Comments latenac has made
feminists care about any objectification
This isn't a feminist site but if you go to feminist sites you'll see just as much discussion about bathing suits and lingerie ads as PETA ads. Once again we're back to the false logic of "It's ok for PETA to do it b/c other people do it." It's not ok for ANYONE to do it.
Your logic and other's is similar to the logic after the invasion of Iraq for other countries who wanted to oppress a group, well the US is dealing with terrorists that way so it's ok for us to label someone we don't like as terrorists and get rid of them. If you want to have the moral high ground about animals then you need to make sure you aren't sacrificing other morals in the process otherwise you just end up hurting your cause.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
objectification
You don't need a man in the ad to qualify it for objectification. The ad was supposed to run during the Superbowl. A majority of viewers for the Superbowl are male. The ad is being a voyeur into what vegan women do in their spare time when they're alone. So the ad is telling these males if you are a vegan then you can have these women obviously they need something a little bigger than asparagus but you'll need to eat a vegan diet in order to get them and satisfy them.
It's telling any women who watch if you are a vegan you can look this way b/c look at the man next to you how he's drooling over this. If you want him to drool over you that way then you better buy our product "veganism". I think it's a stretch to think that eating a vegan diet alone will get you the bodies of the women they have in the ads but that's what the ad is implying.
It not sex that's the problem I'm all for well done eroticism and don't object to nudity, however this is objectification. This is what PETA does in all of its promotion.
I do agree with your very last statement though.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
target for the ad
The target for the ad wasn't superbowl watchers or feminists. If that were true they would have honestly tried to make an ad that NBC would have run. The target for the ad was to make NBC reject it so they could get publicity. It's a PR stunt nothing more, nothing less.
The ad objectifies more than just feminists, it objectifies women, period. Who I am guessing are the vast majority of PETA membership. I don't know for certain but I'd be willing to bet money on it. So my point was using objectification of the gender that probably sends in the most money to you to show the horrors of the objectification of animals is hypocritical at best.
And why anyone would think that sex would be better with vegans from this ad is beyond me. I just came away thinking vegans prefer to masturbate with vegetables and I should probably think twice before going over for dinner.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
I meant more defense of the tactic
Saying that others use this tactic to sell things therefore it's ok for PETA to use this tactic is what I'm objecting to. Is it ok to sell your soul if it means people are talking about your product or cause? What does it do to a cause to help one group to stop being objectified if you're objectifying another group, in fact a group that's one of your main targets?On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
re I assume
Yes actually I do protest other media that objectifies women. Frankly most other SuperBowl ads are tame compared to this.
However, I can't believe that PETA defenders or anyone who supports environmental causes would resort to "Well the other guy does it" as a defense. Poor logic and only makes it easier to say, "Well you know he's eating "sea kittens" wrapped in bacon, so why shouldn't I?" "My neighbor has a Hummer why shouldn't I?" "China and India aren't cutting carbon emissions, why should I?" etc., etc. But I guess this is what happens when one picks one single cause to champion fanatically without regard to its ramifications or effect on the community around them.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
other ads
They've done other ads and pr stunts along these lines. The only ads they ever do consist of objectifying women in some way, shape or form.
If this is how vegans want to market themselves and their cause then they shouldn't be surprised at the backlash they get. Yes people talk about this and they get free PR as a result which is why I wish NBC had said, OK we'll take you're money but in the end it just makes them look like a bunch of nuts. I know not all vegans agree with PETA but guess what, this is the most vocal voice you have for your movement.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
marylou you haven't
been paying much attention then to how PETA markets themselves. This ad is pretty par for the course.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
wish PETA would have their bluff called
I wish NBC had taken PETA's money if they even actually had enough to pay for an ad. Their tactics are ridiculous they don't actually create a dialogue as I've read some people claim. They create a hitting over the head which just ends making every vegetarian and vegan looks like a militant screeching fool to those that aren't. Thus hurting their cause and reducing understanding between vegans and non-vegans. That's all without even getting into how much their stunts offend me as a feminist.On Did NBC squash PETA corn-porn? posted 10 months ago 44 Responses
feline pine
We've been using scoopable feline pine for awhile now and don't have any of the issues you seem to. Doesn't stick to our cats or float in the air and scooping is just fine. We do scoop thinking out of the litter boxes every other day and add litter as needed. I can't imagine the smell from any cat litter if we only cleaned once a month.On A review of non-clay cat litters posted 1 year, 2 months ago 32 Responses
poorly written
Whether you eat meat or not this is a poorly written article. This guy seems to lack the courage of his convictions. I could understand wanting to understand meat to be a chef and thus eating it while going to cooking school but no reason if you were honestly concerned that much about animal welfare to not at least try to be a vegan or even just vegetarian chef after schooling.
And then even though he's concerned about using the whole animal he still doesn't seem to understand anything about sustainable animal production.
There are myriad people to interview on this subject who are much more committed and articulate about their positions. Fergus Henderson, Rose Prince to name two. Even Anthony Bourdain who wouldn't be a vegan in a million years could make a better argument.On Getting to the meat of the matter with Boston chef Jamie Bissonnette posted 1 year, 3 months ago 21 Responses
well this actually explains a lot
Of course you'd all think that there's no need for the sausage or to even consider it since you've never actually had to deal with a small child not wanting to eat something or take into consideration a partner's food preferences.
It was irresponsible to use the picture of the food for a recipe it doesn't go with especially posting it so close to the recipe. Why have a picture at all?
And DogYeast or Caniscandida, you're not doing a classicist reading of the article or your own comments for that matter, you're just doing a very bad post modern reading of it. Derrida is turning in his grave. However I'm surprised as someone who speaks French and claims to be a Classicist you didn't recognize the name of a Victor Hugo character, it's Latenac.
And John, while there are "Vermonters" like that the vast majority of Vermonters are lower to middle class. Real Vermonters don't even ski.On How author Betsy Block convinced her finicky family to mend their dietary ways posted 1 year, 4 months ago 25 Responses
did anyone read the article before posting?
Besides me? From the article-
Short answer: She takes it slow. "I started this meal makeover with a bang, immediately alienating all three beloved members of my family and increasing tension in the home," she says. Chastened, she switched from giant steps to baby steps: "Taking it one step at a time and practicing more than I preach are both helpful."
This book isn't for someone who isn't already a vegan or vegetarian or someone who doesn't give a damn about what the rest of the family thinks in terms of food being served. She's trying not to alienate everyone in her family and thus she takes it slow by baby steps. Getting my husband to eat legumes would be huge step and a minor miracle like the author a workable compromise would be to add a little sausage or something else that he likes to a legume dish.
And you buy a package of sausage and break it into smaller packages to be used for different meals. Not too difficult and very economical.
Reading articles before commenting on them helps a lot.On How author Betsy Block convinced her finicky family to mend their dietary ways posted 1 year, 4 months ago 25 Responses
critical mistake in summary
McDonalds owns a majority stake in Chipotle. Chipotle already has a better image than McDonalds so it probably feels it can get away without paying the extra penny while the McDonald's brand needs to look like it's being a good corporate citizen. Corporations could theoretically affect big change but consistency would be the key here.On When will the conscientious burrito giant pay up for less exploitative tomatoes? posted 1 year, 4 months ago 6 Responses
cranky perhaps
but at least I have better reading comprehension and understand the point of an article. Living with an english major and having majored in literature myself I do get cranky when people don't actually read things that they comment on.On How author Betsy Block convinced her finicky family to mend their dietary ways posted 1 year, 4 months ago 25 Responses
Vermont
You don't really know many Vermonters if you think 1/3 of its gdp comes from trust funds.On How author Betsy Block convinced her finicky family to mend their dietary ways posted 1 year, 4 months ago 25 Responses
you didn't really read the article did you?
It's about learning to compromise with your family to make better food choices. If you have someone in the family that feels no meal is complete without meat, the small step of reducing the amount of meat in a meal is the logical place to go not telling them tough we're going completely green and vegan whether you like it or not.
Good lord why does the environmental movement for green food have to be so black and white and my way or the highway? Compromise getting everyone to move with you a little bit is far effective and green than being fundamentalists and saying all or nothing and thus only getting a very small portion of the population to go green.
And it's still not a representative picture of what the recipe will look like. On How author Betsy Block convinced her finicky family to mend their dietary ways posted 1 year, 4 months ago 25 Responses
that picture can't be right
First of all it's not soup in the picture and second of all it looks more like ham than chorizo in the picture. The chorizo would give it an orangeish hue. Not to mention a lack of chard.
And John this is about taking small steps not big ones.On How author Betsy Block convinced her finicky family to mend their dietary ways posted 1 year, 4 months ago 25 Responses
hardly an about face
In the article he said he'd be willing to go on a boat with Greenpeace to document illegal tuna catches. Rather specific and not a full endorsement of Greenpeace. I also doubt he gets lots of fish from industry groups and he's not based in NYC, he's based in Atlanta.On Celeb chef clarifies his relationship with Greenpeace posted 1 year, 4 months ago 5 Responses
then someone
is impersonating you in other threads about food where your impersonator ignores the topic at hand and exclaims, "think about the animals!" and claims there's no such thing as an omnivore. So since you're near vegan that could make you a carnivore as well, right?On Iowa's chefs and their farmer-suppliers get busy recovering from disaster posted 1 year, 5 months ago 15 Responses
it's ridiculous
feeding animals what they can't actually eat and thus have to be bred to eat. I know one of the problems in raising grass fed beef in the us is that there are very few breeds that can actually be raised grass fed now. Here in Vermont a farmer actually brought in a breed from New Zealand b/c they're still grass raised there. Not to mention you can actually see the different in eggs from chickens that eat what they should eat vs. ones that don't.
It always amazes me and frankly sickens me to see what we've done to our food supply to get plentiful, cheap, not very good food.
Technically anchovies don't belong on caesar salads but they certainly belong in pizza and puttanesca.On Farm animals consume 17 percent of wild-caught fish posted 1 year, 5 months ago 13 Responses
no not really I don't find it disturbing.
I find it annoying that apparently no other discussion about food can take place on Grist without fundamentalist vegans coming in and crying "what about the animals you heartless good for nothing humans?" I think there are more issues about food and the environment than animal welfare. I think the destruction of a burgeoning slow food movement with small organic farmers and the restaurants who support them was the actual point of this article.
Perhaps you could write for Grist and write all the animal welfare articles you want? Or maybe you could just convince them to write more articles about it.On Iowa's chefs and their farmer-suppliers get busy recovering from disaster posted 1 year, 5 months ago 15 Responses
casc and John
must you ruin every food post with your religious zeal?On Iowa's chefs and their farmer-suppliers get busy recovering from disaster posted 1 year, 5 months ago 15 Responses
My heart goes out Iowa as well.
Glad to hear as in New Orleans restaurants are leading the way to help with the recovery. I hope the farmers markets are open soon and the farmers recover soon as well. On Iowa's chefs and their farmer-suppliers get busy recovering from disaster posted 1 year, 5 months ago 15 Responses
carnivores
Carnivores only eat meat. I don't only eat meat. I eat meat, fruit, veggies, grains, etc. I eat everything much like my chimp relatives. I'm an omnivore.
A chain isn't a circle. Hence the phrase, top of the food chain.
At least I haven't resorted to personal attacks. If that's all that you are down to then I understand why you wish to stop the conversation.
Anthropomorphism n. Attribution of human motivation, characteristics, or behavior to inanimate objects, animals, or natural phenomena.
If you can't see how you attribute human characteristics or motivation to animals by setting animals as the same as humans then you're right we have nothing to talk about.
For the record the conversation at least for me was more about being able to meet halfway. Alton Brown promoting sustainability will bring a lot more people to understanding where their food comes from than calling people diseased or thoughtless unless they become a vegan. And it's not just because he has a television show.
Heidi Swanson has done more to make increasing my vegetarian meals by just showing tasty, veggie, whole foods and not preaching. And maybe one day I'll find the vegan equivalent and I'll understand veganism as more than just a religion or political movement but as also joy in food and something that takes everything into account not just animals. On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
anthropomorphism?
A vegan isn't really going to throw that charge at me, really? Are you sure you know what that word means? Placing all animals as being equal and worrying about animal suffering above all else is anthropomorphism in the extreme. I'm part of the food chain and don't think that my cats or the chickens I eat are human or even equal to. Singer's speciesism argument doesn't hold much weight with me.
And btw, I'm not a carnivore, I'm an omnivore. My cats on the other hand are all obligate carnivores.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
platforms javaearth
If this article were about Alton Brown going vegan and using his show as a platform to shed light on animal issues, I wouldn't stomp in and say "yeah what a bunch of hypocrisy eat animal, eat animals! That's the only way to go green!" And I would be against anyone who did.
That's the problem no real discussion can take place apparently on this site that includes all types of dietary lifestyles without vegans apparently coming in and say "you call yourself environmentalists? you can't be an environmentalist unless you're a vegan."
As for the "chicken moment" it has nothing to do with the chicken feeling better. It's the act of recognizing where you're food comes from and what it takes to bring it to your plate.
Do you recognize all the field animals that might have been killed bringing your dinner to your plate? I mean the mice, squirrels, rabbits, insects, etc., etc? Do you recognize the migrant labor that goes into your food? Unfortunately or maybe fortunately every dietary choice comes with a list of sacrifices that we need to recognize. It's not like a vegan lifestyle absolves you of all guilt about your groceries. Just as an omnivore diet doesn't absolve me of all guilt.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
you call it not classy I call it
understanding where your food comes from and embracing it. To me, it's actually very classy and not weird at all. But then I actually usually meet the meat so to speak before I buy it from my local farm. So I've met the chickens, pigs, lambs and beef that I purchase there on a regular basis. Best way to know how the meat I'm eating was raised.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
askantik
If you had read the comment above mine you would have realized I wasn't actually responding to you.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
askantik
If you had read the comment above mine you would have realized I wasn't actually responding to you.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
annoying self righteousness --yuk!
You could get a lot farther in helping animals if you actually realized not everyone is going to go vegan and supporting methods that actually raise awareness of where food comes from to the average person.
I'm really tired of the all or nothing attitudes. Awareness of where are food comes from and what it takes to get it is something I support. I support reducing meat consumption. I support paying real prices for food and for eating seasonally and trying to as much as you can locally. (I'm not giving up coffee) I'll even campaign that anyone who only eats boneless, skinless chicken breasts b/c they can't stand the idea of bones should be forced to become a vegetarian if not vegan. Or anyone else not willing to face up to the idea that they're eating an animal. I don't understand why all groups can't first work together to raise awareness of where our food comes from and the sustainability of it. And then we can split into our various religious (er I mean dietary) sects.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
yay AB
Glad to hear he'll be turning his show to cover issues of sustainability. His show has always been a wealth of information. I never would have known what a nutritional anthropologist was without him.On Food Network star Alton Brown adds a pinch of sustainability to the pot posted 1 year, 5 months ago 27 Responses
as long as you have a family that will eat
one or any of the combination below
tofu
legumes
eggs even if you're going lacto ovo
nuts
other meat substitutesUnfortunately my husband is allergic to nuts, doesn't eat tofu, legumes disagree with him (I think it's related to the peanut allergy), won't eat eggs. And frankly I'm suspicious of seitan, veggie burgers and other processed protein substitutes.
He does however eat a wide variety of grains and fruits and vegetables. So if I can cut back on meat while buying meat raised in a way that probably actually has less environmental impact than a package of veggie burgers, all the better. On The great Mark Bittman on how to push meat off the center of the plate posted 1 year, 5 months ago 18 Responses
happy to see this article.
I've been looking for ways to cut back on meat consumption without worrying my husband we're going veg and this gave me a lot of good ideas. We're also lucky to live near and belong to a csa that does pasture farming. It's more expensive than conventional meat but it tastes a lot better and plus we get to meet it before we eat it. I think voices like this can help people rethink what they eat and also encourage them to buy better quality and more humane food.On The great Mark Bittman on how to push meat off the center of the plate posted 1 year, 5 months ago 18 Responses
re: A spoilt anthropocentric view, but habitat is
I was actually agreeing with you. Now knowing that the lines are already there and it really is just a matter of aesthetics it just makes it ridiculous.
We actually have a similar problem in Vermont all the time. Not just with wind but basically with newcomers* who don't want anything change, it should just be pristine and wonderful up here all the time. They're ignoring that some progress needs to be made some perfection sacrificed so that those who were here before they got here can live and put bread on the table. Life isn't so black & white that either the environment can be saved or humans can be saved. There are compromises that can be made in the name of smart growth and development.
*not all newcomers are like this.On Huge Calif. solar plant would run transmission lines through state park posted 1 year, 5 months ago 39 Responses
nucbuddy
Don't worry, Wolverine just thinks there shouldn't be any humans on the planet. So any solutions that enable humans to get energy aren't good.
This is comparable to the wind energy issue here in Vermont. We all want energy from more sustainable resources but let's make sure there isn't a visible eyesore to get it. In the meantime a greater eyesore is brewing from people are promoting less sustainable and clean energy sources like coal and nuclear. At some point we're going to have to look at tradeoffs. Just because something might be an eyesore to humans it doesn't mean nature really cares all that much ie the plants and animals around it. On Huge Calif. solar plant would run transmission lines through state park posted 1 year, 5 months ago 39 Responses
my derision was apparently more about
your attitude than sahms or work from home whoever. Holistic approaches are needed not single minded ones. Its why I could never be vegan I can't believe in animal rights to the exclusion of anything else in my life, it would cause unbalance. Just like believing in environmentalism or capitalism or anything to the exclusion of all else creates unbalance.
Humans are part of the earth whether you like it or not. If things get too crappy all the environmental causes you espouse will go right out the window b/c people having to choose between food or medicine or gas to get to work or whatever aren't going to want to get behind any movement that will reduce them to have to choose some food or some medicine or some gas to get to work.
As for your crack about wohm well we're all individuals who have our own families and need to make them work for us in our own unique way. I know plenty of moms who are better off being wohm or would be better off and I know plenty of the reverse. But this blog isn't about the mommy wars but thanks for contributing to it.On Protests erupt worldwide over fuel prices posted 1 year, 5 months ago 25 Responses
Wolverine
Yes of course it's time to change how we live. It has been for quite some time. But if you look at the countries listed protesting rising fuel costs, it's not just Western, industrialized nations. It's also poor ones who are just scraping by.
Most of the smug people I do see bragging, cheering on high oil prices are people who live very comfortably to begin with and shop at Whole Paycheck and maybe even work out of their homes if they aren't stay at home parents to begin with. They're about as clueless as the comments made by Michael Pollan and Alice Waters about how now the price of food is going up people will choose to buy higher quality food and eat less.
Yes I'm sure the average American who is just getting by to begin with working 2-3 jobs is thinking yay oil is going up it will force people to change! yay conventional food now is only $2 cheaper than organic, I'll go 3 days without lunch to buy the organic!
There needs to be a balancing act between helping those in need and changing our way of living. I could actually be happy about rising oil costs if I saw a truly concerted wide ranging effort to provide alternatives to how we're living now that are workable. We shouldn't be cheering high oil prices or even demanding lower oil prices, we should all be working together to come up with what the new norm will be and how we can address these issues in a way that's best for the planet and best for the poor. On Protests erupt worldwide over fuel prices posted 1 year, 5 months ago 25 Responses
soy has its own issues
Yes you can be sure it's organic. But you aren't getting most of the vitamins and minerals added into it since they don't mix well into the soy milk. And then there are host of issues with over consumption of soy in the US as well. On Why that organic label on your milk doesn't tell the whole story posted 1 year, 6 months ago 25 Responses
still has BPAs in it though
I agree veggies are better fresh or frozen. But there are staple pantry items that are affected by this that you can't get frozen and some you can't get fresh without significantly increasing costs and/or time. Thinking coconut milk, anchovies, canned tomatoes, curry pastes, canned legumes, etc. Given the economy and the already almost elitist issues with local and organic food it's rather cavalier to just say - let them eat fresh or let them eat frozen. Organic food purchases are already dropping precipitously as gas prices go up. If we really want to convert other people to wanting to do what's best for the planet and even our own health the assumption that people aren't living from paycheck to 4 days before the next paycheck is going to have to go.On Umbra on plastic bottles and BPA posted 1 year, 6 months ago 13 Responses
canned tomatoes?
So no canned tomatoes either? I can live without plastic water bottles and canned foods except canned tomatoes and canned red curry paste. Good lord.On Umbra on plastic bottles and BPA posted 1 year, 6 months ago 13 Responses
Catalog Choice
Well at least now I know why so many of the catalogs I opted out of on Catalog Choice show up as unconfirmed. 4 confirmed, 57 unconfirmed and 3 refused. I was very disappointed then Title Nine and Territory Ahead refused my requests through them.
I do find it ironic NWF helped to create it b/c I know all of my membership to them for the year I belonged had to have been used on mailings of asking for more money, calendars, address labels, gift bags, wrapping paper, etc. After 3 months I finally asked them to cease and desist, send me e-mails and relented.On Postal service and direct mailers join together in a pro-junk-mail campaign posted 1 year, 8 months ago 6 Responses
ends don't justify means
Don't exchange "cruelty and slavery of animals" for "objectification of women." The tactics of by any means necessary just ends up preaching to the converted and no one else.On From Flesh to Flurry posted 1 year, 9 months ago 6 Responses
Thank you
As the kitty mom to 3 indoor cats thank you for the other reason to keep your cat indoors. The only problem in your argument is you have to make sure the cats have been trained to kill in the first place. A lot of cats are taken away from their mothers too young to have learned how to hunt properly. Our 3 cats unfortunately for us and the mice that occasionally wander into our house weren't. As a result they just play with the mice until it dies of heart attack or something else or we've caught it and put it out for the owls.
What's the first to keep them indoors? Longer life expectancy. I had several outdoor cats growing up none of them lived longer than 7 year until we started keeping them inside. Now I have cats that are 16, 15 and 5. It's not only cars you have to worry about but disease - tics, feline hiv, etc., poison- one cat we had died of eating a bad plant, predators - owls don't eat cats but since they have to kill when they attack or be killed, they often accidentally kill them, not to mention hawks, wolves, your local variety of big cat.
And for the person who hates Blue Jays, while you may not like Blue Jays, they actually help other birds flee from predators. If you had bird feeders, you'd know that Blue Jays are often on the perimeter warning other birds about potential threats.On Umbra on cats and birds posted 2 years ago 72 Responses
miss manners is right
No one has to give a birthday present when invited to a birthday. In trying to dictate to people what to give or not give you are operating under the assumption that everyone is going to give you a present. Not that you can't make suggestions about what to give if someone should ask.
The easiest way to stop your 1-6 or 7 year old from getting a bunch of stuff you don't want them to have is to not have a birthday part for 20-30 kids and all of your relatives. The rule of thumb is number of kids per year in age. Even at 7 invitees it's still intimate enough that there probably will be discussion from the invitees about presents and you can make your wishes known.
Huge birthday parties for kids so young aren't for the kids but for the parents. On Umbra on kids' birthday parties posted 2 years, 1 month ago 15 Responses
why can't we all just get along?
C4nier you missed the point of the article you posted as well as Umbra's point, the point is the FAO's report looks into the future if the demand for meat continues to increase at a high rate. Neither the article you linked to or the FAO report says that right now meat consumption is the number 1 cause of global warming.
And amc89 if you can actually get all of those nutrients from your food great but I don't know a vegan that doesn't have to get at least some of their nutrients from supplements or fortifed food. You don't become a vegan for health reasons, you can't do a vegan diet without supplementing. You do a vegan diet for ethical reasons.
As for all of the problems you mention with fish and meat those are also potential problems in eating fresh produce as well except maybe saturated fat.
What I don't understand is that if we're all fairly environmentally conscious here why aren't both sides uniting to get rid of factory farming first and promoting sustainable farming? Why aren't we working together to change the Farming Bill? Once sustainable farming practices are universal then let's splinter into our religious groups of vegans vs. omnivores.On Umbra on meat eating and global warming posted 2 years, 2 months ago 41 Responses
obligate carnivores
"Cats are FAR more dependent on meat than dogs."
Cats are obligate carnivores which means they can't survive on anything but meat.
Dogs like humans are omnivores. Show me a vegan that can eat a natural, healthy diet without eating fortified food or taking supplements and maybe I'll change my mind that humans are meant to be omnivores.On Animal-rights group makes the stupid claim that enviros must be vegetarians posted 2 years, 2 months ago 208 Responses
typical PETA
Don't know why you'd even write this. PETA's methods are not to start a discussion or even pretend to have one. They're methods are just designed to make you feel guilty for not agreeing with them. Well and to get people to write about their extreme stance and tactics so they get even more PR. I certainly hope to never live in a world where PETA's vision for animals comes to pass. Although it would be amusing to see the faces of the people who didn't really realize what they were agreeing to.On Animal-rights group makes the stupid claim that enviros must be vegetarians posted 2 years, 2 months ago 208 Responses
classes
Also, keep an eye out for gardening classes on how to create a backyard habitat. I took a great one here in VT that was offered by the NWF and Gardener's Supply. The class emphasized native species b/c of their ease and guaranteeing a food supply for native animals. But it also provided a good list of non-native invasive species to avoid. I agree that you don't always have to plant native species but if you're going to do that you need to be aware of what might be invasive, what might not provide food to animals and also crowd out plants that do provide food, etc. It just takes a little more effort.
And if you find the class, we got as an added bonus Mr. Mizejewski's book in our materials. It is a very useful book.On Umbra on attracting wildlife posted 2 years, 3 months ago 14 Responses
hooray for CSA's
I love getting something new every week. And even in Vermont we have a winter CSA that provides root veggies and even some greens throughout most of the winter.
What I also like about CSA's is they teach about eating seasonally.
I won't feed the troll but DrSid you should really learn more about what organic is and how people actually used to get their food before monoculture farming took over.On Umbra on community-supported agriculture posted 2 years, 3 months ago 9 Responses
for Green Granny
Ugh,I would never buy anything local from a farmer who wouldn't let me visit their farm either. Most farmers I know here in Vermont are more than happy for you to visit their farms and look around. It can be expensive to officially be organic so there are a lot of unofficial organic farms here that raising things I think in far more organic conditions than some of the big industrial organic companies.
Coffeepot12, if you're upset about pigs in your gummi worms and marshmallows, you should probably know gelatin can come from almost any animal and often does, that includes beef and horses, too. And frankly if you don't see any irony in questioning how healthy and organic pigs are and question how healthy things can be while at the same time complaining about pork products in your gummi worms and marshmallows, well I think you have other things you should worry about.
As for whether a pig is clean or not the ones I see on the organic farms are not dirty smelly animals at all. I pick my flowers, peas, herbs and tomatoes not all that far from one of their pens and am never overcome by any smell.
As for eating pork, well frankly I can only defer to Tony Bourdain, the pig is a magical and tasty animal. Or maybe I should defer to Homer S. mmmm bacon.On Umbra on organic pork posted 2 years, 3 months ago 19 Responses
CSA
The other advantage to non-factory farmed pork is it tastes better. Current FF pigs are bred to be low fat which renders them difficult to cook well and remain tasty. Smaller producers raise forgotten breeds which helps to book biodiversity and thus tastier.
My CSA raises pork. Pasture raised is probably the term you'd want to look for.
http://www.jerichosettlersfarm.com/meatsandeggs/pork.html ...On Umbra on organic pork posted 2 years, 3 months ago 19 Responses
nikki
Thanks for answering my question in a friendly way. Can you paint a picture of what the ideal vegan farm would look like? Where does the fertilizer come from? How do you do pest control? Is there a model somewhere that I can read about of a vegan farm like I can for the Polyface model of "grass farming"? Small local, sustainable farms are very important to me and how my family eats. I would think there has to be a market for small, local sustainable vegan farms or maybe I'm wrong. I'm not going to give up being an omnivore but I am curious and would support a sustainable vegan farm as much as I support my sustainable omnivore one. Or maybe there isn't really all that much of a difference.On Umbra on sustainable meat posted 2 years, 3 months ago 32 Responses
Meg
I don't think the farmer who runs my CSA and who raises lamb, chicken, beef, pork as well as veggies would think it would be better for you to abandon your principles and buy the meat she raises. She might ask that you buy some eggs from her since you're not a vegan. But she has very strong principles herself and I can't imagine her asking someone else to abandon theirs.
As I picked up my share yesterday and thought about this column. I did wonder what my CSA farm would be like if it went vegan, financial considerations aside. Right now the tomatoes I picked up were grown in the hoop house where the laying hens spent the winter and contributed to the soil. The lambs and other grazing animals are rotated and help to eat cover crops so new crops can be planted. Manure from all of the animals help the veggies I get grow. Horses help to cut down on tractor and other fossil fuel vehicle usage. It's basically an ecosystem in the Polyface farm way that Michael Pollan wrote about. Each component is dependent on another and helps out a component in some way.
Admittedly my impressions of veganism make it seem extreme to me, would the ideal vegan farm have no animals whatsoever? Would no manure be used? With the short growing season in Vermont I doubt any farm could make a real go of it without using some animals. Most of the farms here have a few chickens or a couple of cows or farm horses. I just have difficulty wrapping my head around how it would be better to use chemicals to fertilize crops rather than manure from farm animals and how you could have a complete ecosystem for a sustainable farm without using animals. But maybe I'm wrong and veganism doesn't preclude that.On Umbra on sustainable meat posted 2 years, 3 months ago 32 Responses
feeding winter birds.
The Audubon Society says no that's not true birds don't migrate based on availability of food. It has to do with length of day and other seasonal changes.
http://magazine.audubon.org/backyard/backyard0001.htmlOn Umbra on feeding birds posted 2 years, 3 months ago 19 Responses
dependency
We worried about dependency as well when we put our feeders up. But the average bird only gets about 25-30% of their daily food from a feeder even in winter. If you notice, birds start to disappear from feeders in the spring once bugs and other more tasty things come out. And we take ours down then b/c we dont' want to encourage bears to visit.On Umbra on feeding birds posted 2 years, 4 months ago 19 Responses
survival of birds
"I think we're overlooking a vital point here, and that is the habitat and food sources lost to wild bird populations when an area is developed. Surely, any effort to replace these lost resources has some environmental value that isn't being considered here."
I have to agree. We only feed birds during the winter. Putting out bird feed increases a bird's survival rate by 1/3. It only takes about 1 big bag of sunflower seeds for the winter and we buy suet made by our CSA. We also plant and have plants that are attractive to birds and other wildlife in our yard during the spring, summer and fall. Even the NWF recommends bird feeders as part of the mix to have your yard certified.
As for feeders attracting undesirables, you're going to attract undesirables by planting native plants to make your yard more attractive to birds. It's part of the ecosystem balance.
I could plant blueberry bushes for the birds in my area but that would also attract bears and other wildlife that likes blueberries. As the NWF will tell you, you want to balance your ecosystem and not limit it to only the "good" species that you want. If you do limit it you throw the ecosystem off balance. You have to take the good with the bad.
You don't have to empty out your bird bath everyday. You have to keep it clean though so bad things don't develop in it. One reason to empty it out every day is to prevent mosquitoes from growing. But there are other ways of preventing that.On Umbra on feeding birds posted 2 years, 4 months ago 19 Responses
even if it is more expensive, so what?
Americans spend far less on their food than any other country in percentage of income. Maybe instead of buying that extra TV you could just buy better food.
Although I do follow the rule of local organic first, local second, non-local organic third. But then I'm actually lucky enough to live in a state where local organic is cheaper and available even in meats as long as I'm willing to invest in a CSA or buy 1/4 of a cow.On Local or organic? It's a false choice posted 3 years, 6 months ago 9 Responses
thank you
It seems like now all I hear is ethanol this and ethanol that. It's going to be the saviour of everything. I keep thinking back to this episode of West Wing I saw where Toby talks about how it takes more fuel to make ethanol that it actually saves. It's sad that all of this hype is for naught but good to know I'm not crazy.On Ethanol is suddenly all the rage in D.C. and Detroit posted 3 years, 6 months ago 18 Responses