Comments kyotousa has made

  • grassroots solutions

    Big federal public works projects that install renewables and feed-in tariffs for residential and non-residential electrcity users are two key elements in the swift transition to carbon free energy.

    While Adam and Mike are working on those solutions, the rest of us who are itching to get involved, need to look no further than our local public schools. Beset by growing budget shortfalls our schools are in real jeopardy. They can, however, begin to address their fiscal problems by implementing strict conservation requirements, improving efficiencies in existing energy systems, and adding renewable systems to their rooftops and parking lots.

    We've developed a model (HELiOS) for California public schools (that should work in any state that offers rebates or incentives for renewable energy systems) that demonstrates how it is possible to install a PV system without increasing a school district's operating costs. All that it requires is the modest financial support of the local community. Once installed, the district pays for the PV system from its avoided electricity costs.

    California has nearly 10,000 public schools and many additional district owned buildings. It's not hard to imagine California's schools producing 500 to 1,000 MW and more while creating good paying jobs, reducing carbon emissions, and showing our children that we're serious about addressing climate change.    

    You can see how HELiOS works at our in-progress, not yet released website: www.heliosproject.net And you can always contact us if you want more information.
       

    Tom Kelly

    On Solar's bright ideas for the green stimulus package posted 11 months, 1 week ago 4 Responses
  • city financed solar hot water

    The City of Santa Cruz is working on its own version of Berkeley FIRST - municipal financing for solar hot water. Systems will be paid for via the resident's water bill. Shorter payoff, big savings.

    Tom Kelly

    On Municipal property assessment financing for solar and energy efficiency posted 1 year, 1 month ago 14 Responses
  • Just say no

    The recommendations for eating healthy and sustainable fish require a consumer to be pretty savvy about this issue. I've watched health department colleagues try to pass those messages on to the public for years with little effect. I have a simple solution - let's give the fish and the planet a break and end our consumption of fish and other aquatic animals. Get your fatty acids from vegetables. We'll reduce our exposure to mercury (especially children and women of child-bearing age), give the wild species a chance to rebound, and do away with farmed animals who are treated cruelly and end fish farming practices that affect the health of the oceans and other wild species. Problems solved!

    Tom Kelly

    On Amid collapsing fisheries and factory-farmed salmon, how to choose sustainable seafood posted 1 year, 3 months ago 33 Responses
  • Not just for the rich

    It's true that the climate crisis we are facing is so dire that leaving the solutions up to the market seems short sighted at best. Government should be helping to underwrite the cost of renewable and efficiencies. To some extent it has done so with rebates and tax incentives, but it still leaves a significant number of people who, but for the cost, would be glad to put up PV or insulate their homes.

    Some cities get it. San Francisco has an excellent rebate for low income homeowners that does a pretty good job of making solar affordable. Recent changes in the California Solar Inititiative also provide enhanced rebates for low income homeowners. It's not enough, but it does point out that some are doing more. Those are the type of examples we, as advocates, should be using to demonstrate that it is possible for everyone to participate.  

    Tom Kelly

    On California's innovative energy efficiency loan program is a model worth copying posted 1 year, 3 months ago 5 Responses
  • Necessity, not luxury

    Bravo to the State of California for making it possible for cities to provide financing for energy efficiencies and renewables. It will be interesting to see if it results in an upsurge in solar installations and efficiency upgrades.

    It could have a remarkable effect if we would all stop wringing our hands over "payback" periods to determine if switching to renewables or more efficient technology is affordable. Ask yourself this: when you go into a car dealership (if that's still a place you're likely to visit), how often do you ask the salesperson to calculate the "payback" on the car? You don't - because a car is generally considered to be necessity. And that's the attitude we have to adopt with existing technologies like solar panels. The implementation of solutions that will help to stave off irreversible changes in the planet's finely tuned climate shouldn't be calculated on a typical cost-benefit analysis.

    If you live in Berkeley, CA you can sign up its financing program which is set to kick-off this fall. Making this program work in Berkeley will give other California cities the confidence to launch their own programs. See, http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=22620 ...
     

    Tom Kelly

    On California's innovative energy efficiency loan program is a model worth copying posted 1 year, 3 months ago 5 Responses
  • evolution of the nay-sayers

    First they denied climate change was occurring - and paid a lot of faux scientists, think-tanks, and phony citizens groups, to put out their propaganda. Then their ad men and women convinced them to acknowledge the problem - and create phony do-nothing councils and put money into developing cozy relationships with national environmental groups. Brillant!

    Well, guess what? The most recent data on global GHG emissions indicates that emissions are rising faster than the worst case scenarios modeled by the UNFCCC. We can't go on thinking that we can solve this planet threatening condition with smoke and mirrors. We must act at whatever level we are capable of, and not let ourselves become seduced by the feel-good, meaningless statements of people, companies, and organizations that have only their own misguided interests in mind.On Companies not following through on pledge to lobby for carbon reduction posted 1 year, 9 months ago 6 Responses

  • 700,000 evacuated - really?

    I spoke with a colleague in San Diego this morning (Wednesday) about the size and scope of the SoCal wildfires, expressing my amazement at the number of people displaced. He indicated that the number is overstated and sent this link along (http://www.signonsandiego.com/firemap/) that indicates that the number is less than 100,000. Still a lot, but I wonder why there's such a disparity. Any ideas?On California wildfires continue to rage posted 2 years, 1 month ago 1 Response

  • Make you case, Alex

    Folks who are still eating meat, fowl, and fish in 2007 remind me a lot of people who used to smoke tobacco way back in the 1980s. Touchy, is how I would describe them.

    We now all know just how bad smoking is for you and for everyone around you even though its taken a generation for many people to recognize it.

    But instead of all the rhetoric about holier-than-though and the like, let's see a discussion about the reasons why eating animal products is good for people and the planet. If eating animals is a good thing, it may not get me to change my diet, but at least I'll stop encouraging people to eat lower on the food chain. What do you say?

    Tom Kelly

    On Animal-rights group makes the stupid claim that enviros must be vegetarians posted 2 years, 2 months ago 208 Responses
  • I'm impressed!

    The work that is being done on climate change by colleges and universities (and some high schools, too!) is really quite remarkable. My hat's off to all of you.

    For those institutions that have built some internal capacity on this issue, I would encourage you to reach out to the cities and towns in which you are located to form partnerships that will help local government and its residents to step up their efforts to address climate change. Issues such as transportation, housing, purchasing, and community offset projects, are examples of common issues that are more effectively addressed by collective action. It's working here in Berkeley and is opening up additional opportunities that may not have been otherwise possible.On 15 Green Colleges and Universities posted 2 years, 2 months ago 62 Responses

  • voluntary actions DID get us civil rights

    I would venture to say that none of the mostly white men watching LBJ sign the Civil Rights Act ever got arrested for sitting in at a southern lunch counter or got hosed by a water cannon or were attacked by police dogs while marching peacefully for civil rights. It was mostly individual, nameless, average Americans who were subjected to that type of treatment that finally gave the people in that photo the courage to create the legislation intended to make American society more equitable.

    It's a mistake to diminish the value of individual actions in addressing national or global issues. Without widespread changes in our consumption patterns that alert policymakers and commerce that we are abandoning our energy intensive lifestyles, the efforts of much smaller advocacy groups that lobby for better legislation will not be as effective. By now we must all realize that we can't rely on our politicians to provide any real leadership - it must come from us.

    Let's encourage everyone to do as much as they can. Change lights bulbs? It's a start, especially if it gets you thinking about everything else you do that is contributing to this growing climate crisis. Those types of individual actions and the change in thinking that occurs when awareness has been raised, will help to produce the kind of widespread changes in policies, products, lifestyles, and attitudes that might give this planet, and all its forms of life, a fighting chance.On Voluntary actions didn't get us civil rights, and they won't fix the climate posted 2 years, 2 months ago 61 Responses

  • another vote for taxing gas

    A modest tax on gas, diesel, and aviation fuels will provide states and municpalities with the revenue to address the major sources of greenhouse gas emisssons - transportation and energy. A gas tax can be implemented quickly relative to a carbon tax assessed against fossil fuel producers. We tried to get a carbon tax on energy producers passed in California last year and it failed! If the measure had passed, it would assuredly have been challenged in the courts robbing us of the few remaining years we have to make real reductions in GHGs.

    Over the last 7 years, Californians have consumed nearly 16 billion gallons of gas a year. At $3.25/gallon, all taxes amount to approximately $0.66. If we were to assess an additional $0.25/gallon as a gas tax for the carbon produced (assumes that carbon costs $25/ton), we would have an additional $4 billion annually to fund:

    1. Better and cheaper public transportation that would benefit low and middle income earners;
    2. Increase state subsidies for energy efficiency programs and renewable energy;
    3. Provide incentives for more fuel efficient and lower emission vehicles including those used in agriculture.

    The list could go on - you could do much with $4B a year AND you might find that you have the right combination of inducements and disincentives to get people to understand the urgency of the issue we are facing and begin to change their behavior.

    Tom Kelly

    On It's not the same as a carbon tax, and it's not cool posted 2 years, 4 months ago 13 Responses
  • more on tax incentives

    Here's another website that will give you the skinny on a whole range of federal tax incentives for energy efficiency, renewables, and more: Tax Incentives Assistance Project (TIAP). You'll find them at: http://www.energytaxincentives.org/

    HOPE YOU FIND THAT HELPFUL!
    On Umbra on solar funding posted 2 years, 5 months ago 6 Responses

  • NY solar

    You'll find lots of good information on solar for all States at DSIRE (http://www.dsireusa.org/) It will give all the skinny on rebates (Rick - $3.75/watt - wow! - if you're served by the Long Island Power Authority), incentives, federal tax breaks, and more. It's a real bargain out there on the Island. Here in PG&E territory in northern California, the rebate is a paltry $2.50/watt.

    If you want to know what's in the works around the country, see Vote Solar at www.votesolar.org.

    And finally - a word about the question "What's the payback on the solar system"? When you buy underwear, soap, food, cars, and all of life's necessities (OK, maybe not everyone will agree on the underwear), does one ask the salesperson about the "payback period"? Of course not! And it's about time we stopped asking it about renewable energy. It's now or never! On Umbra on installing solar power posted 2 years, 5 months ago 7 Responses

  • Prop 87 voters not "ordinary"

    Van Johnson states that Prop 87 was defeated by "ordinary" voters and suggests that the environmental movement shares some responsibility for that loss. I respectfully disagree.

    Prop 87 did not go down to defeat because working people voted no. It failed because many unemployed, under-employed and average working people simply didn't see any good reason to vote at all. In the November 2006 elections, less than 40% of Californians eligible to vote did so (and only 56% of registered voters bothered to cast a ballot). And who are those voters generally? For the most part they are people with decent incomes who feel they have a stake in the system. The failure to turn out voters who are most affected by poverty, pollution, and a sense that their votes are meaningless does not rest on the shoulders of those working on environmental issues. It does, in my view, fall at the feet of a political system that fails to provide adequate voice and representation to the millions of ordinary Californians who have been shut out of the system.

    Can that trend be reversed? It is a tough nut to crack, but environmental groups may be able to play a part in achieving a better turn out by ensuring that their message to legislators always includes a demand for good jobs, cleaner air and water, and environmental justice - and, of course, not giving up on those demands when it comes tiime to make the deal.

    Tom Kelly

    On Where are low-income and minority greens in the media? posted 2 years, 6 months ago 21 Responses
  • no such thing as a pest

    Build a healthy environment in your garden and you'll create a place where life of all sorts will want to be.

    Our garden is full of life, and yes, it includes slugs, aphids, and earwigs and other critters that vendors of toxic chemicals love to portray as pests to extract millions of dollars from us that could be better spent on compost bins, bat boxes or backyard beehives. You do not need to expose yourself, your family, your neighbors, and the other equally important life forms that inhabit the planet to long-lived poisons that are unneccessary for a healthy garden.

    Bugs of all sorts play an important role in achieving the type of balance that allows everything else to flourish. Do they occasionally nibble a tender shoot? Sure, but they also provide a food source for the other birds and insects that you want spending some time in your yard. Overtime, and as the balance of your yard improves (improved soil, variation in type, size, and density of plants, sources of water, places for insects to reside) you'll see a greater range of creatures taking up residence. And you'll see your garden with new eyes and find yourself thrilled that the basil has been munched, knowing that your actions have made a contribution to the health and well-being of your garden, your neighborhood, and the planet.On Umbra on fighting pests with pests posted 2 years, 6 months ago 12 Responses

  • HELiOS Project

    KyotoUSA has developed a concept for installing solar on California's public schools that won't cost the school district anything more than it is currently paying for electricity. We call it HELiOS - Helios Energy Lights Our Schools.

    The idea is to provide the district with a "gift" - money raised by a city's residents, foundations, etc. that offsets the cost differential between the annual payments for the PV system and what the district saves in electricty costs. The size of the "gift" depends on the size of the solar system and the rebate amount available from PG&E, but it is a relatively small amount (e.g., less than $40K for a 100Kw system producing about 160,000 KwH annually). In 7-8 years a district can be saving more in avoided electricity costs than it is paying for the system.

    There are a lot of variations on this concept that can address the needs of a district. You can read a bit more at www.kyotousa.org and you are welcome to contact us to discuss how this might work for your school or school district.On Umbra on gifts for your school posted 2 years, 7 months ago 3 Responses

  • It's really up to all of us

    It can be discouraging to hear politicians of all stripes continue to deny humanity's role in creating the climate crisis that we are facing.  But you know what? Politicians generally only "get it" when they realize that public support for a political solution is overwhelming. It's often the only way to overcome the influence of big-money interests that continue to hold sway over both major parties.

    We are experiencing a surge of grassroots activity in response to climate change in cities throughout America. We can all play a role in this effort by reducing the greenhouse gases for which we are individually responsible and urging our cities, workplaces, schools, and religious institutions to do the same. If we do (and is there any doubt that we must?), the politicians will follow. They always do.

    Tom Kelly

    On One of them is missing posted 2 years, 9 months ago 6 Responses
  • keep up the pressure for real change

    If the best we can hope to get out of newly empowered Democratic Party controlled Congress is the politically palatable McCain-Lieberman-Obama "Let's Con Ourselves Into Believing That We're Really Doing Something to Save the Planet" bill, then we have to get out in the streets and raise some hell!

    The Earth and its inhabitants will not survive if the best we can do is M-L-O's measly 2% per year reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Scientists are telling us that we need an 80% reduction in GHGs yesterday! Just look around you to see what the impacts have been from a less than 2 degee F warming. What will a five or 10 degree F increase mean to the planet? How about "the end of life as we know it"?

    Let's demand that Congress get beyond what's acceptable to the Fossil Fuel Industry and Big Business, and offer legislation that will improve our chances of survival. The Sanders-Boxer bill (Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act) would be a good place to start.

    In the meantime, continue to push from the grassroots. Urge your city, its businesses, institutions, and residents to do their part. Local pressure is what is driving these changes at the state and federal level. Don't let up! On Senate bills and corporate coalition push Washington toward climate action posted 2 years, 10 months ago 4 Responses

  • street trees

    One cautionary note before we write off tree planting entirely - the article and the comments have raised some valid issues, but run the risk of leaving the reader with the sense that tree planting is of marginal value.

    Most of our cities have become "heat islands" as a result of hardscaping and the removal of open space (see, www.epa.gov/heatislands/about/index.html). Typically, a city's downtown can be 10 degrees F hotter than the outskirts. Hotter cities mean more electricy use which means more CO2 in the atmosphere. Street trees, parks, and other open spaces can have an enornous cooling effect. So while I think it's true that we should be cautious in trying to create or extend natural forested areas, we should be doing far more to create and preserve the urban forest.On Umbra on tree planting posted 2 years, 10 months ago 18 Responses

  • Ride for Climate - 2007

    Check out Bill Bradlee and David Kroodsma's Ride for Climate (www.RideforClimate.com/USA), a US bicycle tour beginning in April to raise awareness of global warming and to promote solutions. Contact them now to offer your organizing, media, and financial support. These guys are awesome!

    Tom Kelly

    On A pedal-tastic roundup posted 2 years, 11 months ago 8 Responses
  • Give Dingell a chance

    Dear Rep. Dingell,

    I think you make a very good point about New Zealand sheep. New Zealand is home to some 43 million burping, farting, pooping sheep that are undoubtedly producing tens of thousands of tons of methane, a very powerful greenhouse gas. Our paltry herd of 6 million burping, farting, pooping sheep, given their numbers, produces much less.

    But did you know, Rep. Dingell, that the US has 93 million (mostly factory farmed) bovine gas producers (107 million if you add the Canadian herd) compared to just 5 million New Zealand cows? So, when it comes to barnyard emissions, I think it's safe to say that we in America are still No. 1! Please try to get your facts straight before passing the blame for US inaction on climate change onto the shoulders of the less culpable.

    In that light, I welcome the fact that you will be holding hearings on climate change in the House. The US Congress (with a few notable exceptions) may be the least informed body in the world on global warming and its impacts. The sooner you and your colleagues get to work on creating much stricter CAFE standards (did you know that we can't export American cars to China because they don't meet Chinese gas mileage requirements?), putting some real money into renewable energy tax credits and subsidies (taking them from the carbon industries' overflowing coffers), funding public transportation, taxing carbon emissions, and protecting our remaining forests and open spaces,  the more likely we Americans will be able to stand proudly with the rest of the world in the daunting effort to preserve the diversity of life that inhabits this beautiful planet.

    Let's see what you're made of.
    On John Dingell talks to Grist about climate change, fuel economy, and the 110th Congress posted 2 years, 11 months ago 17 Responses

  • and other acts of generosity

    Dear Talia,

    Your question to Umbra prompts me to write about another act of generosity.

    Recently, the mother of a young Indian girl called us at KyotoUSA to say that her daughter, Gautami, wanted her family and friends to help celebrate her birthday by giving the value of a traditional birthday gift to an organization working on climate change.

    Gautami asked her mother if she could designate KyotoUSA as the beneficiary. A few weeks later we received a generous gift from Gautami that will help to install a photovoltaic system on a Berkeley public school. The system will produce all the electrictity the school will need, thus eventually saving the school district money, reducing its carbon footprint, improving air quality, and adding an educational component to the school's science curriculum.

    We were deeply touched by Gautami's thoughtfulness and her desire to help preserve the beauty and health of our planet. The example that you, Talia, and Gautami and the young people of the world are setting is truly inspiring. Let us hope that your kindness will foster a willingness among many to make the changes in our lives and attitudes that are necessary for the survival of all life on this planet. Shalom!On Umbra on eco-tips in event programs posted 2 years, 11 months ago 7 Responses

  • Foot the Bill - another resource

    The World Resources Institute offers a free how-to publication called "Working 9 to 5 on Climate Change: An Office Guide" that will walk you right through the process of creating a GHG inventory for your office and provides some good ideas for making meaningful reductions. You can download a pdf version at: http://climate.wri.org/officeguide-pub-3756.html
    On Getting a toehold on your company's climate footprint posted 3 years, 3 months ago 1 Response

  • organic food - is it reall y more expensive?

    I saw a posting in Grist once from someone who stated that her food bill was a lot less since she started buying organic food. It got me to thinking about whether that could be true.

    After doing a little informal research, here's what I concluded:

    1. By restricting my purchases to only organically produced food, I bought far fewer items - I stayed away from foods made with genetically altered organisms and those that had a number of additives intended to extend shelf life. I managed to get everything our family needed to stay healthy, well-fed, and fit, and no longer wasted money on products that are over-processed, unhealthy, and, if you consider their external costs (pesticides, herbicides, worker exposures, depleted soils, GMO'd, etc.) much more expensive than organically grown food.
    2. Grocery chains that offered organic produce, milk, etc. charged a premium - similar items when purchased in season were cheaper in the local store that carried mostly organic food.

    So, my advice is, buy organic every chance you can.

    Tom Kelly
    KyotoUSAOn Local or organic? It's a false choice posted 3 years, 6 months ago 9 Responses

  • Climate Change and You

    Each one of us has the potential to make a significant contribution to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Umbra lists several worthy ideas, you can also get some pretty good ideas from May's "Vanity Fair" of all places. Undertaking as many of these simple lifestyle changes as possible will dramatically reduce our individual carbon footprint.

    If you want to do more, you can engage your city in an effort to reduce emissions from its municipal operations. Cities are listening to their residents and are responding. Why? Because becoming more energy efficient saves them a ton of money. Energy for heating, lighting, cooling, and vehicle fleets are significant costs for all cities.

    People all around the country are urging their cities take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. If you want to learn about how that is being done, contact us at KyotoUSA (kyotousa@sbcglobal.net) and we'll describe what has worked for us. If you want to get your hands on some good organizing material check out the Sierra Club's Cool Cities program (http://coolcities.us/).

    This is a very do-able approach to making significant reductions in greenhouse gases and raising public awarenenss. In fact, it's the one place where we can all make one hell of a difference.

    Tom Kelly
    KyotoUSA On Umbra on global warming and you posted 3 years, 6 months ago 5 Responses

  • Interview with Sir David King

    It is refreshing to hear a top government official speak with candor about climate change. King acknowledges the urgency with which governments must act if we are to avoid the most catastrophic consequences, the beginnings of which we are already experiencing.

    King fails to mention is that we have at our disposal the tools to make immediate and significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions. It's a solution that each one of us can implement right now - we don't have to wait for the development of new technologies that will sequester GHGs or for nuclear power plants to come on line. Simply stated, reduce your consumption, increase your conservation.

    While governments seek to expand their economies and simultaneously attempt to reduce their GHGs (a nearly impossible task in the short run), we consumers can exert immediate influence by buying less of everything and using less energy. We can urge those institutions that we are a part of (employers, schools, religious organizations, local government) to adopt similar policies. When aggregated, these actions will have a substantial impact on the amount of GHGs that we are producing.

    Now is the time to act - the time for doubt, hand-wringing, defeatism, and the belief that it's someone else's problem is over. Let's roll up our sleeves right now and get to work on making our own personal contributrion to the solution.On An interview with Sir David King, Britain's top scientist and climate crusader posted 3 years, 9 months ago 1 Response

  • House moderates: Little, late

    The real reason that the House Republicans pulled ANWR and the coastal drilling element from the budget bill on Wednesday is because Republicans lost two gubernatorial races on Tuesday that they would have won a year ago. These guys are simply reading the tea leaves and trying to ensure their own re-election. It's as simple as that.

    Tom Kelly

    On House moderates: Little, late posted 4 years ago 3 Responses
  • School Daze

    One of the most difficult issues to bridge in informing the public about global warming and its effects is how we discuss this situation with our children. Sure, you don't want to scare them, but at some point we have to be honest with them about what we are facing. How we shape our children as consumers and what type of expectations for the future we imbue in them today, will have ramifications for the survival of the planet. Perhaps the best way to convey these messages to our children is to significantly reduce our own consumption and reconsider our own material expectations while explaining to our children that the "good life" is also a simple one.

    To Laura in Heartsfordshire, I would say that you will want to remind the adults that will be reading your report that the effects of wasteful energy practices are already imperiling the health and well-being of the planet. And if you and your fellow students are up for it - demand, respectfully of course, that your school officials ensure that they are doing everything they can to reduce energy use and waste at your school, and that you and your chums are ready to do your part in that effort.
    On Umbra on why we shouldn't waste energy posted 4 years, 2 months ago 1 Response

  • Paper or Drastic?

    Dominick in Spokane sounds as if he is taking the first step that begins his 1,000 mile journey to a cleaner, healthier planet. Let's encourage that impulse. Neither paper nor plastic is the best choice, Dominick, get yourself a reusable bag made from organic hemp. And then start taking a look at the food you're putting in it. Organic, locally grown, seasonal, and plucked from the earth or a tree are the criteria you'll want to strive to achieve. And if you can walk to the store and back, even better. That should get you started - the big picture will soon come into view.

    Your advice, Umbra - to send a check to an environemtal organization or a letter to your Representative - tends to reinforce the civic passivity that has descended upon America and has made us all believe that our salvation lies in the hands of someone else. Americans must be encouraged to recognize that they have real political influence at the local government level and within their local institutions, and that they should begin to exert that power.

    The best current example of how local participation can succeed can be seen in the success of Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels' Climate Protection Agreement. Now at 175 US cities and counting, many of these cities were encouraged to join in setting emission reduction targets for their city operations by the advocacy of average people who petitioned their mayors and city councils to take action. Imagine how much of an impact on climate change we would have if every city in this country adopted this policy? Could the States and Feds be far behind?

    And Dominick - the City of Spokane has not yet signed on to the Climate Protection Agreement. It should. Why not pull together a few family and friends and contact Mayor James E. West at 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd., Spokane , WA 99201 (509) 625-6250 or the City Manager and ask that the issue be put on the City Council agenda so that you can address the City Council and request its support?

    Take a look at the Seattle website on the CCA (www.ci.seattle.wa.us/mayor/climate/) for what the CCA involves, and at our website (www.kyotousa.org) for background material and talking points. And feel free to contact us if you have questions about how other advocates have fared. On Umbra on personal actions that make a real difference posted 4 years, 3 months ago 11 Responses

  • Brits personal emissions plan

    The scope and quality of the ideas that are being proposed to reduce our production of greenhouse gases (GHG) is heartening. While the US federal government continues to drag its feet on climate change, it seems that much of civil society around the world (and yes, even in the US), is starting to take action. The idea of an individual "cap and trade" program for personal GHG emissions, while complex, is not unlike the incentive programs that many water and electricity utilities currently offer to customers who reduce their consumption.

    The article generated an idea that might be more quickly implemented. Suppose we aggregated GHG emissions into a defined unit, such as a city, whose GHG emissions could be based upon city govenment operations, business and institutional activity, and population size.

    Grants could be made available to cities during the start up phase to assist them in conducting their GHG inventories, outreach and education activities, and business development plans.

    To encourage local activities that would reduce the city's overall GHG emissions, meaningful incentives from the state or federal governments would be provided only to those cities who reduced their GHG emissions. The "penalty" for cities that failed to reduce their GHG emissions would be the loss of access to the incentives.

    Many cities in the US are already voluntarily engaged in efforts to reduce their GHG emissions (see, ICLEI http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=1118 and Mayor Greg Nickels' Climate Protection Agreement http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/mayor/climate/). Not only are these cities responding to their concerns about global warming, many are already beginnig to understand that it makes financial sense, too. Reductions in energy consumption and waste production and investments in renewable energy are money in the bank - or the assurance that vital city services can be maintained when city budgets are squeezed.

    Officials in many US cities, however, fail to recognize their city's role in global warming, even though the majority of the US GHG production occurs within our cities. And when asked to act on their city's contribution to the problem, city officials often state their belief that resolution of the issue falls to the federal government. If we can offer our cities the financial incentives to become cleaner and greener, we may be pleasantly surprised at the wilingness of cities and their inhabitants to act collectively to address this growing threat.On Brits consider radical plan to measure personal emissions posted 4 years, 3 months ago 3 Responses

  • The Revolution Will Be Localized

    Since we're unlikely to see any action from the feds on global warming any time soon, it is heartening to see that States and cities are taking global warming seriously and are beginning to take action and establish policies that reduce their production of greenhouse gases.

    Congratulations to ICLEI, Redford, Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson, and Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels for putting this issue before the public - and all in a relatively short period of time.

    Now, if we want to build on that momentum and actually get our cities and their governments to follow through on their commitments, we, the folks down here who are going to have actually make life style changes, pay the new taxes, and support these new policies, must become an active (and welcome) element in that process of change. The responsibility for making this a successful partnership - local government and its citizens - falls equally to both parties. We, the citizenry must get involved (we can't expect someone else to do it, if we won't do it ourselves) and our local governments must encourage and accept our participation in that process. A city can do that by establishing a citizen council on global warming and encouraging similar advisory groups in the business, religious and educational community. These advisory councils can look at energy consumption and renewables, water usage, waste production and disposal, purchasing, and more in their respective areas of responsibility. With the support of the citizenry, municipalities can be the real drivers of the type and degree of change that  may give us a shot at avoiding the worst impacts of global warming.
    On Sundance getaway converts mayors into climate activists posted 4 years, 4 months ago 1 Response