Comments Alex 77 has made

  • I don't see how senator Franken's rhetorical support for strong climate legislation can be taken seriously after he signed onto this coal supporting letter. As a longtime listener to his Air America shows, as well as a campaign contributor, this one broke my heart: http://www.grist.org/article/2009-11-12-fourteen-democratic-senators-stick-up-for-coal/On Al Franken (D-Minn.) posted 1 week, 3 days ago 3 Responses
  • *_*

    The Big BangOn A 9/11 SAT quiz posted 1 year, 2 months ago 5 Responses

  • I know that Grist has to pay it's bills...

    ...but it is pretty painful to see both a Chevy and a Caterpillar ad at the bottom of this page.

    The environmental and energy crimes of these two corporations are difficult to overstate. On Considering recycled energy will politically facilitate a national clean energy plan posted 1 year, 5 months ago 12 Responses

  • I'd rather it be Lieberman.

    What a terrifying choice this would be. The US Chamber of Commerce's stances on everything from climate change to CAFE standards have been the polar opposite of what would be called progress by the environmental community. His speech that is linked to above could have been written by Dick Cheney, and is an energy supply-sider's wet dream, focusing on: increased production of all fossil fuels, increased consumption, exclusively technology based efficiency improvements, protection of maximized economic growth at the expense of the climate, and expansion of "alternative fuels" (code for biofuels, CC&S-ready coal plants, nukular, etc.)

    I can't imagine a choice for VP that would more effectively dash my hopes for the promise of an Obama presidency.
    On Obama VP possibility heads establishment energy advocacy group posted 1 year, 5 months ago 6 Responses

  • I can't believe my lying eyes!

    Has Grist now taken to publishing the sophistry of one of the industries most responsible for the environmental destruction it lives to fight? Can we now look forward to a column by a "guest author" extolling the common goals of the environmental movement and the coal-to-liquids industry? I'm disgusted that you've chosen to print this. Every word is a lie, and your entire staff knows it. Auto manufacturers have done everything in their considerable power to block responsible energy and environmental policy for a century, no matter how massive the cost to the planet, no matter how tiny the cost to their margins. And to let this shill float the idea that manufacturers are manufacturing their vehicle fleets "according to consumer demand" is the biggest letdown of all. These companies CREATE consumer demand in whichever direction maximizes their profits, via omnipresent marketing and PR throughout our culture, which has usually meant persuading people to desire the largest, least safe, least efficient vehicles available.

    Please realize that your readership is more educated and discerning than to let this piece stand.
    On It's shifting consumer demand that will drive increases in vehicle fuel efficiency posted 1 year, 6 months ago 25 Responses

  • Wallrock is correct

    I agree - the vitriol is misplaced here. Werbach may not be living up to our stratospheric hopes for him, but his work on social environmental movements should not be savaged like this. On Adam Werbach follows up 'Death of Environmentalism' with 'Birth of Blue' posted 1 year, 7 months ago 46 Responses

  • Tell him...

    ...that Dick Cheney and James Inhofe just had a press conference, caving on climate issues, and will have Kyoto signed by 4pm eastern time today. On ECO:nomics: Quick observations posted 1 year, 8 months ago 5 Responses

  • Who needs a Department of Energy...

    ...when "Wal-Mart Energy Experts" stand ready to advise and shape energy policy at the state level. What a disastrous tradeoff - energy efficient statehouses in exchange for a massive buildout of the most GHG-intensive "alterative" fuels we can come up with. As David Roberts eloquently put it regarding CTL in China: "Screwed."

    Adam Werbach, is this what results from your historic penetration to the belly of the beast?On State govs embrace the range of 'alternative fuels,' from nukes to clean coal to biofuels posted 1 year, 9 months ago 4 Responses

  • Chambers of Commerce...

    ...both nationally and locally, are increasingly becoming impediments sustainable practices and climate crisis response. The US Chamber of Commerce in particularly is extremely belligerent, wielding massive influence to prevent meaningful GFG legislation or anything that challenges traditional growth structures.

    Is there a movement within or against the US Chamber of Commerce to green its awful ways?On In North Carolina's Triangle, a severe drought has leaders stumped posted 1 year, 9 months ago 8 Responses

  • Great response, Adam

    You nailed it. Borenstein's latest hit piece against solar once again fails to account for the necessity of mechanisms that foster market-driven/government-supported growth and improvements of technology. In his mind, such technologies should be constrained to the laboratory exclusively until they are competitive on the wholesale market with fossil-based competitors. He makes no mention of the massive subsidies that traditional fossil generated power receives. On Borenstein analysis of solar PV misses the point of California's solar program posted 1 year, 9 months ago 10 Responses

  • Very screwed!

    David, I for one appreciate that you don't sugarcoat such developments, and call them as they are. Perhaps large scale Chinese development of CTL will hasten a climate catastrophe, and that maybe it will even be properly attributed to human-forced climate change. It would seem that only an awesomely destructive climate event will move the masses, and governments, to get serious about not killing ourselves.

    And remember what Derrick Jensen said:

    "We're f@#*%d, and life is really, really good."On China kicks off the coal-to-liquids rush posted 1 year, 9 months ago 8 Responses

  • Fantastic news!

    Great rundown on the latest regarding the enemy of the human race.

    One thing this calls to mind is, what does the skyrocketing costs of coal plant construction do to the average price/kilowatt-hour of new coal fired electricity? I believe the conventional wisdom puts it at $.05-$.10 to the consumer. Doesn't this need upward revision?On Another bad week for coal posted 1 year, 9 months ago 7 Responses

  • I can't live without...

    ...Renewable Energy Access. Fantastic site for all things clean power, with an indispensible weekly podcast.

    http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news;jsessionid=7 ...On Seeking ideas for good green listening posted 1 year, 9 months ago 7 Responses

  • Wrong again, Charles

    Had you a basic understanding of how grid-tied residential and commercial systems work, you wouldn't write that 5.5 hours of daily sunshine will come as an unpleasant surprise to buyers of these systems. 99% of the photovoltaic systems being integrated around the world use the utility grid as a battery of sorts, requiring no onsite storage or batteries, and nullifying any negative effects of non-constant sunlight.

    You are correct, however, in stating that solar is presently an immature technology. The massive benefits being reaped by its current deployment are nothing when compared to what the near future holds given decreasing manufacturing costs, silicon price reductions, and new technologies currently being commercialized.

    I suggest you gain a better knowledge of solar technologies prior to writing such strong opinions  in the future. On The numbers add up for solar power, whether you're in Seattle or Albuquerque posted 1 year, 9 months ago 11 Responses

  • Not hopeful

    I am employed in the commercial solar industry, and we are presently facing a very real and dramatic downturn in our prospects due to ITC uncertainty. My heart sinks at seeing that once again, the democrats seek to fund this tax package through doing battle with the most rich, powerful, and entrenched corporate entities in the nation. There has to be a better way. The cliched "definition of insanity" comes to mind, as they keep trying this route, but nothing has changed to make for a more positive outcome than the last 3 times it was attempted.

    What it leaves me thinking is that this is being done by the dems to placate our desire for effort, but knowing that this effort will not translate into success. On House Democrats make another push for renewable-energy credits posted 1 year, 9 months ago 5 Responses

  • Show them no mercy

    Big kudos to the Youth Movement for getting into the trenches with these swine from ABEC. Make no mistake - these people doing ground work for ABEC are either incredibly stupid, unethical, or both, and they need to be made to realize the consequence of their actions here.

    Is there a place we can go to find out where ABEC will be locally, so that they can we prepared to meet them when they come to our town?On Ragtag youth and ABEC face off in South Carolina posted 1 year, 10 months ago 3 Responses

  • Counter Attack

    The arguments against coal, and further coal plant construction in the US, are numerous and bulletproof. I am outraged and enraged by these plans for further coal expansion. Any additional needed generation can be achieved by conservation, which the bulk of the country hasn't begun to attempt, and utility scale renewables.

    $35 million buys a helluva lot of influence in one year, and there needs to be a countervailing program to publicize the lies and distortions this coal industry PR will bring. I'd like to see a "Inconvenient Truth" style documentary focused purely on coal, coal interests, coal PR, and the consequences of its proliferation. On The widening war between activists and coal posted 1 year, 10 months ago 10 Responses

  • Ignore jabailo, GonzoDon

    jabailo is famous in Grist's comments section for regularly vomiting up the most ridiculous theories on climate change that are to be found on the internets.

    It defies me why Grist allows him to post here, as each of his postings contain a link to his blog, containing ever more of his drivel. And of course his blog asks for donations from readers, should someone feel intellectually enriched enough to pay jabailo for his trash.On Land-use policy is not a laughing matter posted 1 year, 10 months ago 24 Responses

  • "You Americans..."

    "The presidential race is interesting from an environmental point of view because it will determine whether the US federal government continues to block progress, or finally gets on board with the program."

    Your insinuation of Americans' ignorance aside, I do appreciate you bolstering my point for me, EB. And while the "partisan logjam" of American politics is an unfortunate thing to witness, and a poor framework through which to manage a response to climate change, this election offers the possibility of a democratic supermajority. Such a situation would mean the US "getting on board with the program" (internationally) as you put it, but more importantly would signal the start of domestic policies that begin to undo the damage. As the 2nd largest emitter of greenhouse gases, and the largest consumer of goods and resources on the planet, this is extremely significant. Cap and Auction, a national RPS, stopping new/scaling back existing coal electrical generation, no CTL, CAFÉ standards with teeth, intelligent urban planning, and the possibility of exerting influence over our trading partners (China, Latin America, etc.) to behave more responsibly as regards climate, all stand as strong possibilities. Our level of influence has certainly and rightly diminished, and will take time to recover, but a closer study of the climate positions of Edwards, Clinton, and Obama should give you some of the hope you clearly lack. On McCain and Clinton win posted 1 year, 10 months ago 10 Responses

  • No, riverguy

    David - kindly disregard riverguy's comment. Your solid (albeit neutral) election coverage has been extremely useful to your readers, and you'd be doing us a disservice to ignore election results as they come in. The winner of this election will have the most critical environmental responsibilities of any leader in world history. Please continue to be a vital source of election news. On McCain and Clinton win posted 1 year, 10 months ago 10 Responses