Comments meander has made

  • Berkeley's financing: pay for solar over 20 years

    The city of Berkeley, California started a program where people who install solar on their house can pay for it over 20 years on their property taxes. The first offering was filled in under 1 hour. The financing is handled by a private entity, not by the city (but one could easily imagine the city selling bonds to provide the capital).

    The San Francisco Chronicle has details.On Solar hot water heating's day in the sun posted 9 months ago 4 Responses

  • Amazon too

    Amazon is working with manufacturers to receive products in non-clamshell packages, as this piece at AZoCleanTech describes. They are in a special position, though, because they don't have to worry about display or shoplifting.On Goodbye to the clamshell? posted 11 months, 1 week ago 1 Response

  • Sort of mainstream: Living on Earth

    It's not exactly the NYT or WaPo or USA Today, but public radio's Living on Earth has been on top of the renewable tax credit story, giving it coverage several times. Once they even mentioned that the tax credit proponents were one vote short of breaking the filibuster and John McCain couldn't be bothered to show up for work, so the bill was stopped.

    The L.O.E. website has transcripts and downloadable audio available for many years of the program (and is also available for subscription via podcasting software).On Media finally tells public about the real roadblock to good energy policy posted 1 year, 3 months ago 8 Responses

  • Forget amending the farm bill, we have a C-in-C

    "Speaking of the farm bill, that tortured piece of legislation brings to mind another reason to look askance upon Schwab's offer: making it happen would require rewriting the farm bill. Does anyone really think that's going to happen?"

    <snark>
    Some apparatchiks in the Bush administration probably think that the president can unilaterally change farm subsidy policy.  Here's how they would see it: 1) under the unitary executive theory, the commander in chief can not be limited by Congress or the judiciary on matters of national security.  2) United States soldiers, torturers and spies eat food, therefore food policy is part of the commander in chief's official duties. 3) Thus, Congress cannot interfere with the president's work on food policy.
    </snark>On Beware of U.S. trade officials bearing gifts posted 1 year, 3 months ago 3 Responses

  • "Raw" doesn't mean raw anymore

    Another thing about almonds is that since September 1, 2007, most packages of "raw" almonds have been sterilized using either fumigation by propylene oxide (a potential carcinogen that was briefly used as a gasoline additive for racecars) or steam heating. If you want truly raw almonds, you need to purchase them directly from the grower, which is impractical for most of the country. Finally, the pasteurization rule doesn't apply to almonds destined for export (are non-U.S. stomachs that much tougher?).  This rule was forced on the USDA by the big almond companies to prevent scares about food poisoning from damaging their revenues. Personally, I think consumers should be given the opportunity to buy truly raw almonds if they want, allowing them to take the very small risk of food poisoning (almonds sit on the ground for a time after being shaken from the tree, and they can be contaminated by sloppy practices in shelling and packing plants too).

    Last year, I wrote a piece at the Ethicurean with more details on the USDA's raw almond scam and some pictures of an organic almond farm near Sacramento.
    On The unshelled story on the nutty side of our food supply posted 1 year, 4 months ago 7 Responses

  • ...a huge mistake

    A paraphrase of one of his catch phrases from the late, great Arrested Development TV series unfortunately applies to our transportation system in the current era:  we've made a huge mistake.On Well-Arrested posted 1 year, 5 months ago 4 Responses

  • Two-thirds???

    "The 'Use it or Lose It' legislation failed to muster the two-thirds majority needed to pass the measure, by a vote of 223-195."

    Since when did the House become a body requiring two-thirds majority for legislation to pass? What happened to 50 percent + 1?On House approves two measures to address energy prices, third fails posted 1 year, 5 months ago 9 Responses

  • Salmonella items

    caniscandida wrote "Anyway, it would be helpful to know if the pathogen resides on the surface of the tomato, or deep in its flesh.  Can washing our tomatoes save them?  Or, are they hopeless?"

    The Food and Drug Administration has some FAQs on tomatoes and salmonella. They don't specify where the bacteria reside and recommend tossing any fresh tomatoes you have. Other people, like journalist Elizabeth Weise of USA Today, say that "Cooking tomatoes at 145 degrees for at least 15 seconds will probably kill the bacteria." Finally, if you know which state your tomatoes came from (not likely), you can see if that state is on the recall list.  California, for example, is not on the list (and is also not producing many fresh tomatoes for export right now -- the crop is still a few weeks away).On Tomato salmonella scare hits the big time posted 1 year, 5 months ago 13 Responses

  • Composting and containers

    The "100% compostable" marking on bioplastics is not always correct.  The material requires a relatively high temperature to compost, conditions found only in commercial or municipal facilities (those used to compost green waste from homes, like Jepson Prairie Organics in Northern California).  If you toss the containers in your backyard compost pile, they might never degrade. In a landfill, it's highly likely that they will never degrade because of the inert conditions.  (This post explains more of the bioplastic story.)

    Another way to handle yogurt is by using reusable packages. In the San Francisco area there is a company called St. Benoit Yogurt that sells yogurt in ceramic pots.  When you buy a pot you pay a deposit (50 cents or a dollar) to the retailer.  Many people love their product and their use of reusable containers is an extra attraction.  On Recycled plastic products gain ground posted 1 year, 6 months ago 3 Responses

  • $ per mile vs. $ per gallon

    Somehow we need to stop thinking only about the price per gallon of gas and start thinking about the price per mile traveled.  I don't know about you, but I don't buy gasoline because it's a nice liquid and good to have around -- I buy it because it provides mobility.  

    A car that gets 70 mpg will go as far with a dollar's worth of $7 per gallon gasoline as a 35 mpg car goes on a dollar's worth of $3.50 per gallon gasoline, so both gas prices look about the same in terms of miles per dollar.  With plug-in hybrid and other advanced technologies (like Amory Lovins' super-car), we can significantly increase the mpg in the next decade.

    Of course, thinking on a dollar-per-mile basis is longer term thinking -- it is no easy task to switch cars.  The new car development cycle is a few years long, so even if the CAFE standard was magically increased today, it would take a few years for the changes to ripple through the system.On But soon we will be mad for $6-7 gas posted 1 year, 6 months ago 6 Responses

  • Diesel complexity

    Professor Jacobson's analysis is interesting, if somewhat overly complicated.  I hope we see many other analyses of diesel vs. gasoline as the new clean diesels are released in the future so that consumers can make informed decisions.  

    Jacobson's comparison of a very efficient gasoline car with a diesel car makes some sense, but it is also worthwhile considering a like-for-like substitution:  someone buying the diesel model instead of the gasoline model.  For example, the diesel Jetta (50-60 mpg) instead of the gasoline Jetta (25-30 mpg).  Or a diesel pickup instead of a gasoline one.  

    Regarding dehada's point about "carbon black" being an oversimplification:  diesel particulate matter (PM) is indeed tremendously complex, but is essentially black carbon at its core.  Diesel PM is composed of thousands of compounds and is emitted in a range of sizes.  The core of diesel PM is made up of tiny particle that are almost pure carbon.  These carbon particles -- which are the part of diesel PM that is "black carbon" -- are coated with various hydrocarbons and sulfur compounds in liquid or solid form.  Professor Jacobson and other researchers have done some work examining the effect of PM composition on its climate change impact. (Some good background on diesel PM can be found at the South Coast Air Quality Management District.)

    As for dehada's complaint that "[t]he point about the climate effects of 'carbon black' is particularly troublesome to me because you're the bold takeaway from your post portrays the science behind the issue in the same light as the well-documented science behind the climate effects of CO2," black carbon receives significant coverage in the IPCC reports.  While its role is not as clearly understood as CO2's -- the IPCC rating for "level of scientific understanding rating" is "medium to low" (Figure TS-5 in the Technical Summary (PDF)) -- recent research, like the paper cited by Romm in the post, indicate that the problem of black carbon is even worse than the IPCC assessed.  

    Phillip Huggan makes a good point about international agreements, but there are numerous challenges to adding black carbon.  The biggest is that unlike CO2, the nature of the PM -- what fraction is black carbon, the particle size, etc. -- depends highly on its source.  The PM from a cookstove is not the same as the PM from a diesel engine (and the PM from a Chinese diesel is different from an Indian or American diesel).  Furthermore, it is quite a bit harder to do an emissions inventory.  With CO2, you can multiply the fuel consumption by a conversion factor and get the emission of CO2, but it's not so simple with PM (an article on p. 2214 of the 9/27/02 issue of Science explains this clearly).   A recent paper by Professor Tami Bond of the University of Illinois explores the topic in depth and concludes that even with all of the uncertainty it's possible to add black carbon to international negotiations.

    As the commenters above point out, the current model year of diesel trucks and the next model year of diesel passenger cars will have pollution control technology that nearly eliminates the PM emissions.  But there are still millions of trucks and pieces of off-road equipment in the U.S. without PM emission controls.  Technology exists to make dramatic reductions on the in-use equipment, with California taking the lead.  EPA also has funding this year to help pay for the equipment.  With trucks and construction equipment having long lifetimes -- often 20 to 30 years -- cleaning up their exhaust can have significant health and climate benefits.On Why hybrids beat diesels posted 1 year, 6 months ago 21 Responses

  • Outside of LA would be more exciting

    It would be even more exciting if Jake was taking his organic restaurant to a place like Houston or Fresno or somewhere else that doesn't have any such options.  I can think of a score of eco-eateries that are already in Los Angeles -- will one more in that crowded market make much of a difference?On Jake Gyllenhaal to open organic restaurant posted 1 year, 7 months ago 4 Responses

  • The "quote-unquote experts"

    A piece at Huffington Post by Sam Stein contains a quote from Howard Wolfson, Clinton's chief spokesperson that sound like it could have come out of the mouths of Bush or Cheney:

    "We believe the presidency requires leadership," said Wolfson. "There are times that a president will take a position that a broad support of quote-unquote experts agree with. And there are times they will take a position that quote-unquote experts do not agree with."

    Much of the mess we're in today is because the Bush Administration has been ignoring the experts and going with the gut feeling or radical ideology of the President and his minions.

    Stein's piece also has this:

    On Wednesday, The Huffington Post attempted to find one expert from any and all ideological persuasion who believed that a gas tax holiday is a wise idea. It proved impossible. However, the idea is likely popular in upcoming primary states like Indiana and Ohio, and other politicians, alongside Clinton, have argued that it is in the government's interest to give all consumers a bit of at-the-pump relief.
    On A gas tax holiday would be cynical and indefensible posted 1 year, 7 months ago 19 Responses
  • It's not about the U.S.

    My guess is that the President is referring to a proposal to send cash to countries that are having hunger problems instead of sending bags of American-grown corn, soy and wheat.  The cash would then be used to buy food from local farmers, thus stretching the funds (no shipping costs) and helping the local economy.  The idea is embedded somewhere in the current farm bill proposal, but I'm not sure how much traction it has in Congress.  Many powerful members of Congress see the foreign aid program strictly as a money-making business for U.S. ag interests, not as a way to help hungry people.

    And meanwhile in Bush's bureaucracies: the Federal Trade Commission refuses to do anything about record levels of consolidation in the meat industry, the EPA is changing rules to allow more air and water pollution from CAFOs, the Commerce Dept is pushing for more free trade agreements and opening foreign markets up to U.S. beef, and so on.On Nonsensical nuggets from the prez's press conference posted 1 year, 7 months ago 8 Responses

  • Using Congress as a stalling tactic

    It's telling that the Bush Administration -- the gang that has been grabbing power for the executive branch since Day One -- says that only Congress can deal with climate change policy.  Seems like a total delaying tactic to me.  The Bush gang knows that nothing is going to happen in this Congress, so they try to push the responsibility to them.

    The Bush logic:  it's OK for unelected bureaucrats in the Office of the Legal Council to legalize torture or for unelected bureaucrats in the Dept of the Interior to allow destruction of West Virginia wilderness via mountaintop mining, but bureaucrats must not do anything to slow climate change.On Thoughts on Bush's latest speech on climate change posted 1 year, 7 months ago 10 Responses

  • Grassy knolls

    Cattle can also graze on land that is too hilly, that has too many rocks, or is otherwise unsuitable for growing corn or other crops (besides grass).On Antibiotic-resistant bacteria thrives in CAFO pork, and Wall Street gobbles up Big Meat shares posted 1 year, 8 months ago 25 Responses

  • How about plug-in hybrids?

    Plug-in hybrids offer a way to use electricity to power personal transportation.  But many of the models will probably be made outside the U.S. (Japan, Mexico, China, Brazil, etc.).  Shouldn't the use of these foreign-built cars then be considered foreign energy sources too, even if they run on home-grown electricity?  On McCain's crooked talk on nuclear power posted 1 year, 8 months ago 5 Responses

  • Bees on the TV

    Last summer the science program from a San Francisco public TV station (KQED) had a segment about bees that is worth watching.  They interviewed two bee researchers and took a look at some programs sponsored by the Xerxes Society and the Audubon Society to improve habitat for native bees around farms.  On A long-time beekeeper's take on colony collapse posted 1 year, 10 months ago 9 Responses

  • And another new study showing EPA is wrong

    In response to the EPA's denial of waiver (which I see as purely a stalling tactic), the California Air Resources Board (the state agency with the mandate to implement the climate change legislation that the EPA is blocking) did some calculations comparing the California plan with the national fuel economy standards in the federal energy bill (PDF).  California's plan leads to significantly more reductions of CO2 equivalents:


    * By 2020, California is committed to implement revised, more stringent GHG emission limits (the Pavley Phase 2 rules). These increase the stringency of the current rules and would reduce California GHG emissions by 33 MMTs [million metric tons] of carbon dioxide, 74 percent more than the 19 MMTs from the federal rules in 2020.

    ...

    * The cumulative benefits of our standards have also been estimated (See Figure ES-1). Between 2009 and 2016, the California standards will prevent emissions of 58 MMTs of CO2. This is almost three times the 20 MMTs expected if only the new federal CAFE standards were implemented. By 2020, the full California rules would prevent 167 MMT of CO2 emissions, more than twice the 76 MMTs reductions of CO2 expected if only the federal standards were implemented.


    On Increased CO2 in the atmosphere exacerbates the effects of air pollution posted 1 year, 10 months ago 6 Responses
  • Shutting down the government -- Clinton vs. Bush

    The situation is a bit different now than it was when Gingrich shut down the government.  In late 1995 and early 1996, Bill Clinton's approval rating was about 55 percent*.  These days, the American public hates George W. Bush.  His approval rating has around mid-30 percent for almost two years, after a long, nearly continuous decline.  The percent of people that strongly dislike him is probably near Nixonian levels.  They aren't going to change their opinion because he issues a few vetoes.

    But it's hard to know what the public will think about the government shutting down because the GOP is filibustering everything and the president's idea of compromise is "give me everything I want."    

    (Bush and Clinton approval numbers from WSJ)

    *which is actually lower than it was on the day he was impeached (about 65 percent in that period)On Sen. John Kerry defends Dem decision not to force a filibuster on the energy bill posted 1 year, 11 months ago 22 Responses

  • Edwards had some good lines

    At the presidential candidates' climate change forum, John Edwards had some good lines on the subject of green tech and jobs:


    Right now, we're sitting by the side of the road, as foreign companies race ahead with developing green technology. Bell Labs invented the solar cell in New Jersey in 1954, but today, 90 percent of solar panels are manufactured overseas. China's even produced a solar billionaire. General Motors made the first modern electric car, but today, Toyota and Honda lead the world in producing hybrids. Just last week, I saw this headline: 'Foreign Firms Envision Windfarms Dotting The U.S.'
    ...
    Why should foreign firms be the ones taking the lead in building windfarms here in America. Why is that not being done by American firms?
    ...
    If we take the steps that I propose, American entrepreneurs and manufacturers can lead the world in developing the green technology we need to generate clean, reliable energy and to use it more efficiently.

    (source:  Living on Earth)On How the Dem candidates should answer the question on energy independence posted 1 year, 11 months ago 6 Responses

  • 20 percent less than what???

    "reduce our nation's consumption of gasoline by 20 percent in 10 years"

    After the state of the union speech in which the "20 in 10" plan was announced, I remember hearing that it was not 20% below 2007 consumption levels, but 20% below the projected 2017 levels.  Is this correct?  I dug around whitehouse.gov and doe.gov for the answer but could not find anything describing the baseline in the "20 in 10" plan.  Anybody know of a document that pinpoints the baseline?  On President says he will sign energy bill posted 1 year, 11 months ago 20 Responses

  • Time for new strategy. Or new leaders

    It might be time for Sen. Reid to step down as Majority Leader.  His approach to breaking the record number of GOP filibusters is not working.  The Dems should force the GOP to actually filibuster -- it's not like the time wasted by endless GOP speeches during a filibuster would be better spent doing what they are doing now:  basically nothing (almost none of the budget resolutions have passed, the food and farm bill is months behind schedule, etc.).  

    Dan Froomkin's invaluable White House Watch in the Washington Post sums up the situation nicely:


    Historians looking back on the Bush presidency may well wonder if Congress actually existed.

    Time and time again, President Bush has run circles around what is, at least on paper, a co-equal branch of government. Sometimes he doesn't bother to ask Congress for its approval. Sometimes he demands it -- and gets it.

    Amazingly enough, that didn't change when the Democrats won control of the House and Senate. They just make a bit more fuss before rolling over.

    ...

    Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald surveys the morning's headlines and concludes that "all of this behavior by the Democrats is absolutely necessary. They have no choice. Otherwise, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News will attack them for being weak (as though there is some circumstance under which they wouldn't) and that would be terrible. Nothing exudes strength, courage, toughness and resolve like having your behavior continuously described -- accurately -- as 'bowing,' 'capitulating,' 'backing down,' 'caving' and 'surrendering.' Those are the verbs Americans love most when looking for the party to lead them."


    On Senate Republican minority blocks energy bill posted 1 year, 11 months ago 5 Responses
  • And on climate change...McCain

    In the latest GOP debate, McCain had an answer about climate change that I like a lot, that frames the response in terms of our kids' future:
    "Suppose that climate change is not real, and all we do adopt green technologies, which our economy and our technology is perfectly capable of. Then all we've done is given our kids a cleaner world. But suppose they are wrong. Suppose they are wrong, and climate change is real, and we've done nothing. What kind of a planet are we going to pass on to the next generation of Americans? It's real. We've got to address it. We can do it with technology, with cap-and- trade, with capitalist and free enterprise motivation. And I'm confident that we can pass on to our children and grandchildren a cleaner, better world."

    via The Carpetbagger ReportOn How the Dem candidates should answer the question on energy independence posted 1 year, 11 months ago 6 Responses

  • More about biodiesel

    In my comment above I wrote that biodiesel will probably not be recommended for the new 'clean' diesels.  But that might not true forever.  As the biodiesel industry matures, the quality and consistency is improving, so engine manufacturers might be more open to the use of biodiesel in their engines.  Furthermore, we can expect that the companies will be considering material compatibility with biodiesel during the design and validation process.

    One example is New Holland, which makes agricultural, utility and construction equipment.  A while ago they said that B5 (5% biodiesel, 95% petro-diesel) was acceptable.  Then they upped it to another level.  Last week they announced that B100 was acceptable for use in their engines.On High gas prices make hybrids look even better posted 1 year, 11 months ago 45 Responses

  • Manufacturing energy, and diesels

    Easterbunny wrote:  "Does anyone know what the carbon footprint of the manufacturing process is? Does it make a significant difference to the calculation?"

    The Union of Concerned Scientists' hybrid blog addressed this issue last year:  "A variety of reputable investigators have concluded that 85-90 percent of energy use and global warming emissions attributable to an average vehicle over its entire lifecycle come from operation. Only 10-15 percent is production and disposal. This is true for both hybrids and conventional vehicles."  The rest of the post goes through some calculations to determine how much fuel economy improvement your new car would need to make up for the energy required to manufacture it.  

    On the subject of diesel cars, you should look for the new generation of diesels.  Mercedes has at least one already, the VW Jetta will be released in mid- to late-2008, and later on we'll see other small diesels (including the Audi A4 and something from Honda).  The next generation will be almost as clean as gasoline cars -- they will have particulate filters to capture the soot and NOx removal catalysts for the NOx.  The cars will even be clean enough to sell in California.  But you probably won't be able to run much biodiesel (I'm guessing that the warranty will allow up to 5% biodiesel blended with regular diesel;  it could be zero, given the ultra-high precision injectors in the current diesels.)

    In contrast, a pre-2008 diesel is far dirtier than a gasoline car.  They emit toxic particulate matter at far higher rates; their NOx emissions are 10 to 40 times higher.  For example, the EPA Green Vehicle Guide gives the 2006 diesel Jetta a 1 for air pollution (10 is best), while the gasoline model gets a 6 or a 9 (not sure why there are different scores -- one is a California model?).  

    I agree with the comment directly above mine.  Buying a hybrid rewards good behavior and innovative thinking.  On High gas prices make hybrids look even better posted 1 year, 11 months ago 45 Responses

  • Some points

    GreenEngineer wrote: "Hopefully we can build on that next time around, although the five-year period between farm bills is going to make it hard to sustain those gains."

    I also hope that the awareness built during this year's farm bill debate will be around in 2012.  But we don't have to wait until then to be active.  Each year's agriculture appropriations bill offers a chance to affect food policy.  For example, Congress has the habit of promising big dollars for conservation in the farm bill, then not fulfilling that promise in the following years.  We'll need to remind Congress each year that they need to fully fund the conservation programs (and other non-mandatory programs).  There is also lots of work to do at the state and local level (like that preposterous ban on labels about antibiotics and growth hormones in Pennsylvania).

    To Jason's point about farmers producing things that people want, a few weeks ago the SF Chronicle had a front page story about the lack of subsidies in California has allowed the farmers to be daring and demand-driven:  


    They operate on a simple concept that mystifies Washington.

    "The first mistake a lot of farmers make is to figure out what they can grow and grow that," said Jim Cochran, an organic strawberry and vegetable grower on the coast north of Santa Cruz. "Which is a really big mistake. The first thing they need to figure out is what they can sell."

    In fact, if California vegetable farmers got crop subsidies, we might all still be eating iceberg lettuce, said Daniel Sumner, an agricultural economist at UC Davis. Crop subsidies discourage the innovation that is evident everywhere in California.

    Imagine, Sumner said, what today's produce aisles might look like had Congress decided to subsidize salad in 1933.

    "The payments are made for iceberg, and you think the market's going to demand romaine," he said. "You say, 'But I have to give up my payments to do that.' You can picture the scenarios."

    In the San Joaquin Valley, farmers are planting tens of thousands of acres of almonds because prices are high. In Georgia, the market is calling for pecans, but Congress subsidizes peanuts - regardless of the market.

    But if you have a barn full of specialized equipment and lots of debt on that equipment, it can be difficult to switch crops or diversify.  Perhaps more government fund should be directed towards allowing farmers to transition to crops that local people want to buy, like vegetables in Iowa, or pastured chickens in Illinois, or pecans in Georgia.

    --- meander

    On A response to my critics posted 2 years ago 11 Responses
  • Health care vs. innovation

    One of the reasons the U.S. auto companies can't afford to innovate is the staggering sums of money they devote to health care for their workers and retirees.  I recall hearing that they spend more on health care than steel.  When are they going to start fighting hard for a national health care system that will help car companies focus on making cars instead of managing health care costs?On Big Auto unveils efficient cars, continues to fight against strict efficiency standards posted 2 years ago 7 Responses

  • Returning credibility to science

    How will you repair the damage that the Bush administration has done to the federal government's scientific agencies?  

    --- meander

    On Leave suggestions in comments posted 2 years ago 35 Responses
  • Why not more organic farmers?

    GreenEngineer asked why we don't have more organic farmers.  An article in Rodale's The New Farm explains some of the reasons in detail. One is that it takes three years to transition to organic, during which time the farmer's produce is in a twilight zone that many retailers or consumers can't handle:  more expensive than conventional but not certified organic.  Another is that they don't know how to make the transition and don't know how to get the proper training.  Most of the university extension programs are aimed at conventional ag, and there aren't many organic farming technical support out there (unlike the huge pesticide and fertilizer sales force).

    More on this topic, and how the Food and Farm Bill could make a difference at The Ethicurean

    --- meander

    On Another study shows organic ag outpacing conventional posted 2 years ago 16 Responses
  • Cary on

    Whiskeytown alum Caitlin Cary teamed up with Thad Cockrell to make the mostly great Begonias a few years ago.  Their songs have old school country instrumentation with classical country lyrics about heartbreak and bad luck.  The album page at Yeproc Records has a sample track to stream, and I'm pretty sure that one of the album tracks can be legally downloaded from somewhere on the web (I can't remember where).

    --- meander

    On Have an alt country weekend posted 2 years, 1 month ago 4 Responses
  • The fence and human lives

    One of the purposes of the fence is to make the journey harder for migrants by pushing them deeper into the desert.  The theory is that fewer will try.  The reality will be that more will die.  

    A fence does nothing to fix the tremendous economic problems in Mexico.  It does nothing to stop the big meat packers from hiring undocumented immigrants. It's all a big show to make the xenophobic wing of the GOP happy, and also a chance to waive some laws.

    How long before we hear that drilling in ANWR is a matter of national security, and therefore the national wildlife refuge act can be waived?

    --- meander

    On HSA waives environmental and social laws to keep the Mexicans out posted 2 years, 1 month ago 5 Responses
  • No new taxes pledges

    Unfortunately for those who hope for a more stable future, it is almost a requirement for Republican candidates to sign "no new taxes" pledges during their campaigns.  This short-sighted rigidity is already showing up in failing infrastructure (falling bridges, urban sinkholes, leaking water systems) and deferred maintenance.  In California we have been getting around the no new taxes requirement of the state GOP by selling bonds, conveniently forgetting that someday they will need to be paid off (with interest).

    --- meander

    On Investments are needed to stave off climate-induced water crisis posted 2 years, 1 month ago 13 Responses
  • My worst headline

    The headline in the Oakland Tribune (California) was "Presidential Prospects Warming?" in large letters and "Gore, IPCC win Nobel Peace Prize" in much smaller letters below the big headline.  

    --- meander

    On NY Times editors get the Gore Nobel story right posted 2 years, 1 month ago 3 Responses
  • Not exactly guilt free

    Guilt free is going a bit too far, as these fizz systems have CO2 cartridges which require energy to produce, ship and refill or recycle.  I doubt that there has been a life-cycle comparison because of the low volumes produced.

    For a home consumer who consumes sparkling when they throw parties, the energy balance may be favorable to buying bottles, since there is the issue of buying a specialized fizz machine that will be used sporadically (plus the cartridges).  For a restaurant, however, where they are serving many liters of sparkling water each night, the economies of scale probably make the machines a great deal energy-wise.  

    --- meander

    On Want environmentally conscious effervescence? DIY posted 2 years, 1 month ago 3 Responses
  • How much of China's CO2 is for export products?

    I've been wondering what fraction of China's greenhouse gas emissions is from manufacture of products for export.  Much of the electronics, clothing and other consumer goods made in China would not be produced within their borders if no one was buying them---or if companies based in the U.S., Japan and E.U. weren't making the decision to open plants in China.  Some of the CO2 emitted in making a laptop, for example, should be assigned to the country or countries that hosts the company that picked China as the manufacturing site and the consumer who bought the laptop.  Has anyone done this type of greenhouse gas accounting?

    --- meander

    On China's foreign minister talks climate and development posted 2 years, 2 months ago 1 Response
  • It's even worse...

    Bravo to Eilperin and Mufson for straightening the spin, but the situation is even worse when it comes to energy efficiency, as blogged by David Roberts back in March at this site:  


    The nonpartisan U.S. Government Accountability Office recently issue a blistering report on the Department of Energy's delinquent treatment of energy efficiency standards. Despite a mandate from Congress, DOE has missed all 34 deadlines for issues standards covering everything from consumer products to power transformers. Only 11 sets of standards have been completed; 23 remain unfinished.

    Even the things the Bush administration is taking credit for have been obstructed or mismanaged.

    --- meander, a.k.a., Mental Masala at Ethicurean

    On Unusually straightforward journalistic fact-checking at the Post posted 2 years, 2 months ago 1 Response
  • So much to say

    A few observations and one fact check in a very long comment:

    Sen. Lugar (R-IN) is currently one of the main proponents big changes to farm subsidy programs (the "FARM 21" plan), and so Connor's history with Lugar is raising eyebrows in Congress.  I would guess that his time at the Corn Refiners' Association has changed his mind about subsidies, and that for the most part he likes the system just fine.  An article in the Hill points out that Connor is in favor of stricter income caps than Congress wants. That's probably OK with the corn industry because my recollection is that most of the wealthy recipients of subsidies are growing rice and cotton, not corn.  The Hill article:


    Although Connor is well-respected on the Hill, some lobbyists see his advocacy for limiting subsidy payments as a potential problem. The administration proposed that those with incomes above $200,000 should not be able to receive farm subsidies, a policy that would affect cotton and rice farmers in the South more than other producers. The current limit is $2.5 million.

    In February, Connor defended the proposal in an interview with The Associated Press. "I don't know if there is anywhere in the country you can go where $200,000 adjusted gross net income is not a lot of income," he said.

    [...]

    Previewing potential campaign arguments, Johanns came under criticism from some farm-state lawmakers on Wednesday when news of his imminent resignation floated. Conrad said should stay with USDA until work on the farm bill is completed.

    Some lobbyists, however, said privately that Johanns's absence would make little difference in the outcome of the farm bill.

    Via FarmPolicy.com, the Des Moines Register has an article indicating that many of those hopes about ethanol being a savior for small rural communities and small farmers are probably going to be ill-advised:

    Early signs of a shakeout are rumbling through the ethanol industry, which will lead to more plants being owned by fewer and bigger investors, a leading biofuels venture capitalist said Thursday.

    I don't know where you got the statistic for this, but it seem wrong to me, about seven times too high:  "Today, HFCS is the dominant sweetener in the U.S.; 42 percent of the corn grown here goes into making it."  Table 31 of the USDA Feed Grains Database Yearbook lists the quantity of corn used in HFCS manufacturing as about 525 million bushels per year between 2001 and 2005.  Production is generally about 10,000 million bushels per year, and domestic use between 8,000 and 9,000 million bushels per year.  

    In 2006, the big users of corn were "Feed and residual use" at about 60% of domestic usage and "Fuel alcohol" (i.e., ethanol) at 22% of domestic usage (up from 9% in 2001).  HFCS is only about 6% of domestic usage.

    --- meander, a.k.a., Mental Masala at Ethicurean

    On USDA secretary resigns; industrial-corn man takes charge posted 2 years, 2 months ago 6 Responses
  • Recipe error

    The recipe looks delicious.  But I think this line in the recipe has a typo:  "In another bowl, whisk egg yolks until they hold stiff peaks."

    I'm guessing that you mean "whisk egg whites until they hold stiff peaks", as it is rather uncommon to whisk whites with a large quantity of honey.

    --- meander, a.k.a., Mental Masala at Ethicurean

    On How to stick it to the ice-cream Man posted 2 years, 3 months ago 22 Responses
  • Coops!

    I have been seeing Cooper's Hawks near my office and house in the San Francisco Area (East Bay!).  The office sighting was all to brief as I passed by.  The house sighting was quite a bit more interesting.  A hawk was circling in the sky above my neighborhood, vocalizing as it soared.  Then I heard some other bird sounds, the chirps of agitated Anna's hummingbirds.  I could see them making bold dives into the hawk, trying to drive it away from their turf.  Again and again the two hummers lunged at the hawk until it got annoyed enough to soar to another area.

    --- meander, a.k.a., Mental Masala at Ethicurean

    On What are you seeing out there? posted 2 years, 4 months ago 47 Responses
  • Send Jack to FNC

    How about if Jack Bauer pays a visit to the Fox News Channel (more accurately called the Fox Opinion Channel) and politely requests that they cover climate change issues fairly, instead of being a mouthpiece for the GOP and corporate interests?  As long as Fox News keeps broadcasting deception about climate change, a few biodiesel-fueled generators on a Fox TV project are just greenwashing.

    Some examples over at Robert Greenwald's Fox Attacks project.

    --- meander, a.k.a., Mental Masala at Ethicurean

    On The TV show 24 will reduce its carbon footprint posted 2 years, 4 months ago 4 Responses
  • Cost calculations

    The post states that "My friend sent a link to a recipe for homemade laundry detergent, which costs about $2 per batch, or less than 6 cents a load."

    I have been using that homemade laundry detergent for a few months with great success.  I calculate a cost per batch of $2.33, for a cost per load of between 10 and 20 cents (depending on how many scoops you use).  But there was an initial investment of about $12 because I couldn't find buy Borax or laundry soap by the cup (they come in 3 pound boxes).  

    --- meander, a.k.a., Mental Masala at Ethicurean

    On Can a mother survive without antibacterial wipes? posted 2 years, 5 months ago 13 Responses
  • Visibility and complexity

    As someone who had a little bit of involvement in the Petrini hubbub, here are some of my thoughts on Tom's post and the resulting comments.  

    The farmers who receive the bulk of the subsidies are more or less invisible to those who live on the coasts, and even many in the middle states.  Corn, soybeans and cotton don't appear in stores in their original form -- they are processed into products like soft drinks, oil or clothing and sold under different brand names.  You can't go the to store and buy "George Naylor corn-fed beef.".  The farmers at the SF Ferry Plaza Farmers Market, on the other hand, are people we see every week.  We know their products, know their histories, and have connected with the real people behind the food.  And so it was a lot easier to get riled up when the "known" farmers were slighted.

    Another factor is that farm subsidies are hard to understand. Petrini criticizing a farmer for being a slacker is far easier to comprehend than Cook's statistical analysis and discussion of pass through vs. direct payments.

    I agree with some of the commenters that Ken Cook and EWG are going after the system, not the farmers, i.e., not aiming for a complete destruction of subsidies, but a reform so that farm subsidies go to those who need the assistance or risk protection.  That's why payment limits are a repeated request from EWG and others.  Do we really want individual farmers (or their convoluted paper setups) to be receiving $1 million in subsidies?  Do we want our national policy to reward such large operations?  Or should payments reward how the farmer treats the land, animals, and workers?

    My sense is that many subsidy receiving farmers are trapped in a system that they didn't design, one that has been corrupted by industries like ADM and Swift. Perhaps another piece for the reform puzzle is a voluntary buyout program, in which farmers can choose to have their specialized equipment purchased and their debt on that equipment restructured (or retired) so they can try a different type of farming, like grass-fed beef or pastured pork, or fruit orchards, or specialty vegetables.  On Don't blame farmers for the farm-subsidy mess posted 2 years, 5 months ago 21 Responses

  • Previous preemptions

    One example that I am sure about is privacy protection for consumers.  California (led by State legislator Shelia Kuhl, I think) passed strong protections against privacy theft by banks.  The legislation would have required all mailing lists and information sharing to be "opt in" instead of "opt out," for example.  The GOP Congress responded by disallowing states from passing their own privacy regulations.

    There might have been state credit card regulations that have also been preempted, perhaps regulations limiting interest rates to something like 20% per year (which is far too low for credit card companies).
    On Threatening local control in our food system posted 2 years, 5 months ago 7 Responses

  • Meanwhile, they go after CAFE

    Green Car Congress writes about the auto industry's efforts--by themselves and through Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM)--to prevent any CAFE increases.  Green Car Congress:


    Beginning this Memorial Day weekend, members of the auto industry are rolling out a comprehensive campaign to convince Americans to oppose proposed increases in the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, and to pressure their elected officials to vote down such proposals.

    The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM) has launched a website (www.drivecongress.com) that encourages citizens to compose messages of protest against "unrealistic fuel economy increases" to be hand-delivered to elected officials. AAM represents BMW, DaimlerChrysler, General Motors, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota and Volkswagen.

    The website allows users to insert statements provided by the AAM, such as "I value fuel economy, but I also want many other attributes in my automobile like safety, passenger and cargo room, performance, towing, hauling capacity and more" or "Rather than setting a harmful mandates [sic] like the one being proposed, the government should encourage the use of alternative fuels like ethanol, and provide incentives for consumers, like me, to purchase alternative fuel autos."

    The Detroit News reports that the campaign will also include at least a million dollars of radio ads in ten states that have a high percentage of truck and SUV owners.

    The whole post is worth reading to see what Big Auto is up to and what they say about CAFE (one item: it "stifles innovation").On Can Hemp Dashboards Be Far Behind? posted 2 years, 6 months ago 1 Response

  • Could $70 billion reduce gasoline use by 10%?

    Over at the Blog for Rural America, Dan Owens makes an interesting wager:  "I bet that we could conserve 10 percent of gasoline consumption for a lot less than 70 billion dollars."   Could we?  How much would a 10% increase in fuel efficiency cost?  

    GreyFlcn:  the Institute for Transportation Studies at UC Davis has a lot of life-cycle analysis of just about every practical transportation fuel.  Dr. Mark Delucchi is one of those working on the project, and has links to numerous reports.On Hint: We're talking about Congress here posted 2 years, 6 months ago 17 Responses

  • Problems with long term thinking

    (My Gristmill user name is meander, but I go by Mental Masala at Ethicurean.)  

    Thanks for the link and coverage of this important issue.

    A small bit of irony in Schwarzenegger's budget plan is that he has been one of the biggest boosters of the "California Grown" marketing project. He will have a hard time promoting California agriculture when visiting Japan or Europe if it is paved over. But then again, that's a problem for the future to tackle.  We can just keep up with the status quo of paving over farmland, right?  We'll just buy our vegetables from China or Argentina.

    The inability of humans to recognize dire consequences of today's urban planning  decisions reminds me somewhat of the inability to realize that today's energy and transportation policies could have severe consequences in 10 or 20 years (i.e., climate change).

    A May 19, 2006 article in USA Today called California city [Bakersfield] to expand boundaries illustrated this to some extent:


    At a time when many areas of the country are trying to contain sprawl, the City Council won approval this year to expand an area chosen for development outside city limits that could nearly double Bakersfield's size in the years ahead.

    [...]

    Mayor Harvey Hall says Bakersfield has little appetite for higher-density developments and other urban design trends. "I certainly respect the interests of the smart-growth people," Hall says. "But as the mayor, I support prosperity. You just can't stop growth."

    If traditional growth patterns persist -- opposition to large-lot, cookie-cutter sprawl has been muted but is on the rise -- it will mean further loss of some of the world's most productive farmland. Bakersfield sits at the southern end of the flat, fertile Central Valley, a 400-mile-long food machine that provides much of the nation's fruit and vegetables.

    [...]

    Farmland is being urbanized across the valley, but nowhere as fast as here: 70,000 acres in 1988-2002, more than 7,000 acres in 2002-04, the state conservation department's most recent reporting period.

    Last year, the department warned Bakersfield that it was illegally expanding in protected farmland. "They're as sprawl as sprawl can get," says Edward Thompson, American Farmland Trust's California director.


    On Schwarzenegger to California farmers: Considuh this a divorce posted 2 years, 6 months ago 4 Responses
  • And the surprises keep coming

    Via Accidental Hedonist, the House Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry approved the following Federal pre-emption language for their part of the Food and Farm Bill:

    "no State or locality shall make any law prohibiting the use in commerce of an article that the Secretary of Agriculture has inspected and passed; or determined to be of non-regulated status."

    Clearly an attempt to ban states, counties and cities from forbidding GMOs, cloned dairy cows, and other such risky (but profitable) practices.On Democracy in jeopardy posted 2 years, 6 months ago 3 Responses

  • Writing to Congress

    Building on what Steph Larsen wrote above:  

    When I receive letters back from Senator Boxer, she includes a postscript saying that letters sent to the Senate and House office buildings are delayed for a long period of time for security screening, but letters to the district offices will be read by staff almost immediately.  The webpages for members of Congress will show the addresses of one or more district offices.On Now is the time to harangue your reps about farm and food policy. posted 2 years, 6 months ago 7 Responses

  • Will Pelosi allow amendments?

    Steph wrote "With the current level of public pressure to make major adjustments to the way farmers are paid and food is grown, I wouldn't be completely surprised if there were one or more viable challenges to the Agriculture Committee's proposal on the floor this time around."

    There are enough interest groups lining up so that a "floor fight" could break out.  But will the House leadership allow one?  In the House, the Rules Committee (and leadership) will decide how many amendments will be allowed for the Ag Committee's offering.  If this number is very low, there won't be much of a floor fight.  After the shameful and near tyrannical reign of the Republicans in recent years -- in which bills were provided to members just hours before the vote, amendments were not allowed, and the minority party shut out of the conference process -- the Dems are probably going to have to allow some amendments to be offered to show their openness to debate.  At the Mulch blog, Ken Cook of the Environmental Working Group wondered if Pelosi has already assured Peterson that his bill will make it to a vote without amendment.

    Those who live in districts with members of Congress who are not on the Agriculture Committees, tell your lawmakers to not trade his or her vote away without serious concessions.  Residents of Speaker Pelosi's district (San Francisco), include something in your Farm Bill letter asking for a real debate with amendments when it comes to the floor of the House.

    Check if your members of Congress are on the Ag Committee:  House Ag Committee members, Senate Ag Committee members
    On Now is the time to harangue your reps about farm and food policy. posted 2 years, 6 months ago 7 Responses

  • 20% lower than what?

    Wasn't one of the unreported loopholes in Bush's 20 in 10 plan that the goal was to be 20% below the expected 2017 consumption rate?  That's a lot easier than 20% below today's consumption rate.On Not exactly posted 2 years, 6 months ago 8 Responses

  • Speaking of "marker bills"

    Via the NYC Farm Bill Workgroup, I discovered a handy Action Guide at Om Organics which includes a timeline for the Food and Farm Bill and explanation of "marker bills."On Reps. DeLauro and Gilchrest want to invest in local infrastructure. posted 2 years, 6 months ago 13 Responses

  • Changing attitudes in Iowa

    The concentration of the animal raising industry is also having negative impacts on attitudes towards agriculture in general.  The Dept. of Economics page at Iowa State has a report called Iowa's Changing Swine Industry which says this about Iowans' changing attitudes about hog raising:

    Pigs once viewed positively across Iowa may now be viewed negatively. Pigs in rural Iowa were once called 'mortgage lifters' and pig manure odor was the 'smell of money.' But in 2004, the ISU Rural Life Poll found that when rural Iowa residents were asked their preferences about rural development activity, hog confinements ranked below prisons, solid waste landfills, slaughter plants, and sewage treatment plants as desirable rural development.

    On How food processing got into the hands of a few giant companies posted 2 years, 7 months ago 16 Responses
  • the bad kind of blue water

    Another reason to think about your jeans purchase is the environmental damage of the dyes and chemicals used for weathering and etc.

    The September 26, 2006 edition of Living on Earth had a segment called "Blue Jeans, Blue Water" that visited Tehuacán, Mexico, an area that is famous for its mineral water.  Blue jeans factories have led to blue streams and rivers.  Download an MP3 or read the transcript here.On On the latest eco-conscious denim trends and events posted 2 years, 7 months ago 2 Responses

  • The FDA docket page

    If you want to read the petition to see the full proposal, visit FDA Docket 2007P-0085.  

    How often are citizen's petitions like this approved by FDA?  Can they approve parts of it and reject other parts?  On ADM gets its filthy paws on an immaculate confection posted 2 years, 7 months ago 23 Responses

  • Lovins loves it

    Amory Lovins has been talking about "feebates" for years as an efficient way to incentivize purchases of high MPG cars.  But this bill is far too slow to get moving.  The article says, "The bill would apply to new cars, pickups, minivans and sport-utility vehicles, starting with 2011 models."   Why does it take 3+ years to calculate a feebate structure?  Just pick the mean MPG, do some calculations of recent sales of each model, and assign the values.  It could be ready for the 2008 models. On Fuel-efficient vehicles could save you several times over posted 2 years, 7 months ago 9 Responses

  • Hearing in Congress on Political Interference

    From the Washington Post Today in Congress page, for March 19, 2007:

    House Oversight and Government Reform (10 a.m.): Holds a hearing on "Allegations of Political Interference with the Work of Government Climate Change Scientists. (PART TWO)" Philip Cooney, former chief of staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality; James Hansen, director of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; George Deutsch, former public affairs officer for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; James Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality; and Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, testify. 2154 Rayburn.

    It's nice to have Rep. Waxman in charge of the oversight committee doing some real oversight.

    Here is part 1 of the series.On Debunking the 'water vapor' nonsense posted 2 years, 8 months ago 35 Responses

  • Dissenting on Lord Krishna

    Some great suggestions above -- especially the huge book by Deborah Madison (for a great whole grain bread, try the sunflower seed bread on page 666) -- and Robert Delfs' comment is a tour de force.  

    I may be in the minority here in that I don't like Lord Krishna's cuisine.  Something about it bothers me.  My recommendations for Indian cookbooks are Julie Sahni's Classic Indian Vegetarian and Grain Cooking (covers all of India) and Chandra Padmanabhan's Dakshin (South India only). For Thai cooking, I have had great results using Thai Vegetarian Cooking by Vatcharin Bhumichitr.On Seriously, isn't it just gross? posted 2 years, 8 months ago 44 Responses

  • Pollan's responses

    A ton of hype is surrounding the Pollan-Mackey meeting.  The first venue it was scheduled for sold out in a few hours, and so it was moved to a place that is 3 or 4 times bigger.  It will be attended by quite a few bloggers, so there should be some varied commentary over the next few days.  

    Pollan's letters in response to Mackey's posts are on the Pollan website (letter 1, letter 2).
    On Michael Pollan and Whole Foods guy go head to head posted 2 years, 9 months ago 3 Responses

  • Living on Earth Segment

    The frequently great Living on Earth had a segment about an MIT report on geothermal resources in the U.S.  Read the transcript, stream or download here.

    Too bad Halliburton or Exxon-Mobil doesn't have a geothermal division -- there would be plenty of resources if they did.On It don't make no sense posted 2 years, 9 months ago 21 Responses

  • Why now?

    This is a troubling executive order, but one that raises a lot of questions for me:  

    Why didn't this happen the day after Bush's 2001 inauguration?  

    Do the anti-regulation people who pushed this realize that a Democratic administration could use the tools to go overboard in the direction of regulation?    President Hillary Clinton, anyone? (same goes with the massive grab of executive power to torture and incarcerate indefinitely without charges or a trial)

    Can't the next president repeal the executive order on inauguration day?

    How does this fit into the Clean Air Act, for example, which requires standards to be set to protect human health, not to meet a cost-benefit ratio?On Now it's regulatory posted 2 years, 10 months ago 2 Responses

  • Pollan's pieces

    Bart Anderson wrote:  "That's a dynamite essay by Michael Pollan. In case it disappears behind a paywall, look to another posting at the International Herald Tribune."

    Pollan also archives many of his pieces at his own website, thus preventing paywalls from hiding them.On Why the vegetarian critique of meat-eating should make meat-eaters squirm posted 2 years, 10 months ago 103 Responses

  • What's up with Wes Jackson

    Perhaps Grist or Gristmill could look in on Wes Jackson at the Land Institute in Kansas and give us an update on their work.  I remember being inspired 15 years ago by Wes Jackson's vision of food harvested from perennial prairie grasses.  The idea was compelling:  food (and probably now fuel) comes from nitrogen-fixing perennial plants grown using no-till agriculture.  On Let's put bison back on the praries posted 2 years, 10 months ago 26 Responses

  • Ethanol or meat?

    American consumers haven't yet experienced one of the side-effects of ethanol:  higher food prices, especially for meat and dairy (and possibly soft drinks).  

    Keith Good's farm policy e-mail newsletter (sign up at farmpolicy.com) had this tidbit yesterday:


    Mary Lu Carnevale, writing yesterday at The Washington Wire Blog (Wall Street Journal) noted that, "President Bush's plan to power up ethanol production is raising red flags among the nation's poultry and meat producers. They worry that rapidly rising ethanol production will further push up prices for corn, the main animal feed grain.

    "'We estimate that ethanol demand has already increased the price of chicken by six cents per pound wholesale,' said the National Chicken Council's chief economist William P. Roenigk. 'If government continues to push corn out of livestock and poultry feed and into the energy supply, the cost of producing food will only increase.'"


    On Once subsidies and tariffs are removed, watch out posted 2 years, 10 months ago 7 Responses
  • Go back a few years...

    I don't have the number on hand, but I know that California's AB32 Climate Change law takes the carbon inventory from at least 5 years ago, or maybe even 10 years ago to prevent "under the wire" strategies.  On Oh snap! posted 2 years, 10 months ago 6 Responses

  • Don't sit by the phone

    "I think my reasonableness bored him."  

    Don't expect to be invited back...On Fun posted 2 years, 10 months ago 19 Responses

  • How many bills go anywhere?

    That's great that Markey (D-MA) and Ramstad (R-MN) introduced a bill to protect ANWR.  But a lot of bills are introduced, some of which are purely symbolic, some of which are bottled up by the leadership, and a few get a vote.  How many introduced bills actually make it to a floor vote?  

    Perhaps Markey needs to use some of the GOPs dirty tricks to get the ANWR protection through the Congress.  Like attaching it to the Iraq debacle emergency funding resolution.  Or to a DoD funding bill.  Or some other "must pass" piece of legislation.  The hypocritical howls of "that's not fair" from the GOP might cause some permanent hearing damage in Congress and the press room, however.  On What is this 'good news' you speak of? posted 2 years, 10 months ago 10 Responses

  • Not all subsidies, but the current ones

    I don't see that ag subsidies are inherently evil, but only that many of the current U.S. subsidy programs -- which reward huge industrial monocrop operations, act to increase commodity production, and degrade the environment.  The process by which subsidy programs are created and maintained is also suspect.  Take, for example, the Conservation programs, which have many more applicants than dollars, and which are always the first to be cut when the Farm Bill fund is short.

    Ag subsidies could do great things for the environment and small farmers.  Would a subsidy program that provided direct payments to farmers for converting from conventional methods to organic methods be acceptable?  Or one that promoted multi-cropping?  Or one that paid farmers to stop using GMO seeds and start using heirloom varieties?  Or one that paid farmers to grow vegetables and fruit for local schools, instead of GMO corn for ADM and Cargill?On Just in case you need another reason to oppose ag subsidies posted 2 years, 11 months ago 5 Responses

  • Bright spots?

    One very tiny bright spot that could come from the ravenous demand for corn might be a lessening of pressure on Mexico and other corn-growing countries.  As documented numerous times (by Michael Pollan here), Mexican farmers are being devastated by cheap U.S. corn imports.  

    Another potential bright spot might be a reduction in consumption of HFCS sweetened soft drinks, and thus reduction in the health effects of overconsumption.  I haven't seen any data on the demand elasticity for chicken vs. cola, but would bet that Americans would sooner give up cola than chicken.    
    On An interview with Missouri farmer and ethanol co-op member Brian Miles posted 2 years, 11 months ago 3 Responses

  • Bright spots?

    One very tiny bright spot that could come from the ravenous demand for corn might be a lessening of pressure on Mexico and other corn-growing countries.  As documented numerous times (by Michael Pollan here), Mexican farmers are being devastated by cheap U.S. corn imports.  

    Another potential bright spot might be a reduction in consumption of HFCS sweetened soft drinks, and thus reduction in the health effects of overconsumption.  I haven't seen any data on the demand elasticity for chicken vs. cola, but would bet that Americans would sooner give up cola than chicken.    
    On Check out the latest entries in the celeb-biofuels biz posted 2 years, 11 months ago 3 Responses

  • Bright spots?

    One very tiny bright spot that could come from the ravenous demand for corn might be a lessening of pressure on Mexico and other corn-growing countries.  As documented numerous times (by Michael Pollan here), Mexican farmers are being devastated by cheap U.S. corn imports.  

    Another potential bright spot might be a reduction in consumption of HFCS sweetened soft drinks, and thus reduction in the health effects of overconsumption.  I haven't seen any data on the demand elasticity for chicken vs. cola, but would bet that Americans would sooner give up cola than chicken.    
    On Can U.S. corn farmers fill both bellies and tanks? posted 2 years, 11 months ago 3 Responses

  • Bright spots?

    One very tiny bright spot that could come from the ravenous demand for corn might be a lessening of pressure on Mexico and other corn-growing countries.  As documented numerous times (by Michael Pollan here), Mexican farmers are being devastated by cheap U.S. corn imports.  

    Another potential bright spot might be a reduction in consumption of HFCS sweetened soft drinks, and thus reduction in the health effects of overconsumption.  I haven't seen any data on the demand elasticity for chicken vs. cola, but would bet that Americans would sooner give up cola than chicken.    
    On It's time for a real "food vs. fuel" debate posted 2 years, 11 months ago 3 Responses

  • And meanwhile, in the Executive Branch

    The SF Chron reports (via the AP wire) that Bush May End Drilling Ban In Alaskan Bay. The Bay in question is Bristol Bay, home of one of the world's great salmon runs.


    The Minerals Management Service said accidental spills could foul coastal water quality, and the noise and pollution from more ship traffic could disturb or kill seagoing creatures. It said even a large spill probably would harm only a small portion of the fish populations, but could pose a serious threat to marine mammals.

    The Bering Sea Fishermen's Association raised alarms about protecting the region, as did the Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association, which said the drilling would threaten the salmon runs.

    On Friday, more than 30 people representing fishermen, native Alaskans and conservationists wrote Bush urging him not to lift the ban.

    Here is the WWF's press release on the subject.On 'Govern', that is posted 2 years, 12 months ago 5 Responses

  • Or they'll sell out

    If the labor shortage goes on for too long, the farmer might decide to give in to the developers who want to convert their farmland into tract housing.  This might not be a big deal in Yuma County, but in the Central Valley of California, the development pressures are intense around Bakersfield, Fresno and Sacramento.On Winter veggies served with a labor shortage and a side of rocket fuel posted 3 years ago 18 Responses

  • More Inhofe

    Reuters reports:

    The U.S. Senate's most vocal global warming skeptic, James Inhofe, on Thursday dismissed a U.N. meeting on climate change as "a brainwashing session."

    via TPM MuckrakerOn Inhofe on the U.N. climate summit posted 3 years ago 1 Response

  • Iowa in the Chairman's seat

    I just read that Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa is the probable chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee.  That's bad news for any farmer who is not growing commodity grain crops (and probably also for farmers who are growing commodity grain crops, as the system tends to keep tilting ever more in favor of big corporations).On Early indication: Agribiz still rules the Hill posted 3 years ago 1 Response

  • India and Insects

    India is in the midst of a drought of such severity that the export of lentils (dal) has been banned until further notice.  Here is my blog post about it from August, with some links to news reports.

    Insects might have to become a more important diet in the future, either as a primary food or as an input to fish farming (as pointed out by caniscandida above).  Most of the world has no problem with insect eating;  Europe, the U.S., Canada, and Japan seem to be the largest exceptions.  From a rational point of view, if the insects come from a clean source, there is nothing dangerous or "dirty" about eating certain kinds of insects.  In fact, they are highly nutritious, and (so I read) delicious. Attitudes in Europe and America about eating insects derive from societal reactions to the varieties of food and the natural landscapes of Europe and North America (excluding parts of Mexico), according to anthropologist Marvin Harris.  I cover the topic here in more detail, and include links to insects as food web sites. On Go veggie -- a poll posted 3 years ago 41 Responses

  • A more welcoming movement?

    To me, it looks like the sustainable food movement is more welcoming than previous food movements in the U.S. (like haute cuisine).  The feature items of sustainable food, like locally-grown vegetables and grass-fed beef, are available at markets that are open to the public and well advertised, not hidden behind secret doors in a private club or in exclusive restaurants.

    In addition, the movement is more about ingredients than technique.  Look at the menu at Chez Panisse, for example, a restaurant on the front line of sustainable dining.:   simple preparations of extremely high quality ingredients.  Dishes you could imagine producing at home, like salads, steaks, mashed potatoes, fruit compotes.  

    On the subject of sugar:  also of importance in the sugar trade was the conversion of the raw material (cane) or the by-product (molasses) into rum.  Rum had the advantage of a high value to weight ratio, and was a key currency in the slave trade.  The story is told, among other places, in A History of the World in Six Glasses, by Tom Standage.On Why everyone should be allowed to love food with unrestrained glee posted 3 years ago 3 Responses

  • 53-47! Amazing!

    When I gave up on refreshing the election results, I was half expecting a narrow Pombo victory.  At that time, the largest, most Pombo-esque county (San Joaquin) was only 25% counted, and was polling 52-48 for Pombo.  Thus, it was a jaw-dropping surprise this morning to see the 53-47 victory for McNerney.  I hope Pelosi has the wisdom to put him on energy and environment committees.  Maybe she could give him Pombo's old office as a symbolic gesture! (the rules of seniority probably wouldn't allow a first termer to take the office of a 10+ year member of Congress)

    Re:  caniscandida's question about the California map.  I also noticed a white area last night south of San Francisco.  I think it was Monterey County, and probably because their results were coming in too slowly.  San Joaquin is east of SF.  To find it, skip the first set of counties on the eastern SF bayshore (Contra Costa, Alameda), and it is the next one over.  On McNerney up on Pombo posted 3 years ago 5 Responses

  • California Secretary of State site

    Here's the official Secretary of State site for the Pombo-McNerney race, including County by County results (unfortunately San Joaquin, the Pombo stronghold, is slowest to report).

    And the California Propositions Page.  90 ("takings") is falling behind, with a lot of LA County still to be counted.  Check out the cool results map too (keep in mind that LA County has a population greater than most of the green swath down the middle of the state).On McNerney up on Pombo posted 3 years ago 5 Responses

  • Pombo and corruption

    Early exit polling showing that corruption was an important factor in voter's minds is a very good sign:

    The Associated Press has just posted a piece on its exit polls, and just like CNN's exit polls found, AP is finding that corruption is a key issue driving voters today. AP's exit numbers are also finding a surprisingly high number of evangelicals going Dem

    From TPM Election Central (which also has an excellent election results table)On Enviros turn eco ear to House races posted 3 years ago 1 Response
  • Regulatory Re-takings

    Here's a hypothetical:  suppose that I live in a state with one of these "destroy all regulations" laws, and my neighbor proposes to convert his house into a rendering plant for road kill (assume for the moment that the revenue from the plant would more than make up for any loss in his property value).  Normally, zoning and public health laws would prevent such conversions, but since passage of the destroy all regulations law, the city is forced to waive the zoning and other laws to avoid a costly financial settlement.  And so the plant is built, stinking up the neighborhood and overrunning it with reeking trucks.  This would probably have negative impact on the value of my house.  Would this loss be considered a "taking"?  Would I be entitled to financial compensation?  
    On Why only takings? posted 3 years ago 6 Responses

  • Does anyone really know?

    Another disturbing commentary about war costs is War cost reports said to be incomplete, understated by Winslow Wheeler, Director, Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information.  The dollar figures are disturbing on one level, but the description of the Pentagon's accounting systems---which seem to make Enron look like a model of honesty---is truly revolting.  


    DOD's accounting methods continue to be problematic. The $7.1 billion that CRS reported earlier it could "not track" continues to go untracked. It appears that CRS found another $4 billion that it could "not track" (see page 8) [commenter's note:  the page numbers refer to a Congressional Research Service report linked to in the commentary]. Furthermore, DOD's reports on war costs are incomplete and "understate expenses by over $20 billion because DOD's financial system for tracking war costs has excluded certain types of expenses" (see page 32).
    [...]
    DOD also refuses to provide any comprehensive estimate for the costs to replace and repair all worn out equipment. There has been discussion of an "in-house" Army estimate of its "reset" costs at $36 billion; the Marine Corps has estimated $11.7 billion for themselves. However, these estimates do not appear to be comprehensive (see pages 18-19).

    And yet another analysis of costs is The Economic Costs Of The Iraq War: An Appraisal Three Years After The Beginning Of The Conflict by Linda Bilmes (Kennedy School, Harvard University) and Joseph E. Stiglitz (University Professor, Columbia University).  Via an interesting Q&A with Professor Bilmes at Nieman Watchdog.On How would you spend it? posted 3 years, 2 months ago 5 Responses

  • Oil traders have some market power

    The September 24 SF Chronicle has an article entitled Oil's slippery slope:  Moves by monied speculators bear heavily on prices that explains why energy prices might be dropping:


    [...]
    Deep-pocketed speculators helped fuel the steep rise in oil and natural gas prices as they pumped money into the markets for those commodities. Now they're pulling some of their money out, causing prices to plummet.
    [...]
    But a crucial role in the market is played by big investors who never have the slightest intention of taking tanker cars full of oil or gas. These are high rollers, such as investment banks and hedge funds, that buy contracts for future delivery of commodities as bets on the direction prices are moving.

    The movement of all that speculative cash isn't the only reason energy commodities are tumbling. But analysts say the behavior of big market speculators has amplified and speeded up the drop.
    [...]

    The Nieman Watchdog website (a project of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard) has had some good coverage of oil prices lately:  on politics and on speculators.On No posted 3 years, 2 months ago 1 Response

  • One last post

    A few years ago, the San Francisco Chronicle had a piece about someone's quest to make corn tortiallas at home.  The article itself is interesting (and includes the tidbit that Alice Waters has a fantasy of opening a tortilleria), and even better is the list places to buy fresh masa in the SF Bay Area.  (They missed La Finca in the Fruitvale area of Oakland, and various Mexican groceries on the weekend)

    I wonder if there is a giant list of fresh masa sellers on the Net somewhere?On How Mexico's iconic flatbread went industrial and lost its flavor posted 3 years, 2 months ago 13 Responses

  • Re: caniscandida's question about lime processing

    I just happen to have McGee's "On Food and Cooking" next to my computer (anyone interested in food should have a copy of this book), and he has something to say about the advantages of processing corn with lime:


    In the last thirty years or so, scientists have uncovered the fundamental purpose of alkaline processing.  First...[it makes the "hull" fall off]. Second, alkalinity improves the amino acid balance in corn by decreasing the availabiliy of the major storage protein, zein, to the human body.  This protein is most deficient in lysine and tryptophan, so that reducing its contributionto the overall protein content reduces the relative deficiency of the these amino acids.  The relative availability of lysine increases 2.6 times, and that of tryptophan 1.3 times, when corn is made into masa.  ...for the avoidance of pellagra, alkaline conditions release corn's bound niacin, which can then be absorbed and used by the body.

    Some protein is lost through the conversion, but the amino acid adjustment and niacin release received in exchange is well worth the cost.

    McGee writes that corn was introduced to most parts of the old world without the secret of alkaline treatment (or perhaps the flavor was not appreciated), resulting a large number cases of pellagra in areas where corn was the predominent grain.  
    On How Mexico's iconic flatbread went industrial and lost its flavor posted 3 years, 2 months ago 13 Responses

  • A recipe using fresh masa, and more

    Beyond the tortilla, masa is used in many ways in the Mexican kitchen.  The snack called a "sope" is one of the easier ones (and doesn't require deep frying).  Here is a step-by-step blog post that I wrote in June.

    I don't know of any Mexico-specific blogs, nor any Mexico-specific food sites, but recipes using fresh masa might be available at Rick Bayless's site (Frontera Foods) or epicurious.  If you are interested in making tamales, the SF Chronicle had an article about Diana Kennedy (one of the modern legends of Mexican cooking writing in English) and her advice on tamale making.On How Mexico's iconic flatbread went industrial and lost its flavor posted 3 years, 2 months ago 13 Responses

  • And a loss of genetic diversity

    There are hundreds of corn varieties grown in Mexico, but just a few grown in the U.S.  By importing subsidized U.S. corn, poor farmers growing unusual varieties will be put out of business, thus reducing genetic diversity.  History has shown that reliance on a small number of plant varieties can lead to disaster.  See a 2004 piece by Michael Pollan for more.On How Mexico's iconic flatbread went industrial and lost its flavor posted 3 years, 2 months ago 13 Responses

  • And Pombo too?

    The California Chronicle reports that Rep. Pombo (R-CA) also has some connections to the Alaska oil mess.  Via Talking Points Memo.On Shady oil funds traced to Washington senate candidate posted 3 years, 2 months ago 3 Responses

  • Diesel emissions standards and Mercedes

    The Green Car Congress blog has a post today that explains some of the issues around certifying diesel passenger cars for California and the Tier 2 EPA rules, and how Mercedes-Benz will meet them.

    Of special note is the small plot showing the evolution of the emissions standards over the next few years.  A 2004 model year gasoline car emits less than 0.07 g/mi of NOx and nearly zero PM.  Diesel cars up to 2003 are in the Tier 1 box.  Tailpipe emissions are significantly higher for the diesel.

    This PDF from the EPA has all of the gory details of Tier 0 and Tier 1 automotive emissions.  Be sure to look at the footnotes, which contain various diesel loopholes (e.g., a higher NOx limit for Tier 1).  I looked for similar Tier 2 documents at EPA, but couldn't find them. On New diesel cars will crop up in California. posted 3 years, 2 months ago 4 Responses

  • Grass fed beef and health

    A few months ago, the Union of Concerned Scientists did a literature review about how nutrional characteristics of beef and milk are affected by how the animal is raised.  I haven't seen much coverage of their study.  

    The report is "Greener Pastures:  How grass-fed beef and milk contribute to healthy eating", and can be found here.

    The key findings, summarized in the Executive Summary:

    "We reviewed all the studies published in English we could find that compare levels of [beneficial] fatty acids in pasture-raised milk and meat with levels in conventionally produced milk and meat, and converted these levels into amounts per serving of milk, steak, and ground beef. The resulting analysis found statistically significant differences in fat content between pasture-raised and conventional products. Specifically:

    • Steak and ground beef from grass-fed cattle are almost always lower in total fat than steak and ground beef from conventionally raised cattle.
    • Steak from grass-fed cattle tends to have higher levels of the omega-3 fatty acid ALA.
    • Steak from grass-fed cattle sometimes has higher levels of the omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA.
    • Ground beef from grass-fed cattle usually has higher levels of CLA.
    • Milk from pasture-raised cattle tends to have higher levels of ALA.
    • Milk from pasture-raised cattle has consistently higher levels of CLA."

    ALA, EPA, DHA, CLA are defined in the Exec Summary.On A brazen move from an agency shot through with industry players. posted 3 years, 2 months ago 5 Responses
  • Clean diesels are still a few years away

    We won't be seeing new diesel cars in much greater numbers in California for a few years.  Current diesels and those released this year and next year are among the dirtiest cars on the road (consult the EPA's Green Vehicle Guide for details).

    The introduction of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel is an important step (it will keep tons of sulfur out of the air as well as reducing emissions of PM and NOx slightly), but is not enough on its own to allow diesel cars to meet California's stringent requirements on diesel cars (the "Tier 2 Bin 5" target).  Instead, it is merely an enabler for the advanced emission control devices that will be needed to reduce particulate emissions by 95% and NOx emissions by 75%.   A particulate filter (standard equipment on European diesel cars, and soon to be standard on heavy-duty diesel trucks) can take care of the PM, and some sort of process like selective catalytic reduction can remove the NOx (this is the hardest technical challenge).

    And even if the automakers meet the emissions targets, it's unclear whether they will actually enter the market, as the economic conditions aren't as favorable as in Europe (e.g., Europe has a diesel-friendly tax structure).  And the automotive trade literature I read generally says that automakers have confidence they can meet the emission targets, but aren't sure if the cars will sell.  A new diesel car is about $1000 more than the gasoline version, and these days diesel fuel is more expensive than gasoline (it was 20 cents more yesterday).  When I see announcements of new diesel cars at Autoblog Green or Green Car Congress, they are almost always about Europe.  

    It might be possible to buy a used diesel in Oregon or Nevada and bring it into California, but I don't know if the car would be able to pass the smog test.  I think rules forbid importation of non-compliant cars with fewer than 7,500 miles on the odometer into California.  On New diesel cars will crop up in California. posted 3 years, 2 months ago 4 Responses

  • Nationalization of house building

    One factor not mentioned in the post is the nationalization of the house-building industry.  The NY Times had a Magazine story about the subject a few months back, so the full text is behind the dollar wall.  The significance of nationalization is that the profits from projects in sprawl-friendly areas can be used to pay the "costs of doing business" for projects like the one described above.   Back in the days of small, regional house builders, it would be much more difficult to come up with $22 million to pay off the city.  
    On Sprawl bribery is beating smart growth posted 3 years, 4 months ago 2 Responses

  • Amount of food vs. amount of hunger

    There is a lot of garbage in that Shell statement to comment on, but I'll stick to one thing.  People generally don't go hungry because of a macro-level shortage of food.  They can't get enough to eat because of a combination of war, poverty, lack of education, poor land management, government policy, or official corruption (such as that seen in oil-based kleptocracies where international aid flows into the bank accounts of gov't officials instead of to the appropriate project).

    And take a look at the U.S., for example.  The food industry produces something like 4000 calories per person per day, but still millions go hungry or are malnourished.  

    See Food First's 12 Myths about Hunger for more detail.
    On Food vs. fuel posted 3 years, 4 months ago 13 Responses

  • ..and for air pollution

    Confined Animal Feeding Operations (it's hard to call them a farm, even a "factory" farm) have also been let off the hook for their air pollution impacts.  In early 2005, the EPA exempted CAFOs from the Clean Air Act and other environmental laws in exchange for the CAFOs' voluntary monitoring of emissions.  Here is the Sierra Club's statement about the deal.

    More here and in the CAFO papers.On Factory farms let off the hook for water pollution, activists say posted 3 years, 5 months ago 1 Response

  • "The One Percent Doctrine"

    Michiko Kukutani's New York Times review of Ron Suskind's new book, "The One Percent Doctrine" starts out with this paragraph:  

    The title of Ron Suskind's riveting new book, ''The One Percent Doctrine,'' refers to an operating principle that he says Vice President Dick Cheney articulated shortly after 9/11: in Mr. Suskind's words, ''if there was even a 1 percent chance of terrorists getting a weapon of mass destruction -- and there has been a small probability of such an occurrence for some time -- the United States must now act as if it were a certainty.'' He quotes Mr. Cheney saying that it's not about ''our analysis,'' it's about ''our response,'' and argues that this conviction effectively sidelines the traditional policymaking process of analysis and debate, making suspicion, not evidence, the new threshold for action.

    It's disappointing, but not surprising, that Mr. Cheney's doctrine only covers actions that involve blowing things up, torture, and killing people.  But shouldn't his doctrine also apply to Climate Change and environmental policy?   If there is a 1% chance that huge areas of U.S. coastal cities will be destroyed by rising sea levels, shouldn't the U.S. "act as if it were a certainty"?  Or if there is a 1% chance that increasing levels of ozone in California will cause a generation of children to have seriously underdeveloped respiratory systems, shouldn't we "act as if it were a certainty"?    
    On Um, actually it matters whether global warming is human-caused or not. posted 3 years, 5 months ago 3 Responses

  • Alternative to Times $elect

    Pollan has been posting his NYT pieces on his personal website, usually a few days after they appear in NYT Select.  His piece about the Whole Foods letter is here.On Mackey v. Pollan posted 3 years, 5 months ago 4 Responses

  • The unexamined issues

    The so-called "unexamined class issues lurking in the background" deserve some significant attention, so I'll just throw in a few cents now.  

    I see much of the positive activity around increasing food options for lower income people coming from greenies and the Left.  The lack of supermarkets or produce stands in inner cities and low income areas isn't because of elitist farmers' market shoppers -- it's a combination of corporate decisions and the low margins in the food business.   And for many residents in these underserved neighborhoods, just getting to and from the grocery store can be an expensive ordeal requiring many bus rides or a taxi, thus increasing their overall food costs.

    Who was fighting for the South Central Farm?  Board members from Safeway or WalMart?  Bankers?  No, greenies and foodies.  Environmentalists are also working in low income areas to open more community gardens and preserve urban farms. On Umbra on farmers' markets and food stamps posted 3 years, 5 months ago 9 Responses

  • Send GOP to Chinese rivers

    Yet another disaster in the libertarian environmental paradise that is China...Whenever I hear of a GOP plan to gut the Clean Water Act or Clean Air Act in the U.S. (weekly?  monthly?), I've often wondered if it would make any sense to send the officials (and their families) proposing the gutting to live in China or Soviet-era-ravaged Eastern Europe for a few months to see the results of weak environmental laws.  How will their children's soccer playing be affected by a haze of particulate and sulfur dioxide?  Will they enjoy relying on bottled water for all of their needs?

    Would it make a difference?On China can pollute and dam all at once! posted 3 years, 5 months ago 4 Responses

  • More on land use

    Replying to myself:  There are actually rational reasons for a city to choose a car dealership or big box over housing.  Housing is a net loser for the city coffers.  Because of the crazy way that revenues are shared in California (property taxes go to the state, but sales tax to the city, or maybe the reverse), cities love to approve business uses, but hate approving housing.  

    These are rational in the short term, but will come back to haunt us in the long term.  Major fixes are needed up and down the entire land-use and taxation system.On Umbra on ethanol posted 3 years, 6 months ago 28 Responses

  • Land Use

    We definitely need to be smarter about land-use planning.  Take the areas around the Bay Area Rapid Transit stations in the San Francisco area, for example.

    Driving by the Colma BART station the other day (after a hike at the amazing San Bruno Mountain State Park), I noticed a large construction site close to the station.  What did the forward thinking Colma city officials approve for this prime piece of real estate?  What would be built on this piece of land next to a multi-billion dollar rapid transit system that is especially short on riders in this part of the Bay Area?  A car dealership.  A glorified parking lot, with perhaps 20 employees.  Brilliant use of the land next to the hyper-expensive BART tracks!  They must have learned from El Cerrito, a city which surrounded one of their BART stations with big box stores.  Yep, I'm going to ride BART to Home Depot to buy some plywood, gardening supplies and a new BBQ.  Or the Glen Park neighborhood of San Francisco, where a firestorm broke out over a proposal for a small market with 30 parking spaces or something like that.  

    But then there is the tiny town of Hercules battling Wal-Mart over a prime piece of property that the city wants to make into a village-like town square instead of a box surrounded by pavement.  Wal-Mart, of course, claims that they absolutely need that property; otherwise, they will go bankrupt (a slight exaggeration on my part, but they are the biggest corporation in the world.  Can't they be nice for a change?).On Umbra on ethanol posted 3 years, 6 months ago 28 Responses

  • Farm policy

    According to Michael Pollan's latest book, the birth of "corn as king" and a cheap food policy occurred in the mid-70s under the Nixon administration.  I don't have the book handy and can't find any of his articles on the internet, but my memory is that there was a huge grain deal with the Soviet Union that caused food prices to rise significantly, and protests were starting to pop up around the U.S.  So Nixon's Secretary of Agriculture (Earl Butz) changed the structure of the farm subsidies to encourage more production.

    The "Farm Bill" is coming up for renewal in 2007, so this will be an opportunity to change some of these subsidies programs so that they encourage organic agriculture (or at least reduce subsidies of the corn industry).  The "free traders" and much of the world is outraged by the subsidy programs in the U.S., so it might be possible to make some changes (but with a GOP Congress, the food-processing lobbyists will write the bill, so let's be realistic).  Grist Mill had a good discussion of what a Farm Bill should look like a little while ago.
    On Umbra on the cost of organics posted 3 years, 6 months ago 6 Responses

  • Consolidation risk?

    In the short term, running a massive monocultured organic farm is probably the most cost-effective practice to meet Wal-Mart's low price demands.  As Wal-Mart pushes for lower and lower prices, a potential downside could be that small organic multi-crop farms are swallowed up by big companies. who are beholden to Wal-Mart contracts.  

    Also, a huge company like Wal-Mart is probably not predisposed to dealing with small farmers -- they would rather sign one or two contracts for organic lettuce than one hundred.  On Wal-mart's organic bomb posted 3 years, 6 months ago 40 Responses

  • Buying miles, not gallons

    I don't have a lot of time to write this comment, but wanted to throw out an old idea that would be part of a cognitive shift about gasoline (and electricity and natural gas).  

    In the media interviews, people are always complaining about the price of a gallon of gasoline.  But we don't buy gasoline as an object to admire or put on the shelf.  We are buying mobility, we are buying miles.  You can probably travel a lot farther on a dollar in a Prius with today's prices than you could in a 1970 Chevy in 1970.  The same applies with electricity costs.  We aren't buying electrons, we're buying light, TV, radio, and etc.

    I think that making such a shift in mindset might help spur better efficiency in our vehicles and appliances.  Would you complain about $10/gallon gasoline if your car went 150 miles on a gallon?  Would you pay $1000 more for a car that saves $3000 in fuel costs over its lifetime?  Most Grist reader would probably say yes to both, but I don't know about the general public.On Gas price follies posted 3 years, 7 months ago 4 Responses

  • Biodiesel and CO2

    My understanding is that serious research shows that energy balance for production of biodiesel is about even (i.e., it takes 1 unit of input to get 1 unit of output) , but that there are real benefits in terms of global warming gas emissions.  The best paper I have seen is Sheehan et al.'s Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus (pdf), which found that for the transit bus case, over the life-cycle of the fuel, "[b]iodiesel reduces net emissions of CO2 by 78.45% compared to petroleum diesel. For B20, CO2 emissions from urban buses drop 15.66%."  If amazindrx knows of credible, peer-reviewed research that shows the opposite, please post the links here.  

    There is a danger to minimum biofuel requirements that are higher than what the local region can provide.  A few months ago there were reports that the EU's biofuel target would be met by fuel made from soybeans grown on recently-cleared Brazilian rainforest or palm oil from recently-cleared Indonesian rainforest.  Fuel from these sources will have a significantly negative carbon balance (see EU must ensure that bioenergy is really green, for example).  And once the big oil companies see a market in biofuels, they will go to the least-cost option, even if that means tearing down the rainforest or highly-industrialized, fuel-intensive farming.
    On Biodiesel: The slippery facts posted 3 years, 7 months ago 37 Responses

  • Eating Local in the Blogs

    An informal group of food bloggers will be exploring the issues and tastes around eating locally during the month of May.  The HQ for the diffuse event is Locavores.  I'm going to give it a try---it will be a great challenge to my cooking skills and a chance to think more carefully about what I'm eating.On Under the Covers: Getcha grub on posted 3 years, 7 months ago 5 Responses

  • Sierra Club strategy relies on trusting the GOP

    I think it was a mistake for the national Sierra Club to endorse Chafee.  An endorsement by the local chapter in the primary would make sense, as would an endorsement of a moderate Republican in a very red state like Oklahoma.  But for the national office to endorse him for the general election at this early date is madness.  They don't even know who he will be running against!  

    I read Carl Pope's explanation, Brad DeLong's, and many comments in the blogosphere.  The strategies seem to rely on the GOP leadership keeping Chafee on critical environmental committees.  I wouldn't trust Sen. Frist farther than I could toss an oil rig across the ANWR tundra.  Now that Chafee is endorsed by the Sierra Club, I'd expect an order to be coming from Karl Rove to Sen. Frist to "Get Chafee off of the environmental committees."  

    In years of GOP control of the Congress since 1994, the GOP has steadily whittled away at the traditions of the institution.  For example:   the House GOP leadership has held votes open for hours to get the result they want (instead of the usual 15 minutes);  members of Congress frequently aren't given the time to read the bills they are voting on;  the minority party is completely shut out of the and, most relevant to this case, the rules of assigning Committee Chairs are changing.  It used to be that the Chair was given to the most senior member of the committee, but these days loyalty to the leadership is also an important factor.  Congressional expert Norm Ornstein has described many of these changes in several articles, and sometime later this year he will have a new book about the subject called "The Broken Branch" (co-authored with Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution).
    On The Sierra Club and Lincoln Chafee posted 3 years, 7 months ago 8 Responses

  • Another problem with the article

    Your post does a great job covering many of the misconceptions about biodiesel in the E article, especially the idea that switching from a recent model gasoline car to an old biodiesel-powered car is a "clean" switch.  I hope you also send a version of the letter to E's editors.  

    The E article also made the frequent nitrous <--> nitric oxide switch.  The smog-forming chemical is nitric oxide (NO and NO2), or NOx.  Nitrous oxide (N2O) is also emitted by engines, but has little role in smog formation.  It is, however, a powerful greenhouse gas.On Smells like french fries posted 3 years, 7 months ago 33 Responses

  • Labels, and already purchased appliances

    Labeling that explains the expected future stand-by energy costs might also help, but given the American consumers singular concern for the selling price, it probably won't work.  

    But what can we do about the current collection of stand-by energy hogs?  Most people don't have the tools to identify which of their appliances is using 30 watts at idle and which is using 1 watt.  They therefore won't be able to know which ones are worth unplugging when not in use.   Perhaps an energy conservation agency could let people borrow a device which measures stand-by energy consumption.  Does a simple, user-friendly device like that exist?  On Giant power sucking sound posted 3 years, 8 months ago 4 Responses

  • Another Big Reason: $$$

    Another reason for the lack of new urbanism or new models of housing is money.  Big projects require loans and other financial instruments, and the people who control the money are quite risk averse.  They know how to calculate the probable return on investment for today's sprawling developments;  they know what kinds of risks are involved.  But with New Urbanism, they don't know, and therefore won't provide the funding.  I don't know where it is archived, but the story of the Kentlands in Gaithersburg, Maryland (Montgomery County) is full of the architects making design compromises to satisfy the bankers.  For example, the first commercial development was a huge strip mall grocery store.  The main street came several years later.  Edge City, by Joel Garreau, discusses the financing of the suburbs and mindset of developers in some detail.  On Why isn't there more new urbanism? posted 3 years, 8 months ago 28 Responses

  • Link and public spreadsheet

    The blog Green Car Congress has an extended and slightly more technical summary of the article (link).  The article's authors have made available the spreadsheet that they used to compare the methodologies (link).  On Science says: Ethanol good on energy, not so much on environment posted 3 years, 10 months ago 6 Responses