Comments Applied Ecotechnics has made
Actually we agree on a great deal.
I'm not saying that suffering by any living thing is less valid than it is for any other creature, regardless of size, appearance, or what kingdom, phylum, genus or species it belongs.
The important point to bear in mind is that no matter what food lifestyle choices you make something alive is going to die.
A plant is no less alive than an animal and the distinction of placing it in another kingdom is completely arbitrary, because all taxonomy is purely a human consideration, not anything imposed by nature.
Vegetarianism kills as many living things as does eating meat, and in some cases even more.
Then there are the environmental issues. To eat a balanced vegetarian diet requires, in most cases, importing material from a much wider area, increasing the environmental damage caused per pound of food used.
Consider also that in the case of hunting, it is very necessary to control certain populations not only for the good of the local crops and vegetation but for the health of the species itself, at least until, and if ever, the proper predator balance can be reestablished in that area.
Further, is it any more humane to kill something that you cannot hear or see the suffering of? In this regard a plant is much the same as a fish or a clam or many others species.
I live by a native American philosophy in this regard and that means I respect the sacrifice that is made by the consumption of any living thing, be it plant, animal, or some other arbitrary human classification. It is still a living thing and it gives it's life so yours can continue, and deserves to be treated as humanely as possible in doing so, including doing all you can to help perpetuate it's species and offspring.
There is not ethical superiority to vegetarianism in this regard, you kill a plant, or you eat it's seeds or fruits and those are not returned to the earth in any way that perpetuates that species or the cycle of life and is just as effectively killing it as if you were to shoot a deer.
I also have to say I find the PETA stance against pet ownership distressing and hypocritical in light of the many donations accepted from pet owners, though I dislike the term, my cats own me more than I do them and they made the choice to adopt me when they invaded my house.
The policy position that bee keeping is slavery is yet another absurd and ethically dubious position that has been promoted by PETA.
Add to this the killing of animals in their shelters as well as the unethical clandestine obtaining and killing of animals from other no kill shelters and there are many, many reasons to be seriously dubious about just how much the organization is sticking to its original intended purpose.
National claims these are aberrations caused by overzealous people, yet we see it time and time again and when overzealous is more the rule than the exception you have to start asking just how much is independent and how much is actually instigated then simply denied after the fact.
So while some of the goals may still be quite worthy, the tactics and other agendas of the organization are offensive and the ethical claims are extremely dubious at best.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Animal rights group called out for repeatedly exploiting women posted 1 year, 4 months ago 38 ResponsesThanks Jon
Okay, that is much more sensible and I agree.
Meanwhile, there are some very nice hybrid tractors coming along and those are of course and excellent path toward fully electrical tractors.
I also agree that smaller scale farming and local energy production with microgrids is an important part of the energy infrastructure, and will be more reliable, cost effective and efficient.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On From fossil fuels to manufacturing for wind and solar energy posted 1 year, 4 months ago 19 ResponsesReplacing oil with renewables.
Well, yes and no, some renewables will help replace oil more than others.
For example, methane can be liquefied and used in much the same way as ethanol.
Likewise methane can be used to make production of both ethanol and biodiesel more efficient and thereby more ecofriendly.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Blogosphere responds reservedly to Gore's call for 100 percent renewable electricity posted 1 year, 4 months ago 14 ResponsesOn a further practical note
Consider also that farm equipment lasts decades and that the average farmer won't be buying a new tractor, harvester or whatever for a very long time.
Right now we can greatly reduce the use of dino-diesel by using the residue left over from methane disgestion applied on old strip mine land and have a workable alternative without taking away any farm or forest land.
There are also the benefits to the watershed that will occur from these lands being properly managed and their erosion and saturated runoff being reduced.
So that said, I would appreciate it if people, such as you Drx, would stop lumping all biofuels and all biofuel farming approaches together, because it is simply not valid to make such gross over generalizations.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On From fossil fuels to manufacturing for wind and solar energy posted 1 year, 4 months ago 19 ResponsesProve it.
Show me one workable electric tractor that can actually handle the workload.
Also a hybrid still needs fuel.
As you also well know, there are more ways to grow biodiesel crops than to use land that is already a farm or forest. There are more than enough acres of damaged industrial grounds which will benefit environmentally from being used to grow biodiesel crops.
While you are at it find me good solid proof that you can make a clothes dryer and water heater that operates more efficiently with electricity than natural gas.
Sure, there are alternatives, clothes lines, but some days it is rainy, and you can use other ways to heat water but in many applications natural gas or some similar form of gaseous fuel is still more efficient and efficiency is key factor in cutting waste and thus demand and environmental damage.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On From fossil fuels to manufacturing for wind and solar energy posted 1 year, 4 months ago 19 ResponsesThat is only one perspective.
Many people, including native Americans, believe that it is not abusive to kill an animal for food.
Many of your statements revolve around rhetoric which is purely based on personal belief which is more of a religious nature than a scientific one.
Obviously anything "industrial" is by definition not "natural".
In fact most things done by mankind are by definition not natural, even if they are brought about by the all too natural needs dictated by the human body.
It is also an important fact that the reason eating of humans is considered immoral and unethical is that it is extremely risky behavior from a disease and health perspective.
I won't waste time debating with you about the issues of the healthiness, pro or con, of a vegetarian diet, except to say there are many people with far less of an agenda and well proven scientific and medical credentials who find serious health concerns stemming from vegetarian diets.
Your definition of abuse is also as selective and personally biased and not one which is commonly held or necessarily any more morally or logically valid than those held by others.
So in short, the entire personal bias of the belief system you are promoting is just that, personal, and to try to push it onto the rest of the people of the world is a violation of the basic rights and freedoms which you claim all living creatures should have.
Any claims to any moral high ground based on such beliefs are by definition nothing but spurious rhetoric.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Animal rights group called out for repeatedly exploiting women posted 1 year, 4 months ago 38 ResponsesFair enough.
And you do mention some good ideas which we agree on, such as not only better designed homes but better design of the actual communities they are in.
However I am including biofuels as a critical component of renewable generation of electricity.
Certainly you can see the value of turning every sewage plant in the world into an eco positive renewable energy source, while at the same time reducing the damage done by the need for sewage treatment and landfills.
If and when carbon sequestration becomes viable then such systems will become even more ecopositive.
Also, at least for now, electric vehicle technology does not seem to hold much promise in the heavy torque areas where it seems quite likely that the need for biodiesel will be around for quite some time.
A system of using organic waste products to grow biodiesel fuels in either an algae based system or a system that uses reclaimed lands such as industrial sites and old strip mines is productive both as an energy alternative and as a way to reclaim such lands and bring them back to a more natural condition.
Lastly, there is still one other problem with the all electric option. The basic laws of thermodynamics, specifically the issue of conversion of energy types into different forms being always less than 100% efficient. Right now it is much more efficient to use natural gas for many applications than it is to use electricity, such as most applications which require some form of heating.
I don't see how you are going to get around this fundamental inefficiency of an all electrical approach.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On From fossil fuels to manufacturing for wind and solar energy posted 1 year, 4 months ago 19 ResponsesOkay Jon, Why are you ignoring critical options?
I know you have to have seen the postings I made in the "What about 90% Mr. Gore" thread.
All I see you mentioning are Wind, Solar and later, Geothermal.
You completely ignore biofuels even after I made it clear that there are good workable and ready to build non-food based biofuel systems available that already do everything you claim could happen with other renewable sources.
You also ignore the importance of increases in the efficiency of the use of energy and curbing demand such as I address in my comments about increasing the number of energy efficient homes that are built, especially in cooperation with infrastructure improvements you (rightly) recommend in your responses later.
Please tell me this is just an oversight on your part due to shortage of time or other constraints.
Here is a copy of what I am referring to:
How about roughly 69% in two years?
Seriously, not trolling, not kidding.
Two key technologies combined can do it that quickly.
1. Non-food based biofuel production using an integrated system of biodiesel, integrated methane digestion and composting fed to high efficiency fuel cells or cogeneration equipment, while returning the organics to the earth as clean safe fertilizer. Benefit, roughly 33% of the energy needed, all while being profitable and cost effective and quick to build.
(Fertilizer use ends up cutting still more out of the fossil fuel dependency problem but I don't have a firm percentage at the moment so that is not in the 69% mentioned.)
2. High energy efficiency housing. There are several alternative housing technologies around now which cut 90% or more of the energy used in an average home. With roughly 40% of the energy use in America going to home use that translates to roughly 36% energy savings.
With the housing market down and so many people losing their homes, good cost effective housing can and should be a huge focus. Quite a few of these homes could be built and ready for use in as little as six months.
Combine these two and you get 69% energy reduction, using very thumbnail calculations admittedly but the point is that the technology to do a big part of it is already here and reliable, cheap and profitable.
We just need either government or investors with the backbone to step up and it could start happening very quickly.
I know this because it is what I have been working on since 1982, long before such things were fashionable.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
by Applied Ecotechnics at 7:39 AM on 22 Jul 2008
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On From fossil fuels to manufacturing for wind and solar energy posted 1 year, 4 months ago 19 ResponsesRainforst Action Network
They have some good ideas but like everyone else they are not infallible.
Their recent pamphlets and publications about the "Myths of Biofuels" is one example. While much of it is true they completely ignored, or were unaware of, non-food based biofuel options such as the ORB system I developed.
In light of that technology, their myths fall short of applying to the entire field, but are still valid for the specific industries they mention.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Are biofuels a core solution? posted 1 year, 4 months ago 201 ResponsesShouldn't that be...
Office of Misdirection and Coverups?
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Committee hears testimony from whistleblower on EPA dealings posted 1 year, 4 months ago 1 ResponseIt's scary
I agree. The level of apathy and ignorance in this country is truly appalling.
Of course when you consider the intentional undermining of peoples rights to push for change and the corruption of the sources of basic information that most people rely on and all the misinformation/disinformation it is easy to see why many people lost their motivation.
Add to this the culture of consumer brainwashing and focusing on material and personal desires and you have a recipe for apathy and the resulting corruption of our system.
Getting the word out to the general public or even just to people in office and investors who make be interested in the profitability of such things is ludicrously difficult and also made even more difficult by various laws as well as the existing inertia/apathy, even amongst the media.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Blogosphere responds reservedly to Gore's call for 100 percent renewable electricity posted 1 year, 4 months ago 14 ResponsesPETA should try some real MEAT.
I have been a lifelong supporter of fair and decent treatment of animals, worked in a big zoo that lead the way on better conditions and special breeding programs for endangered species, long before it was talked about publicly, and have supported all sorts of animal care and decency programs such as World Wildlife Federation.
At one point PETA did some good. Then it got weirder and weirder, about the time Tipi Hedron came along.
For me the final straw was when they picketed a research lab in the facility I was working at claiming it was abusive to animals. However they neglected to check their facts, as they often have, or they would have found out that the lab in question dealt only with behavioral studies of fruit flies and they were not harmed, killed or maimed in any way.
On the topic of MEAT. It stands for Meat-eaters for Ethical Animal Treatment and as your would expect the goal is to stop the many abusive practices perpetuated on livestock and research animals and others around the world.
There has been some discussion of it but so far it hasn't gone very far to the best of my knowledge but the point is that if you want to serve the cause of animal rights issues and abuse you shouldn't be trying to confuse the issue with your own personal agenda about food choices.
Animal abuse can be stopped without trying to force everyone on the planet to become a vegetarian and the two issues can and should be considered entirely independently of each other.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Animal rights group called out for repeatedly exploiting women posted 1 year, 4 months ago 38 ResponsesHow about roughly 69% in two years?
Seriously, not trolling, not kidding.
Two key technologies combined can do it that quickly.
1. Non-food based biofuel production using an integrated system of biodiesel, integrated methane digestion and composting fed to high efficiency fuel cells or cogeneration equipment, while returning the organics to the earth as clean safe fertilizer. Benefit, roughly 33% of the energy needed, all while being profitable and cost effective and quick to build.
(Fertilizer use ends up cutting still more out of the fossil fuel dependency problem but I don't have a firm percentage at the moment so that is not in the 69% mentioned.)
2. High energy efficiency housing. There are several alternative housing technologies around now which cut 90% or more of the energy used in an average home. With roughly 40% of the energy use in America going to home use that translates to roughly 36% energy savings.
With the housing market down and so many people losing their homes, good cost effective housing can and should be a huge focus. Quite a few of these homes could be built and ready for use in as little as six months.
Combine these two and you get 69% energy reduction, using very thumbnail calculations admittedly but the point is that the technology to do a big part of it is already here and reliable, cheap and profitable.
We just need either government or investors with the backbone to step up and it could start happening very quickly.
I know this because it is what I have been working on since 1982, long before such things were fashionable.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Blogosphere responds reservedly to Gore's call for 100 percent renewable electricity posted 1 year, 4 months ago 14 ResponsesYour taking the small predator thing too far
>I also love cheese enchiladas with mole and ice cream.
You eat moles? That's certainly sustainable but taking the the predator thing a bit too far. :-)
>But I eat these things very occasionally and don't lie to myself that they're healthy.
Then you have to check out better ways to make pizza because you can make it far better still than you acknowledge here.
I grow my own organic tomatoes, buy free range beef and defat it before I use it, and use home grown organic vegetables and spices.
You already mentioned whole wheat crust, and I also add flax seed to it some times when I have some extra.
Good organic low fat cheese rounds it out and keeps the fat low and the taste high.
Check out great recipes from people like Gram Kerr and the Frugal Gourmet.
>They're just fun foods that won't hurt you if you eat them sparingly and not regularly.
This applies to many things and with a little effort most such foods can be made a lot healthier, as can much of our current energy and consumerism picture which is causing so much trouble.
Anyway, if you ever travel out this way you will have to stop by for good, organic low fat pizza that tastes like it came from a big city Italian Pizzaria. (It runs in the family.)
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Al Gore on Meet the Press posted 1 year, 4 months ago 30 ResponsesYour taking the small predator thing too far
>I also love cheese enchiladas with mole and ice cream.
You eat moles? That's certainly sustainable but taking the the predator thing a bit too far. :-)
>But I eat these things very occasionally and don't lie to myself that they're healthy.
Then you have to check out better ways to make pizza because you can make it far better still than you acknowledge here.
I grow my own organic tomatoes, buy free range beef and defat it before I use it, and use home grown organic vegetables and spices.
You already mentioned whole wheat crust, and I also add flax seed to it some times when I have some extra.
Good organic low fat cheese rounds it out and keeps the fat low and the taste high.
Check out great recipes from people like Gram Kerr and the Frugal Gourmet.
>They're just fun foods that won't hurt you if you eat them sparingly and not regularly.
This applies to many things and with a little effort most such foods can be made a lot healthier, as can much of our current energy and consumerism picture which is causing so much trouble.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Al Gore on Meet the Press posted 1 year, 4 months ago 30 ResponsesSticking to waste.....
Yes, glad to see you see the point but it goes further than that still as well. Add in returning the organic material to the soil near where it came from in the first place, truly closing the loop on the organic resources for the first time in modern history.
Consider the use of the output fertilizer for growing biodiesel crops and you have further benefit, especially if you do so on the usually poorly reclaimed former strip mines which we have many thousands of acres of here in the US.
The deeper you look the better it gets.
All this being true, we are still having a bear of a time getting investors to commit to building full sized ones even with conservative profit margins of 30% annually.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Are biofuels a core solution? posted 1 year, 4 months ago 201 ResponsesBiofuels are indeed not the only answer.
It quite true that we need other things.
Actually we need at least three.
- Good, non-food based biofuels and integrated comprehensive biofuels programs such as our own ORB system.
- We need big increases in efficiency in our industry and daily lives.
- We need people to stop thinking of energy as something they can just use and disregard. All energy use has an impact, even the best biolfuels. The bird in a guilded cage mentality just won't cut it or no amount of technological advancement will be able to keep ahead of constantly growing demand.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Are biofuels a core solution? posted 1 year, 4 months ago 201 Responses- Good, non-food based biofuels and integrated comprehensive biofuels programs such as our own ORB system.
No need to cut down plants or trees for biomass.
Why waste the time and energy AKA expense and eco damage to harvest new material when there is a massive amount of readily available organic material being thrown away every single day in every nation in the world.
Organic wastes from trash, sewage and other sources can produce an immense amount of energy in way that is clean, safe, efficient, profitable and truly renewable.
Consider this: How many millions of tons of sewage are disposed of every year and how many cubic yards of methane (~"natural gas") can be produced per ton?
As long as there are living things there will be organic waste.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Are biofuels a core solution? posted 1 year, 4 months ago 201 ResponsesOn the right track
You are very much on the right track when you talk about using organic wastes as a source for biofuels but there is a bigger picture to examine.
Consider that 2/3 of the raw tonnage of material that goes into a landfill is organic.
That represents a huge amount of raw material for organic decomposition for biofuel.
With the growing trend towards mandatory composting and the ability to cooperatively cross couple several types of biofuels production into one overall system the level of fuel and energy production which can be produce from organic waste material already available is massive.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Are biofuels a core solution? posted 1 year, 4 months ago 201 ResponsesPizza, Food, Gas, Fuel, Environment, Economy.
It all runs together and goes round and round doesn't it?
Good pizza is not junk food. It is in fact one of the most well balanced single foods you can eat, especially if you load it up with good organic vegetable toppings and mushrooms on top of a home made whole wheat shell you coat with garlic and olive oil before you bake it.
As long as you keep the ingredients good and the fat managable relative to your exercise levels it is one of the top foods there is. It also happens to be the food that fuels more late night studies and work sessions than any other.
Oddly enough another great well balanced food, for which the same advice applies, is ice cream.
Anyway, the whole energy issue is one huge smoke and mirrors circus of the under informed being mislead by the unethical.
I've spent years trying to get people to pay attention to real workable answers that could be put into place immediately and are cost effective and the media, government and investors turn a dead ear to it because it isn't flashy enough.
Van Jones is right and is saying the same things I have been saying for years. (see the itinerary for the UN NGO conference in Seoul a few years back)
There are workable solutions available now, ready to be built, that are productive, put people to work, produce true renewable clean energy and are safe and reliable.
Such a program as the Green New Deal would yield many of the same benefits as the space program did. New jobs, new technologies, a huge leap forward in many areas while being productive both economically and intellectually in addition to the environmental (and thereby health and productivity also) benefits.
Visit our website or email us for more information as we are actively looking for people to work with to help improve the future of our civilization.
On Al Gore on Meet the Press posted 1 year, 4 months ago 30 Responses