Comments Kira has made

Never on a Friday

I actually thought it got a lot of attention. But why release on a Friday? Shades of the Bush administration!

I think if it hadn't been for the whacky weather (gw-related or not), this report, Al Gore, and AIT would have been ignored. Nuthin' like a 60-degree January day to make converts.
On It just ain't sexy posted 2 years, 9 months ago 16 Responses

Clearly I'm late to this party

Tom describes the book as covering the "cultural history of vegetarianism from 1600 to modern times." I have only read reviews of the book, but does it talk about the natural history of vegetarianism? Isn't our physiology geared toward being omnivorous? I once read that no traditional society on earth is vegetarian. It's one thing to declare it better philosophically, but how about physically?

And if "livestock production emits fully 18 percent of global greenhouse gases," what if we replaced all those cattle with the original animals that used to be around, like the past numbers of bison, antelope, etc. Wouldn't they be producing gas too? Just because the gas is emitted from a domesticated animals, doesn't make it worse.

"Who are we to make other sentient creatures suffer and die painful deaths, so we can gain our sustenance. . ." Do away with war, and we'll talk.

Like most things we Westerners consume to excess, if we had to pay the true cost of meat production--its impact on the environment as well as the animal--we'd probably eat a whole lot less, because it would simply cost too much. That doesn't make it evil, per se.

If we think that somehow we can stop eating meat and therefore think of ourselves as pure in spirit, then, really, how about we start with ending the killing of other humans first. Isn't that much more profoundly monstrous?

Besides, chimpanzees, our closest genetic relative, eat meat. They also make war, rape, kill infants. Sigh.

For those who think animals suffer by being slaughtered, do you advocate getting rid of all predators? Don't wild animals suffer too? Not all, if any, are killed quickly and painlessly. Why are we the only bad guys? Just because we know better? I tried going vegetarian. I didn't feel well. Sometimes I think you just have to accept that it's a cat-eat-mouse world. Limit the environmental damage, pay the full cost, which would reduce consumption, and let's move on.

Personally, I treat meat as a side dish in my meals. Actually meal. I really only eat it at dinner and then very small portions. I like it. I think it's healthy (I don't buy Perdue or Tyson). And, something we Westerners seem unable to grasp, fine in moderation.

Right now I'm on a kick to eliminate high fructose corn syrup from my diet. Much worse than meat, I say.

Michael Pollan says "eat like an omnivore."
On Why the vegetarian critique of meat-eating should make meat-eaters squirm posted 2 years, 9 months ago 103 Responses

Hard Science

I think reporters are hesitant to write about climate change because it is hard to write about science, period. I once wrote science stories and found my scientist sources parsing every word I used because I tried to translate their very exact, yet hard to understand, language into something lay people could grasp.

Take the term climate change, for example. Debate rages about whether we should call it global warming or climate change. I've read stories implying that climate change is a wimpier, even right-wing, appellation. But I had a scientist insist I write climate change because global warming is misleading. Climate change CAN mean colder temperatures in certain areas. Climate change can cause the Gulf Stream to stop flowing, which will render England uninhabitable due to cold.

But I very clearly have gotten the message that climate change WILL produce more intense storms, but trying to pinpoint how much more instense a storm is because of climate change is likely something we won't know until years have passed, decades maybe, and we can look back and analyze the whole spectrum of storms.

Whatever caused Katrina to be as severe as it was is moot compared to the fact that as soon as it crossed Florida we were told it was heading straight for New Orleans. And why New Orleans was not prepared, is frankly inexcusable, whoever is to blame. And let's face it, who could be prepared for devestation the size of Great Britain?On How are journalists covering climate change in Katrina's wake? posted 4 years, 2 months ago 10 Responses

common scents

I confess I did not read the whole article, but if the pandas want to get their pee as high as possible (I got that it's for scent marking), why not climb up and pee down?

Maybe this is why they're endangered.On This bears repeating posted 4 years, 8 months ago 1 Response

Why them?

Good god, indeed. Why, ABC, pick on the Israelis when we are doing so much worse?On Pollute, two, three four posted 4 years, 9 months ago 3 Responses

Discover

I love Discover magazine. It has a "wow" in every issue. It covers all kinds of science and makes it understandable to us dweeb-brains.

www.discover.comOn Tell us about your favorite eco-magazines made of paper posted 4 years, 10 months ago 53 Responses

RFK, Jr.'s elevator pitch

"[W]e consider safeguarding the water we drink, the air we breathe, the wildlife and wild places we cherish ... as the most important of the moral values."

This is from "Nature: A Real Moral Value"
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., AlterNet
Posted on January 11, 2005, Printed on January 11, 2005
http://www.alternet.org/story/20937/

I hope he doesn't mind.On An elevator pitch for environmentalism posted 4 years, 10 months ago 154 Responses

Elevator pitch

Environmentalists believe that the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" includes the right to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and live on a sustainable planet. On An elevator pitch for environmentalism posted 4 years, 10 months ago 154 Responses