are strange. if you're not an activist to work for good public policies to be put in place, why be an activist? aren't we just complaining for no reason? this legislation is a good starting point, it can be made better, and we will continue to ask for it to be made stronger, and we will come back to it again and again to keep it working properly. we will also continue the foxhole to foxhole fights against individual pollution sources too, but this legislation will help make those fights easier. those are honorable achievements, and if some activists would rather concentrate their efforts on that, that's fine, but we really need everyone to come together for this final push. otherwise, it looks like we don't have a strong public backing for our movement. we must show our real numbers, show them the votes.On Calling all radicals: Unite for Kerry-Boxer posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 32 Responses
  • it is not renewable and we do have peak uranium situation to think about too. these projects only come online here in the US from those dreaded government backed loan guarantees. there's only $18 billion approved from 2005 (not small change.) there's 4 projects up right now on phase 1 approval. all of them cost $10 billion or more (some are lying or not being upfront about their real cost, NOT including waste disposal of course of course...so numbers numbers). if we divy up the money amongst all 4 projects, u wouldn't get enough to finish any project...just enough to start the project, have the project declare bankruptcy half-way thru completion, default on the loan, and then walk away like nothing happened. for many of the French companies that do this, the rest of the money might come from the French bank (government), but even then they are trying to deregulate who would get first privilege in the case of default on the government-backed loans. banks are arguing that they should get what's left-over first, rather than US taxpayers. can anyone say credit default swaps? they have no intention of building anything that will produce a single kilowatt of energy--this is a scam on US taxpayer's money, and by the time the senate investigation hearings are opened, it will not have brough us a single step closer to stopping climate change.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 197 Responses
  • i like cap and trade, i have never supported a carbon tax and at this point i don't think i ever will, but at this point i'm just trying to see what these actions are adding to the political process. we are debating over mechanisms, the way the health care debate has folks who insist on single-payer when it will not happen--the president has said no to single payer. those who support the public option similarly get a load of crap from single-payer folks. i don't know if it is helpful in anyway to anybody to be split up like this, even if it's just a handful of us. i mean, the prez has also said no to carbon tax, so what is the goal? i think Weiss has it exactly right--polluters re-assesed their positions and decided to eat away at whatever bill had the momentum. we'd have the same problem with a carbon tax bill. the thing that concerns me most about carbon tax that no one has really answered is why EXXON supports it. EXXON is advocating for a carbon tax in Australia right now. their lobbyists sound just like any ultra-left progressive on the idea. what loopholes have they found? i don't think it's just about splitting up support on a bill there, i think it's a strategy of getting around any real responsibilities for their pollution--so what is it about carbon tax that would give them a loophole? anyways, all the protests still shows our decision-makers that we mean business on climate change, so it is helpful to a certain degree, but i'm getting concerned that we are playing into the hands of the far-right who would love more examples of our "extremism" so they can relate it to terrorism or communism or whatever name-calling they do.On ‘No compromise’ faction attacks climate bill posted 2 months ago 104 Responses
  • my instinct would tell me no.  i still feel that natural gas and oil are common lobbying buddies too close to be trusted, and natural gas would rather scuttle the whole bill than see it thru.  i'd hate to get one of their reps in a hearing, thinking he was our ally, only to slam the bill.  or, manipulate the availability of drills, see below.


    natural gas doesn't need our help to fight climate change as they stand.  coal plants are being replaced by natural gas, leading to coal's total energy production last year going down, while natural gas power production has gone up.

    i'm not a fan of natural gas, and besides, we'll be fighting to make sure that geo-thermal projects can get a hold of those drills.  oil and gas basically own all the drills that geothermal would also use to do their projects.  if they don't own them, they may own the patents to them instead.  can u imagine a geothermal company going to the gas companies and asking if they can lease their drills for a project--yeah, just for a few months, we're building a geothermal plant that will basically help to put your industry out of business...i'm sure the answer will be, oh sorry, we don't have any available for the near forseeable future.

    if we do use gas as an ally, the government needs to gain access to those drills, and keep them on hand solely for the purpose of geothermal plants and nothing else.

    it is nice to see oil and coal all in-fighting each other, and not as united together.   coal screams out that oil is foreign dependance, oil screams out against clean coal...now gas?  no, i don't believe it, i think this is a back-up plan that the oil industry has to get what they really want thru a trap door, as opposed to the backdoor.

     

     

    On Should greens ally with natural gas against coal? posted 3 months, 1 week ago 16 Responses
  • my instinct would tell me no.  i still feel that natural gas and oil are common lobbying buddies too close to be trusted, and natural gas would rather scuttle the whole bill than see it thru.  i'd hate to get one of their reps in a hearing, thinking he was our ally, only to slam the bill.  or, manipulate the availability of drills, see below.


    natural gas doesn't need our help to fight climate change as they stand.  coal plants are being replaced by natural gas, leading to coal's total energy production last year going down, while natural gas power production has gone up.

    i'm not a fan of natural gas, and besides, we'll be fighting to make sure that geo-thermal projects can get a hold of those drills.  oil and gas basically own all the drills that geothermal would also use to do their projects.  if they don't own them, they may own the patents to them instead.  can u imagine a geothermal company going to the gas companies and asking if they can lease their drills for a project--yeah, just for a few months, we're building a geothermal plant that will basically help to put your industry out of business...i'm sure the answer will be, oh sorry, we don't have any available for the near forseeable future.

    if we do use gas as an ally, the government needs to gain access to those drills, and keep them on hand solely for the purpose of geothermal plants and nothing else.

    it is nice to see oil and coal all in-fighting each other, and not as united together.   coal screams out that oil is foreign dependance, oil screams out against clean coal...now gas?  no, i don't believe it, i think this is a back-up plan that the oil industry has to get what they really want thru a trap door, as opposed to the backdoor.

     

     

    On Should greens ally with natural gas against coal? posted 3 months, 1 week ago 16 Responses
  • i guess i should also say

    i was there at this event, with my son.  i just absolutely loved the dog and pony show that the republicans played on this. hehe!  one lie to the american public after another...it was like theater.

    the look of fear in the republican's eyes, when he said "it looks like it's starting to rain out here."  it was almost as if they were worried about being struck by lightning, for all the lies they just told!!!On GOP leaders unveil new energy bill that calls for some of everything and lots of drilling posted 1 year, 4 months ago 15 Responses

  • sorry, that's supposed to be a reply

    to the trollish comment above.On GOP leaders unveil new energy bill that calls for some of everything and lots of drilling posted 1 year, 4 months ago 15 Responses

  • sounds like the GMA at work here

    every business person i talk to complains about how climate change, and our dependence on oil, esp our increasing imports of foreign oil, have ruined the economy and businesses.

    apartment landlords complain how non-efficient appliances and ever increasing utilities, heat, ac, etc, are squeezing their renters to the point where they can't pay rent.

    america grows so much surplus food, it aint' funny.  we export a ton of it.  we give it away.

    the cost of food going up has nothing to do with demand, it has to do with THE PRICE OF OIL BEING OVER $150 A BARREL.  that cost affects the manufacture, production, and transportation of food, and that's all going up cuz that's defendant on oil.

    why don't you go and talk to the folks at the GMA about the current research on cellulosic biofuels, like alfalfa and switchgrass.  read Gary Hirshbergs' book, Stirring it Up, to find out more ways in which businesses, esp food manufacturers, can SAVE SAVE SAVE money by investing in renewable fuels?  

    as Jeff Swartz, founder of Timberland, once said, "What idiot would leave costs on the table?"  it's way more than just tree-hugging...it's profits.On GOP leaders unveil new energy bill that calls for some of everything and lots of drilling posted 1 year, 4 months ago 15 Responses

  • if obama's so smart

    what solution does he have for nuclear waste?  he gets $200,000 from Excelon corp, and he wants nuclear power in our energy mix.  i mean, i'm just a lowly little muggle here, but what does obama have cooking in the Department of Magical Mysteries for nuclear waste?

    Edwards has the plan, and we're still voting for him in the primary.On Obama parries ABEC posted 1 year, 10 months ago 5 Responses

  • So where are Edwards' supporters going?

    You know,the supporters for the candidate who was first with a green energy plan and global warming plan?  The only candidate who's ever mentioned cellulosic sources for biofuels??  The only candidate who's taken a clear stand on no new nuclear power plants? Who's never taken a dime from special interests, or Excelon corp?

    Glad you asked!  We're still voting for Edwards in the primary!

    Take the pledge today, and let these other two left-over know that we mean business when it comes to going green!

    http://edwardshasmyvote.wordpress.com/ingOn Obama parries ABEC posted 1 year, 10 months ago 5 Responses

  • i hate huffpo

    YET AGAIN! Terrible reporting on John Edwards when it comes to the Huff Po. This has got to be the WORST news source ever! Why do i bother following these links to it?

    John Edwards' website has got the be the simplest, easiest and most comprehensive website to navigate in the history of elections! Please read here for the REST of Edwards' plans to meet our energy and global warming needs:

    http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/energy/new-energy-econo ...

    just a little excerpt:

    Invest in Renewable Sources of Electricity: Renewable energy has been seen as socially desirable but costly. However, wind is already competitive with conventional sources in many markets. Solar could be competitive within three to eight years. [RAND, 2006; Economist, 3/10/2007]

    Open the Electricity Grids to Distributed and Renewable Generation: Traditionally, electricity has been produced at large, central power plants and transmitted through miles of power lines. Distributed generation of electricity promises reliable, clean, cost-effective production that is less vulnerable to natural disasters and attacks. Farms, factories, schools, and communities ought to be able to establish their own power sources and efficiency projects and compete with traditional plants to sell wholesale capacity, as New England has pioneered. [DOE, 2000; New England ISO, 2006]

    lots more, go read.On Coal lobbyists step up their game posted 1 year, 10 months ago 7 Responses

  • needn't be hemp

    but JOHN EDWARDS is the only one who's really on the top about looking at celluolsic biofuels!

    switchgrass is looking good, less nitrogen, up to twice more fuel per acre than corn.

    types of sweet potatoes are being researched in the South, good for poor soil types...

    did you see the sweet potato lady following edwards?

    http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/12/politics/fromther ...On Ready to Barack posted 1 year, 10 months ago 4 Responses

  • but it's not

    the science that they used to try to prove that it was safe turned out to be wrong, and some of it fraudulent.

    seriously, john edwards....there's a reason friends of the earth endorsed him...

    if i hear obama flip flop one more time about nuclear power i'm gonna flip out.  he gets $200,000 from excelon corp, you know, the folks who own three mile island?

    never trust a clinton.

    hey, maybe if i just type edwards a bunch of times it'll improve the number of times he gets mentioned in articles...edwards edwards edwards edwards....On Hillary Clinton brings an environmental issue to the fore in Nevada posted 1 year, 10 months ago 9 Responses

  • now no offense to dennis

    but i support john edwards, who i think has a fantastic environmental plan that's great, and he doesn't support new nuclear power.  he's admitted that his vote on yucca was based on info that has since been revealed to be false, much like the iraq vote.  edwards' platform would also move us toward getting rid of nuclear weapons here and abroad.

    don't know what to say about the debates.  i suppose edwards supporters are lucky that edwards hasn't been cut out by this point too...On Leading Dem candidates talk nuclear power at Nevada debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 2 Responses

  • HELLO!! JOHN EDWARDS!!!

    Edwards has the best environmental plans, hands down!  and he's had them for months, the other two frontrunners just copied his plans!!!

    Follow the leader!

    I did a vid about Edwards and nuclear power like to see it here it is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvTyTWJBamcOn Hillary Clinton brings an environmental issue to the fore in Nevada posted 1 year, 10 months ago 9 Responses