Comments amazingdrx has made
- "Anthropomorphic global warming is a fraud designed to take wealth from the United States and give it to dictators and thugs. That's the long and the short of it." What wealth is it you think the US still posseses? The huge credit card bills we owe to chinese state owned banks? Can we go to some international credit fraud agency to protest when they raise the rates and boost their profits with extra fees? Maybe we could start a war with them and just refuse to pay? Or just print a bunch of money and use it to meet the payments? I think it is more reasonable to depend on the capacity for invention and innovation we still posses, to give our educated, skilled, motivated workforce back their manufacturing jobs, then beat the competition. It's the only realistic plan to get out of the huge financial hole that war of choice (for oil), wall street "trading", and crony contracting kleptocracy have dug. The world is waking up to the fact that any national economy that depends on fuel based energy, like ours, is a sitting duck for multinational corporate kleptocracy. In order to maintain prosperity and financial security they are turning to renewable energy, a virtually unlimited power source that drops in price as mass production makes the devices we need to use it ever cheaper. We need to tap into that export market and supply the world and ourselves with wind, solar, smart grid, electric transportation, ground source heating and other new energy economy devices ASAP. Pay down the national credit card bill rung up by the previous regime or face the axe of history, that's the real dilemna facing US now. No exports, no manufacturing, no jobs, no money,bad credit, ...failure on a massive scale. That's what delayer/denier propaganda spread by lobbyistsand their clusterfox media cronies have in store for us.On Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success posted 12 hours, 37 minutes ago 36 Responses
- Oooh "leftist"? That's harsh, yes I am thankful for american socialism and it's participants. Military personel, firefighters, police, teachers, all government employees. I guess you would contract all those jobs out. It worked great with blackwater, KBR, and halliburton, why not? You would take a shower in a KBR built facility, right? Or send your daughter to work for halliburton in Iraq. You must have a "scientific" faith in "free" market contracting. Hehey, really a gay slur against Maddow? Very sophisticated! No doubt she would be devestated by your scathing repartee, if she took any notice of it (doesn't seem very likely though). Actually I believe in capitalism, real competitive capitalism that can put us back in the lead in global manufacturing. This sorry excuse for a (wall street) planned economy you all put your faith in isn't capitalism at all, it's corporate feudalism. The divine right of monopoly corporate capital to rule the planet. Kind of ironic since the orginal american revolution and the teaparty you "teabaggers" claim to emulate was in opposition to one of the first feudal corporate monopolies, owned by british royalty, the British East India Company. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company You all put your faith in the princes of monopoly capital like Cheney and Bush. Good choice. An endless sea of national debt is the result. Corporate kleptocracy gone wild. And I bet you are not making a dime off of that faith. In fact it is destroying the US economy and your future prosperity along with it. Just sit back, take in the beckscrement you live on and enjoy, as in the american revolution and WW II you relax while the rest of US do what needs to be done to face down this current crisis. Ok? After all it's your right to slur and taunt while we work, it's still a free country. No thanks to the kidnapping, torturing, murdering Bush/Cheney regime that "contracted" our future out to their cronies.On What to make of the new climate poll posted 1 day, 14 hours ago 41 Responses
- Sometimes muddling isn't a way thru. As during WW II and now with economic and climate crisises looming. Another factor to consider is fatalism often takes hold once one's time left shortens signifigantly. Which kind of plays into denial and delay, since mainly older citizens actually vote consistently in signifigant numbers. Baby boomers, hard living goes along with "conservative", those diseases of hard living like tobacco, booze, speed, and prescription drugs tend to bring on the end earlier and increase fatalism. In other words, no need to do anything different, I won't be around that much longer. Keeps the guzzling going, and oil wars, and GHG disaster. Pragmatic idealists take a different tack. Act now, act efficiently and get ahead of looming problems, then sell those solutions to the rest of the world. Why not go out fighting? Sure the task is basically hopeless, but that makes it more interesting. How to summon the cultural foresight to power a technological civilization with renewable energy and feed it with organic ag? Now there's a worthy challenge.On Chuck Norris on Copenhagen posted 1 day, 22 hours ago 14 Responses
- Well "t" (if that is your real name), How do you figure we are going to pay down our debt? Cut taxes? Admit it, that is your answer to everything. Deregulate and cut taxes. The only way to get solvent again is to beat the world in manufacturing. Nobody wants our gas guzzlers or nuclear reactors anymore or any of the old energy wasting fossil fueled dinosaur technology. We need to figure out what they do want and start making that stuff better, faster, and cheaper than the competition. You believe in competition, right? Hehey. Teabaggers may not have the best answers to our pressing economic problems, regardless of their views on evolution (admit it, you don't believe in Darwin's theory either), climate change, and death panels. Just something to consider. Nothing real serious, it just involves the end of US empire. No national exports, no money, bad credit, no influence on the world stage..one follows the other..I guess it's too hard to grasp eyyh t? Maybe consult limbaugh or beck for explanation?On What to make of the new climate poll posted 1 day, 23 hours ago 41 Responses
- Awesome brownie! This makes me think that organic ag could be really efficient with a lot less specialized robotics. http://www.ars.usda.gov/pandp/people/people.htm?personid=5573 Great info thanks again. Let me know how your wheat crop turns out.On Ecological farms: the only real way to feed an increasingly hungry world posted 2 days, 1 hour ago 11 Responses
- "At 18,000 feet it does not drop below freezing very often and precipitation is almost always going to be in the form of snow, which may actually increase in that area due to global warming." It's a similar situation at the ice caps most of the year bio-d, any precip turns to snow/ice. Of course open water in the Arctic is now increasing rain over ice sheets in summer and forming glacial lakes that stream down through cracks and lubricate the ice dumping it into the warmer waters at an alarming exponentially increasing rate. Since Lake Superior has had open water all winter, lake effect snow has been helping drought stricken areas near the shore. Any sort of natural mediation is welcome, but will probably not put a signifigant fight against factors like exponential ice melt. Snow/ice cover in polar regions reflects 24/7 sunlight in the warm season, darker water and ground absorb it. More snow that lasts longer could have a huge cooling effect. It's mainly having a huge warming effect now, as less snow/ice is the trend. I wonder what percentage of glacial ice still benefits from higher precipitation at cold altitudes? Here's another cooling possibility from mother earth. A few potential supervolcanoes, like the magma bubble under yellowstone, maybe ready to bring some "nuclear winter" type cooling with massive release of particulate matter, as in 1816 "the year without a summer". That kind of intervention might be worse than the problem. There are signs that where glaciers and aquifers are dissapearing as in Alaska and Yellowstone, the gravitational counter pressure from the water that helps hold the magma in check is failing. Land is measurably rising. Lake Superior was formed by the weight of ice and water pressing down, so is it reasonable to infer that removing water weight could spur volcanic eruptions? I think so. What is the magma situation under Iceland Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets? We know Iceland is a geothermal energy paradise and as in Yellowstone hot springs are all over.On SuperFreak Dubner embraces ClimateGate conspiracy theories posted 2 days, 12 hours ago 21 Responses
- Who was that feller from the duuhbya regime that claimed the Iraq War would cost US taxpayers 1.8 billion? Then got the job heading up The World Bank, but was fired for hiring his girlfriend? I can't recall his name now, maybe it's because of the mass media blackout on holding the "heckuva-job-brownies" accountable? Anyway I think that appointment spoke for the basic nature of institutions like The World Bank. Where are this guy and his girlfriend working now?On Will Africa's farmland become a 'resource curse'? posted 2 days, 14 hours ago 8 Responses
- "Healthy skepticism" eyyh? Is the wingnut urge for national economic suicide a sign of mental health? How much national debt is enough for you all? Will it be enough when saudi and chinese billionaires have mcmansions in all our national parks? How can that strain of psychosis be overcome? Encourage smoking for one and alchoholism and even greater levels of prescription drug use. It would allow the terminally beckscremental to go quietly. And by all means continue to enable insurance company death panels (the real death panels) that work through all the tricks of the mega-opolist insurance corps. Smoke 'em if you got 'em Palinites. And don't forget, those hillbilly heroin tablets work better if you crush and snort or shoot them. Drug limbaugh has shown you the way to relieve your pain (and ours) permanently. Just say yes to the wisdom of the ceegar chomping portly doctor shopper. Do it for your country!On What to make of the new climate poll posted 2 days, 15 hours ago 41 Responses
- With the failure of healthcare reform, democrats will lose congress in 2010, that will make everything Obama tries to do fail. Rove wins. Palin/Beck administration will take over in 2013 and Chuck will be sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom. Beck is sporting the big shoulder (falsey strength and character) look, a sure sign he is sluffing off his nebbish shell to prepare for his big moment. Since healthcare reform has akll but failed already, be nice to Chuck. He maybe the next secretary of defense. I wish I were kidding. This is going to be worse than the Bush appointments because our hopes were actually raised a bit. All you folks who were bending over backwwards to be peaceful and polite and really nice to hollering lying teabaggers at the healthcare townhalls in August? Or didn't even bother to show up to defend your rights? Try to remember that moment when all was lost, the moment you could have acted en masse, when you are listening to President Palin give the state of the union. Remember the very important reasons you just couldn't show up or decided it was rude to fight back.On Chuck Norris on Copenhagen posted 3 days ago 14 Responses
- From 80 dowen to 72%? Is that within the error range of these polls? The really alarming part of a slide is that it signals climate legislation will follow the path that healthcare reform has. 70% wanted real reform and at least some kind of public option, then the teabaggery started being covered as fact by mass media, "death panels" became real in the minds of millions of americans. The result? So far any and all reform, regulation of the insurance industry has failed, and there will be no public option until 2013 or 14, if at all. The 80 or 72 or 55% who want climate problems addressed will not trump lobbyists and clusterfox and teabagging in the media mind set, lies and bribes will win again. Polling on climate change won't matter. Remember when everyone in media was saying it didn't matter if Rupert bought the Wall Street Journal? His wife is liberal they said, she will make him behave. Mass media and mass insanity go together. The only way to get any progress on climate will come from a global commerical boom in renewable energy and organic ag, and the only thing that will motivate that is fear. Not fear of climate disaster, but fear of econoomic disaster as the US slides ever further behind in the competition to manufacture the new global energy economy. When even the ultra-wingnut robber baron who funded the swiftboaters, namely Pickens, gets on the big green commercial boom bandwagon but can't get anything done because he can't get the power from wind farms to where he can sell it, it ought to be a sign that even the worst clusterfox propaganda can't hide the fact that we are on the verge of economic armageddon. Before looming climate disaster makes prosperity and comfort here all but impossible, the sea of US national debt will. That's something that can move even politicians. National bankruptcy, we are almost there. Failing to jump on this green manufacturing boom right now will make it impossible to catch up. Put questions that address the failure of US green manufacturing to compete on the world stage in poll after poll after poll (I mean HAMMER it home) and just maybe it would move the "fair and balanced" (lies have to have equal weight and coverage with facts, it's only fair and balanced) media mindset.On What to make of the new climate poll posted 3 days ago 41 Responses
- Absolute (corporate) power corrupts absolutely. There is no other power to oppose it left, governments are bribed and cowed. It's a problem. We need a new Teddy Roosevelt to re-bust these global trusts. Otherwise the short term bottomline values-free system will doom our biosphere.On Will Africa's farmland become a 'resource curse'? posted 3 days, 12 hours ago 8 Responses
- Forgot one point, but it's a very important one! By becoming leaders in green technology, like this national electron superhighway, the US can experience a manufacturing boom, similar to the boom after WW II and the internet tech boom in the 90s, that in turn boosts tax revenues. Those revenues will pay for the intial investment in the national supergrid and for other renewable energy programs. Did the TVA and REA pay their own way in tax revenue due to economic growth? Undoubtedly many times over. It's time to invest, as a nation, in a well planned publicly owned electron superhighway and electric commuter rail system. Run it along freeway medians and existing right of way. It will not only pay its own way, but the economic export boom will pay down our huge national debt and pay for a lot of other things we need. Real healthcare reform, real public education right through graduate school (as in Europe), real social safety net that takes care of those in need, especially those with mental health problems homeless on the streets right now as we go to thanksgiving. Veterans, former teachers, police, firefighters, healthcare workers..they are out there right now, abandoned. We have truly lost our way thanks to the corporate bottomine ruling our public policy.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 3 days, 12 hours ago 164 Responses
- Yep ghost, mass production brings cost per unit down, and since renewable energy is fuel-free that means it will get cheaper with cheaper devices. Along with mass produced smart grid and national supergrid devices to smooth supply/demand from sea to shining sea. Mass produced liquid cooled HVDC that is installed in sections of concrete channel can be easily replaced with superconducting cable whenever or wherever it proves feasible. That triangular link to make the first nationwide grid connection is already under construction. So should the US lead in this new energy economy or let China and other planned economies get all the exports and green jobs? The delayer/deniers are destroyiong our economic future and the force of any moral leadership we might of once held in terms of saving the biosphere. This is a huge reason that we need to jump right on a national electron superhighway and real free market in electricty that will impell trillions of dollars in invesment capital into the new energy economy. Pickens had to abandon his ambitious wind power plans in Texas, no way to sell it, no transmission lines.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 3 days, 12 hours ago 164 Responses
- "The new diagnosis finds that arctic sea ice is melting 40 percent faster than the panel estimated just a few years ago." It is simply incredible that scientists do not publicize the obvious exponential nature of this crisis. "40% faster" is an inadequate dscription of what's happening. Perhaps we could have an explanation describing the time it takes to double the rate of melting, methane release from melt, and so forth? Exponential increase means that the rate doubles every so many years. With effects like ice melt increasing in speed continuously. That 40% increase will not be stable, it will double in a few years. It's the difference between speeding up in your car 40% and keeping your foot to the floor and continuously increasing your speed. If you let up on the gas after you are going 40% faster, that's it. You go no faster. Climate change is proceeding with the pedal to the metal, going ever faster and faster. That 40% ice melt isn't the end, it's a snapshot on the way to disaster. I know this is hard to explain, but really, scientists need to corner IPCC official, politicians, and reporters and lecture them on this until they understand it and report it. This is crucial, only understanding on this point will get the urgency across. Especially with talking point denier fever raging with this ridiculous hacked e-mail BS. This isn't like healthcare reform, where only 100s of thousands will continue to die every year because teabagging lies helped gut the legislation. We are talking worldwide catastrophe, with 100s of millions of lives at stake in the coming decades and billions after that.On ‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science posted 3 days, 23 hours ago 35 Responses
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current This'll convince you Gene. From wiki: "The controllability of current-flow through HVDC rectifiers and inverters, their application in connecting unsynchronized networks, and their applications in efficient submarine cables mean that HVDC cables are often used at national boundaries for the exchange of power (in North America, HVDC connections divide much of Canada and the United States into several electrical regions that cross national borders, although the purpose of these connections is still to connect unsynchronized AC grids to each other). Offshore windfarms also require undersea cables, and their turbines are unsynchronized. In very long-distance connections between just two points, for example around the remote communities of Siberia, Canada, and the Scandinavian North, the decreased line-costs of HVDC also makes it the usual choice. Other applications have been noted throughout this article."On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 4 days, 14 hours ago 164 Responses
- Yeah Bob, large capacitance might even mean storage on a buried HVDC grid? Could that capacitive storage be enhanced sometime soon with nano-tech insulation via ultracapacitor technology? Maybe layers of nano-tech insulation separated by vacuum or de-ionozed water, who knows? Another factor in favor of underground HVDC is the sag effect in overhead wires, they are limited in current capacity by heating of the wires, sagging, and failure. Which hits extra hard in the hot summer peak of the peak load season. Underground conductors can be actively cooled with ground temperature circulating fluid in high current situations. Making their peak capacity maybe 2 to 3 times that of overhead for the same quantity of copper conductor. The other great feature is that underground HVDC in concrete channels could be easily replaced with superconductor lines when and where they are deemed practical. Cold could be stored in phase change fluid when renewable energy surpluses were available, thus reducing the losses due to the refrigeration necessary to operate superconductors. I think the lack of NIMBYism on buried HVDC is an outstanding feature too. We need a nationwide free market in elecytricty yestyerday to get investment flowing into renewables and storage. Pickens had to cancel his wind plans due to lack of transmission capacity. How many trillions would flock to renewables with a national supergrid to sell the power over? A European HVDC loop is under consideration now. Will chinese companies supply the equipment? Who will build out the eventual superconducting power lines and storage? We still lead in this technology now.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 4 days, 14 hours ago 164 Responses
- Maybe this needs reframing Bill? Really just a 5% per year reduction in GHG would be enough, but everyone insists instead on lofty (usually alarmingly inadequate) goals in 2030 or 2050. Across the board conversion to reduce GHG in industry, homes, and agriculture that resulted in a mere 5% per year would be enough. Maybe we should stop talking armageddon and start talking about incentives to encourage these year after year modest reductions? And build a green manufacturing boom here in our flailing economy. I think the boom would take on its own momentum and exceed the 5% per year goal. Organic ag can actually reverse the effects of GHG if it is applied on a global basis. It cancels huge GHG emissions, but also removes and sequesters GHG in soil. It really is the only practical form of geo-engineering. Reverse engineer chemical agriculture and we have a chance.On Bill McKibben says time is running out on climate delays posted 4 days, 14 hours ago 1 Response
- I like Brand's use of the "We will have to wait and see who was right" fallacy. Likely outcomes of R and D ought to be considered in planning the new energy economy. Is it likely that the nuclear industry can produce a fast neutron waste recycling/neutralizing reactor design that is safe and cost effective and develop and test it, then mass produce it in the next 10 to 20 years? Not if past performance is any indicator. Will the industry accept the kind of scrutiny and regulation it has lacked in the past so that safety and efficacey can be verified (Reagan: "Trust but verify"). Or will a new generation of nuclear power pile up more waste and produce more contamination? Will "cost over runs", complete ignorance of additional hidden costs like waste cleanup, and liability waivers prevent any kind of financial responsibility? The old false dilemna at work here is a tried and still untrue argument. Renwables are unreliable. Fossil fuel is killing the climate. Therefore, nuclear power is the only alternative, no matter what the cost or health risks. This is all Brand has ever had in his argument for nukes, the rest is window dressing. Buy the false premise, that renewable energy is impractical, then follow down the garden path to the false conclusion. My response is that nuclear power is here, wether we want it or need it. The used fuel rods "swimming" in the water circulating storage pools at every reactor site need to be dealt with. Just letting them sit there, wether the reactor is still in use or not, is too dangerous to leave as a legacey for future generations. And it's too dangerous to transport to central processing or entombment. See the "glow train" controversey. http://www.tv.com/mega-disasters/glow-train-catastrophe/episode/1205417/summary.html Fast neutron reactors that treat the waste need to be retrofit into existing nuclear power plants. Prefferably a few of these that are used over and over, moved from one plant to the next, to treat the waste. Then after a few decades nuclear power could sunset safely. And generate coal killing kwhs in the meanwhile. If and only if nuclear industry cooperation with oversight can be assured. Right now the industry IS the NRC.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 4 days, 15 hours ago 197 Responses
- Heckuva job brownie! (sorry,hehey couldn't resist) Great find, gotta link? As I suspected all along, organic soil produces more food. But weeds are the fly in the ointment? Superweeds, pigweed that has evolved around herbicides are ravaging chemical ag right now. Agri-chem mad scientists say they will have a new superweed killer in 2015. Chem-free organic ag can be industrial, that's the oft-overlooked point. And the superweed problem inspires the answer. Cultivation on tractors used to be the treatment for weeds, some farmers stricken by the superweed epidemic are going back to it. That has a lot of drawbacks, labor costs, rows have to be further apart (reducing yields) to acomadate tractors and expensive fuel has to be burned. Not to mention the tractors themselves, equipment loans, the main overhead besides chemicals for most farmers. How to remove weeds and water and organically fertilize crops without lots of tractoring and mega water wasting irrigation? With pinpoint weed removal, soil testing, watering, and fertilizing via solar powered robots that go up and down the rows 24/7. Harvesting of corn, grain, and bean crops could still be done with combines (maybe plugin hybrid combines?), but everything from planting right up to the harvest could use robots. Furthermore robots could grow/harvest nitrogen fixing legume forage crops like alfalfa between rows. Imagine this if you will, as a sort of organic ag robot art installation. Picture this: A prairie plot restored by robots randomly replanting the full biodiversity of nature. Robots then randomly insert different (heirloom) corn and grain plants in amongst the prairie plants, wheat, corn, soybeans, then harvest them all separately leaving the original prairie plants. It would look pretty interesting in time lapse. Zero impact organic farming? Is it possible? Maybe not practical, but an interesting art project to illustrate organic robotic ag.On Ecological farms: the only real way to feed an increasingly hungry world posted 5 days ago 11 Responses
- Ok comrade, 'nuff said (wink).On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 5 days, 1 hour ago 197 Responses
- A brief explanation of distributed renewable smart grid technology (for the rest of us): http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2008/12/12/4017535.html Just explaining it is difficult, reporting on ongoing projects is nearly nonexistent, even here on Grist. This is something only the very geekish have bothered to even try to understand. But if we could manufacture at least half of this technology as it spreads worldwide, we could pay down our debts and really take some leadership in saving the biosphere. All those things that are hard to pay for now, like healthcare, would be a lot easier to bear given economic restoration. It won't happen unless we decide to compete again. The same old central nuclear and fossil grid systems with switches, telephones, and operators just won't sell around the world anymore. It would be the same as our old copper wire telephone system trying to compete with cellular networks. Emerging economies are bypassing copper telephone wires, just like they will bypass central nukes and coal for national power supplies. Billions of customers are waiting to buy solar/battery systems to charge their cellphones, run LED lights, operate low power water pumps, and so forth. That's our target market..or should be. The same for all the low cost mass produced items that can make life off the big business grid safe and comfortable, like solar water recycling/purification systems, composting toilets, biogas cooking devices, solar water heating. It's an endless demand to export into if we could only get into manufacturing again. And if many here in the US went to this sort of conservation living, maybe debt levels would begin to drop, public and private.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 5 days, 12 hours ago 197 Responses
- Hehey, nice to see you all admit you are pro nuclear centralized power and anti-distributed renewables and conservation. Gene and Daniel kind of disguised it for awhile. Good for you though, honesty is the best policy. Trying to pretend you were only against rooftop solar, but were favorable to other renewables and conservation was no doubt a clever strategery! Palin/Beck 2012! Best of luck to you. Who needs spies to beat US indeed! With the talking point denier/delayer level of understanding of the new energy economy ruling public policy. Of course Rod has always been in favor of distributed nuclear power, as that is his business, small nukes in each community or each building, even nuclear powered buses.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 5 days, 12 hours ago 197 Responses
- Actually Umbra, that first hot wet composting phase releases methane and nitrous oxide (300 times worse GHG than cO2), landfill/waste transfer stations should have biodigestion for yard, non-recyclable paper, wood, and high nitrogen food waste and manure. A separate biodigestion system should be installed for human waste. The organic fertilizer can then be added to more cellulosic waste, leaves,and crop waste to produce organic soil. Slower aerobic composting is always ongoing in healthy living soil. Biodigestion lets the GHG gases be collected and used for backup renewable energy for wind and solar power. Farms, factories, landfill/transfer stations, and large rersidential buildings could have biodigestion along with fuel cell/turbine (70% efficient) electric cogeneration and waste heat recovery. That kind of distributed cogeneration could be sized to supply the whole grid with an emetrgency power level that would keep essential services and appliances going, and normally provide backup power to smooth renewable energy supplies. Distribuited biogas backup would also run on natural gas in the case of extended low power/emergency situations. Here in Wisconsin dairy farmers are using manure, crop waste, and wood chip bedding based biodigestion/power generation systems. This is spreading all over farming areas as it is proving cost effective, especially along with the savings in expensive chemical fertilizer.On Ask Umbra on trash, toxics, and tots posted 5 days, 15 hours ago 7 Responses
- Just because an increase in energy use corelates to manufacturing activity in the past does not mean that will continue. In this case, a re-evolution of cultural values aimed at less consumption can increase manufacturing activity. Millions of renewable energy, conservation, and smart grid devices manufactured and installed to reduce fossil and nuclear power use can do that. Sure electric transportation will use more grid based electric power than gas guzzling. But the transition to electric transportation will take decades, by the time it is acomplished renewables and conservation will be ready to replace nukes too. Keep the current nuclear plants going to close down coal faster and kick in conservation and out about 10 to 15 years nukes might supply the 40% figure. As waste recycling/neutralizing fast neutron reactors are used to keep on generating power in present plants, while processing the used fuel rods and other waste, nukes can then be shuttered one by one. The main anti-renewable/conservation/smart grid talking points depend upon static snap shot views that are totally unrealistic. As if somehow we would or could transition overnight. This is why we need to test various transition models with computer simulation. A continual back and forth based on talking points will have us slipping further and further behind the planned economies. Just as in the healthcare "debate". Taliking points got us no public option until 2014, mandatory insurance, and virtually no regulation on monopoly insurance, healthcare, and drug companies. Where will that put us in the global healthcare rankings? Falling even further down the list as costs rise ever faster? Yep. We are heading in the same direction as far as new energy economy manufacturing already, more talking point lobbyist obfuscation will send us spiraling downward. Less manufacturing, more borrowing, fewer jobs, fewer exports, and so on..right down the debt/job loss drain. China's misstep into nuclear power and other dangerous boondoggles might slow them a bit, but they have money to burn. The new energy economy is winning there because their economy is motivated by export, global competition. And the world wants a new energy economy, even if lobbyists and their fauxnews fans do not.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 5 days, 15 hours ago 197 Responses
- The screaming beckscrement!! Ahhhh! Obamunism is taking over! Hehehey. I think in the end the louder they scream, the more they will be marginalized. The argument of course will be that the socialist Obama will now tax everyone through an energy tax disguised as cap and trade, based on the global warming hoax, then hand it all out to his fellow travelors. And acorn will turn us into a communist dictatorship. Only Rupert's minions can save us. Ahhh! This should help delay any energy legislation though. Any shift of subsidies from fossil and nuclear to renewables is going to be blocked by the BS. Just as in healthcare "reform". No public option until 2013 or 14? Requirement to buy insurance from present unregulated megaopolist insurance corps. This is not going well at all so far. Rove is smiling.On FOX News and TrollCat agree: Global warming is BUNK! posted 5 days, 23 hours ago 14 Responses
- Interesting nano, I think we are 20% nuke here in the US. With conservation power consumption might be cut in half, that would leave existing nukes supplying 40% of our power. Cogeneration, ground source heating/cooling, efficiency, and downsizing needless consumption could get the cuts. And it's much cheaper than building new nukes to close coal down. By going nuclear China is handicapping it's growth, spending cash on costly dangerous boondoggle and endless waste storage.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 5 days, 23 hours ago 197 Responses
- Maybe Brakmaster could ask Brak to talk to the powers that be? Could he ask why R and D $$ are not getting to the task of defining the possible/probable path that the new energy economy might follow? We need Planing to compete with planned economies, like China. BTW. Bee network from Ted conference India!! http://womaninhavana.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/day-four-ted-india-the-positives-of-negative/ "Anil Gupta illuminated the afternoon with a lecture on why “minds on the margin are not marginalised minds”. The Honey Bee network seeks to ensure that society can learn from grassroots innovators, giving examples of 70-year old Saidullah who developed an amphibious bicycle so he can cross the lake to meet his love, a two wheeler washing machine that can be brought to people’s doors to help women with their heavy domestic tasks and illustrated how these local solutions fit downwards, creating a place for small scale solutions in a globalised world." The simple answers are already out there, like bees bring food source information back to the hive, hive-mind internet communication should be bringing grassroots successes to the new media hive. This is what I been talking about. They say it so much better than I do. The message that can head off disaster? Simple mass produced green inventions that fulfill all the requirements of modern life, safe water, plentiful food, electricty and information technology, waste recycling, all afordable to the poorest (with help). Good enough solutions so that even the richest would be able to try the simple green lifestyle and admit it works and accept limitations on their profligate consumption, even if its only a week away from their jetsetting. If Bill and Melinda Gates or Warren Buffet lived this way for a week, would they get behind its mass production and availibility across the planet from the poorest to the richest? I think so. Get the richest and poorest to happily squat on the same inexpensive mass produced squat toilets and the connection will be forged. Gotta make going "native" spaceship earther trendy. Then the hundreds of billions in investment dollars will show up from under mega-matresses. To drive a 10s of trillions in green economic growth, through curbing consumption and increasing recycling, efficiency, renewables, and basic symbioisis between humans and the biosphere.On Skeptics claim global warming is fake after top scientists' emails hacked at CRU posted 6 days, 12 hours ago 43 Responses
- Good idea Bob! Also why not convert existing overhead AC powerline corridors to underground HVDC transmission, with many times the power capacity? No right-of-way or NIMBY problems. I guess the lack of planning really shows up if you consider the alternative, what if we had leadership like we had during WW II, where rational planning could move us forward? We are hobbled by kleptocracy, lobbyists bribing the government back and forth. Meanwhile nothing gets acomplished except mega-corporate thievery.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 6 days, 13 hours ago 164 Responses
- Daniel, dispute the wisdom of one who knows the ways of Brak at your own risk. Do not risk the fate of the rest of humanity by angering him. Brakmaster, I thought your take was particularly humorous, hehehey.On Skeptics claim global warming is fake after top scientists' emails hacked at CRU posted 1 week ago 43 Responses
- Have these hacked emails been turned in beckscrement yet? No doubt a chalk-talk will be devoted to this conspiracy. Palin/Beck 2012!On Skeptics claim global warming is fake after top scientists' emails hacked at CRU posted 1 week ago 43 Responses
- Ok Bob (evidently Ron too), so I guess you won't be in the small minority that would sacrifice for the future of the biosphere. No problem, we only need to convince 10% of us to join up. I figure that 10% are ready right now and would jump at the chance to actually experience this sort of green living, at least on vacation. This is all it takes to start a trend. The problem is not that going green can't be done, it just can't be done in time (to head off the worst effects of GHG climate change) unless the citizens of wealthy nations are willing to sacrifice to do it. Rich and poor alike will need to squat on composting toilets, in fact that's a perfect example of how the gas guzzling, coal burning culture needs to come back down to earth, literally. Oh yeah, I forgot to add plugin vehicles. And eco-clothes washing needs some innovation. All these green fixes will need scaling up to apply to cities and large apartment buildings (or the organically squeamish who can't abide the thought of not wasting gallons of water on each flush), in the case of composting toilets, the suction flush system. You guys keep on blogging all about how things are hopeless and can't change though. Meanwhile I will be hanging out with the green revolutionaries. We will be adding the safe, clean compost back into the soil, thank you. No need for sewer pumping trucks. Hehey.On Solar's rapid evolution makes energy planners rethink the grid posted 1 week ago 44 Responses
- Alert! Attention UF: Clothesline war in Pennsylvania. A woman is facing opposition from neighbors to her underwear "airing" in public. She vows to fight for her right to eco-friendly clotheslining. Could interesting pictures of underwear on clotheslines become a Grist staple? You have the fans who would apreciate this topic. http://www.grist.org/article/umbra-ecrush Hehehey.On Ask Umbra on shower caps, computers, and junk mail posted 1 week, 1 day ago 20 Responses
- Good point Alida, if most of us got our protien from veggies, wild fish populations and other endangered delicious animals might have a chance. Then the ocasional sushi treat or salmon would be aok. I think there is a way to have clean healthy ocean aquaculture as well as pond fish farming on land. The commercial profit motive is there already, and like Erik and others have noted it is creating more eco-problems and actually making it harder on wild species in most cases. Meanwhile giant factory ships net wild fish to be ground up into chicken feed. When chickens could eat worms for protien, worms grown on organic waste biomass. Human industry is making a dying mess of the biosphere. Too bad because it would seem all the technology exists to have prosperity and symbiotic eco-friendly industry and ag.On So long and thanks for all the fish posted 1 week, 1 day ago 47 Responses
- Bob, Ron here's my model. It involves extreme sacrifice, low power electricty only and even lower emergency power with battery storage (new Oasis lead acid battery, 1500 cycle life, no maintenance) and biogas backup. Heat and cold storage built into the building (an insulated tent), air and water pressure stored for washing, solar and biogas cooking, composting toilet, solar cogeneration (electricty and heat), small scale wind (vertical rotor), ground source heating/cooling, wood burning backup for heating, cooking, and electricty (with a thermocouple). These individual dwellings would be interconnected with a grid that is also connected to a few larger buildings with more solar panels and batteries, bigger biogas systems, and bigger wind machines. One of the main factors is how much sacrifice people will be comfortable with. A local system like this with say 20 of the smaller dwellings and three larger shop/greenhouse, library/kitchen, and meeting hall like structures, ought to be able to produce a surplus at times that could not all be stored. By that time maybe my local utility would let me connect that local grid with theirs. It would tend to smooth out low power situations, so emergency power would only be needed in storms. And allow the surplus to get onto the grid. This is the sort of scenario to start out with i think, in real life for me, and in a computer simulation. It would show how the smart grid could be built up layer after layer. Eventually connecting factories, farms, waste processing stations, and large buildings with their own distributed cogeneration backup systems. Maybe these kind of simple demonstrations are a way to get the powers that be to authorize more detailed supercomputer models. My suspiscion is that fractal distributed computing will eventually take over, each smart grid device part of a hive-mind of distributed computers responding to very organic human needs for heat, light, electricty, information and so forth. The smart grid like a living creature with electricty for blood and an internet nervous system that responds to factors like the weather, wind, sun, heating/cooling load, all the internal and external demands put upon it, and even stores electricty, pressure (air/water), and heat/cold. I still wonder what residents of boulder think of their experience with the smart grid. Is it smart yet? Hehey.On Solar's rapid evolution makes energy planners rethink the grid posted 1 week, 1 day ago 44 Responses
- Firestorms!! Humans can't put them out, the tornadic winds created by the chimney effect suck in fuel and air until it rains or all the fuel is gone. On the bright side, if enough particulate matter gets thrown up into the atmosphere, a "nuclear winter" effect might cool the planet down for a few years. Off course firestorms also release huge amounts of GHG into the atmosphere, stop sequestration of GHG out of the atmosphere due to dead trees and grass, and provide a dark surface that absorbs even more solar energy.On Top 25 reasons to give a damn about climate change posted 1 week, 2 days ago 29 Responses
- Firestorms!! Humans can't put them out, the tornadic winds created by the chimney effect suck in fuel and air until it rains or all the fuel is gone. On the bright side, if enough particulate matter gets thrown up into the atmosphere, a "nuclear winter" effect might cool the planet down for a few years. Off course firestorms also release huge amounts of GHG into the atmosphere, stop sequestration of GHG out of the atmosphere due to dead trees and grass, and provide a dark surface that absorbs even more solar energy.On Top 25 reasons to give a damn about climate change posted 1 week, 2 days ago 29 Responses
- If we want to be the technology manufacturing source for the new global renewable energy economy we will need to at least learn how to do it here first. Instead coal, oil, and nuclear power lobbyists are in control of R and D and energy policy. To rip their stranglehold from around our collective neck, we will need some clear ideas about how a roll out of renewable distributed smart grid generation and storage will interact with the old energy economy in the transitional decades. That will need computer modeling that takes into account not only the latest technological breakthroughs, but some extrapolation of how mass production will reduce the cost of renewables. I don't see any push in this area from the administration or the energy secretary. Someone please tell me I've overlooked their WW II like intitiative in this area? Is it secret? Maybe MIT is keeping it under wraps? We can only hope. Gotta keep ranting about this until academia notices I guess. What a situation.On Winning the clean energy race: a new strategy for American leadership posted 1 week, 2 days ago 5 Responses
- Actually Erik I got that advice from an author I saw on Colbert, can't remember the title of her book now, it was a plea and a warning that ocean life is dying due to overfishing and bycatch. She recommended only certain types of fish farming though so your critique does hold up, shrimp wasn't one her farmed recommenmdations. I agree on most aquaculture, it's as bad or worse than other chemical ag. On a local level here I'm mainly thinking of trout, walleye, panfish, and crayfish (a substitute for shrimp) as freshwater pond raised fish, fed organically with worms grown on leaves and pine needles and organic garden waste. By filtering the water for merrcury constantly fish that are safe for children and pregnant women can be produced. And this would replace demand for waning stocks of wild fish. The ocean farming scheme is similar, but the boost for the natural food chain would be organic fertilizer made from algae. The filtration of the algae and digestion to make the fertilizer would also make energy from biogas. It's a real long shot I'll admit. But given all three coastlines of the US with an installation that generates energy for the grid and houses a fish farm, placed every few miles, 100s of billions of dollars worth of fish and renewable energy and fresh water (from desalination) and really good jobs would be the result. No slave labor needed, like the labor on factory ships that scour the seas. Try and get a factory fishing net past these floating farm/power stations, that would at least keep them out of a 10 or 20 mile zone from the coast. I know purity of greeness is really trendy, but some compromises with crass commercialism might be helpful to mother earth. For instance, feeding the masses with cheaper, farmed fish, even bluefins, might just save wild populations about to become extinct. And there is absolutely no other way to save them. Treaties simply do not work.On So long and thanks for all the fish posted 1 week, 2 days ago 47 Responses
- Yeah Ron, I agree on coming at this from the individual independent end, if each home or building has backup and storage built in, that would make a positive cash flow regional renewable source that could break into utility markets. A wedge like the one here in Wisconsin made by a utility is effective, they voluntarily pay 23 cents per kwh to customers for their solar power. Make a supergrid national that could serve as a free market, regulated of course, and we would be looking at booming investment in renewables. Here is where we are at now. 10% of us want to go green power, even grid disconnected green power. Less that 1% are now doing than. As the slim percentage that are proving renewables work get more youtube and mass media exposure, the rest of us 10% of renewable belivers will jump in. That will create a huge societal change where corporate mass production really kicks in behind green. I think a super computer model that tests varying mixtures of indivdual renewable distributed generation and storage homes, buildings, farms, and factories connected together using distributed smart grid switching compared at varying levels interconnected with existing baseload power would be vital. It could present a transitional timeline that would inform investment, R and D, and subsidy. Replacements for baseload like great plains wind farms or offshore wind/wave power could also be taken into the modeling.On Solar's rapid evolution makes energy planners rethink the grid posted 1 week, 2 days ago 44 Responses
- I kind of knew that Sara, but good dialectic needs some ignition. Hehey. You are right about the cultural re-evolution taking centuries. So when did it begin? The push for quality of life to replace the quantity of possesions and consumption as the main motivating force behind civilization? The value of the individual trumping the value of the collective. It is kind of like changing army ant/bee hive-mind behaviour, teaching bees to live and work alone or in pairs? Then there is the wireless social networking building a sort of global human distributed organic computing hive-mind. Whenever wars break out at least a small percentage of us who actually do the fighting revert to ant-like behaviour, with the individual once again expendable for the collective welfare. Likewise with police and fire fighters. Are we ants..or are we rare unicorns, each individual's experience containing enough magic to make a multiverse? I vote for the multiverse! That J-curve? Notice how GHG climate disaster, ice melt, and so forth all display it. So a commercial boom could conceivably compete successfully with the rate of exponential climate change. The Frisbee, the Bic lighter, the horseless carriage, the steam engine all the pop product adoption curves say it can. One thing we really need is an up to date model of the alternative paths this new energy economy could take, where oh where are our super computer modelers to enter the data? Distributed emergency backup grid power equal to 200 watts per home, with each installation covering 100 to 1000 homes (or equivalent load), smart grid timing of demand using battery storage in individual homes and buildings, plugin vehicles charging up overnight or at work acting as storage.. all these aspects of this particular commercial new energy economy boom ought to be simulated. Then we could leap ahead on the technology needed for the most effective, competitive roll out. We have a really under informed dialogue on these issues now, the same old lame anti-renewable talking points substutute for fact based discussion. We need the facts. And we need them plugged into the best predictive equipment we have to see how this whole transition can be encouraged on all levels, individual, corporate, and government. Please write an article about super computer modeling action/inaction in this area?On Copenhagen: Getting past the urgency trap posted 1 week, 2 days ago 4 Responses
- Only buy farm raised fish and tell your family and friends to do the same Terri. Wild commercial fish should be boycotted completely. Rabble rouse for a solution like this: The ocean based energy/fish farming is the answer, 1000 ft diameter floating wave generators could house fish farms along the coastlines that physically block factory fishing. These generators would be ring shaped, a 50 foot wide floating edge of the 1000 ft ring would collect the wave energy breaking over the edge and send it around the ring in a channel that emptied through a turbine that collects the wave energy. That would leave the central area protected and perfect for large pond nets that hold the fish farm, algae and smaller fish and microorganisms would circulate through the nets with algae filtered and collected for biodigestion energy and fertilizer production. Wind and ocean current generator could extend upward and downward from the platform "energy ship". Each ship would have a crew that commuted from shore as with oil rigs, and electricty and fresh water (from desalination) could be transported to shore with underwater power cable/pipes. The generator blades extending from the platform would prevent factory ships from fishing in coastal waters with their miles long, ocean life killing nets. These generators could be the equivalent of 50 megawatts of grid power each, with 20 of them equal to a coal or nuclear power plant. Our shipyards could manufacture them like Liberty ships were made for WW II. With all our hi-tech manufacturing improvements. This is job building, coal killing, fish farming, ocean life saving, GHG canceling technology, just what the US needs to get our manufacturing base back. And pay down the huge debts we owe to our manufacturing competitors like china.On So long and thanks for all the fish posted 1 week, 2 days ago 47 Responses
- Yes Cliff, I think aquaculture that grows it's own baitfish from veggie protien, algae, then on up the food chain is the right way to go. Put it out on the ocean and no land area is needed. Floating wind/wave/ocean current power platforms could shelter these sort of farming operation. They could double as energy producers and farm space. Lined up along coastlines out far enough to be invisible from shore they could shelter coastal fisheries. Key food sources for the farm food chain, from algae up to baitfish could be hatched and go through accelerated growth in solar powered incubators. The farm could stick to natural organisms in a natural balance, but enhance the density of the living system in that area with extra air exchange and trace organic fertilizer from biodigestion systems. Algae is a huge energy source too.On So long and thanks for all the fish posted 1 week, 3 days ago 47 Responses
- "The structural changes required to get us off carbon and onto a truly sustainable footing challenge the economic assumptions that humans have lived by for 2500 years. Change that wide and deep will be the work of an entire century, maybe two." Ahh, if FDR would have taken this tack....? "The diffcult we can acomplish immediately, the impossible takes a little longer." Where is the spirit that came up weith that slogan? Sara...are you an ameri-can or an ameri-can't? Your stages? I would like to suggest an alternative, but not necessarily mutually exclusive, explanation of tumultuous cultural/economic change. The consciousness of the problem, in this case GHG climate change, penetrates a very slim percentage of humans at first. As the number slowly grows to the critical level of 10%, over 40 years in this case, the rate of enlightenment proceeds exponentially. Yes, the same way the rate of clmate disaster is proceeding. right now we are at the stage where a small precentage of humans have actually started building solutions, becoming part of the cure. That will build towards 10%, then take off exponentially. Will it be in time? Claiming it will take 200 years isn't goping to help speed it up any, hehey. You may be right, but let's pretend you aren't, just in case we can act precipitously. As we did during WW II. An effort like that is exactly what we need now.On Copenhagen: Getting past the urgency trap posted 1 week, 3 days ago 4 Responses
- We really need to get behind this R and D issue Ron. We need a computer model that studies the transition (that would happen over the next 20 years) as greater penetration of renewable DG and S (distributed generation and storage) starts to shut down centralized fossil and finally nuclear power. Boulder and Austin have real live smart grid projects to study too. We can't even seem to get a Grist report on how things are going in Boulder. You just know main stream media will not cover it. Without a sophisticated model that fills out the vision of new energy economy possibilities/probabilitieswe will continue to face moronic anti-renewable talking points ad nauseum. Get ready for anti-climate cure teabaggin'. A model could also help estimate required investment/subsidy, manufacturing and job growth from greening the economy. Does anyone around the Grist thread have a connection to the energy secretary? He likes super computers, right? Hehey.On Solar's rapid evolution makes energy planners rethink the grid posted 1 week, 3 days ago 44 Responses
- Good take on Obama strategy. How it eventually works out on healthcare should predict how climate change legislation will fare. Will we be forced to buy insurance from the "death panel" crew at mega-opolist insurance corporations or will we have an affordable public option? What we should be angry about is the lack of action on computer modeling of the interaction of a distributed renewable generation and storage smart grid with our present central "dumb" fossil and nuclear powered grid. Different possible transition paths need to be explored and explained to policymakers and the public. Then maybe political choices could be made with intelligence behind them, instead of lobbyist cash? Where should incentives go to encourage the best possible transition for the climate and the economy? Assume cost trends in renewable energy will be going down with mass production and that the price of fuel based energy will go up. As fossil and nuclear power industries are forced to accept the cost of the messes they have made, and are continuing to make, the price will rise even faster than inflation in oil, natural gas, and coal based energy. The effect of price spikes in oil and natural gas due to international conflagrations and storms and market manipulation should be considered too. Super computers are designed for these complicated simulations afterall, and we the people did pay for them (secretary Cho's old lab, Lawrence Livermore for instance). So what's the holdup? We want better rhetorical ammunition to fight the denier/delayer corporate lobbyist astroturfers. Step aside please coal and nuke lobbyists, we the people need some cutting edge technology applied to the new energy economy roll out and the all important political decisions involving subsidy diversion from fossil and nuclear power to renewables. The planned "communist" economy of China is beating US capitalists. Time for some planning of our own.On Is Bill McKibben right to be angry with Obama? posted 1 week, 3 days ago 37 Responses
- It looks like computer simulation with various levels of distributed generation and storage operated through a smart grid would be helpful Ron. It's a shame it hasn't already been done. Any California graduate students out there looking for a project? Maybe the energy secretary could arrange some Lawrence Livermore super computer time to devote to this? Wedge it in between the virtual nuclear weapons testing maybe? Not that I'm complaining, better to have virtual nukes exploding than real ones. But this would seem so obvious a pressing research task to start designing a California grid upgrade that can adjust to changing technology and renewable energy market dynamics. R and D on this whole topic seems to be on the back burner somewhere, when it should be fundamental to new energy economy planning. Maybe wait for chinese R and D and just buy a whole new smart grid built there? I guess they'll put it on our credit card eyyh?On Solar's rapid evolution makes energy planners rethink the grid posted 1 week, 3 days ago 44 Responses
- I wonder if this study included a computer model of a distributed renewable grid? That San Diego solar rooftop study is looking more and more prescient now. This is great news, they forgot a really big potential part of a distributed grid though, heliosatat fields over factory parking lots and buildings and even over surrounding farm land. All the energy could be focued on a solar furnace tower to supply factory heat, then the heat can be stored to generate power all night long. Even malls and other big buildings could host solar furnace distributed generation and storage. By adding enough of these into the grid and relying on waste stream biogas backup generation, distributed at farms, landfills, food processing plants, and sewage plants, solar really could supply a sunny region with enough power with much less extra transmission capacity. But long distance HVDC should still be used as a way for these sunny regions to export their excess power. And import wind power in case of extended cloudy weather. These desert projects look problematic though, it would be better for California to go with a buried HVDC system that connects its different regions with different solar, wind, and biogas resources. Offshore wind, wave, and ocean current power could be huge there. Far enough offshore on floating platform energy "ships" it would be past NIMBYs POV and it could even desalinate extra water for the state.On Solar's rapid evolution makes energy planners rethink the grid posted 1 week, 3 days ago 44 Responses
- Good feature tase. Farming in the desert under heliostats that partially shade the plants and concentrate the sunlight onto a solar furnace tower would work well in regions with limited crop land and/or severe water shortage. Saudis and California desert farmers take note. The heliostats could even rotate and form a cover to collect water and keep plants from freezing in colder climates. A lot of water given off by the plant leaves would condense at night on the cover. Desert turned green under partial shade with ultra-efficient water/organic fertilizer application would absorb a lot of GHG. The solar furnace would shut down coal plants. As far as the wine business. With the glut of grapes, quality has got to be the only way to survive in this industry. How do you get quality? Perfect soil obtained through perfect watering and organic fertilization. The organic fertilizer could be made specially to enhance the flavor, the natural constituents chosen for the soil contribution to the taste of the grapes. The watering designed to emulate the years with rainfall paterns that produced the finest vintages. This is a sophisticated type of farming when it's devoted to quality, vintners would be a good target market for biodigestion organic fertilizer and energy production systems and robotic ag equipment, specialized robots that sample soil and add just the right amount of water, fertilizer, soil ammendment, and mulch. They could afford to be first adopters of this technology as it is developed, then as mass production kicked in other farmers could start to use it. Wineries could advertise their zero carbon footprint (maybe even negative?) with this green technology. No more fossil fuel energy or fertilizer use, and they would prevent chemical fertilizer run off related GHG emissions. Go green grapesters and finance organic robotic farming R and D with a short pay back period in energy and overhead savings. I'm betting customers would go for the green karma message and better taste. Watching the robots would be fascinating, that'll draw visitors. Webcams even! What an advertising hook.On Winemakers face climate change with dread posted 1 week, 4 days ago 4 Responses
- Well Al, to repeat myself: It is a shame that so much effort seems to be wasted still debating deniers, they are only speaking to a hard core of maybe 20% true believers in the faithfilled corporate lobbyist cause. Combine their "scientific" climate talking points with ones that appeal more to swing voters, like, "It's too expensive to cut GHG, it will cost us jobs because the chinese and other economies will use cheap coal powered manufacturing to compete with us." Can american made steel compete with a steel mill in China that pays, say a tenth what it costs here for electricty? That's the case already, without renewable energy. They claim renewable energy will make our electricty cost 15 or 20 times what it costs in China? What part of the cost of steel is due to electricty? Wind power is cheaper than coal right now. I think it will bring our costs down. And we can compete by exporting renewable energy devices manufactured here. Other national industries and utilities already know renewables are the way to go. If we ever want to compete again we better just get on this green wave and lead. The main cause of job loss is currency manipulation skewing price competition, chinese currency is set so that chinese state owned industries make money, and lots of it! That effect dwarfs differences in chinese coal and american wind as far as the cost of electricty. Job losses from making the coal industry clean up it's mess (that's how to "price" coal)? The jobs created in a midwest/Minnesota wind power industry alone will dwarf any of that effect. And miners will be hired to cleanup ash sludge and the like. Sidestep the GHG climate question and go with the economy, it works everytime the deniers start to regurgitate their predigested clusterfox pablum.On Al Franken (D-Minn.) posted 1 week, 4 days ago 3 Responses
- It is a shame that so much effort seems to be wasted still debating deniers, they are only speaking to a hard core of maybe 20% true believers in the faithfilled corporate lobbyist cause. Combine their "scientific" climate talking points with ones that appeal more to swing voters, like, "It's too expensive to cut GHG, it will cost us jobs because the chinese and other economies will use cheap coal powered manufacturing to compete with us." Can american made steel compete with a steel mill in China that pays, say a tenth what it costs here for electricty? That's the case already, without renewable energy. They claim renewable energy will make our electricty cost 15 or 20 times what it costs in China? What part of the cost of steel is due to electricty? Wind power is cheaper than coal right now. I think it will bring our costs down. And we can compete by exporting renewable energy devices manufactured here. Other national industries and utilities already know renewables are the way to go. If we ever want to compete again we better just get on this green wave and lead. The main cause of job loss is currency manipulation skewing price competition, chinese currency is set so that chinese state owned industries make money, and lots of it! That effect dwarfs differences in chinese coal and american wind as far as the cost of electricty. Sidestep the GHG climate question and go with the economy, it works everytime the deniers start to regurgitate their predigested clusterfox pablum.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 1 week, 4 days ago 174 Responses
- The AP1000 does not have the "fast neutron" design that can recycle and neutralize nuclear waste, it should be rejected on that basis. Back to the drawing board Westinghouse. Furthermore the "new generation" of nuclear reactors ought to be designed to fit inside the existing containment buildings to replace existing reactors. They should continue to generate power until the waste is all reprocessed and rendered relatively harmless. By then nuclear fission will be obsolete. So time the obsolecense with the waste cleanup completion, wouldn't that be the most responsible, economical solution? Close them down now with huge nuclear "swimming pools" full of waste that has to have water constantly circulated (to prevent a disaster 17 times worse that Chernobyl from each pool)? Or treat the waste and keep generating power, closing down coal a bit quicker? I think the right course is to correct the criminal corporate/government negliegance that has victimized ratepayers and taxpayers and residents around mines, nuclear processing/waste facilities, and reactor sites. And any proposed design, like the AP1000, ought to be required to undergo destructive testing of it's major components, just like cars are test crashed before approval. Isn't it reasonable to subject a test model to the sort of disastrous forces it might encounter in operation before it is approved for mass production and installation? Good luck "re-calling" a defective nuclear reactor, yikes.On Nuclear companies face reactor design problems, ethics questions posted 1 week, 4 days ago 6 Responses
- There is a fix for what you experienced EG. It's an industrial technology that is used to cancel the sound from loud machinery. Microphones pick up the noise which is then sent through an electronic processor into a sound system that produces canceling sound waves. With this application you could have a small noise free zone in your home or yard. It could maybe be plugged into a boom box so you could move it around, but to cancel the noise at the source a larger system right at the source would be needed. It might be worthwhile to experiment with the idea of sending canceling sound waves right through the core of the wind machine blades using them as "speakers". BTW, that grain drying could have been wind powered directly with a tall "chimney" tower with a silent vertical rotor generator on top that would drive a ducted fan (silent) inside the tower. When the grain was dry or the wind was strong enough to supply excess power, the farmer could sell kwhs back to the utility. Now there's a great ag/wind power combination. It would make a huge utility bill into a check from the utility to the farmer. Solar concentrating PV cogeneration with the extra heat going to heat grain storage/drying area would produce a lot of excess electricty. Agriculture and renewable energy are better together, the conservation and cogeneration and backup for the grid from farm waste biogas digestion and organic fertilizer prevent huge GHG, but also remove it from the air and sequester it in valuable soil. The kind of soil that yields more food and fiber with no chemical addition.On One doctor’s quest to sound the alarm on ‘wind turbine syndrome’ posted 1 week, 4 days ago 60 Responses
- Here's a good water conservation system to use with the fog collection screens. With drainwater systems running into greenhouses, nearly all of the water used can be recaptured. Composting toilets can hold the pathogenic waste and nuetralize it, while the rest of water feeds underground into a greenhouse with a plastic layer under the soil layer. The plants then "distill" the water, turning it into vapor coming out of their leaves, as night cools the greenhouse the water condenses inside and it can be caught and collected as it drips. With another bit of technology, compound parabolic solar collecting PV louvers, electricty and hot water can be collected, and the lovers can adjust the amount of heat in the greenhouse to protect the plants on hot days. This is the sort of technology that will work in LA just as well as it will work in Peru. You have to admire the NGO model for low-tech green human-helping delivery, would eco-tourism go with this? The water collecting screens are interesting too and would work well with the solar water recycling greenhouse, but could a groundwater temp tank, that keeps water fresh and cool and mosquito free be employed instead of a toxic chemical treatment? Also it would seem a rudimentary improvement would be to only water crops with drain water (minus sewage of course).On Peru slum goes cutting edge as 'fog catcher' posted 1 week, 5 days ago 4 Responses
- How about a nice long lasting, durable, recyclable shower cap alternative? http://zapatopi.net/afdb/ It also protects from "mind control", so important in this age of obamunism. http://www.zazzle.com/obamalogo_bamunism_stop_bumper_sticker-128352548782078381 Hehey. Very cool bumpersticker, I just ordered one. Now get with that water conserving (10% of regular shower water use)Dymaxion "fog gun" shower test please Umbra? http://www.buckminster.info/Ideas/07-IcosHouseShowerScientific.htm (most modest shower tease award 2009..goes to..)On Ask Umbra on shower caps, computers, and junk mail posted 1 week, 5 days ago 20 Responses
- Really huge wind machines move slower and make less noise. And produce more power per dollar invested and land area setback. The amount of power collected varies with the square of the diameter of a wind turbine (2 times the size 4 times the power), and it varies with the cube of wind speed (2 times the wind speed 8 times the power) and larger machines reach up higher in the air to tap much higher speed, steadier wind. That means that a huge 1000 ft diameter machine replaces many times the number of smaller wind turbines. And these 1000 ft machines need over a mile between installations in the direction of prevailing winds (the rule of thumb is 7 times the diameter of the wind rotor). There is many times the wind power we need in remote areas of the great plains and far enough offshore to be nearly invisible and inaudible. With a national HVDC power grid that 3 to 5 cent per kwh electricty can be circulated to shut down coal and eventually nuclear power. How does the noise from nuclear and coal power plants effect people within 2 km? How about the other effects of coal and nuclear power? How big is the footprint of radioactive leaks, mercury in the water (pregnant women and children are advised not to eat fish anymore, because of mercury from coal power), and the GHG climate disaster looming over the entire planet? Bigger than a 2 km setback? Sound and sight issues for distributed wind employing smaller, faster moving, noisier machines can be addressed with innovative design features like vertical axis (gets rid of the "thump") and imitation plastic owl feathering along blades. Machines can be constructed with clear plastic and padded to prevent fatal bird collisions. Distributed wind is a tiny part of the whole wind resource, the big coal killing wind power will be built in remote regions with slow moving huge wind machines that are much quieter and more bird friendly. Rooftop solar cogeneration (electricty and heat), ground source heating/cooling, and biogas grid backup are the big distributed local renewable energy sources. No noise or anoyance issues with these. In 40 years or so ambient temperature superconduction and nanotechnology should make these large wind machines obsolete as very high efficiency solar power, transmission, and storage drop the price of electricty below the cost of maintaing the old huge wind machines. Then they will be recycled, using renewable energy. We need wind over the next few decades if we are going to leave a human friendly climate to the upcoming generations. Keep up the lame denier/delayer talking points based on "research" like this and the coal industry will keep on removing mountaintops and devestasting the biosphere. What are the health effects of that scenario?On One doctor’s quest to sound the alarm on ‘wind turbine syndrome’ posted 1 week, 5 days ago 60 Responses
- Thanks Matt! Let's roll (hehey)! I'm looking for wilderness property to start a resort like this now. That way people can come and experience zero carbon impact comfortable tent (houseless) living and see how they like the idea. All the water conservation/recycling, solar electric/water heating, composting toilet, local organic food, wind powered, biogas cooking/electric backup, silent sports trail running, biking,skiing,swimming, paddling zen...ing out with yoga and sweat lodge (icehole jumping), high quality of life/low consumption lifestyle vacation they can handle. So far everyone I tell about it out on the trail loves the idea. Experiencing is believing, if they feel the sacrifice is worth it and that this zero carbon life is real, it might just spread. Then there's youtube too. Some people will believe video evidence made by vistors. All we need is 10% to retire, go to school, or just live and work from this sort of camping venue. Then help spread that lifestyle to the poorest nations first. Think about it, 20% of humanity is wealthy enough to live this way and donate part of their savings in bills (due to their low impact/low cost tenting) to pay for one setup like this to be shipped out to a family in need per year. At that admittedly optimal (idealistic) rate in only 5 years the other 80% of humans would be able to live this way too. Mass production could make that goal practical, how long did it take to ramp up WW II war production? Pragmatic idealism in action! 20% who are rich (relatively) sacrifice (greatly enhance the quality of their existence) and donate to lift everyone's boats all over the planet, starting with the most at risk people first. If karma, heaven, or the magical effect of mirror neuron empathy are real, this kind of total commitment to spaceship earth and our fellow travelors should come as close as possible in this dimension. Hehey. Bucky Fuller would love it, people going on vacation to use his "fog gun" water conserving Dymaxion shower.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 1 week, 6 days ago 174 Responses
- Thanks Matt! Let's roll (hehey)! I'm looking for wilderness property to start a resort like this now. That way people can come and experience zero carbon impact comfortable tent (houseless) living and see how they like the idea. All the water conservation/recycling, solar electric/water heating, composting toilet, local organic food, wind powered, biogas cooking/electric backup, silent sports trail running, biking,skiing,swimming, paddling zen...ing out with yoga and sweat lodge (icehole jumping), high quality of life/low consumption lifestyle vacation they can handle. So far everyone I tell about it out on the trail loves the idea. Experiencing is believing, if they feel the sacrifice is worth it and that this zero carbon life is real, it might just spread. Then there's youtube too. Some people will believe video evidence made by vistors. All we need is 10% to retire, go to school, or just live and work from this sort of camping venue. Then help spread that lifestyle to the poorest nations first. Think about it, 20% of humanity is wealthy enough to live this way and donate part of their savings in bills (due to their low impact/low cost tenting) to pay for one setup like this to be shipped out to a family in need per year. At that admittedly optimal (idealistic) rate in only 5 years the other 80% of humans would be able to live this way too. Mass production could make that goal practical, how long did it take to ramp up WW II war production? Pragmatic idealism in action! 20% who are rich (relatively) sacrifice (greatly enhance the quality of their existence) and donate to lift everyone's boats all over the planet, starting with the most at risk people first. If karma, heaven, or the magical effect of mirror neuron empathy are real, this kind of total commitment to spaceship earth and our fellow travelors should come as close as possible in this dimension. Hehey. Bucky Fuller would love it, people going on vacation to use his "fog gun" water conserving Dymaxion shower.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 1 week, 6 days ago 174 Responses
- One figure I think you can rely on is from a Minnesota prairie study Jon, 1.8 tons of CO2 sequestration per year per acre. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/314/5805/1598 (Unfortunately the main thrust of the analysis was producing so-called "carbon negative biofuels", but the 1.8 ton per year figure is still sound) How would organic farming that uses recycled waste stream fertilizer compare? The prairie study measures the amount of biomass added to the soil every year, that would probably work for organic farming too. Given the enhanced growth rate of plants selected for farming, it would probably be more, but some of the plant material is removed as a farm product. If that biomass removed is replaced with recycled biomass as organic fertilizer/soil ammendment, the sequestration rate could be higher than natural prairie soil? A good example here in Wisconsin is dairy farms than use wood chip bedding for cows then put the chips and manure into a biodigestor. The biogas is used to generate electricty for the grid and the organic fertilizer that comes out, including partilly digested wood chips, is used as soil ammendment. I'm betting that organic farming couldn't offset our current GHG emissions, but it could make civilization carbon negative if renewable energy and conservation eliminates most of our carbon footprint. My evidence? The prairie soil that sodbusters first plowed in the 1800s was 20 to 30 feet thick, if all farming activity on the planet built soil year after year, that could remove the GHG burden built up in the atmosphere. How fast would it work? There's a good question for organic ag research. Start out on these dairy farms that biodigest waste and grow their own feed for their cows. But you notice with this system, wood chips are added to the process. Burning biomass for energy cuts this recycling process off, better to use the biogas in a 70% efficient fuel cell system, then return the fertilizer to the soil. Combustion needs to be replaced with biodigestion and fuel cells.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 1 week, 6 days ago 174 Responses
- Let's roll Matt! (hehey) I'm looking for wilderness property to start a resort like this now. That way people can come and experience zero carbon impact comfortable tent (houseless) living and see how they like the idea. All the water conservation/recycling, solar electric/water heating, composting toilet, local organic food, wind powered, biogas cooking/electric backup, silent sports trail running, biking,skiing,swimming, paddling zen...ing out with yoga and sweat lodge (icehole jumping), high quality of life/low consumption lifestyle vacation they can handle. So far everyone I tell about it out on the trail loves the idea. Experiencing is believing, if they feel the sacrifice is worth it and that this zero carbon life is real, it might just spread. Then there's youtube too. Some people will believe video evidence made by vistors. All we need is 10% to retire, go to school, or just live and work from this sort of camping venue. Then help spread that lifestyle to the poorest nations first. Think about it, 20% of humanity is wealthy enough to live this way and donate part of their savings in bills (due to their low impact/low cost tenting) to pay for onr setup like this to be shipped out to a family in need. In only 5 years the other 80% of humans would be able to live this way too. Hehey, pragmatic idealism in action! 20% who are rich (relatively) sacrifice (greatly enhance the quality of their existence) and donate to lift everyone's boats all over the planet, starting with the most at risk people first. If karma, heaven, or the magical effect of mirror neuron empathy are real, this kind of total commitment to spaceship earth and our fellow travelors should come as close as possible in this dimension. Bucky Fuller would love it, people going on vacation to use his "fog gun" water conserving Dymaxion shower.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 2 weeks ago 174 Responses
- As with the lowly (who are we to judge?) microorganism on a petri plate, quality trumps quantity in terms of survival. Choosing better genetics is the tool that these tiny creatures use, they just have to get those decisions by sacrificing most of their number in a rapid turnover of evolutionary acrobatics. We try to choose a better conscious course for our civilization through a better quality and length of life for individuals, but without mass production that road won't be taken by the bulk of humanity that really needs to change course. With life you can't just shoot for idealism, you need pragmatism too. Pragmatic idealism, human industry and productivity driven by our better angels. We are going to need to work our way out of this carbon disaster Steven. But you are right to question an increase in human manufacturing activity as a way to get there. It's not more organisms, more humans consuming more of the biosphere that signals success, it is an exponential wave of recycling, reuse, and conservation powered by renewable energy that will allow the reduction of each human carbon footprint enough to get a collective elimination of the global human carbon burden on the biosphere. Zero times 7 billion is still zero, 7 billion times a negative number, with each human managing to do their part to increase carbon sequestration from say organic farming based on waste biomass recycling, could build to a huge climate cure over time.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 2 weeks ago 174 Responses
- Nice false dilemna fallacy sub. Was that solar energy prof a coal lobbyist? Buy the false premise (the distributed nature of renewable energy makes it unreliable), and follow the unsound argument down the garden path...to the false conclusion. The fact that renewable energy is virtually everywhere, fuel-free, and doesn't cost a penny, makes it much more reliable than central fuel based power grids. As more and more fossil power plants are built, fuel gets more and more expensive with scarcity and market manipulation. As more and more renewable energy is tapped it gets cheaper, because the devices to harvest and transport it get more efficioent and cheaper due to mass production. This is happening right now with wind and solar power. Costs per kwh keep on dropping...while fossil fueled energy gets ever more expensive. And this is really a bonus! No wars need be fought over renewable energy, like they are over oil. There's a really big hidden cost of fossil fuelisness.On Is "we're going to burn the coal anyway" an argument for carbon sequestration? posted 2 weeks ago 40 Responses
- As with the marvelous hydrogen economy, cellulosic biofuels, and newer cleaner safer nukes, CCS is a boondoggle to soak up the scarce capital that needs to be directed instead to the real new energy economy. Renewables, conservation, electric transportation, are the right targets for investment dollars. These other plans are delay and diversion, plain and simple. Invest in wind, solar, and a super grid and coal can be stopped. Keep on with lame excuses, talking points from coal industry lobbyists, and misdirection will doom our national future as a green manufacturing leader and leave the biosphere a dangerous place for humans and other living things. CCS is nothing but a corporate mirage, but even if it could be made effective, the much lower efficiency actually dictates the combustion of much more coal. Running CO2 separators, compressors, pipelines, and wells takes energy, that energy will come from burning even more coal. It's a vicious delayer cycle of carbon death for the human friendly climate.On Is "we're going to burn the coal anyway" an argument for carbon sequestration? posted 2 weeks ago 40 Responses
- A bit more pontification Steven (ahh, hemm). How I would envision this sort of sacrifice for the climate, is that people in wealthy nations would choose to live simply in solar powered, insulasted, comfortable, and efficient tent-like shelters. A portion of the rent or mortgage payment and utility expenses avoided could help pay to manufacture systems to export the simple technology to people who really need it to survive. Composting toilets, solar battery electric power, solar water recycling and water heating, ultra water conserving compressed air/water spray washing/cleaning, biogas cooking gas and energy systems, a community wind power system, could all be sent to friends in countries where these items can't be afforded. A former Grist contributor wrote an article about an eco-tourism trip to Coasta Rica where she helped local people build a pig powered biogas cooking system and install solar/battery electric power. This sort of action could be expanded so that as 10% of americans decide to become houseless in this way, through donations and eco-tourism and student exchange programs and the like, the effort could expand to cover a similar proportion of all of humanity, starting with those in the most desperate conditions. A lifesaving effort funded by sacrifice, give up your mcmansion and live in a (green-tech) tent, and donate what you saved to supply friends in need with clean water, heat, sanitation, and so forth. I bet people like Gates and Branson would even kick in some cash. So houseless green revolutionaries, especially baby boomer (ex?) hippy campers could mainly donate their time and energy, maybe even traveling to other countries and helping install these devices. Then hosting visitors and students from those countries in beautiful tent living here. Houselessness made voluntary and patriotic, you betcha! Intentional communities, campgrounds, wilderness conservation land, could all host campers. It would be a hoot. Probably a hootenany or two too, eeeww earplugs kids! Hehehey.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 2 weeks ago 174 Responses
- That's a very good point Steven. You have distilled the contradiction out of the dialectical mash, hehey. How is it possible to lift all 7 billion boats without using the whole biosphere up? Econmic activity brings the possibility of survival to the poorest and financial security to the middle class. I would say that an emphasis on quality of life, with the wealthier citizens of spaceship earth sacrififcing meaningless consumption and quantitiy of possesions, could be a way to lift everyone together on a different wave. Would financial security and reproductive (and all other) rights for women tend to reduce population? I think so. Quality over quantity, a whole new cultural ethic, could counter the old philosophy of eternal growth. If the activty humans pursue is to recycle and remanufacture our techno-civilization into a symbiotic one, that sees us all as part of the living planet, then i say let the (solar, wind powered) solar panel and electric car factories hum. And maybe cancel the full parking lot? Bike trails and electric buses would be much better. So can we have job and manufacturing (exponential) growth and financial security and a more secure life for even the poorest and still become carbon negative as a civilization over the next couple of decades? Dean Kamen's water purification device for drought and famine stricken regions is an example of the current attempts to use technology on a small local scale, using mass production efficiency. This area of development is huge, it has billions of potential customers. Composting toilets, water recycling systems, biogas cooking setups, all kinds of low tech inovative production can be targeted to solve survival hurdles. But even wealthier people can voluntarily adopt a high quality lifestyle using this simple technology too. It would allow sacrifice to help out in this transition, just as people grew victory gardens and collected rubber and metal for recycling for WW II war production. I would not mind being hooked up to a solar panel and batteries and coast once in awhile if the smart grid needed to put me on emergency power. Or drive an electric car that would only have a top speed of 50. A lot of us would be willing to live on a par with our fellow humans around the globe, if we could all come to a higher quality lower consumption symbiotic life together. I'm thinking 10% worldwide would volunteer to do this if they knew it would work and how to get there. That just might start a trend in time to turn the climate disaster around.On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 2 weeks ago 174 Responses
- That Tres Amiga link is awesome Bob. The question that comes to mind is why are they not using the superconducting bridge circuit for storage? And will the insistence on superconduction slow down the rollout of a national HVDC grid? The objection to using regular copper underground for HVDC supergrid connection was that individual lines have to be buried a few meters apart to avoid overheating. The idea of cooling one or two really large hollow conductors in a concrete channel with the cooling fluid circulating inside and outside the conductors and dumping heat to the ground (or to cold air in winter)would take care of that. Then as superconducting technology is rolled out, the copper could be replaced in an orderly transition with the same concrete channels in place (just like fiberoptics are replacing copper in information technology). Pretty interesting article, they mentioned overhead power line NIMBYism and using freeway median right-of-way. Now I guess they better check out the transitional technology I mentioned and also using the superconducting loop to store power. Once the system is up and running it might even store a certain amount of power anyway, by testing that effect and enhancing it, who knows we may get a national electron superconducting highway that stores power too. That would be good. A good use for excess renewable energy would be to store "cold" to keep the superconducting lines cold enough. A gas that liquifies a few degrees just below the liquid nitrogen superconductor coolant could act as cold storage. That cold storage could be "recharged" whenever excess wind or solar power was available. Eliminating the losses due to refrigeration of the superconducting line. Starting with buried fluid cooled copper and transitioning to superconductor line, sited in the same installations in freeway median, would provide a gradual, affordable transition to fully superconducting national HVDC grid. Will it also store power? There's some suspense for the Tres Amiga project. The other question I have is how will this be re-regulated? That issue is going to have to be faced up to, corporate power unlimited, produces unlimited corruption. That is not the way to start this green energy re-evolution, monopoly corporate market manipulation.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago 98 Responses
- Maybe a thought experiment would be useful Adam. Could we imagine the mindset of people in Europe as the nazi invasion proceeded? Now how about contrasting that with the attitude of americans at the start of WW II? In Europe the blitz rolled, but that was far away for most americans. Experts must have realized that catching up to nazi war technology and production seemed nearly impossible at that point. The only course was to ignore the threat and hope the war would be confined to the continent. Back to our future: As seawater levels rise and glacial water supplies melt, the famine, disease, and war due to forced migration will produce hell-scape many orders of magnitude worse than Katrina, the recent US experience with disaster. Americans will bemoan the horror, and kick in adaptation efforts here, hoping the worst effects of disaster will be confined to other areas of the planet. Do you remember what happened next way back in the last century? Nazi tanks, planes, ships, and guns were all better than our instruments of war. So why didn't they roll over the whole world, like they rolled over Europe? Because the German war effort could not get the exponential growth effect into their factories. The assembley lines of Henry Ford, emulated by the rest of US industry, never really took off there. German industry produced 1 tank for every 30 tanks made by US factories, the same for ships, planes, guns and so forth. Our war material was inferior in performance for the most part, but we had so many times more equipment, fuel, food, and soldiers that we won. We spread our assembley line technology to Russia too. The exponential effect of GHG climate change is extremely obscure to the media and general public. Blame it on math and science illiteracy? Maybe so, jornalists in general are english majors in college, separated since grade schoold from science geeks who revel in concepts like exponential growth. Einstein said it, "the most powerful force in the universe is compound growth", we geeks live by statements like that from our childhood heroes. Meanwhile the rest of humanity can only wonder why, so what? Who cares about a math principle at the heart of the force of gravity itself. Why should we care that it defines the very nature of life? Cells divide and growth expands exponentially, thus life survives the battering of the titanic forces of our universe. Will media and public ever notice concepts like this? Even when this principle explains exactly why GHG climate change is a real emergency. Maybe the WW II analogy can get the point across? We beat that threat with exponential growth employing mass production, the assembley line. Adopt that powerful exponential manufacturing effect again, to face exponential climate disaster, and just maybe we'll have a chance. The great part about this politically is we can sell the climate cure quietly to our small contingent of environmentally aware voters, and at the same time shout about the prosperity, jobs, and financial security and independence brought on by the new energy and ag economy. So give some hope to those who understand the danger and despair, a very small percentage of us (maybe 10%?), by invoking that same concept that defines the disaster (exponential growth) and also holds hope for a solution that can match the ever increasing velocity of the catastrophe. Renewable energy and organic agriculture can proceed exponentially with a commercial manufacturing boom. It's really our best hope now. We can sell it as an effort to maintain our economic security in a very competitive world. We already have the support of the geekish enviro faction, the swing voters who vote jobs and family financial security are the ones we need to convince now. They understand a humming assembley line and a factory parking lot full to capacity. And a family checking account that doesn't bottom out from mortgage, credit card, car payments, insurance and on and on. Maybe we need to understand their point of view Adam?On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago 174 Responses
- Maybe we will see this kind of interview with Lester, Amory Lovins, and others on the cable talk circuit? Maddow, Colbert, Stewart, King, Olbermann.... producers take note of Dave's video please. You just know Colbert is watching it about now. Better watch some Colbert reruns to get ready Lester, hehey. The whole ice melt topic is excellent. Water and agricultural disruption from sea level rise and the drying up of traditional glacial water sources for nations like India, a titanically devestating economic effect for almost every region on the planet. Explaing why the effect feeds back into itself and proceeds at an ever increasing rate is a big challenge. An arctic cap that has solar absorbing ocean water versus solar reflecting ice/snow for the 24 hour daylight arctic summer is going to heat up faster and faster as the ice dissapears. That warmer water will in turn melt the Greenland ice sheet faster. Dobbins form in the glacier, lakes on the surface draining through cracks roar through the interior lubricating and undermining the bottom of the ice sheet. That makes bigger chunks break off into the sea as the glacier speeds up on it's path to the warmer arctic ocean. I guess some video/animation would be best to explain this kind of feedback effect.On Lester Brown and I, diavlogging posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago 5 Responses
- No more dams! We have too many already. River current power, ocean current power (the gulfstream off the east coast), tidal power, wave energy can all be tapped without new dams. These are steady predictable renewable energy sources that can come online without disturbing marine transportation or wildlife. Wind powered pumps storing energy behind existing dams and in new resevoirs, established in river wetland flood zones that were drained for agriculuture, would be a stabilizing addition to a national power grid and also help restore depleted aquifers. Increasingly severe climate change related drought and flooding will mandate much better water management and conservation. Energy storing wetland resevoirs that refill aquifers could be the key to facing glacial melt and the drying up of traditional international water supplies. Think of a nation like India, not to mention the US southwest, where will their water supply come from once glaciers dissapear? Flood waters will need to be captured, purified, and stored in wetland resevoirs and aquifers. Glaciers and a very few insufficient man made resevoirs are our storage now, climate change will end that in a few short years.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago 164 Responses
- "Its not going to happen. The environmentalists in CA will not allow all the new power lines that will be needed " Nobody will allow or invest in the cloud of overhead power lines you claim is necessary. That's a big reason that a buried transmission line, that carries the same current as about a tenth of the 80,000 megawatts of overhead AC transmission lines you recomend, is the way to go with a national electron super highway. 8 central power plant's worth of transmission with 2 or 3 times the current capacity of the equivalent conductor area suspended on towers, ought to be enough for main lines, then maybe 2 or 3 power plant's worth of capacity for feeder lines from prairie wind farms and solar furnace powered cogenerating factory areas with heat and compressed air storage for 24/7 power. If the buried HVDC lines are actively cooled with circulating fluid that dissipates resistance heating to the ground, emergency peak carrying capacity would be greatly enhanced. No heat, sag, and failure, that limits the capacity of over head lines, or low efficiency AC transmission, or NIMBY lawsuits to stop this technology. Why give this new energy economy manufacturing to other countries, why not pioneer smart super grid technology here and reap the job growth it will create? To make deniers, delayers, and naysayers calm and happy in their waning years? Not a good basis for national energy policy.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago 98 Responses
- These viruses appear to have a rat vector, namely corpo-RATS. The rats that run the corps(e) and their rat friends in government that are killing the biosphere. Great article Tom! Great comment farm girl! Tune in, turn on, drop out. Get as much of your food as possible from local farmers. Corporate ag and corporate government need to feel the cold reality of a massive boycott of their so-called food products.On Time for the mainstream media to face the factory farm-swine flu link posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 23 Responses
- Yep Bob, good eye. I was looking at the heliostat cost cutting, missed the rest. When is Google going to call us for new ideas? Hehey. I think the integrated solar furnace powered silicon fab/solar PV cell factory with CAES featuring geothermal well heat and factory waste heat for boosting the turbine air, with biogas/natural gas fuel cell backup is something they would want to try. You just know someone at Google is putting these pieces together. These are exciting times to be a geek.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 98 Responses
- Yeah Bob there was an article here on natural gas turbines being adapted to run on compressed air to do away with the compressor losses in the turbine. It dawned on me then that geothermal heat or solar furnace heat could substitute for the heat provided by the gas combustion. A very efficient backup for those renewable heat sources would use the natural gas (or biogas) in a solid oxide fuel cell first, extracting 50% of the energy directly in the form of electricty. The high temperature waste heat from the fuel cell could then be used to help powere the CAES fed turbine.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 98 Responses
- CAES goes better with geothermal heat and solar furnace heat to boost the output and replace the heat of compression, it's a way to make both geothermal and solar furnace power waterless, not to mention it stops the earthquake danger related to injecting water into hot rock formations. Maybe wind plus CAES could be done for less than 13 cents per kwh that way? Great way to cut through the capacity factor, fuel cost mess Bob. Per kwh cost! I discovered this too a few years back debating renewable energy haters. Anyway, really great work, very inspiring watching you take on all comers. We're gonna win, we got physics on our side, hehey.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 164 Responses
- I think progressives are shifting their stance on nuclear power Karen. We want a complete cleanup and will put up with nuclear plants only as long as that takes. The power generated in the meanwhile is welcome as a replacement for coal. The question is: will the industry put up with real regulation and R and D on a new mass producible "fast neutron" reactor design that can be retrofit into existing nuclear power plants so that the waste can be recycled and neutralized onsite? Build out of "self"(un)regulated nuclear power in its present form is unacceptable. This generation needs to cleanup it's nuclear mess. Nuclear industry leaders, lobbyists, and bought and paid for legislators and "regulators" will need to come around to save nuclear power. So far I see zero movement on their part, for instance, huge nuclear booster John McCain won't even accept nuclear waste transport through Arizona, but he is still in favor of a waste repository? Just ignoring the waste and contamination is not an option, onsite waste cleanup must be the central feature of any new generation of nukes.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 164 Responses
- Actually Bob I think Raser technologies has the right idea, a closed cycle turbine system, smart grid ready and able to tap all kinds of waste heat. For cooling of the condensation part of the Carnot cycle, ground source cooling using a circulation fluid would be excellent, the waste heat could even be dumped under a city, farming area, or greenhouse to cut winter heating loads. Have you heard of compressed air energy storage that pumps air underground into geothermally heated areas, then uses the air to drive turbines for grid power backup on demand. This could be built in conjunction with concentrating solar heat storage. The problem with compressed air energy storage has always been the lost heat of compression. And the problem with geothermal is water use and earthquake danger from steam lubricating underground rock layers. Storing compressed air inside a deep well pipe in hot (dry) rock would solve these.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 98 Responses
- Did anyone else notice the oft-repeated and debunked anti-renewable energy talking points injected in this thread? The great news though, the "trolling" isn't destroying the dialogue as it often has in the past. It seems to actually be a helpful influence? Is that some sort of sign that the cultural/political meme is shifting our way? Re-frame it and they will come..around, hehey. The discussion re-framed into a green jobs and manufacturing initiative to let US compete on a global scale again and free our economy up from the weight of periodic imported energy price spikes, the usual denier/delayer talking points fall to the floor and wriggle, gasping for air. I think the secret is to not reply directly to trollishness, simply reply to a cooperative commentor, and refer to the talking point in passing only. Passing on to a positive addition to the dialectic.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 164 Responses
- Hydro power dams and all dams need much better fish ladders and replanting for runs of fish already destroyed. A very effective periodic lock system that allowed fish to pool in a tank that then "locks" at the bottom and fills with water to the depth of the dam, then opens and cycles over and over all through the run would do it. River current power generation is a huge untapped distributed power source too. Either underwater "wind" mill type devices in deep enough water or conveyor belt drive hydro-generator systems installed on existing concrete areas (these would not interfere with boats or wildlife). Another great new hydropower source could be tapped by installing dams in the sides of rivers that drain flood water off into river lowlands (many former wetlands, now cities or farmland) then allow water to flow back through side dams further down the river when flooding subsides, turbines or conveyor belt dgenerators could then tap the flow both ways. Into and out of wetland resevoirs. This would also restore aquifers and clean flood waters. Wind powered pumps could even be used to store hydropower in wetland resevoirs and move water back up the water gradient to wetlands further away from the river. Imagine the power and water conservation possibilities available in the large river systems, it's huge.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 164 Responses
- Yeah bio-d, my conclusion too. Trusting Russian data collection on their 30 year old design might be difficult, even with the "nuclear power at any cost" revolving door "self" (no) regulation NRC. A new R and D effort will need to be mounted, and not simply to recycle unused fuel, these reactors will need to neutralize waste with "fast neutron" reactions. The industry should not be allowed to proceed with new reactors unless they both recycle and neutralize existing waste, are passively failsafe (with all power shut off anywhere in the operating cycle, the reactor shuts down safely), and they do not produce new nuclear waste or contamination problems. This might take a decade ot two, given the fact that just permitting financing and building a known and approved design nuclear plant right now usually takes over a decade. That will be too late to head off climate change. Nuclear needs to go on the back burner, with R and D carefully directed to these new goals.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 164 Responses
- No substitute for "ready reserve capacity"? I say we could find enough utility customers that would accept a bit of sacrifice, operating on emergency power to help adjust during a transition to a renewable smart grid. As in WW II when people pitched in and sacrificed for the war effort, we still have patriotic green citizens enough to acomplish this kind of national effort again. Cure frequent outages with emergency backup storage in homes and those homeowners would be glad to cooperate. It would mean our vital home systems could still function during storm outage. During ice storms for instance, when we need heat, circulating pumps or furnace blowers would still keep our homes warm enough to keep us and the pipes from freezing. Replacing frozen plumbing is a mortgage busting expense when one is on the edge of bankruptcy wondering when job loss or medical emergency will make a family homeless. The growing storage, used with smart grid technology to smooth supply/demand mismatch, could gradually eliminate the need for "spinning reserve" (coal or nuclear turbines are kept spinning, producing no power, wasting fuel).On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 164 Responses
- Nordpool! Very cool ac. I wonder if Gar could do an article on this? He is pro-electron super highway. Cost of the buried and underwater HVDC would be most interesting. Maybe a danish grid expert would write an article on this? It would be helpful to have a cost estimate for buried HVDC cable to use in designing a hypothetical super grid for the USA. With no over heat, sag, and failure effect, like overhead lines, and half the transmission losses, the copper in overhead lines could be recycled and put to better use, carring 2 or 3 times the power per cross sectional area, in a buried national smart grid. A "Yankpool"? Mass produced concrete channel and conductors that swim in insulating coolant, installed with robotic digging, assembley, and placement equipment? Buried in freeway median, with the parts delivered by semi, that might beat the cost of overhead wires in terms of dollars per kwh transported? Stringing overhead wires on towers assembled with cranes can run into a lot of cost over runs. Not to mention the delays created by NIMBY lawsuits against overhead power transmission. That adds huge cost and delay,as we see happening with new nuclear power plants, time is money. When will the Norwegian Statoil Hydro floating wind machine be connected to Nordpool? There's a date to celebrate for renewable distributed smart grid boosters ...everywhere! On second though, Grist why not send me to report on Nordpool? Hehehey.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago 98 Responses
- Good point ac. If everything were washed and cleaned with 90% compressed air (people, clothes, dishes, windows, dogs...) and 10% water and composting toilets and pinpoint irrigation were the norm, and nukes and coal plants were shut down, maybe, just maybe water would be less of a problem someday. But then there is the problem of climate change and melting glaciers and drought. I like wind/wave powered floating desalination to augment waning natural water supplies. Great site too, are those 60kv DC underwater cables (kables)? Flow charts like this might just show how a distributed renewable smart grid could work with visual representation. All the conjecture filled with theory laden utility engineering terminology just doesn't penetrate the mass media public mind set.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago 98 Responses
- Forgot one other major advantage of DC long distance transmission: Power capacity of overhead lines is determined by resistance heating in those lines, when too much power is carried on an overhead wire, it heats up, sags, and eventually fails. Underground, HVDC transmission systems can consist of cable that carries cooling fluid, so that when an emergency overload ocurrs, fluid can be pumped down the core cooling the cable and preventing failure. This allows underground HVDC to carry far more electrons at normal transmission levels, but also to safely exceed normal power levels in case extra transmission capacity is necessary in an emergency. Pumps can respond to rising cable temperature, dumping heat to the ground using heat exchange or evaporative cooling in an emergency. Overhead wires rely on passing air for cooling, not as reliable in peak situations like ultrahot summer cooling loads. Also overhead wires are vulnerable to storms of ever increasing severity (given climate change), 300 mph super tornadoes are here already. Should a national grid be exposed, overhead to these storms? Even ice storms can bring overhead power down. A safe and reliable national grid must be buried. AC transmission can't be done efficiently underground. Therefore: A national grid must use HVDC. Debate over, hehey.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago 164 Responses
- HVDC long distance power transmission is a post Tesla/Edison AC/DC battle development Sean. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Currents Tesla was right about AC for local grids, transformers are the key to adjusting for line loss voltage drop. With Edison's DC local grid voltage dropped the further away from the generator the customer was, then that made it impossible to mass produce motors and other devices that work at a standard specific voltage. Transformers easily conquered that problem, but they only work with AC. So AC is the right way to go for the power that enters your home. Long distance transmission is different, the losses due to AC transmission are double those of DC, this becomes a major efficiency factor in a system that would span a continent to smooth renewable power variations. Furthermore, the conversion systems in local areas that tap the HVDC lines and turn the DC into AC for the local grid solve compatability problems with different AC phase, frequency and voltage in the local systems. The conversion also allows local grids to compatably feed excess power back onto the national HVDC grid. This makes distributed generation and storage act like a central power plant in terms of reliability and it makes the super grid act like a huge power plant (without the one-way nature of central power plants). Another advantage of DC over AC for long distance transmission is the capability of burying HVDC lines with the same low losses of overhead HVDC. AC transmission losses soar with underground/underwater installation because of capacitance to ground in the cable. AC looks at a capacitor as low resistance and that long cable with a ground sheath around it acts like a giant capacitor. DC looks at a capacitor as a high resistance storage device, which means that HVDC actually incorporates some extra storage in the buried cable. And of course HVDC buried lines face much less NIMBYism. No stray voltage, no unsightly overhead wires. And another benefit, HVDC as a buried cable wind or solar power collection network that picks up power right from the renewable energy devices, automatically readjusts voltage, frequency, and phase before the power gets into your home or factory. HVDC could be buried in a right-of-way dispute-free zone, federal highway freeway median. The NIMBY lawsuits for AC overhead lines would be similar to the delays encountered with projects like cape Wind and the construction of new nuclear plants. Interminable lawyering/fiddling while the climate burns. All about HVDC, invented in Sweden in the 1930s, first deployed in Russia in the 1950s, in use all over the world now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current ps. I'm a former television transmitter engineer, my first job out of college. Thus my fascination with high voltage electricty. I'm a real geek from an early age, reading all about Edison and tesla, building Tesla coils, reading about the birth of nuclear power and the Manhattan Project and nuclear submarines in grade school. I was right there (in spirit) with the guys under the squash court in Chicago piling up graphite blocks to build the first nuclear reactor during WW II, even though I was a couple decades late to the party. My b-day is 7 years to the day after the first bomb test. Like many of my classmates, taught to "duck and cover" in school, I dreamed of a mushroom cloud on the horizon out the school windows. What a nightmare.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago 164 Responses
- Exactly Gar, investors in northern plains wind need to be able to sell it, for that a free market national power grid is the hot setup. There's another problem though. A land rush for wind power sites would allow speculation and related market manipulation to drive the price of wind electricty sky high. A national park on the prairie that doubles as a wind leasing area operated fairly by the government to insure renewable energy for US all would be helpful. Theodore Roosevelt Prairie National Park (and national wind farm), we need a new national park (like the African wildlife parks where the herds roam) covering parts of each of the northern great plains states. Let's see bison thundering again. Taxes? It's a political loser, cap and trade is a tax plus another venue for "derivative" trading. "Bundled climate default swaps"? No thanks. Divert subsidies from coal to wind, make the coal industry clean up it's mess, including the mess they already made. Don't call it a tax, just use regulation to force the costs on big coal that they have avoided all these years. That'll put a price on carbon. In general diverting subsidies from big fossil, nukes, and chemical ag (well over 100 billion per year) to reneweble energy and organic ag will be enough incentive to get this energy re-evolution going. And it's tax and revenue neutral, no new spending..no new taxing. That's a plan our poor democrats can run on. When this healthcare "reform" turns out to be mandatory health insurance from the same old companies, with no cost controls, and no public option until 2013, and allows insurance monopolists to set prices so high for "pre-existing conditions" that only Saudi shieks can afford it, no amount of money or volunteers will get our democratic candidates re-elected. Add in a new tax in the form of cap and trade or a tax and dividend, or whatever. And Cheney could beat Obama in 2012. What I'm saying is, we are in deep trouble politically. Rove is licking his chops as this mutation of "reform" is being crafted. He can't wait for cap and trade legislation. We have all but failed on healthcare already, if we don't get this green jobs and manufacturing deal done, forget it. Back to the Reagan revolution, kiss the biosphere goodbye. The stakes are very high and the right knows they only need to morph anything that passes the way they did to this healthcare bill to win it all in the next few years.On To unlock wind power, put a price on carbon posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago 7 Responses
- The rocket scientists are up against google? http://www.reuters.com/article/GlobalClimateandAlternativeEnergy09/idUSTRE58867I20090909 That could be rough. Raser makes a better closed cycle turbine system too. Water based turbines are not as efficient unless the steam is discarded. And water use is the Achilles heel of coal and nuclear already, do we want to go there with solar too? I think not. These solar heat storage turbine systems would work better in conjunction with heat hungry factories. Like maybe silicon fabrication/solar PV cell plants for instance? Now there's a winning technology. Green manufacturing of solar PV that provides cogenerated power for the grid even after the sun sets. Lots of US dollars held by the Saudis might just be available to invest in technology like this. They want to go with solar as their oil dries up. Let's make a deal. Our technology and their money could build solar powered PV factories all over their deserts and ours. Heed this trend silicon valley.On SolarReserve's 24/7 solar power plant posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago 98 Responses
- Uhh yeah maybe "superconducting" smart grids are pretty futuristic Sean. But superconducting energy storage is actually helping smooth the power my computer is using right now. A national grid would only need high voltage direct current transmission, a technology developed in the 1930s. the stabilization produced by all the dsifferent reneewable sources in diverse locations would make on huge baseload power system, taken all together, as this national grid could allow. As we know from experience centralized grids shut down quite often. They aren't perfectly reliable. I submit that a renewable grid with distributed storage in each building and distributed emergency backup capacity of 200 watts per home would be more reliable than the present central grid. Think of it like the emergency power system on a submarine. In every sub movie when the depth charge hits, disrupting the main power circuits, backup circuits automatically kick in. This is the sort of system I'm talking about. It doubles as an emergency system right down to the individual building and a distributed storage and generating capacity that smart grid computers can use to smooth reneable supply and adjust demand. Backup biogas/natural gas cogeneration plants for every 100 to 1000 homes or equivalent load, located in factories, on farms, at landfills, at municipal waste facilities, and larger buildings would stabilize the grid better than central baseload power does now. And a national HVDC grid is much more reliable than any sigle coal or nuclear plant. What might seem fantastic now, might just seem obvious a few years into this 20 year transition from fossil and nuclear power to renewables. By the time it's obvious, the real money will have been made. I want in on some of the juicy trading before the bubble bursts, hehey. Bring on the earnings expectations!!On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago 164 Responses
- Yeah Sean this present centralized grid needs "baseload" power. But a distributed generation and storage renewable smart grid with a national electron super highway would not. A gradual transition over the next 20 years will still use baseload power plants though. The fly in the ointment? Nuclear waste. It's there. everywhere a nuclear power plant exists. Here in the US in used nuclear fuel rod "swimming pools". This waste and the decommisioned parts of nuclear plants can't be safely and economically transported, the two are mutually exclusive. A "glow train" (as the nuclear cask carrying trains are nicknamed) can't stop anywhere on it's path because it is like a giant portable x-ray (gamma too) machine. Stop the train and the surrounding community gets a bigger and more dangerous radiation dose the longer the train is stalled. The casks can't be constructed with heavy enough shielding to cancel this effect, because that would makle it too expensive to transport the waste. So it's either too expensive or too dangerous. Furthermore, too dangerous..actually means too expensive. Why? Because the sort of radiation accident from a stalled, derailed, or worst case cask destroying train accident, can't be insured. No company will write the policy, what with nearly unlimited damages. So the alternative is to treat the waste in place, within the nuclear plant containment. That will take new waste neutralizing "fast neutron" reactors, installed at existing plants. That means the nuclear nughtmare will be with us for awhile, it would be an inter-generational crime to leave it for the future. We won't need baseload nuclear power (once the transition to the new smart grid is acomplished), but we are stuck with it. As long as we are operating waste neutralizing reactors, the power from them should be used to shut down coal, oil, and natural gas powerplants ASAP. Even Amory can't beat this argument.On Do we need nuclear and coal plants for baseload power? posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago 164 Responses
- we have a winner. 0.2 liters per flush! http://www.envirolet.com/vf.html It uses a vacuum system to suck the waste outside to the composting chamber. No sewer, drain field or city sewer hookup necessary. It works on the same principle as the vacuum system at a drive in bank. If there are no Envirolet dealers in your area, try it out the next time you drive by a (sh)Citibank branch. Place a suitable test substance in the tube and hit "send". Screaming/vomiting on the part of bank employees will signal a successful flush. You gotta do a video on these vacuum/composting toilets Umbra. Maybe a video "test drive"? Hehey. What better way to make them trendy?On Ask Umbra on climate-skeptic teachers, low-flow toilets, and more posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago 32 Responses
- U..F...oooohh!!...Why do we heart Umbra? "Just BEE-cause". Insect power, keep helping the honeymakers. Talk up the wilderness bee crop idea please Umbra? Just as wilderness crops like shea butter and natural herbal medicines are putting a decent living into natural symbiotic (rain) forestry in Afica and South/central America, it might buoy the rural economy here. The wildflower honey we get from the woods and fields and trails here is sublime. Anopther question? Since 100% perfectly organic is a hard standard to acheive in a contaminated biosphere, could a lesser standard be developed? I'm thinking of honey because it's hard to get 100% wild plant source food for bees, but 95% ought to be possible given wildness trail portable apiaries. Towed out a few miles on a bear proof trailer? Why not? An as-ORGANIC-as-you-can-get standard.On Tweet for the bees posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago 4 Responses
- Right on Steven, we are raising awareness. Maybe a comment on a blog is just a microscopic baby step, but it is a step. Taken all together, all over the internet, these individual comments might just help convince 10% of the humans on planet earth to awaken to our collective plight in time? And realize the solutions will restore prosperity to the developed world and bring the vast majority of humanity that is in poverty up to some sort of comfort and security level. Prosperity and doing the right thing can go hand in hand. All it takes is 10% of us to realize that and the green energy, agriculture, and manufacturing re-evolution will proceed on it's own momentum. 10% is a big number in terms of commercial and political/cultural trends. It doesn't seem quite so daunting to get to that fraction on grass roots, blogland people power. The great progressive Howard Dean showed the Obama forces the way. We need to learn from their excellent examples.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 1 day ago 112 Responses
- The polling is flawed. Calling it global warming is the first mistake. Human induced green house gas climate change is a better term. A much better polling question on this topic might be: Should the US revive manufacturing and jobs by competing in the global race to end reliance on oil, coal, and fossil fuels? Or: Should the US ignore the problems of reliance on imported energy and the loss of manufacturing jobs and stay on the same course auto, oil and coal industry lobbyists have set out for us? Or: Should the US continue to lag in the manufacturing of electric cars, wind machines, solar energy devices, smart grid equipment, and energy efficiency devices, and continue to rely on foreign manufacturing? Polling is a pretty ridiculous activity in general, but it won't go away. So why not design polls that reframe these issues in a more progressive light? These sorts of questions...Do you believe in global warming, the devil, fairies, aliens, ghosts, death panels, all have about the same usefulness as far as public policy is concerned. Proceed from a faulty premise, and get lead down the garden path to an invalid conslusion. Did you see the latest Bachman Boener Newty over reach? "Tell your representatives! Dont take away my healthcare!" It's the same with this poll. "Do you believe in global warming?" Converts in the minds of the under informed into "Do you believe it's warmer today than it was yesterday?" Just do the poll in the fall and the result will be easily forseeable. And teabag the question into: "Do you believe the communist Obama administration, in league with liberal environmentalists, is trying to destroy our country with the myth of global warming?" Then you can get a riot. Hehehey.On Climate psychology in cartoons: clues for solving the messaging mystery posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago 7 Responses
- So are you saying that the course Cheney set out for US is the right one? A continued reliance on imported oil and oil wars to get it. An economy at the mercy of merciless multinational corporations (many of them state owned like ARAMCO, the saudi national oil corp), international manipulated oil trading markets, and debt financed by oil producing nations. Are you suggesting we wait and let China manufacture all the devices needed for the new global energy economy? And that we keep on track making gas guzzlers and removing mountaintops to keep burning coal? Driving toyota and honda monster gas guzzling trucks and sUVs? I've noticed all the real "patriotic" gas guzzlers are switching to imported infernal combustion behemoths. Maybe you ought to form your own country then. Do you already live in Texas, the governor wants to secede from the union? Yes I'm sure you love teabagging as much as the next feller, you have proven that already. Please use it to destroy someone elses future, ours is spoken for already. Sarah Palin would make a great dictator. Good luck with all that.On Why the 'SuperFreakonomics' global-warming chapter is worth your time posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago 12 Responses
- It's true isaac, the sheer volume of regulations might be way too big. Enforcement of the useful ones, like food safety, anti-trust, insider trading, and market manipulation is misdirected and ineffective. Enforcement needs to be applied through random testing, the same way quality control works on an assembley line. Yep, biofuelishness is rampant, blending subsidies, burning rain forest to make palm oil, and so forth are the result of criminal corporate lobbying. On waste stream biomass though, the future is bright. Not only from traditional sources, sewage, farm waste, factory waste, manure, garbage, and waste wood. Think of all that weed and algae overgrowth clogging waterways, a fantastic resource for clean energy to backup a renewable distributed smart grid, GHG prevention, organic fertilizer, toxin removal, and a great opportunity to restore healthy biodiversity to lakes and rivers. A combination of aqua-culture and algae energy and organic fertilizer alone could be huge. Imagine a supply of fish that pregnant women and kids could eat safely (minus the mercury and stray hormones) and that helps relieve pressure on wild fish. An eco-capitalist's dream. Onward. Do good, do well.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago 112 Responses
- That's the key to stopping the big biosphere killing dragnet of constant consumption. Quality over quantity. Poetry over propaganda. Simplicity and efficiency over energy "richness". Taste over supersize.On Simple people posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago 6 Responses
- Exactly what I think isaac, use the waste stream only for biomass related fuel and chemicals. Yep, I will let you know if I hear of research on algae based contamination cleanup. Bioreactors that float in the Hudson River and use the moving river energy and solar power to extract the PCBs from the mud? It's a possibility. I like the idea of taking all the nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer and manure runoff back out of lakes and wetlands with algae, then biodigesting it for biogas energy. Organic fertilizer would be left over. If the toxic metals like mercury or plutonium could be removed in a section of a bioreactor with specialized algae, the final result would be mercury free fertilizer. The special algae could be processed separately and the metal recycled. This is an area to look for new up and coming bio-technology companies. Eco friendly bio-technology, as you state, using the naturally ocurring microorganisms. Maybe sdelective breeding to get the desired biochemical activity. Yeah actually getting past the politics just might get to solutions faster. I'm a free market, pro-capitalist, pro-regulation, anti-corporate monopoly and corruption, pro-socialized healthcare and education, pro-government supported science, research and development sort of political organism, hehey. And I like a government like ours was in WW II when it guided war production, we need to return to yesteryear to get this green re-evolution going strong. Strong enough to restore jobs and end dependence on imported energy and the world at war over oil.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago 112 Responses
- Says mr "free" market. Hehehey. You should consider standup comedy, you don't even need jokes, just a comparison of your paradoxical positions would suffice. Right arm Joel, keep up the good fight for real free markets. Is there any sort of test kit for milk safety that indivuals, farmers or consumers could use? It would behoove ag extention programs to check into this and work on developing random testing regimens for raw milk supplies. The ridiculous, nearly non-existent testing procedures employed now in the food industry in general aren't even random in nature, insuring fatally (well publicized fatalities at that!) flawed results. People who at least understand rudimentary statistics and quality control methods need to step forward from our state university ag programs. Without random testing quality control is non-existent, a total sham. What is more dangerous, untrained, poorly unsupervised minium wage employees preparing your fast food, thawed and frozen who knows how many times on the way to your palate..or responsible farmers selling raw milk to their customers, family and friends directly? The best scenario, random testing of all food in the system, raw or processed. There's your freed up market.On I drink raw milk (sold illegally on the underground market) posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago 49 Responses
- The ocean water spraying "ships" better be wind/wave/ocean current powered energy platforms. Burning diesel fuel to spray the water isn't going to be a good idea. And of course this analysis leaves out the concept of increasing snow in winter over cold arctic regions, protecting ice caps and tundra from melting during the 24 hr sunlight of summer. Dark ocean water and tundra absorb solar energy, snow and ice reflect it. Melting tundra releases methane, creating another huge feedback effect, along with the feedback of darker solar energy absorbent surfaces. Ocean water can be strategically sprayed up near desert areas in equatorial regions too, increasing precipitation and greening deserts, which would extract huge amounts of extra GHG, but only given organic agriculture. Which brings up a much better "geo-engineering" solution, that really might not be geo-engineering in the sense that the freaks and geeks talk it up. Convert agriculture from chemical fertilizer to organic fertilizer derived from biodigestion of the biomass waste stream. That's a way to cancel huge amounts of methane (due to fertilizer and manure runoff acting to decompose cellulose in wetlands) and nitrous oxide from chemical fertilizer and manure. Not to mention that biogas from the process of making organic fertilizer can help to backup distributed generation and storage smart grids. Whatever happened to the "death of environmentalism" guys? These fellers seem to be cashing in on a similar trend. Dissing the DFH/treehuggers. As far as the invalid, unscientific talking points they are repeating, have they never heard about exponential feedback effects? They do have a point on global cap™, it looks like a corporate dodge at best and at worst another source of "derivative" trading for international financial gaming. A commercial wave of renewable energy and conservation products (like electric cars) is already taking off, lead by China and Europe. That is the best hope for climate cure, an exponentially growing business in green manufacturing, investment, and jobs. To match the pace of exponentially growing GHG climate change, only an exponentially growing wave of profit producing business will do. Now it's the role of governments to shift subsidies from the old energy and ag economy to the new energy and ag economy to help it out. Spraying ocean water could be some sort of last ditch effort, too late to have the desired effect because there is no commercial profit motive behind it. This scenario is more likely, let's say we decide we want geo-engineering? Throwing up particles into the upper atmosphere to block sunlight and produce cooling on the order of what happened in 1816 ("the year without a summer"). No need to employ a magical "garden hose". Volcanoes did that job in 1816 and are getting set to do it again. Land is rising due to magma pressure under Alaska. It was in check, pushed back by the gravity of glacial ice. As the ice melts the magma gets ready for a big blowout. Under Yellowstone the aquifer is drying up, drought and water wasting ag and cities are the culprits in this case. With the same result as in Alaska, land is rising as the water weight is removed. The magma bubble is pushing up threatening to produce a super volcano. This is happening all over the planet wherever snow and rain drought, melting ice, and human water waste is removing the cap on magma pressure. Eventually if the trend continues, brought on by climate change and human population growth and water waste, several volcanoes will blow. That will engage a natural catastrophic "thermostat". Say hello to a mini ice age that might make summer dissapear for a few years. Say goodbye to most of world GDP and billions of humans with it. What say you freaks? Maybe you need another chapter on this scenario?On Why the 'SuperFreakonomics' global-warming chapter is worth your time posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago 12 Responses
- Well Gene, I think a computer model needs to be done with different scales of distributed generation and storage. Find the one that optimizes stability with maximum renewables and minimum storage cost. Plug this in if you have a supercomputer at work (hehey): One apropriately sized biogas/natural gas fuel cell/turbine backup generator at a local factory, landfill, or municipal facility for every 100 to 1000 homes or equivalent load. Battery backup for 20 hours of emergency power in every building that is also used to store power through a smart grid to adjust supply and demand. And electric cars with storage that can be used the same way. Rooftop solar on buildings connected to the smart grid that can also recharge backup batteries in emergency outages. Regional, wind, wave, solar furnace factory cogeneration backed up by natural gas fuel cell cogeneration, and PV farm installations connected through a national grid sized to take into account the inherent increased stability from the smart grid with local distributed generation and storage. And last but not least, heat/cold storage in factories, buildings and appliances (like freezers) that is charged up by ground source heating/cooling, that uses excess power when it's available and shuts down when needed. The stored heating/cooling capacity would let the factory furnace, building or appliance coast at the required stable temperature. Could nukes and coal plants be rendered unecessary by some combination of these devices that would actually reduce energy costs over time? Remember the electric cars would save a lot of oil related costs, including oil wars and periodic recessions. Obama claimed the cost of grid power storm outage is 75 billion per year in lost GDP.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 72 Responses
- I sincerely hope you are right Tom, it would be a relief to have a solution for nuclear waste and contamination. We can't leave it for future generations, it would be criminally negligent. But why use them to replace coal, wouldn't it be wiser to start with the oldest most dangerous plants or even already shut down plants first, retrofit them as a test bed? then begin to treat the dangerously stored waste we already have? A few years of secure testing will be needed even if test data does already exist on the design. Mass production for cost reduction is another can of worms that will have to be developed while testing goes forward. Get them going and shut down coal as you get them online. I hate to admit it, as I oppose nuclear power, but we can't let the waste just sit there, it's our responsibility, this generation to handle it. Gotta step up, like past generations did in world wars. It's true for this new energy economy too. It's got to get done, now.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 72 Responses
- Yeah me too isaac, sorry. I have a feeling we are on the same side anyway. Just a matter of how to proceed from here. Dig this crazy bioreactor algae idea. Jimson weed concentrates heavy metals in soil, actually extracts it. What if algae with this genetic trait could be developed (good GMO, recombinant?). Heavy metals, mercury, radioactive metals removed from soil and water by the algae could then be biodigested down to just the basic elements and the metals recycled. Could PCBs be treated similarly by the right algae? Pretty interesting stuff, something like it might already be in the works somewhere. What do you think?On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 112 Responses
- A technique we have become familiar with here over the years, accept that human induced GHG climate change exists, but deny that it is a serious effect that needs mitigation, or that it is too expensive to fix, or that change is "natural", you seem to be recombining (recombinant, get it? hehey) them to further confuse and delay, above all to delay. "...nature is a non-steady state system and tipping points only apply to steady state systems; there has to be a continual, persistant set of baseline conditions to tip away from" Nice gibberish! It's the same old nonsense though, just an excuse to proceed with business as usual, guzzling gas and removing mountaintops to get more coal, with some extra eco-destructive GMO biofuel scams thrown in to look green. And you also know that turning the biomass waste stream into corporate products will take vulnerable genetically modified organisms (microorganisms in this case), just like chemical ag uses GMO to design plants that are resistant to herbicides. The whole idea behind burning biomass as fuel, cellulosic ethanol or biodiesel, is to come up with new patentable microorganisms to do the job more efficiently so that biofuel can compete with petroleum and battery based transportation. Poison the biomass to be processed to kill all the competing micoorganisms, then let the frankenbugs take over. Control temperature and Oxygen/CO2 levels and out pops the gas guzzler fuel of the future! The claim that you never heard of this is a bit strange. Maybe it will give you a new research direction. And are you asking us to believe that you don't just flat out deny human induced GHG climate change when you are with other deniers? Oh sorry for the new terminology, but most of it isn't new at all, it's evolving along with the new energy and ag economy. A "renewable technological economy" was what I was going for. One that does not consume the biosphere, but still uses science and technology..as opposed to a renewable economy that uses labor intensive organic ag and shuns technology. The back to the horse power movement. Agrarian primitivism. Biodigestion of the biomass waste stream to produce biogas energy (preventing huge amounts of methane and nitrous oxide entering the atmosphere) and organic fertilizer using regular old naturally ocurring bacteria combined with solar powered robotic agriculture, that's the sort of technology I'm talking about. Keeping the productivity of modern industrial ag, but throwing out the GHG/fossil fuel intensive, chemical toxin/GMO methods. BTW: you might consider improving your ad hominem skills, try upping your intake of beckscrement and drug limboob. Good luck with that! Hehey.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 112 Responses
- " i work developing chemical processes to turn agricultural and municipal waste into valuable fuels and chemicals through yeast, fungal or bacterial fermentations." You mean like the yeast in snack foods derived from papermill waste? Let me guess, the clorine (that introduces dioxin into our food supply) used to eliminate competing microorganisms in the process is failing, so the next big thing is GMO yeast and a version of "roundup" for microorganisms? No wonder you are defensive. "i dont appreciate being talked down to by a political hack" Hehehey, good obfuscation here though: "Why is it fair that 1% of the worlds population gets to do 20% of the worlds manufacturing?" Why is it that 20% consume 50% of the world's resources in a way that is catastrophically changing the biosphere? Should we increase this destructive consumption in order to increase fairness? Nope. We should manufacture a renewable technical civilization. With technology that does not consume our living planet, the use and manufacturing of products will increase as the standard of living of everyone on the planet imptroves. Lift all boats or go for the corporate bottomline in the next quarterly report? The yeast food additive model is an example of the pervasive short term bottomline world view. So what if the current GMO/toxin cycle is ineffective next year? We can make money now, then develop a new GMO/toxin pair next year. It's all/only about the short term dollars. Your tipping point, point is ludicrous. How can anyone in the biological sciences not understand exponential growth? Your job involves the conditions for growing microorganisms that display this fundamental trait of life itself. Math illiteracy is rampant in media and our culture in general, but even in the sciences? Yep. That's why the "political hacks" pushing denier talking points have such a liesurely time finding scientists to tout their nonsense. Evidently you are actually volunteering to help out? Amazing.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 112 Responses
- Good point hiker, I just consumed some refined sugar after getting off of it for 6 months. The difference is obvious now. I'll try the salt too. I have seen the processed food effect over a longer time period. But as you probably know from hiking, there is still hope for those addicted to junk food. These scientists are wrong in their dire prognosis. The bad news for the addicted? The only cure is exersize, aerobic exersize of at least 45 minutes duration per day. Junk food, heroin, crack, even tobacco can be overcome with the brain biochemical restoration of aerobic exersize. The dopamine effect described in the article in which the rats needed more and more junk food to get the pleasure center reward, is the explanation. Aerobic exersize restores dopamine levels in the brain and clears out dompamine receptors, the sites in the brain that become clogged with the consumption of the addictive substance. As the receptors get filled it takes more and more of the addictive agent to get a pleasure response and only time abstaining form the substance and/or exersize can clear the receptors. Addiction does not give one time for abstinence. Exersize speeds the receptor restoration. The really frightening thing about addiction is that it renders mirror neurons inoperable. Mirror neurons allow the empathy response to occur. And that empathy response is the key to the success of civilization. The old golden rule, universal ethical behaviour. Without which we would all turn into cigar chomping, fentanyl consuming limboobs, looking out for ourselves alone. Hehehey.On Scientists claim junk food is as addictive as heroin posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 18 Responses
- You will need to actually state your solution for waste Tom. It makes no sense to talk about any increase in nuclear power or even keeping the status quo system going without it. Is it to build waste neutralizing reactors that retrofit into existing nuclear sites? As far as I can see it is the only way to deal with the waste problem and it will also generate power. The problem is that this technology does not exist in any affordable, safe, mass producible form. If a design could be developed it would take at least 10 years, probably 20 to actually deploy. Nuclear advocates talk about Russian designs started in the soviet era for instance, but how can any research coming from that sphere be trusted? There is far less oversight there than even the criminally negligent revolving door fake NRC "regulation" here.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago 72 Responses
- "...i profoundly disagree with your assertion that we have only a brief window to act before things spin out of control, there is absolutely no scientific basis for tipping points and the like." Since we know there actually is a scientific basis for human caused GHG climate disaster, and we realize individuals with your point of view can't be convinced by scientific evidence, we choose to stop trying to convince you. We will stick to convincing swing voters instead, people in the middle of the political spectrum. Extremists are being marginalized daily as their spokespersons rant. Feel free to further this cause. It helps get the majority to vote for a climate curing, job creating green energy and ag revolution. We will continue to emphasize economic stability and financial security by advocating independence from imported energy and chemical fertilizer (yes, that's right, ammonia fertilizer is now brought in on ocean going tankers from Russia). Jobs, jobs, jobs. Votes, votes, votes. Stall out this new energy economy with denier talking points and all those jobs continue to be exported. It's the same result of "death panel" talking points in the healthcare debate, 10s of thousands of families losing their homes and 1000s dying every month because they don't have health insurance. Millions losing their jobs, healthcare, and homes because US industries can't/won't compete in this worldwide renewable energy race. It feeds into the same decline brought on by the Reagan revolution. Thank you Reaganites and conservatives, you have turned US into a debtor nation dependent on imported energy and manufactured goods and a second class world power rapidly dropping down the list in every category used to measure national success. Maybe more Reagan de-regulation will help quicken the slide? Let's just let the "free" market build more coal and oil lubricant under this melting glacier. Woooosh! The US economy dropping into the ocean of counterfiet (100s of trillions) electronic currency disguised as "credit default swaps" and "bundled mortgages" and "derivatives". US credit meltdown. How long will china conytinue to lend US our money back to buy more stuff from them? Why actually manufacture anything? That's for suckers, right?On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago 112 Responses
- As with nearly everything we need to get this new energy economy going Jon, one of the first best mass produced wind generators way ahead of it's time, namely the Jacobs Wind Electric was a US product. Way back in the 1930s Minnesotan Jacobs developed direct drive, feathering blades, and a machine so durable it ran in Antarctic winds for decades. With one modification for the legendary Antarctic weather. Sheet metal had to be added to the leading edge of the wooden blades so the wind driven snow wouldn't eat through them over time. We've got the people who can do the job, what we lack is application of capital to the endeavor. If GE and Clipper (founded by former GE wind employees) were given the capital to proceed as vigorously as WW II war production did, they could ramp up and still compete with Vestas and even lower cost chinese companies. But you are right, education so people layed off in other industries could adapt to wind machine production is going to be necessary. We've got a great wind power tech school program here in Wisconsin, right on Lake Michigan. http://www.gotoltc.com/programs/windEnergy.php Check this: Vestas partnering with UW Madison Engineering College. http://www.news.wisc.edu/16491On American stimulus funds benefiting foreign wind energy firms posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago 8 Responses
- Hehey, you said "lick". So do tell us please dear Umbra, what was your choice of Halloween costume? Did you go with the Tina Fey as Sarah Palin suggestion? Pictures? Good idea with the multiple questions, a tribute to Dear Abby?On Ask Umbra on her hotness, corporate gift baskets, and more posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago 7 Responses
- It comes down to this: Is it cooler to drive and live and advocate a carbon free life, or is it cooler to deny climate change and live like a capitalist pig? The ultimate measure of coolness is who will your lifestyle attract? Joe Lieberman, Ann Coulter, "drug" Limboob, Michelle Bachman, and those weird talking heads on effnews...or Al Franken, Uma Thurman, George Clooney, Ana Marie Cox, and the cool talking heads on msnbc... Apparently Dyson thinks it's cool to become a famous clusterfox hero based on lying about climate change, but cool to who? Uncool people. Is Dennis Miller actually funny? Of course not. He's not cool. I saw a car show tonight where the protagonist pretended to impress a beautiful passenger with a ride in an 800 hp Corvette. Was this cool? Nope. The actress pretending to be impressed for the bit, would really have been impressed by a ride in an electric Corvette though. That would have been cool. So be cool, stay cool, cool off the planet. Cool? Cool.On Is Freeman Dyson really "brave"? posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago 20 Responses
- Whoops I forgot another huge source of methane in my article. It comes from manure and chemical fertilizer runoff. Since the carbon to nitrogen ratio for optimum biodigestion is 30 parts carbon to one part nitrogen, when nitrogen from chemical fertilizer and manure runoff enters wetlands, 30 times the amount of cellulosic biomass in lakes and marshes gets turned into methane, nitrous oxide, and CO2. Organic fertilizer on the other hand builds the living soil ecosystem that traps and uses the nitrogen, preventing runoff. And don't forget the fossil fuel used in ag, robotic organic ag powered by renewable energy wouldn't use all that diesel.On Michael Specter's new book 'Denialism' misses its targets posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 49 Responses
- I'm glad you asked that provider, it gives me a chance to tout my blog. Here's my reasonable (?) extrapolation based on a Grist article about a study on this very topic. http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2009/2/18/4097423.html Speculation I'll admit, but arguably supportable. HeheyOn Michael Specter's new book 'Denialism' misses its targets posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 49 Responses
- About one third of the anti-reform blathering talking point time taken up in townhall meetings on healthcare (wing nut beckscrementalists dominated 2/3rds of meetings here locally) were devoted to anti-climate change mitigation talking points. It was insufferable, the lowliest nonsensical crap was drudged up yet again, all the toxic rhetoric we are used to in comments here on Grist and have debunked for years. If you think healthcare reform is difficult, get ready for the national "debate" on climate cure legislation. It should surpass the "death panel" and "socialism" talking points by several levels of vitriolic regurgitation. Even bills that do nothing, like the present healthcare reform and climate legislation, will be compared to maoist armageddon. If the lie-bermans and blue dogs were properly labeled corporate feudalists (republicans), where would we the people stand as far as representation in congress? In the sad powerless minority. Political labels change, but not corporate politics.On Republicans threaten to boycott Kerry-Boxer markup over substanceless procedural complaint posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 17 Responses
- Oh, forgot this key point on organic agriculture. Over 50% of human GHG comes from chemical/fossil fueled ag. Organic ag builds soil with reclaimed waste stream biomass which sequesters carbon. The "geo-engineering" the planet needs is a global switch to organic ag. Organic ag can be done on a similar industrial mechanized scale and at even greater energy efficiency and even greater productivity than chemical ag. All that carbon released by chemical ag from the 20 foot thick prairie soil that sodbusters first encountered over a century ago can be returned, reversing human caused GHG climate change in this century. Feed the world and save the climate or keep importing fertilizer on tankers from Russia? So that our economy depends not only on imported energy, but also on imported fertilizer. Deny that dilemna Specter. Spooky!On Michael Specter's new book 'Denialism' misses its targets posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 49 Responses
- This is shocking, having gotten used to the excellent war reporting of "New Yorker" investigative journalist Seymour Hersh. Somebody slipped up somewhere, we surely could use the kind of war reporting Hersh did in the "New Yorker" on climate change and new energy economy stories. A series from Elizabeth Kolbert on climate change from the "New Yorker" from 2005: http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/04/25/050425fa_fact3 And the latest: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2009/10/05/091005taco_talk_kolbertOn Michael Specter's new book 'Denialism' misses its targets posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 49 Responses
- Good point! How it feels to drive solar electric. Actually the head of the state owned Saudi oil company ARAMCO (the largest oil company in the world, socialist or rather corporate feudalist, as Saudis still have "royal" leadership) said in an interview a year or so ago that they want to supply solar electricty to Europe and other nations in their region once the oil starts running out. It would be good to make a deal ASAP with them. We supply the scientific and technical expertise, they supply the capital (the money we gave them in return for their oil), and we team up and build solar mass production facilities in the US and Saudi Arabia, with the factories powered by concentrating solar furnace cogeneration. The silicon (it's in the sand)is refined and fabricated into PV cells using solar power, then as the materials cool overnight, cloased cycle turbines supply power from the waste heat all night. It's a winner. The big cost in solar PV is the fabrication energy. Or maybe we ought to just wait and let a Chinese state owned corporation (socialist) build out the new renewable global energy economy? Who needs hi-tech manufacturing jobs? Not US, we can just keep borrowing to live. Hehey.On The long and wind-powered road posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago 7 Responses
- Yes this is a familiar problem. Warren Buffet bought 10% of the plugin hybrid car maker, BYD in China. Would he invest in an american plugin hybrid maker if there was one? I think so. But most american capital is invested in international wall street based scams instead of manufacturing. Banking and trading re-regulation might change that, but it hasn't happened. That puts the US and world economy at risk from the same problem. Investors have become acustomed to the large assured (?) returns of ponzi scams like mortgage bundling and credit default swaps. Actually risking capital in real competitive business ventures will not attract capital, the money acumulated in pension and 401k accounts for instance, until the scamming is closed down. And even the few honest investment mavens like Buffet who do still practice risk/reward capitalism will most likely put their money in the leaders like Vestas and BYD. Re-regulate and enforce the regulations or watch the slide continue. We will be lucky if foreign wind, solar, smart grid, and electric car manufacturers create jobs here. An economy that is dependent on imported energy, fertilizer, and manufactured goods has what to buy these imports with? Heavily subsidized GMO chemical grain and corn and a currency that dwindles in value daily. Exactly how can our economy be stable and secure when any international incident in an oil exporting region or storm in a refining area can stifle growth with no notice at anytime? What do most of our leaders do about this problem? Fiddle and rake in bribes from the scammers so they can get reelected. Obama highlights this stuff in every speech, we the people are listening, but most of congress, republicans and blue dog democrats (reagan republicans that have infiltrated the democratic party) pay it no mind. Progressives on the local level need to oust the reagan republicans running our local and state democratic parties. That's where it starts. Expose these traitors, they are not all as obvious as Senators Campbell, Baucus, and Lieberman. Take back the party from chamber of commerce hacks and corporate shills who owe their allegiance to insurance companies and investment "banks". And as far as under a billion going to foreign wind manufacturers to create jobs and clean energy here? Yes, it's a talking point ready for the beckscrement, good job advancing it. When renewable energy ought to instead be getting a big chunk of the 100 billion per year in subsidies to fossil fuel, nuclear power, and chemical agriculture, say 70 billion per year, complaining about this measly 800 million going to wind manufacturers is only worthy of wing nuts. Have you noticed the international subsidy wars over biodiesel for instance? A product that increases GHG many times over petroleum based fuel. How many 10s of billions are being borrowed on US taxpayer's waning credit to keep this scam going? http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=3783 Now what I want to know is why aren't factories here in the midwest humming with wind manufacturing activity and why aren't wind machines and HVDC power lines to carry the power being built in the windy great lakes and great plains regions at a pace comparable to war production levels during WW II? Because the capital from pensions and 401ks are going into big new cycles of wall street scamming? Yep. Call your fund managers and urge them to invest with Buffet. If you have your own retirement investment plan like a 401k, put it into Berkshire Hathaway. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkshire_Hathaway There ARE still honest patriotic successful american capitalists. Put your money with them.On American stimulus funds benefiting foreign wind energy firms posted 4 weeks ago 8 Responses
- Oh one more thing from the wiki article: HVDC is perfect for joining up different AC grid regions, because it gets around the load, frequency, and phase mismatch problems. This also makes it great for joining wind farms to the grid. Will wind machines one day have vertical axis rotors with high voltage generators on the ground (instead of up on a tower) that join right up to an HVDC underground cable loop? Will nanotech yield capacitive storage that can operate at that same high voltage and even capacitance effect generators? Instead of magnets, they use the electrostatic effect of rotating plates passing over stationary plates to turn mechanical energy into high voltage pulses. I can see 1000 foot tall tri-leg towers with auto furling sail "wings" all the way up the tower legs, riding on wheels on a 1000 foot diameter circular track with high voltage generators on the ground feeding buried HVDC. Am I hallucinating or could these generate 20 megawatts? Hehehey.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago 72 Responses
- Hmmmm, "if" the whole grid were dependent on wind alone. Not a very useful hypothetical. You got the 7 squared reference I see. Oh yeah lots of factorsarew in play, especially with AC. With DC not so many, the carrying capacity would be closer to that square factor. That's why DC is better for a long distance grid, lower losses as the wiki article explains. In fact AC is almost impossible to bury with high voltage high power circuits, because of capacitive loss to ground. This also makes HVDC buried cables act like huge capacitors, an interesting phenomenon that may actually help with storage someday. BTW how big are the three phase conductors in the example you cite? On the heating effect in the cables: do they sag at a critical temperature which limits the power transmission? No sag problems in a cable channel, with water cooling and ground source cooling or even waste heat recovery who knows what the upper limit would be? How about a hollow conductor with water flow down the center? Overhead wires are limited in their options for cooling. And extremely vulnerable to weather. As the volatuility of storms increeases due to climate change we are seeing more 300 mph tornadoes. That kind of wind wipes out any overhead power system, one can't be designed economically to resist that wind force, as the power in the wind varies with the cube of the wind speed. Only buried cable could survive in storms this severe. Present economic losses due to storm outage are 75 billion per year (?), I think that was Obama's figure in the solar farm speech the other day. A distributed generation and storage smart grid with buried connections and diverse energy sources and backup, would even allow individual businesses to stay open in a hurricane. During Katrina, motorists were stranded trying to escape as gas stations lost power and couldn't sell the gas they had. It can't be done?! Think WW II, how did all that "impossible" technology get created? How did mass production win the war? The films of German war production compared to US assembley lines is very striking. I think a buried HVDC national grid that maybe carries 10 power plant's worth of power, 10,000 megawatts, on the main lines would be sufficient. Feeder lines to individual power projects, like windfarms or large solar installations could carry 2,000 megawatts, 2 power plants worth of electricty. I think it's a reasonable design criterion, and a more realistic hypothetical that a grid powered by one wind farm exclusively (no other sources, no backup, no storage, no distributed smart grid control over load) where 80 power plants worth of electricty needs to be supplied to one city. ps. I'm a former television transmitter engineer, handling high voltage, high current power systems, AC and DC and even radio frequency was my job. Klystrons! Hehey.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago 72 Responses
- Yeah it was kind of shocking to see Jon taken in by the freak show. On the other hand, I guess I'm one of the biggest techno-fix boosters. Not the GMO,geo-engineering techno-fixes. More the organic ag, renewable energy, smart grid, electric vehicle booster. Messing with genetics and weather, especially for purely corporate bottomline considerations, as I suspect the freaks are pandering too, is truly vile. Don't throw the friendly organic renewable robots out with the GMO monsters.On Save us, [insert techno-fix here], you're our only hope! posted 1 month ago 7 Responses
- More more! This is the kind of stuff that will win the voters over. Riot police neutralized, the coal lobbyists are next. Go get 'em kids!On Children and riot police face off in Canadian "Moms" video posted 1 month ago 4 Responses
- Excellent! There's a good chance they can make it work. But once again it's a good idea to explain how a distributed smart grid smooths out the fluctuations of solar, wind, wave, and ocean current power. And can use biogas from the waste biomass stream as a very efficient, GHG cancelling backup source for renewables. Think about it this way: if we have one wind machine, the power output varies as the wind varies. If we have 8 windfarms, in different locations, all connected over a smart grid, the fluctuations are greatly reduced. I mention 8 windfarms because Gar Lipow wrote a piece here on Grist a few years back that studied the output from 8 wind farms, that verified that effect. Now if we add rooftop solar on every suitable roof, that further smooths supply. Peak demand generally coincides with peak solar. Now in the case of a coastal country like Denmark add in wave and tidal/ocean current generation. Another stabilizing source. And then there is distributed fuel cell/turbine biogas cogeneration, that a smart grid will power up or down to match supply and demand. This goes good with factory energy needs like heating and can be integrated with solar furnace factory heating. It can make each factory a distributed generation site, with solar heat stored for night time power generation along with biogas/natural gas backup. Now consider a smart grid's ability to control load by timing power use and storing heating or cooling in building mass, water heaters, and freezers. And consider the effect of consaervation, using ground source heating/cooling and heat from rooftop solar cogeneration. And here's the really great factor in all this, people are willing to sacrifice some convenience for the climate. If they have to get by with emergency power only once in awhile would that be such a tragedy? It's much better than brownouts or blackouts, so common with the present central power plant grid model. And by all means! Get those vehicles plugged in, that will be a huge storage medium, perfect for smart grid control. Batteries in homes and buildings are good too, they provide the ultimate storm outage protection, along with rooftop solar. So don't worry so much about renewables being unreliable, taken all together with smart grid technology, it's all good.On The long and wind-powered road posted 1 month ago 7 Responses
- Check it out Gene, all about HVDC, developed in Sweden in the 1930s, first deployed in the 1950s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current So three overhead AC conductors handle 1500 mw safely? and it would take 50 of these systems to transport power from the solar installation to the city? I wonder what 500 kilo-volt HVDC would handle? It's used for moving Canadian hydropower down to our cities here in the US. There must be some data on that. This whole topic needs study. I'm also a bit skeptical of the idea that the whole 80,000 mega watts (the output of 80 nukes or coal power plants) needs to be transported from a specific generating location to a specific city. With a national electron supperhighway only a fraction of that would need to be transported. Mainly only backup power would need to go over the national grid for regions with a temporay solar or wind drought to augment other regional distributed backup generation and storage. Working with the old central "dumb" grid model, where guys on telephones throw switches and start up power plants, is just not a realistic picture of how a distributed smart grid is going to operate.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Since when does 10 sun concentration take a tracking system? Read the NREL info, that result was without any tracking device. Simple compound parabolic louvers or trough systems that ratchet up or down depending on season are sufficient. What has been clear for a long while is that the old saw "if it could work it would already have been done" isn't conducive to exploration of new technology. Ask the Wright brothers, their first flight wasn't reported in the New York Times until 4 years after it happened. The times fell back on the old saw. Hmmm, a coindidence? The NREL report was from 2005. You were talking 3 phase AC? HVDC is the standard now for long distance transmission. Are we back in the 1950s? Hehey.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Hehehey, "the laws of physics" eyyh. Funny stuff! I guess the guys at NREL need a refresher course, care to school them? Do you know why a cable 7 times the diameter carries 50 times the power? Answer that and maybe you can get the NREL guys to sit in your class.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Yeah "a whole lot of people" have been working on it, and NREL verified their work years ago. Specifically the 38% efficiency figure for 10 sun concentration (which uses 1/10th the PV material). From WorldChanging.com: The US National Renewable Energy Laboratory just held a conference on photovoltaic concentration technology in Scottsdale, Arizona. Among the announcements: the availability of PV concentration systems with efficiencies close to 40% at concentrated sunlight levels. At the conference, NREL announced a new record efficiency of 37.9 percent at 10 suns, a measure of concentrated sunlight. Soon thereafter Boeing-Spectrolab, under contract to NREL and the Department of Energy, surpassed the NREL record with 39.0 percent at 236 suns announced at the European photovoltaic conference in Barcelona, Spain. This should allow PV concentration system makers to reach their near-term goal of a $3/watt installed price, roughly competitive with other forms of power generation. http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/003127.html So what you are saying is that running 50 seperate cables overhead, with the same amount of copper and 7 times the insulation, would cost far less than a buried cable? They have the same amount of copper. 50 seperate paths with related lawsuits and permitting nightmares and huge towers versus one buried line. The buried cable placxed in freeway median right-of-way with no right-of-way problems, it's all federal already. Ok, everyone is entitled to their opinion. On solar cost, it could follow the same cost reduction curve as PCs have followed. My 10 year olds computer cost 4000 bucks, my new 400 dollar computer is many times faster and better. The concentrating solar cogeneration inovation has not even hit the factory floor yet.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Interesting Gene, thanks! On your point about the cost of buried HVDC. I realized that to carry 50 times the current of one overhead tower mounted HVDC system, one would need a cross sectional area of conductor equal to 50 times that of the overhead wire. That is 7 times the diameter. So a 14 inch buried conductor would carry 50 times the power of a 2 inch overhead cable. The insulation required would also be 7 times that of the overhead cable. Why would this be prohibitively expensive given mass production and installation efficiencies? For example: if Hoover Dam would have been built with crews with cement mixers, it would have cost a thousand times as much and would have taken a thousand years. Factory assembly line produced conductor sections and channel installed with automated robotic equipment in freeway medians could beat the cost of running 50 overhead tower transmission systems? Maybe by a factor of 100? As in WW II war production (Obama mentioned it in his Arcadia Fla. speech, hehey) a lot of inovation will take place as this green manufacturing revolution proceeds. Superconducting magnetic storage explosions? Seems a bit farfetched, hehey. All sorts of industrial electrical safety systems are employed now to prevent explosions when handling huge amounts of power. Along with R&D on SMES that can store enough power to backup the grid for hours, until backup generation kicks in, the safety R&D would need to be done. I envision distributed renewable energy backup generation in the form of fuel cell/turbine cogeneration using stored biogas with natural gas as the fossil fallback. Would we still need a bit of natural gas, say 1% of emergency backup, with a smart grid and national electron superhighway? I think so. But the low consumption would ensure that supplies last for centuries. Uh dan, on your $7 per watt estimate on rooftop solar, Ithink that cost could come down to around $2 with mass production. The kwh cost is most important. How would solar with 3 times the efficiency 38% versus 12%) and 1/10th the PV material that collects heat for hot water, saving kwhs for domestic hot water heating, compare to the per kwh cost of other sources like wind and large scale solar furnace power. I think it would compete. Until then subsidies could fill in the gap to get the mass production going. Shift subsidies from fossil fuel to renewables and it can get done in a tax and deficit neutral way. Hmmm, "the sun doesn't shine at night?", hehey. That's why diverse sources and a smart grid are needed. Floating wind/wave/ocean current platforms off your cost, far enough so NIMBYs can't see them, farm biogas and other waste stream biomass distributed fuel cell cogeneration, rooftop solar, factory mounted solar furnace cogeneration (that store solar heat in molten salt for nigh time power generation), it's all part of the big renewable source..modulated by a smart grid that also adjusts load, it will be more reliable than the old central power grid.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Uhh..right: "2009 has worst honey crop on record" http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/blogs/bees/honey-beekeeping-47102806 Another teabagger heard from, hehey.On Heat makes honey toxic, and other myths of the hive posted 1 month ago 10 Responses
- The fact that only honey produced 5 miles away from any chemical lawns or farms could really be organic, makes organic honey a perfect wilderness conservation crop. It would also go along with increasing biodiversity in wilderness areas by replacing invasive grasses with wild flowers. Why couldn't bees be fed raw beet sugar over winter and allowed to feed on green house flowers? It would allow northern beekeepers to compete. northern forests and prairies are the only places left in the US where you could keep bees over 5 miles from chemical contamination.On Heat makes honey toxic, and other myths of the hive posted 1 month ago 10 Responses
- Yeah Dan it's from a few years ago. I wrote about it on my blog and provided a link in another post here, back up a few comments ago. That link in my blog is now broken. Here's a functional view: http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:JM9uLlCYTw8J:www.sandiego.edu/EPIC/publications/documents/060309_ASESPVPotentialPaperFINAL.pdf+53%+san+diego+county+solar+rooftop&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjVdACf3rhBSORQPBvlMQlhRFQYc9m3Q_OWCf3TJMrd4jazs6c6B_oCcHPb8wIrT4OQ11YgPuI0PPdaI_t1KG5DINftbsb1bbFdf3-8mgXLPh_P9nRR_yfyajpUld9eQ5hzBOym&sig=AFQjCNFDqUdnegBxnf1X94WbVxwRA3wEWw Check this: insulation values of various substances. http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Insulator+chain It would seem to me that a buried cable could be designed that has mulyiple layers of solid insulator, the hollow gaps filled with liquid insulator like oil or even deionozed water, to form a failsafe package. Detectors would shut down the line when one layer of liquid insulator was breeched, the liquid would be pumped out and filtered or replaced then the circuit reenergized. Robots could even travel inside the liquid layer and repair faults in the solid insulation layers. A deionozed water layer on the outside of the whole cable lying inside a tank shaped covered concrete channel providing a final safety layer. By going over the needed capacity of insulation layering by say 200%, and installing two of these cables side by side, one would always be operational even if a temporary fault repair was being acomplished on the other cable. How much extra safety insulation would 5 feet of deionozed water provide? That would make a two lane national electron superhighway. Could it be buried in freeway median right of way with an electric commuter train on top in a tube? In a sci-fi future maybe? Hehey.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- One more thing, the expense and time problem involved with long distance transmission makes rooftop solar and distributed generation and storage (backup batteries in homes and buildings) combined with conservation efforts like ground source heating/cooling even more cost effective. San diego county could get 53% of its grid power from rooftop solar (according to a study), at the old efficiency of 12% for flat panel PV. Use higher effiociency (up to 38% for 10 sun concentration PV according to NREL testing) solar cogeneration (collects heat as well as electricty) on roofs, and cut heating/cooling load with ground source heating/cooling, and fill in with offshore wind/wave power and San Diego county could be a net power exporter. All this with short range transmission.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- If your estimates are correct it would seem that long distance high voltage transmission is prohibitively expensive and can't be installed in time to head off climate change. But why do solar and wind projects need to be clustered so far away from where the power is used? That's the beauty of rooftop solar and other distributed generation like farm based wind and biogas, it is all over. 20 miles off the southern California coast all the wind, wave, and ocean current power generation to augment rooftop solar cogeneration, is waiting to be tapped. As far as a national high voltage direct current power grid, this estimate of 1500 mw carrying capacity per overhead power line makes buried cables the obvious alternative. One trench carrying enough conductor cross section and surrounding insulation instead of 50 seperate overhead lines makes more sense. What is the status of R&D on HVDC buried transmission cable? Could the capacity of 50 overhead lines be buried in a freeway median? "A number of studies have highlighted the potential benefits of very wide area super grids based on HVDC since they can mitigate the effects of intermittency by averaging and smoothing the outputs of large numbers of geographically dispersed wind farms or solar farms.[19] Czisch's study concludes that a grid covering the fringes of Europe could bring 100% renewable power (70% wind, 30% biomass) at close to today's prices. There has been debate over the technical feasibility of this proposal[20] and the political risks involved in energy transmission across a large number of international borders.[21][21] The construction of such green power superhighways is advocated in a white paper that was released by the American Wind Energy Association and the Solar Energy Industries Association[22]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current Given the difficulty and expense, superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) might be used to cut the cost of transmission by acumulating energy from a national grid to backup each particular region. "SMES is also used in utility applications. In northern Wisconsin, a string of distributed SMES units was deployed to enhance stability of a transmission loop. The transmission line is subject to large, sudden load changes due to the operation of a paper mill, with the potential for uncontrolled fluctuations and voltage collapse. Developers of such devices include American Superconductor." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage My computer is running on SMES smoothed power right now. Large scale SMES could greatly reduce the need for transmission capacity, since the main function of transmission for renewable energy is smoothing fluctuations. On the other hand, a study of only 8 windfarms interconnected, showed how diverse sourcing can increase reliability. Some combination of R&D on long distance buried HVDC and SMES and distributed generation should hold the key to making 100% renewable grid energy the norm over the next 20 years.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- The ultimate? Drill baby drill!! The really (8 months) pregger Ms Alaska Palin with bathing suit competition atire and skin tight high heeled thigh top fishing waders and Tina Fey mask. Of course "fancy paaegant walkin'" would be the treat! The trick would be to avoid drunken horny teabaggers, yikes!!On Ask Umbra on Halloween treats and costumes posted 1 month ago 6 Responses
- "...chemical fuels and gasoline, not electricity, will remain America's practical and most convenient transportation choice. Convenience is the heartbeat of Consumer-land." The MIT power transfer invention using tuned induction that has been commercialized as a pad to recharge wireless devices is the "convenience" leap for electric vehicles. This device allows the efficient transfer of electric power up to a few inches away through the air. Placed under parking spots at work, home or school or mounted in a power strip under a special recharge highway lane, it could recharge cars on the move or when parked and bill the credit account of the driver via internet. As far as convenient "instant" (around 5 min, like filling up with gasoline) recharge at gas stations, it's a few years away in terms of affordable technology. Would it be better to go with this tuned induction system? Consumers wouldn't need to think about this, just park and your car recharges, or on a long trip switch to the recharge lane when your electric "fuel" guage gets low. The recharge system thayt we have now is plugs into outlets, for faster recharge two cords plugged into two different 110 volt circuits. Or a special 220 cable and plug at home. Not convenient, very slow, hours for a full charge, only suitable for up to 10% of us very commited green drivers. But it might set enough of a trend to get induction and instant charge R&D going? Meanwhile electric cars, without backup generators that run on regular you can get at any gas station, will only be suitable for urban travel. Will better generators, of the fuel cell variety, better faster charging batteries, and/or induction recharge arrive first..or all at once? In a commercial wave that sweeps gas guzzlers off the highway over a decade or so, all those devices and more might become ubiquitos. The point is that the physics works already, when will the political will exist so government switches suibsidies from gas guzzling to battery charging. Connect this up with energy independence, an end to oil wars, a stable economy based on clean, domestic, inflation free energy, or a massive wave of green jobs and manufacturing. It seems possible, but only if people who vote see their neighbors driving electric cars. It's our job to be examples, the commited 10% of US. Drive electric ASAP! By hook, crook, or do-it-yourself. People need to see to believe it's possible and media won't feature it until it's obvious. We have orgs like Grist and twitter/facebook and youtube to force the media to notice. The Wright brothers didn't have that, the New york Times took four years to aknowledge their first flight back at the start of the last century. We got it easy compared to them.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Great work Bill! Yes it is very "difficult". Consider this: just plugging the leaking natural gas, equal to 250 million cars in GHG effect, from the oil and gas industry wells, refineries, and pipelines, is too difficult a task. Even though the gas that's leaking is worth 20 billion per year. Imagine an army of inspectors and repair crews spreading out across the globe to get this done. 20 billion per year in savings aren't enough to get it done? How about a trillion per year in efficiency improvements? Can't do that either. What strange creatures we are.On Bill McKibben on International Climate Action Day posted 1 month ago 4 Responses
- More on the use of solar furnace cogeneration and gas fuel cell backup. For instance, in a factory there maybe serveral ovens at several different temperatures, these could be fed waste heat from a fuel cell running on natural gas, in the right proportion to maintain the temperasture of each oven. The fuel cell extracts 50% of the energy in the gas in electricty for the grid, then the other 50% heats the ovens, then a collector brings all the waste heat together where it goes through a closed cycle turbine generator. The generator can also feed off of the waste heat from cooling products like glass or metal. A combination solar furnce and gas fuel cell powered factory would be best. The high percentage of solar insolation in desert or mountain regions would make this a good choice. There is a much better way to use natural gas, with far less pipe to leak from. Once again this is a whole industry that cries out for US leadership. Our R&D scientists and engineers discovered all this stuff. By making local factories backup power sources for the grid, reliability in case of storms is greatly enhanced, local areas would be independent in emergencies.On Methane leakage runs up a $50 billion bill posted 1 month ago 6 Responses
- Wow that's a sad repair rate. This cries out for ground source heating and solar water heating to replace these uses of natural gas. If natural gas were used in fuel cell/turbines at 70% efficiency as distributed backup for a renewable smart power grid, with the waste heat captured, and building heating were done with ground source heat pumps running on renewable electricty, then the gas lines to individual buildings could be eliminated. Only main lines to distributed generators would be necessary and these could be replaced faster and cheaper than the whole present gas infrastructure. Biogas could be filtered and added into the system too, eventually turning natural gas into a barely used backup fuel. Manufacturing uses of natural gas could be outfited with fuel cell cogeneration and converted to concentrating solar furnace heating.On Methane leakage runs up a $50 billion bill posted 1 month ago 6 Responses
- One more thing, how much in terms of GHG and dollars are ammonia fertilizer leaks costing us? And what is the total GHG toll for ammonia ferttilizer made from natural gas? It is shipped in on tankers from Russia now to grow our subsidized grain crops. How much GHG would going to organic fertilizer save, just in terms of replacing ammonia fertilizer? Nitrous oxide, a 300 times worse GHG than CO2, is emitted by ammonia fertilizer too.On Methane leakage runs up a $50 billion bill posted 1 month ago 6 Responses
- Japan's GHG satellite will also show the effect of tundra melt and seafloor methane hydrate melt that releases methane. A huge climate change feedback effect. http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gosat/index_e.html Ag related methane emissions plus the natural gas and oil production leakage plus melting related methane release might actually exceed all human related combustion as a source of climate change. Maybe the satellite information will better define the problem. How to get US oil and gas industry to plug their leaks? That will be nearly impossible. But getting Russian and other national gas and oil industries to do it? Clearly impossible. It's really too bad, it would seem that the profit motive might make it happen, but it hasn't so far. So why/how would it happen without an actual army of inspectors and repair crews backed by law enforcement? pretty sad, that's how the climate crumbles..er, bakes.On Methane leakage runs up a $50 billion bill posted 1 month ago 6 Responses
- "...buy it cheaper from the Chinese on the national credit card." The fees will get you! Hehehey. And intrests rate rises, masked as currency exchange rate "fluctuations". Don't get fluctuated by manipulated currency markets. What a mess. Pay workers here 20 bucks per hour to operate advanced manufacturing facilities, instead of buying questionably quality controlled products made with decades old factory technology operated by 50 cent per hour labor, we will be way ahead in the end. invest and hire american!! Avoid national bankruptcy. You won't like it when billionaire condiminiums replace national park campgrounds. This was attempted at the end of the Bush administration but quickly overturned. Yes, selling the national parks...to settle our debts with China...maybe 20 years from now? Chinese state corporations are buying the Brazilian rain forest right now, to grow mono-crop GMO animal feed and biofuel crops.On Poll finds sharp rise in global warming skepticism posted 1 month ago 31 Responses
- I agree Dan PHEV is the way to go. But i think we ought to simply the picture of this technology to make it easier for voters to grasp. Plugin electric (ultra-efficient Hypercar carbon fiber body) vehicles for urban and suburban drivers, the same plugin vehicles for rural drivers that need longer range and drivers who use their vehicles for work with no time to recharge, with a simple addition. Add a backup generator that runs on multiple fuels, gasoline or compressed biogas/methane. Eventually go to much more efficient backup generators of the multi-fuel fuel cell/turbine variety. They can operate at 70% efficiency versus the typical 14 to 20% efficiency of internal combustion backup generators. This is much easier to explain and understand. Pure electric plugin urban drivers (short range) could even rent a backup generator from their local car dealer for longer drives like vacation car trips. I see you live in san Diego Dan, did you see the study that estimated that San Diego county could get 53% of its current electric power from rooftop solar PV? I wrote about using much more efficient concentrating solar cogeneration along with ground source copoling/heating to provide 100%+ from solar. Making your county a net power exporter. http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2006/11/27/2529627.html And that's without the floating energy platforms that could be anchored off your coast. Wind plus wave plus underwater current power generation with an underwater cable bringing the power into the grid from the energy "ships". Southern California is another "Saudi Arabia" of renewable energy, along with the great plains, great lakes region, all our US coastal areas, and the entire southwest. Connect all these regions together with an electron superhighway, buried in freeway medians, and renewable energy will provide a steady grid supply with almost no storage or backup.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Actually chemical ag and CAFO could be responsible for over 50% of human introduced GHG: http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2009/2/18/4097423.html No til and organic ag are not mutually exclusive. Straw and wood chips used for animal bedding and manure go into biodigestion in some farms here in Wisconsin provider. What's left over is returned to the soil as organic soil amendment and fertilizer. That's how biomass is added back into the soil. Would it aproach the 1.8 ton per acre per year figure of the prairie soil where all the plant material goes back into the soil? It might because crops are selected for maximum growth, and that means maximum photosynthesis, the process that takes cO2 out of the air. Forestry and farming side by side here in our state have a powerful potential for biogas energy backup for the grid and organic fertilizer production. And we have huge wind power potential from great lakes and great plains wind. Solar cogeneration (heat & electricty) mounted on suitable roofspace and over parking lots are our other renewable source here. With all these sources coordinated by smart grid technology we will have an energy surplus to zaaap to cities and industrial areas given a high voltage direct current electron highway. I'm looking for a future where robotics applies mulch, cultivates (removing weeds), and injects water, organic fertilizer, and soil amendment in no til fields. With the advent of superweeds resistant to herbicides, GMO herbicide resistant crops won't be feasible anymore. Do we get on this and make it happen, creating a whole new industrial manufacturing sector, or should we wait and let China do it? I say we need the jobs ourselves right now. Robotic planting could drill the seeds or seedlings into the living orgabnic soil, tilling a very small circle right around the seedling and injecting organic soil amendment right around each plant. At automated speed. Then whenever water levels drop, the robots would come back to inject water and more organic fertilizer as indicated by soil sampling probes. Any weeds that do asurvive would be mown and turned into muclch at the emergence stage, before any weed seeds are produced. Beat that superweeds.On Corn-based meat and ethanol: burning the planet to a crisp posted 1 month ago 85 Responses
- I think 40% of GHG is from chemical ag, that is the figure I remember provider. There are some huge releases unaccounted for too as far as I can figure, namely fertilizer and manure runoff that gets into wetlands, river, and lakes and turns dead plant matter into methane (20 time the GHG effect of CO2). And I'm not sure if that takes into account nitrous oxide (300 times the GHG effect of CO2) released in the application of chemical fertilizer and from non-biodigested manure. I know that natural prairie plants and soil sequesters 1.8 tons of CO2 per acre per year, that is from a Minnesota university study. How much GHG was released over the century of chemical ag as 20 to 30 foot deep living organic prairie soil was turned to a few inches of toxic dust ready to blow away on the wind in the first severe drought? I think it could be calculated, the good news is that returning biomass in the form of organic fertilizer and soil ammendment back into the soil ecosystem could recapture all that GHG over the next century. Organic ag could take the excess carbon back out of the atmosphere and restore real prosperity to farmers. Prosperity not based on government subsidies and imported fuel and fertilizer, but on good old small business/family farm capitalism.On Corn-based meat and ethanol: burning the planet to a crisp posted 1 month ago 85 Responses
- Good analysis of where we stand in relation to China's growing manufacturing advantage. They have the capital to lead this new global energy economy, while our cash has been squandered on oil wars of choice and bailouts and bankruptcies personal and corporate. There are a few things that could help us catch up and maybe even pull ahead. And they all depend on our lead in R&D and inovation. We still lead in this and you are right that invention doesn't do us a lot of good because manufacturing of cutting edge technology isn't usually done here. We need to change that. On solar PV, we need concentrating solar furnace silicon fab and PV manufacturing. We have the scientific talent to develop these factories. They will also generate power for the grid at night as the silicon and the furnace cools, the waste heat can drive closed cycle turbines. On agriculture, we need to develop biomass recycling to produce biogas energy with fuel cell/turbines (70% efficient) and organic fertilizer. Robotic organic agriculture that runs on solar power can then replace chemical ag. We also need to build out a HVDC buried cable national supergrid along with electric commuter rail in tubes in the freeway medians. The power grid would be buried under the rail tubes. Another technology we have now but haven't used is the fiber forge carbon fiber vehicle body molding technology. We also have research on advanced lead/acid batteries that should now proceed into the nanotech carbon direction. Concentrating solar cogeneration is another big new technology we are developing here. We don't need to give up on this economic competition yet. Say we come in second? Will that be the end of the world? Nope. But if we simply give up manufacturing and let all these new inovations and more be manufactured elsewhere, well lets not find out what will happen. Why not at least try to take back the lead?On Poll finds sharp rise in global warming skepticism posted 1 month ago 31 Responses
- With mass production, buried DC transmission would compete with overhead tower transmission on cost. This could be a huge export manufacturing market that would boost US job growth. Other nations will look to us for this technology if we make it part of our national energy policy and get our factories humming. Consider the years and years of lawsuits and delays involved in overhead transmission too. The right-of-way issues are solved for freeway median buried HVDC. And once again you pose the false dilemna of either HVDC or local/regional renewable energy. They really are not mutually exclusive, in fact they go hand in hand. Large scale storage along with HVDC and small scale regional storage and even home energy storage all go well together with smart grid technology. I'm with you on opposing tower transmission lines. But I envision electric commuter rail and HVDC both sited in freeway median space as a major part of our new energy economy. GM and GE and other US industrial giants would experience major job growth from this sort of long term energy and transportation policy. Just like the growth brought on by the federal interstate highway system when it was constructed in the last century.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month ago 72 Responses
- Hehey, the old "carbon neutral" myth is getting close to a big fall again. This is how it works: burning biomass for energy is carbon neutral because the CO2 released is equal to the CO2 removed from the atmosphere by the plants that created that biomass energy. Under that reasoning, switching from burning fossil fuels to burning wood, garbage, waste stream biomass, and liquid fuels made from biomass would magically cure GHG climate change. Of course the glaring problem with that idea is that it uses biomass that would normally go into the soil and sequester carbon into fuel, that instead releases all it's carbon into the atmosphere. Using crops like corn, that take huge amounts of fossil fuel to grow using chemical ag, that strips carbon stored for millenia back out of the soil, doubles or triples the usual GHG release of consuming biomass for energy. Any product, like chemical ag meat or dairy, takes many times the GHG release of veggie food products like soy, in the food cycle. Organic veggie and meat or dairy protein really is carbon neutral or can even be carbon offsetting by using waste biomass for organic fertilizer and biogas energy production. Animal or human respiration or flatulence is an insignifigant, unavoidable GHG release, compared to the huge GHG problem created by fossil fuel energy and agriculture. Consider nitrous oxide (300 times the GHG effect of cO2) released by ammonia fertilzer derived from natural gas, this product is now being imported on tankers from Russia. Food production based on imported fertilizer and imported oil? How is that a safe and sound financially secure plan?On Corn-based meat and ethanol: burning the planet to a crisp posted 1 month ago 85 Responses
- As some of of here have been saying for years: please do not label the phenomenon in question "global warming". We should stick to GHG climate change instead. Greater volatility in weather patterns due to the rentention of more solar energy. More severe droughts and storms, and rapid glacier, ice cap, and tundra melt. The poll question that would help our cause is this: would you favor a shift of US government tax breaks and subsidies from fossil fuel and nuclear power to renewable energy in order to restore US manufacturing leadership and reclaim jobs exported to nations like China that are taking over the lead in the new global energy economy? Or maybe this question too: should our economy be based on domestically produced renewable energy or should we continue to fight wars and experience boom/bust economics based on energy price volatility due to imported fossil fuels like oil and natural gas? Forget the old "global warmning" terminology, it's not helpful. Jobs, jobs, jobs is where we have to go to win the day politically. Invoke the picture of deserted rust belt neighborhoods in cities like Detroit to fight GHG climate change. Emphasize the cost to our GDP of losing the battle for green manufacturing, do we want to buy all the energy devices we will need from China? Solar panels, wind machines, plugin cars, smart grid devices, the latest batteries, and on ands on .. all imported from China, or do we want to become a manufacturing and exporting nation again?On Poll finds sharp rise in global warming skepticism posted 1 month ago 31 Responses
- "How will we solve global warming with renewable energy if citizens see wind and solar power as indistinguishable from large, undesirable transmission lines in their backyard?" How? By burying that HVDC supergrid (under federal highway freeway medians, no right-of-way disputes). That 200 billion dollar "cart" will roll out along with distributed renewable generation and storage and smart grid technology, over 10 to 20 years. That works out to a much smaller 10 to 20 billion per year. Let me ask you how we are to get trillions of dollars of private investment in renewable energy to power our industrial economy with no way for investors to sell the power their renewable energy installations produce? Right now the regulatory mess is insurmountable, experts like Sean Casten might understand it, but how can they even explain it all to the rest of us? Rules written into law by status quo utility industry are strangling any attempt to get this new energy economy off the runway. It would be like trying to conduct coast to coast commerce with a different toll highway every few hundred miles, with each owner of each stretch of highway protecting their own regional monopoly. BTW..Lipow..it's Gar Lipow. Perhaps if you read some of his excellent work here from the past you would know how to spell his name? Hehey.On Renewables are inevitable, transmission is optional posted 1 month, 1 week ago 72 Responses
- Check it out, what could these good people do with a decent grant from Gates? http://www.seedsavers.org/ They could put it to good use all over the planet. Maybe chemical ag based on redistributiuon of wealth to corporate coffers would yeild to real free market farming? It's a possibility, especially with the huge labor force looking for work in most of the under developed world. Labor intensive organic farming and local farm markets could lead to a natural evolution of small business, real capitalism as a basis for real democracy. Corporate monopoly capitalism, of the kind practiced by agribizz is not capitalism at all. It is corporate feudalism, the divine right of capital to use redistribution of wealth to rule the world. A strange mix of monopoly power and kleptocracy.On Bill Gates reveals support for GMO ag posted 1 month, 1 week ago 44 Responses
- Gates also messed up by supporting corn ethanol too. I have a feeling he has "experts" make his decisions for him. If he just supported Seedsavers with a large contract to provide seeds to African farmers, and then used his billions to help support local farm prices and helped Seedsavers to show farmers how to establish seed farms in Africa that preserve successful crop strains, maybe some actual progress would result. Extending GMO/chemical ag over yet another continent won't help anyone except corporate chemical ag.On Bill Gates reveals support for GMO ag posted 1 month, 1 week ago 44 Responses
- It's really hillarious that folks like provider decry anything government does..as inept intervention in "free" markets...except when the check is written to them. Hehehey. The fact is that agribizz lobbyists have invented a system of redistribution of wealth that any good commie would be proud of. The only "profit" grain fasrmers ever make comes from the rest of US taxpayers. Our wealth redistributed in order to make sure corn sugar and fat are the main inputs to both animals we eat and ourselves. Keep on teabaggin' faithfilled patriots, you are destroying the GOP as we blog. And that's good for america. Marginalize the party of corporate lobbyists with your mindless rants. In a twisted way you really are "patriots".On Is Michelle Obama about to take on Big Food? posted 1 month, 1 week ago 40 Responses
- Great job on MSNBC Tom! It figures that radical Ratigan would be the first to feature a radical eco-writer from Grist. What's next? Umbra on TRMS (the Rachel Maddow show)? It could happen.On Is Michelle Obama about to take on Big Food? posted 1 month, 1 week ago 40 Responses
- World GDP is around 60 trillion, so a trillion a year invested in the shift to renewable energy worldwide is not an unreasonable suggestion. Maybe a measly subsidy and tax shift of around 100 billion per year by governments worldwide could get private investment on that trillion dollar per year scale to go into renewable energy. It seems likely that careful planning of exactly how much to encourage which parts of a transition like this, say HVDC transmission, utility customer incentives for solar panels, or farm biogas/organic fertilizer, for instance, would encourage growth that would negate the present growth in the rate of GHG induced global climate change. The growth curves can start out with GHG climate change ahead and industrial commercial scale worldwide green manufacturing could catch up, cancelling GHG increase and even extracting GHG from the atmosphere and storing it in the soil, with organic fertilizer. This sort of approach is kind of a form of geo-engineering, but it engineers soil back to a natural carbon sink living condition and engineers our energy machinery, a global scale disaster with millions of machines spewing GHG, to become neutral in terms of GHG.On We need transmission to solve global warming posted 1 month, 1 week ago 15 Responses
- Yeah I guess I agree on a personal level, I'm not looking to become the next John D of renewable energy either. I would rather live a high quality, zero carbon foot print life, built on a small scale with friends. The trouble is that the rest of humanity, like 90%, don't share our dream. It will take a very large, exponentially expanding replacement of their coal powered, gas guzzling dreams with commercial renewable energy. That will take trillions of dollars. And it needs to start yesterday to save the biosphere as we know it. But our small scale efforts are not in vain, they lead by example. Setting a trend to follow.On We need transmission to solve global warming posted 1 month, 1 week ago 15 Responses
- The cost of fossil fuelishness? Check out the abandoned homes ready to burn in the next arson spree in Detroit and other rust belt cities. That's the real cost of continuing down the dead end path we are on. Exporting renewable energy jobs and manufacturing to China and other nations. Living with an economy at the mercy of oil producing nations and corporations and manipulated world oil markets and storms along the Gulf coast that threaten oil refineries. Those are costs that voters can see all around them. Why is Detroit dying? The US auto industry refuses to shift to electric transportation, instead going in exactly the opposite direction, bigger more powerful gas guzzlers. The same reason the rest of industrial america is dying. A refusal to compete on the global financial stage. Corporate america wants to continue to pursue that next quarterly earnings report, rather than long term financial security. This is the huge invisible elephant in the room. The huge external cost due to reliance on coal and oil and nuclear power. Measure the time lost in the global competition for green manufacturing since the death of the electric car or since the appointment of the bushwacker. Or back to the BJ that made Clinton an early lame duck, just when he had the leverage to act. Or way back to the Reagan win. Just when high oil prices could have impelled a switch to renewable energy. What has been the cost of the Reagan revolution in terms of US leadership in technology and manufacturing and economic growth? What is the cost in terms of family economics? Before Reagan one worker could support a family, now 2 or more workers can't support a family. Nearly every family is one lost job or health emergency away from losing their home. That's a real cost that is easy to measure and point out to voters.On Report finds massive hidden energy costs, mostly from coal posted 1 month, 1 week ago 5 Responses
- A super grid will not be built over night. The 200 billion will be spent over a decade ot two. That puts the spending into a different perspective, 10 to 20 billion per year. Subsidies and tax breaks for fossil and nuclear power are over 100 billion per year. Shifting those funds is the key to building out renewable energy. No, 100% of our energy will not come from renewables tomorow. It will be a gradual transition. By engaging diverse renewable energy sources, from different areas that will become a smooth transition. Allowing a return on investment to individual investors and large industrial investors alike, with a continental electricty market place, is the way to get the kind of change we need quickly enough to head off the worst effects of climate change. Just as national highway systems and railroads let investors in local agriculture and industry market their products all over the country, this electrical super highway will bring on exponential commercial growth. This time in renewable energy devices and green jobs and manufacturing.On We need transmission to solve global warming posted 1 month, 1 week ago 15 Responses
- Unfortunately humans tend towards suicide as an option to life's problems. It maybe because we all realize we have a limited end date. This generates a recurring cultural theme. Apocalypse. The world will not end as human civilization ends. It will change. Much like rats and cockroaches and bacteria and algae and other survivor species, humans will most likely adapt to radical climate change, most likely in vastly reduced numbers. Invoking cultural suicide won't get the political change we need to overcome climate change. The peaceful effective path is to get any of us who realize that zero carbon footprint living is prefferable onboard to change our own lives as an example to the rest. That is around 10% of us. We are more than willing to sacrafice to do this. But we need to convince enough of the rest of humanity that it is in their economic interest to support change in order to start up exponential shift to renewable energy and agriculture. The basic financial security issue is what motivates most people to pay attention to politics. We have already got a movement with a heart, it is just too small to overcome corporate lobbyists. To do that we have to convince people that their short and long term financial security depends on green jobs and a shift to renewable energy device manufacturing. If we continue to develop these machines in our research institutions, but let other nations manufacture and sell them, your job, your healthcare, and your home is at risk. Keep voting to send your jobs to China and other nations and the slide will continue. Take a trip to Detroit, look at all the empty homes just waiting to burn in the next Halloween arson spree, that is the future of your neighborhoods if we keep on exporting jobs. How do we swing voters to a green economic agenda? That's how.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 1 month, 1 week ago 112 Responses
- In a recent poll on the most important issues to voters, the economy was number one. Only 4% said climate change was the most important problem. That's why we ought to stress leadership in renewable energy as an economic and not primarily a climate change issue. Jobs, jobs, jobs. China is pulling ahead in renewable energy right now. Do we want to buy our solar panels and wind machines from China or do we want them manufactured here? Do we want to export these devices, most of which have been invented and developed here? And we ought to note exactly how many people lose their jobs, healthcare and homes whenever a spike in imported energy, mainly oil, trashes the economy. This whole mortgage crisis turned worldwide credit crunch was brought on by soaring oil prices. Sure it was and still is (no regulation has yet been instituted) a house of cards due to lack of regulation and 100 trillion dollar scamming with derivtatives and credit default swaps. But high oil prices set the stage for the crash. Stick to green jobs and long term energy independence and financial stability to get the swing voters in on this fight. Climate change is an issue for us committed greenies. Any economy dependent on fuel based energy is inherently unstable, shortage and price manipulation will always destabilize that system at the very base. Renewable energy is inexhaustable, there is no shortage or price manipulation problem. With fuel based energy, the more energy generation devices produced, the more fuel is used and the price climbs. With renewable energy the more solar panels and wind machines produced, mass production brings the cost of energy devices and thus the cost of renewable energy down. Only those who understand the exponential nature of climate change are going to push hard on a cure for GHG and we are a small percentage of the voting public. That may not change anytime soon. In a recent math education ranking, the US is behind Kasikstan, yes the country that "Borat" lampooned in the movie.On Dispassion as the world ends: The absent heart of the great climate affair posted 1 month, 1 week ago 112 Responses
- Yeah let's consider a natural model. Fractal rules that govern schools of fish, armies of ants, the growth of roots and leaves. A distributed generation and storage smart grid operating with distributed fractal computing can supply the needs of one home or a continent by continually adjusting demand to supply. The more diverse the supply, over a continental grid, the more reliable renewable energy will be. And we are not just talking about supplying power for homes. Factories, trains, and vehicles will take large industrial scale power. As gar points out a national super grid can supply that large scale power without storage. I think superconducting electromagnetic storage will be added to the super grid. This will make each region independent in case of widespread emergency, like hurricanes or volcanic eruption that blocks out solar energy.On We need transmission to solve global warming posted 1 month, 1 week ago 15 Responses
- Transmission towers? Yeah they're a problem. High voltage DC transmission, the type used in long distance transmission, can be buired, unlike high capacity AC lines. AC lines have huge capacitance loss to ground in buried cables and corona effect losses in tower transmission. The electron super highway ought to be buried HVDC. The stray voltage induction effects of AC are not a problem with DC either. So this national high voltage grid will only be used to transport power from the southwest or the plains to the coasts? Why wouldn't it be used to transport wind and water power from the coasts inland too? Or used to transmit surplus power from any region that is sunny on any particular day to an area that is cloudy? The whole point of a continental grid is to smooth the supply by tapping into diverse sources in different areas, acting a lot like a national battery. At 100 to 200 billion over 10 or 20 years why would a national grid exclude local renewable energy? In fact it would encourage it. And it would also encourage industrial scale offshore wind/wave power, and great lakes wind power, and desert southwest industrial solar. Those very large private investments would flow very quickly to these projects as the grid was built strategically to handle the firsat big projects and then on to wind farm after solar furnace project, and even distributed biogas waste biomass projects all over farm country. When investors in solar panels on their roof or investors in offshore wave/wind floating platforms and gulf stream underwater turbines and farm biogas energy investors can all sell their surplus kwhs through the supergrid, it will create an exponential commercial wave of renewable energy investment and manufacturing. And that massive change will build quickly enough to counter the exponential climate change that is melting the ice caps and glaciers and releasing methane from the melting tundra. Little local steps will fit in too, but really massive projects with trillions invested are necessary to get this done in time. Your point about local projects creating more jobs would be a good one, but only if local projects and a national grid are mutually exclusive. They are not. In fact a national grid will allow local utilities to gather all the surplus from local solar panels or biogas fuel cell generators and sell it across the grid. Then local homeowners and farmers can be payed for their contribution, paying back their investment in their solar panels in record time. But I agree, transmission towers are a bad idea, this grid should be buried in freeway medians, with electric commuter rail (in tubes) running over them. Put electric commuter rail and HVDC together. Commuter rail is being put on freeway medians in Minnesota already. Small is beautiful, zero carbon footprint living in individual dwellings is possible. But to turn climate change around we need a massive industrial wave of the type that powered WW II war production.On A little heresy on transmission posted 1 month, 1 week ago 6 Responses
- Good idea! Somedbody write or call John Prine's people and ask him to do a street concert/protest in Peabody's neighborhood? I bet he would if locals could organize it. Paradise-John Prine Then the coal company came with the world's largest shovel And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man. And daddy won't you take me back to Muhlenberg County Down by the Green River where Paradise lay Well, I'm sorry my son, but you're too late in asking Mister Peabody's coal train has hauled it away When I die let my ashes float down the Green River Let my soul roll on up to the Rochester dam I'll be halfway to Heaven with Paradise waitin' Just five miles away from wherever I am.On Coalfield uprising leads to arrests at W.Va. gov's office posted 1 month, 1 week ago 6 Responses
- I guess since I am not officially a member of the Grist editorial staff, it's quite a leap to discover the "whole idea of Grist" by reading my comments. This is a matter of time/energy. Maybe someone somewhere has enough to spare to debunk every story that shows up on world-nut-daily, clusterfox, drudge, or vomits forth from the cake hole of drug limboob. But I don't. In my weltanschuung the burden of proof is on the "provider" of the fuxnews trash to vet that kind of rhetorical filth before posting it. I think most of us here, including the official Gristers, tend to stick to more reliable sources of information be they pro or anti-global climate change mitigation. No one has enough time to wade through the teabagger propaganda flooding the media, internet, tv, and print. So before you join up and attend a teabagging event it would behoove you to check it all out, or you might end up getting a testicular facial. Hehehey.On Why Branson and SuperFreakonomics are wrong, in pictures posted 1 month, 1 week ago 33 Responses
- Really strange. The CBO is cited all the time on accounting for all kinds of policy decisions. How could they flub this so badly? Did a bushie make it into the CBO during the bushwack years? This sounds like the work of a "heckuva-job-brownie".On Is the Congressional Budget Office trying to kill humanity? posted 1 month, 1 week ago 1 Response
- Fight the power! Now these (really) are the beautiful trendsetting people, am I right? Seriously, culture heroes like this beat standard celebs, so let's celebrate their courage.On Coalfield uprising leads to arrests at W.Va. gov's office posted 1 month, 1 week ago 6 Responses
- Good work Yes Men! This just in from "sick-puppy" (Bush 41, the central american "death Squad" CIA director in the 70s, desciption of Maddow and KO) Olbermann, the chamber claims to have 300,000 member businesses. It actually has 30,000. Just a clerical error? Here's a related anecdote. I was asked what business I was representing at a high buck event with our local congressman, a democrat I volunteered for both election cycles he has run. Who asked me, implying I would not be invited without a big check and business representation? My local democratic (a former Reagan republican?) party leader. I think maybe salesmen have hoodwinked the voters AND the politicians into believing they run the world.On Chamber plays the fool in Yes Men hoax posted 1 month, 1 week ago 3 Responses
- Nice find provider, hehehey. That site is knicknamed "world-nut-daily", spreading wing nut propaganda across the net. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=112371# Every bit as reliable as effnews, drug limboob, or drudge.On Why Branson and SuperFreakonomics are wrong, in pictures posted 1 month, 1 week ago 33 Responses
- Exactly right, use nitrogen fixing plants and green manure crops (algae grown in over fertilized ponds and lakes for instance) and biodigested waste stream biomass organic fertilizer. And a byproduct of biodigestion is biogas, a clean efficient energy source, especially when it is used in a solid oxide fuel cell/turbine cogeneration system at 70% efficiency. Furthermore, the algae filtered from waterways can be shunted into solar collectors that use the CO2 from fuel cells to enhance algal growth rate. The CO2 is then sequestered by the algae, the algae then give up their CO2 in the biodigestion cycle or as animal feed supplement or sequester the CO2 when used as soil amendment. Renewable energy, climate change mitigation, and organic fertilizer all go together can restore the 20 foot thick prairie soil that sod busters found when they first got here. That's a lot of CO2 sequestration potential. So how does this not sink in at the policy level of government or the board room level of corporate power? Are these concepts really that radical or threatening to the status quo that they need to be ignored? Evidently so.On Why Branson and SuperFreakonomics are wrong, in pictures posted 1 month, 1 week ago 33 Responses
- Who gets it? Only the planned economy of China, and it's not even socialist, it's full on communist. Somehow they figured out that all they have to do to rule the world economy is lead in renewable energy technology and manufacturing. Capitalists like Branson, Gates, and Khosla still haven't understood what these graphs mean? Just how did they acumulate billions of dollars? It's a real mystery. How in the world are they getting beaten by commies at the worldwide game of global capitalism? But then there is Warren Buffet, the most successful capitalist in history. He seems to get it. He is buying into China's plan. Is he secretly a commie? Hehehey. Pickens seems to partially understand it too. Have you seen the GM ad for their newest product? It boasts the biggest engine in any half ton pickup. And we the people just bailed them out. Maybe it would be good to make a list of major companies, capitalists, and planned economies that get it, and a list of those who don't. Just to keep score.On Why Branson and SuperFreakonomics are wrong, in pictures posted 1 month, 1 week ago 33 Responses
- Exactly Bio-d, "dirty hippies", which makes it even sweeter that we are right here on the leading edge of energy and climate debate. Amazing! Hehehey. You've probably noticed that Brand must be afraid of us too. Excellent.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 1 week ago 197 Responses
- Evidence from the old soviet system or the new KGB-mob run Russia can't be taken at face value stk. Basing any hope on Russian industrial efficiency and safety regulation might not be a good model for the rest of the world, but if they get their nuke-on-a-barge program going we might not have a choice, yikes. Obviously a new waste recycling/neutralizing reactor design that can be tested and proven to be safe and affordable is needed before any new investment in nuclear power takes place. That will most likely take a decade or two. Have you got any information on any R&D into these devices? The last I heard it would involve fast neutron reactors. Any modern verifiable information might help your cause and maybe help eliminate the looming disaster of used fuel rods and other nuclear waste. Do you have any current decommisioning and waste treatment costs from actual experience or any reliable (verified by non-nuclear industry sources) estimates?On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 1 week ago 197 Responses
- The best outcome for the great lakes region would be that we become a net energy provider, provider. We have huge wind energy resources. I was just at a listening session with Sen. Feingold in Lake Tomahawk yesterday. Most of the questions/comments were on healthcare. I asked him about a national power grid that would allow great lakes wind and farm biogas power from our state to be sold anywhere in the country that it is needed, and create a steady supply of renewable energy from coast to coast. That would spur new industry here and help get organic agriculture going. The byproduct from biodigestion is organic fertilizer. If farmers are payed to produce energy and save money by not using fossil fuel based fertilizer, their financial picture will be vastly improved. Just as the interstate highway system allowed farmers to sell their products all over the country, this would make a free market in energy possible. Since you argue that government can do nothing right, would you rather have Halliburton own the highways and Blackwater patroling them? How much would a speeding ticket cost then? Would one be tortured routinely at toll booths? I would say that without government run fire departments, police, and highways, contracting that all out to mega-corporations as teabaggers would recomend, we would be living like Iraqis in no time at all. Except that Iraquis already have single-payer healthcare, as a progressive at the Feingold listening session pointed out. You have latched on to a really tired talking point provider, get over it. As far as cap n' trade, I prefer subsidy diversion. Cancel subsidies for fossil and nuclear power, and chemical ag, and divert part of those saving to the buildout of a national high voltage power grid and subsidies for renewable energy and organic fertilizer from recycled waste stream biomass. Manure, crop and food waste, garbage, wood waste, and even sewage can be used to produce energy, reduce GHG, cut fertilizer costs, build up soil into a living ecosystem that sequesters carbon, and vastly reduce GHG. Nitrous oxide (300X the GHG effect of CO2)emitted by ammonia fertilizer and raw manure and sewage and methane (20x the GHG effect of CO2) released by manure and chemical fertilizer run off are a huge source of climate change. Cap n' trade can be attacked on better grounds than "government can't do anything right". Trading is still completely unregulated, credit default swaps and bundled mortgage "instruments" are still being created and traded. Any cap will be manipulated up as soon as corporate lobbyists get to politicians. We need more regulation, not less. Outlaw corporate bribery passing as "free" speech. Regulate all trading and put the mechanisms into place to enforce those regulations. I guess jailing Martha Stewart and now Madoff was supposed to scare wall street straight? It's not working. Thousands more white collar criminal need to be installed in country club prisons before the routine insider trading and widespread market manipulation will stop. Subsidy diversion will do what cap n' trade will never do. Spur a comnmercial wave of renewable energy and organic ag, that is the way to create an exponentially expanding anit-GHG wave around the world. Only exponential growth in these GHG cures can face up to exponential climate change in time. The Arctic may be ice-free this next summer! No time to lose. The dark ocean will absorb the 24hour sunlight of the arctic summer where the ice cap reflected it, in that case how long will Greenland glaciers last? What will that do to the gulf stream and other ocean conveyors? We are playing god with the biosphere, all justified by ridiculous talking points from corporate shills endlessly repeated by duped "conservative" citizens. Wake up provider.On The American Farm Bureau goes all in posted 1 month, 1 week ago 29 Responses
- Another big technology that can steady the power from renewable energy with storage, already in use on a small scale here in my local utility grid, is superconducting electromagnetic energy storage. It can store the power that flows over a national high voltage DC grid. This technology can benefit greatly from the superconducting electromagnetics employed in fusion and particle accelerator research. It really needs R&D stimulus funding right now. Electric commuter rail and HVDC power cables should be run in freeway medians. Like the interstate highway system these should be government built, owned, and regulated. Commuter train cars and convertible bus/train vehicles would be owned by private companies and local governments. There's a public works project for america, get Detroit making the trains and vehicles. Lots of good jobs would be made, building this out. It would free our economy from the poisonous volatility of imported energy and fertilizer. It's important for financial security, long term prosperity. Even leaving the huge issue of climate change aside. A financial house built on imported oil and fossil fuels is on shaky ground. Is that a bus on those train tracks? Yeah, and it's my ride to work, and it's powered by renewable electricty. And it goes 200 mph in a tube? hehey. It's possible.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 1 week ago 197 Responses
- The capacity factor argument really comes down to cost per kwh Jim. The variability is a different question, the wind blows or does not blow seemingly based on capricious nature. The sun too is affected by weather. One wind farm in Texas might have a problem supplying steady power, but wind farms on the great plains, in the great lakes region, and on the coasts and solar power in the desert southwest from solar thermal power plants, and PV electricty from roofs all over the nation, and biogas powered fuel cells running on waste stream biodigestors all transported over a high voltage electron interstate power grid, will be perfectly steady. Why? Statistics. A study of only 8 windfarms proved it. Then there is load adjustment made possible by smart grid technology in every building and factory. The best nuclear advocates can hope for is a slow 20 year sunset for nukes. If they agree to a compromise. Take care of your mess!On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 1 week ago 197 Responses
- Thanks Bio-d. It sure is great to see Lovins here in the forum instead of Khosla. I don't know if or when a safe affordable waste recycling/neutralizing reactor could be produced, that would safely take care of the contamination. Given the impossibility of moving the used fuel rods and reactor cores safely to some kind of storage facility for a resonable price, one alternative is to shut the reactors down and leave the mess where it is, maybe put it all inside the containment structures. A better one would be to use the better, safer design to treat the waste onsite. The waste processing reactors could be moved from plant to plant. The whole R&D process would take a decade or two at the usual pace of the industry. Maybe the plants could operate within that time and then be decommisioned, one by one dismantled and the radioactive elements neutralized by the special reactors. Coal might be shut down a lot faster with this plan. Are these plants a lot more dangerous in operation than they would be mothballed for centuries? I think we owe it to future generations to clean up our mess now. As with exiting the oil wars, these nuclear behemoths can't just be shut down and left alone, safely. Water circulation must be maintained in the used nuclear fuel rod "swimming pools" to prevent catastrophic radioactive fires and the escape of radiation many times the contamination from Chernobyl. And that is from only one fuel rod storage pool, there are hundreds spread around the country, beside existing nukes. How do you protect these potential disasters from power outage, plane crashes, terrorism, earthquakes, supertornadoes, and so forth? If the water leaks out or stops circulating or evaporates, the fuel rods will heat up and burn, sending radiocative contamination on the wind and into groundwater. So keep them running, producing power and phase them out safely and sensibly? This gives the nuclear industry a big job building the waste treatment reactors and working on the phase out and in the end it will be much cheaper and safer than the alternative.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 1 week ago 197 Responses
- A completely different take on nuclear power: It will be with us for a long time wether it is shut down or keeps running out it's useful safe lifetime. Furthermore, if waste recycling reactors could be installed to replace them one by one, the waste problem would sunset with useful energy as a byproduct and no dangerous transportation or trillion dollar multi century storage in repositories. And if a nation wide high voltage direct current smart grid were built to handle the power from these aging nukes as well as renewables, and conservation were pushed hard, with ground source heating/cooling and electric transportation, fossil fuel could be phased out that much sooner. Nuclear power could die a safe peaceful deatrh with as little extra contamination as possible. What say you, do we let that 20% of national power use from nukes go to 40% as we cut power consumption through conservation? It's not a bad plan. With a very stable dispatchable (utility talk for they can turn it on and off at will when it's needed) 40% nuclear that could actually remain running at a steady state, while different renewables and load timing through a smart grid took up any slack, coal might go by 2020? Just what the new climate estimate says we need in terms of GHG curtailment timing. So make a compromise nuclear power boosters, take 40% for as long as radioactive waste treatment will take, maybe 25 years? Gradually nuclear power can phase out as renewables take over 100% of our power needs in 25 years.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 197 Responses
- Without a simple explanation of why the situation is as dire as this study says it is, hardly anyone will pay it any mind. Somehow the concept of feedback loops (such as tundra melt and methane release) and exponential climate change has to enter the public lexicon. Simply claiming "we are scientists, take our word for it" isn't penetrating mass media and public opinion. And that allows right wing politicians to pander to teabaggers and claim it is a hoax and it enables more centrist politicians to decry the problem in private, but use the excuse of electability to ignore it in public. Compound interest that causes exponential growth in savings might have been a good analogy back when people saved money, but that isn't happening anymore. Maybe compound growth in debt from adjustable rate mortgages, home loans, and credit card debt is an apt comparison now? Somehow a national education in the fundamental math principle of compound growth needs to be made in the case of catastrophic climate change. Another compound growth phenomenon that can counter climate change actually is a source of hope. Commercial exponential growth in renewable energy and electric transportation and organic agriculture.On A scary new climate study will have you saying 'Oh, shit!' posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 16 Responses
- Solid oxide fuel cell/turbine generators that run on multiple fuel sources are one efficiency answer for the military. These can be mounted on electric drive tanks and trucks. A hummer was retrofitted with electric drive back in the 90s. This would also make every truck and tank a mobile power station, when not in use. And it makes the vehicles nearly silent on the battle field. Boeing was working on these generators for backup power on airliners, so jet engines would not be needed to keep the lights on when the planes are waiting on the runway, and as power plants for unmanned aerial vehicles. Electrifying military equipment would allow practice training to be done with rechargable battery power, maybe even kwhs gleaned from wind and sun and waste biogas. And last but not least, a national shift to electrified transportation would end the main cause for these current wars and many more wars on into the future, namely oil. Then the military could get by on renewable power, freed up from wars over oil. And that national shift to electrified vehicles would be enabled by military R&D spending of fuel cells and electrification of tanks and trucks. How do we get there from here? An incremental year after year reduction in oil use. Small gains in mileage and efficiency that are affordable because they actually pay their way in savings would do that. That would keep the price of oil stable, which in turn would stop the motive for oil wars. Think compound growth, small percentage oil reduction over time leading to exponential growth in alternatives to oil. It's possible to beat exponentially growing climate change with compound growth in renewable energy and electrified transportation. Then organic agriculture can reverse the effects of GHG already in the atmosphere by sequestering carbon in the living soil ecosystem.On The U.S. military's battle to wean itself off oil posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses
- My new 400 dollar PC is thousands of times faster than my 4000 dollar 10 year old PC. Is that due to Mooore's Law? In part. But mainly it's due to mass production. In fact we don't need to invoke Moore's Law-like progress in PV cells to get to 1 dollar per watt solar power. NREL already verified 38% efficiency for concentrating solar PV years ago, that was with a mere 10 sun concentrator. Cogeneration, capturing the heat from a solar collector as well as the electricty, can gain another 30% for heating domestic hot water. These advances have not followed into production yet, let alone mass production. But consider this, with 10 sun concentration, 1/10nth the area of PV material is needed to get 3 times the electricty of a normal 12% efficiency flat panel collector. And the heat collected saves kwhs normally used for hot water heating. This kind of performance coupled with cost reduction will cover our roofs with collectors. Will they be manufactured in China or will they be made here, with an acompnying job recovery? That's the important question. Chinese companies are pulling ahead rapidly, while our hedonists in DC fiddle and bathe in bribe money. When will they heed Lovins' advice?On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 197 Responses
- Take a look at the political path for effective cap n' trade Umbra. Then compare it to canceling subsidies and tax breaks for fossil fueled power, and increasing subsidies for renewable energy and using building out a federal high voltage direct current continental supergrid, on the model of the federal insterstate highway system. The trade part of CnT takes some sort of comprehensive financial market reregulation. That would take some sort of comprehensive campaign finance reform, ie., complete public financing, no more "contributions" from lobbyists. What would the cap side of CnT take? The same reforms, plus some sort of way to make the cap very hard to adjust. When a denier/delayer administration and/or congress takes hold, caps would simply be relaxed. Back to zero progress, but once again as with personal offsets, an excuse to continue guzzling gas and other fossil fueled energy products. The guilt reduction/quietism objection to offsets is difficult to surmount.On Ask Umbra on climate weapons posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses
- Magnificent! Now will Brand respond? Good move using the old whole earth trademark picture though, hehey. With the fall of nuke-you-ler friendly politics (notice that this new administration uses the term "nuclear"), coupled with the cost explosion of nuclear power, this administration's tenure should see the end of new nuclear power in the US. Will the industry admit its mistakes and correct them with waste recycling reactors that fit inside the original nuclear facilities? The waste is too dangerous and expensive to even transport to a repository like Yucca Mountain, even if it was a safe site. Dealing with waste and decommisioning old nuclear plants will be a perpetual profit source for the industry, funded by taxpayers. Non-competitive fraudulent contracting will most likely continue for centuries. Moving the waste, storing the waste, securing the waste, combing the waste, cleaning the waste..hehehey..virtually forever.On Stewart Brand's nuclear enthusiasm falls short on facts and logic posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 197 Responses
- " Ask any solar advocate in the U.S., and they will tell you that there is a tremendous amount in the pipeline. So why is it not going in the ground? What is holding up solar in the U.S.?" The same reason wind projects are delayed. Lack of grid capacity and regulation to get the power from where it is generated to where it can be sold to those who need it. A national HVDC power grid would change that, then real free market forces would impell a commercial wave that proceeds at an exponential rate. Forget feed in tarrifs, just shift subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables and to build out a national electron superhighway. At near 100 billion per year those subsidies and tax breaks would do the job. Very soon renewable energy would drop in price with mass production/installation and subsidies could be dropped.On The Spanish solar collapse posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 3 Responses
- One estimate I remember reading claimed that with renewable smart grid technology and using distributed generation and storage and energy conservation, existing cables and transmission equipment already has 5 times the capacity which would eventually be needed. For instance: those electric vehicle batteries would actually reduce necessary grid capacity if they could be used for distributed storage when they are parked, either at home or at work. And switching the air conditioning load to ground source cooling (as well as the huge heating loads in winter) would vastly reduce load. Smart grid timing of high load devices like water heaters and freezers would likewise reduce peak demand. then the existing local grid capacity would be more than enough. But there would still need to be a high voltage diect current "electron superhighway" backbone to transport renewable energy surplus across the continent to ameliorate the varying availability of wind and sun and water power. In other words, concentrate on a national high voltage smart grid and we could avoid the even more expensive wholesale replacement of all those local power cables and transformers and switches. I'm looking forward to your discussion of an HVDC continental smart grid with superconducting electromagnetic storage Amanda. It is essential to get wind, water, and solar power investors to get a return on their money with efficient transportation of southwestern solar power and coastal and offshore wind and water power, and wind and biomass power from the midwest, from areas with excess supply to areas with high demand that coincides with insufficient local/regional renewable energy supply. Anyway, fascinating tale of our mysterious predicament and great writing! Keep up the good work.On Our old electric grid is no match for our new green energy plans posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses
- Twilight? We can hope anyway. Why will oil go away? Not from shortage. It will go away because of cost. Just like Whale oil went away. Kerosene was cheaper than Whale oil. Renewable electricty is cheaper than oil right now. Why isn't it gone already? Monopoly corporate power. What is the alternative to oil for the multinational megaopolists? More oil. Tar sands, shale oil, deep ocean oil, procured and refined using nuclear power. Look for nuclear powered tar sands refining soon.On The violent twilight of oil and a strategy to expose it posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 1 Response
- Sorry about the "12 day" talking point becksters and limboobs, as this CNN article points out: "The committee makes its final vote in October." http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/09/nobel.peace.prize/index.html Why award the peace prize to the first president to break the color barrier (with totally non-violent "peaceful" means), that prevented anyone but white men from running the most powerful nation on planet earth? That color barrier based on centuries of slavery and prejudice, fear and ignorance, finally busted. By a candidate who learned politics from the grassroots up and even with huge resistance (agregiously dirty politicking from his democratic opponents) from his own party in the primary, prevailed. Coming from virtually nowhere to turn the course of the US around, when it was surely headed for an invasion of Iraq, with a Mc(bush)Cain win. Why give the prize to a president who understands that reliance on oil has caused these wars we are currently engaged in, and that renewable energy can end these oil wars and the 10 more that will be waged if we keep using oil? Why award him the prize after he has proven his political strength over these 9 months in office? Only raving wing nuts can't find the answer.On Obama’s Nobel: What it means for greens posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 5 Responses
- Yeah provider (how many quatloos for the newcomers?), what modern organic farming methods are in use or R&D right now? That's a great topic for future articles: take note please Grist authors! The "commie" reference is to all the propaganda spouted from the right on how government "interference" is unamerican. The ag subsidy programs, without which chemical ag farmers would all go out of business, surely constitutes a government made market in ag commodities. There is no "free" market. So tell me why the vast majority of farmers, who vote conservatively time after time, seem to love government running their business? Organic farmers getting subsidies targeted to chemical ag? There's another article topic. I've never heard of such an anti-american conspiracy before!! Is ACORN involved? Hehehey.On Pollan shoots down organic myths at Grist event posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago 25 Responses
- Yeah the cost at first will be prohibitive, it always is for new technology, before mass production kicks in. As you point out, modern tractors and combines are cost prohibitive already, even with mass production. And without subsidies, farmers would lose money with chemical ag, am I right? It already is too costly. Unless of course you are a commie and believe that government ought to redistribute wealth to chemical ag farmers from the rest of US. The pioneering efforts here in Wisconsin, that university extension programs are reaching out to, involve rotational grazing dairy farms and biodigestion of farm waste for energy production and organic fertilizer. If we look at a financial model where farmers get payed for supplying wind, solar, and biogas energy, instead of getting subsidies to prop up the chemical farming industry, actual capitalist market based farming might be possible. Right now without the dole, only organic farmers would stay in business. Why? Because organic farmers don't get subsidies. Given universtiy extension programs that coordinate with organic farmers and help engage engineering departments in the creation of robotic organic ag and renewable energy from farming, and without the over head of chemical ag, maybe farming could return to a capitalist model. Or do you like a commie food supply? Hehey.On Pollan shoots down organic myths at Grist event posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 25 Responses
- Hmm, pulling superweeds by hand? Might be better to send a weed wacker on a robot arm after them. Those abandoned acres might be reclaimed with that kind of technology. So herbicide resistant weeds might end chemical ag and bring on organic? Because of economics and plant evolution. Oh the irony.On The chemical treadmill breaks down and the superweeds did it posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 7 Responses
- Hmm, pulling superweeds by hand? Might be better to send a weed wacker on a robot arm after them. Those abandoned acres might be reclaimed with that kind of technology. So herbicide resistant weeds might end chemical ag and bring on organic? Because of economics and plant evolution. Oh the irony.On The chemical treadmill breaks down and the superweeds did it posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 7 Responses
- "...sophisticated organic ag does exist. Pollan disputed the idea that organic techniques are anti-technology." Thanks for that! It's about time media noticed that organic ag can be industrial. The big challenge for organic versus chemical ag is industrial scale grain production. Can the huge quantities of grain produced using mega tractors and combines and chemicals still be produced organically? The planting and harvesting stages are done with mega machinery. The selection for the particular monocrop over weeds and pests is done chemically. Watering is done with mega irrigation equipment. I would propose that the planting and harvesting and soil ammendment with biodigested waste stream biomass can still be done with mega tractors and combines, maybe electrified versions, but the selection of the crop plant over weeds and pests, and organic fertilization, and pinpoint water injection irrigation could be done robotically. Weeding and feeding the crop night and day. Monocroping could shift to strip crop rotation. And any space between crop plants could be planted by the robots with nitrogen fixing, pest repelling, and other beneficial plants. No more superweed problems either, any weed would yeild to a weed wacker on a robot. Would production be even higher in the long run? I think so, as organic soil started building and soil ecosystems were restored. Instead of monocrops, that easily become vulnerable to widespread weather enabled crop diseases, a more varying genetic stock can protect farm finances. Vegetable crop organic farming could go robotic too, in fact it might be a better place to start. What would trading the economics of chemical ag over head for clean energy producing biodigested fertilizer applied robotically result in? A better deal for farmers and consumers is my guess.On Pollan shoots down organic myths at Grist event posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 25 Responses
- On a related note: congressional democrats down from 50% approval rating to 36% in recent polling. Congressional republicans down to 9% approval rating! Lower than cheney was in his heydey? Obama's numbers coming back up over 50% approval again. Why? Is it because he is pushing US forward on healthcare reform despite the lobbying efforts blocking the way? Yep. Will the same hold true on the new renewable energy economy? We can only hope, and keep talking up global competition on green jobs and manufacturing. We want solar, wind, and plugin car production and jobs right here in the good old USA!!On Growth in renewable energy outpaces nuclear, fossil fuels posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 2 Responses
- Great news Sue! How do these figures plug into the typical technology adoption curve? If it follows the expected exponential path, how long will it take to get into the rapid growth phase that other technologies have displayed (like internet technology for instance)? Can the phenomenon of compound growth in technology adoption beat the compound growth in GHG climate change? The race is on, wether most voters know it or not, and China has a big lead already. Will US capital investment follow Warren Buffet's lead (he recently bought 10% of chinese plugin hybrid automaker BYD)? Or will the usual suspects, effnews/lobbyist teapartying, delay US entry into this global green energy commercial competition a few more years? The 8 year lag due to the bushwacking is already a huge handicap. Will we retain any manufacturing jobs at all if the lobbyists talking through the becks and limboobs manage to kill green manufacturing stimulus? My guess is even those ubiquitos Obama as hitler signs and bumperstickers will be imported from China. Yikes!On Growth in renewable energy outpaces nuclear, fossil fuels posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 2 Responses
- There it is Umbra, the most troubling aspect of offsets. Quietism: I have done my part by buying an offset for my gas consumption, so let the guilt-free guzzling continue. It's kind of similar for cap n' trade. Set up a system where we can buy permits to pollute (through our local utility adding it to our power bill), then we can use plausible deniability to justify coal electricty. As far as the 8 bucks per month mentioned for the offset, would it be possible to drive a giant SUV 40 miles less per month and have the same GHG-saving effect? I think that shifting the 8 dollars from agri-chem food purchases to local organic food buying would do more than buying offsets from some shadowy corporate entity. Should CSAs issue offsets equivalent to share/pound amounts of veggies? How much GHG in terms of methane and nitrous oxide is saved per pound/dollar of organic food versus agri-chem food? There's a good question for a future column Umbra. Nitrous oxide is around 300 times worse as a GHG than CO2 and methane is around 20 times worse. How much GHG does a pound of agri-chem veggie production emit given these figures? How much GHG in terms of equivalence to the CO2 emitted by gas guzzling does you CSA membership offset?On Ask Umbra on buying carbon offsets posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 11 Responses
- Payback period (oops forgot this vital consideration): A simple manual switch or timer on your present water heater, pays for itself in savings in a few months. Convenience is your only sacrafice, no problem for the environmentally committed. Tankless heaters involve expensive installation of new gas, vent, or high current electric wiring and they cost 4 times what regular water heaters cost. A catastrophic hot water leak over a weekend when you aren't home can wipe out years of payback savings. Solar hot water systems have a few years payback in most areas of the US, longer for cloudy areas like Grist's hometown. Combined with a switch on the old water heater, this could be a quick payback. Check into plastic mirrors that track and reflect the sun into your solar hot water heater if you have a roof with poor solar exposure.On Ask Umbra on replacing hot-water heaters posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 21 Responses
- Actually a regular water heater can be turned off most of the time, like a tankless water heater is, and put on a timer or just a manual switch. A regular water heater, that costs a fraction of the tankless version, produces hot water in about 45 minutes. So if you get a solar hot water system that only provides enough hot water say 60% of the time, you can always turn on your old water heater when you need it. Another thing to consider on tankless hot water heaters is that if you were away on vacation and your hot water system springs a leak, your utility meter will spin like a top until you get home. With a regular hot water heater the power consumption would be much lower. Of course you could just shut off your water and water heater when vacationing too, but not may of us remember to do that. You may want to check into solar cogeneration, it produces PV electricity from solar cells, using maybe 20% of the solar energy, then a portion of the remaining 80% is captured as heat to provide your hot water. And with solar hot water heating in northern climes where we are (Wisconsin here), heat storage in the form of a phase change salt that transitions at about 105 degrees F is good. This salt solution stores many times the heat of the equivalent amount of water, and right at the critical temperature needed. I'm not sure if this is commercially available yet. Thestorage salt solution can be "recharged" with offpeak electricty at around half the utility rate too, or waste heat from other sources can help the sun out in providing your hot water supply.On Ask Umbra on replacing hot-water heaters posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 21 Responses
- This topic brings up the related concept of antibiotic resistant microorganisms. The mutation rate related to irradiation might be even faster than mutation and evolution rates encouraged by antibiotics. A few lucky cells, spores, or prions hiding out behind a bit of bone in that hamburger sample that is irradiated, could get just enough radiation for deadly mutation. Most mutations would result in an evolutionary dead end, but some will inevitably change and take a new path. That path could be a big shortcut that quickly passes our human immune systems and our medical science. How do genetic scientists working on everything from new veggie crops to new germ warfare agents induce mutation? A big part of it is no doubt irradiation. We have allowed corporate bottomline considerations to in effect turn our food system into a germ warfare project with antibiotics, hormones, human sewage irrigation, and feeding cows to cows (chickens to cows to chickens to pigs). Do we want to add the powerful mutational tool of irradition to the mix? We already have. Eat local, eat organic, boycott the industrial food system.On Thoughts on irradiated food posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 14 Responses
- I think lowered expectations would help to re-establish those traditions Mark. Thoreau, Teddy Roosevelt, John Muir, Aldo Leopold, Wright, RB Fuller and others still power a cultural movement. A symbiotic world view of humanity inside the biosphere. 10% of us get it world wide. Maybe appealing to that committed group to reach out and do grass roots lobbying is an effective way to deal with corruption brought on by corporate cash. If we accept the fact that only 10% of us will be interested enough to take the time to inform ourselves on green issues and care enough to promote them, the perpetual dissappointment of greens might be overcome. If we make the natural spiritual treehugger argument along with the economic, foreign policy, and national security arguments, some will listen to the treehugging, but the large percentage of voters we need, another 45%, to get actual green change, are going to consider jobs and their family's financial security first. Not to mention the actual life and death issue of these oil wars; when war is joined, those families lose children to them. No matter their politics, that simple brutal fact hits home. Renewable energy! No more endless oil wars! There's a bumpersticker. As the rovians put it: "They have an essay, we have a bumpersticker". 10% of us will happily read/write essays, but we need bumperstickers to get the other 45% we need.On Does anyone still care about "the land"? posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 25 Responses
- You are right about "the land" Kathy, not enough people have a connection with it to make us anywhere near politically influential. In fact most of the time that term "the land" is part of chemical ag and forestry lobbying talking points. Jobs, financial security, and national security are the practical points around renewable energy and electric transportation. No need for a game show, China has already taken over a commanding (permanent?) lead in green manufacturing. Will we have US jobs exporting plugin cars, wind machines, solar, biogas, energy storage, and smart grid devices? Not unless we get going yesterday. Forget talking about climate change. Jobs and recovery and restoring US manufacturing and technology leadership. That's what sells the new (fossil fuel free) energy economy.On Does anyone still care about "the land"? posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 25 Responses
- Cap n' trade is to GHG climate change cure..as..mandatory health insurance with no regulation of the insurance industry and no public plan is to healthcare reform. Taxpayers and consumers will pay corporate criminal conspiracies even more money than they are now to go on looting the treasury and the economy and the environment. The price for carbon and other pollutants belched into the atmosphere and mountaintop removal and aquifer destruction is clear. Why not make corporatistas pay for that? Then take the considerable subsidies and tax breaks for fossil fuels, nuclear power, and chemical agriculture away. And divert some of those savings into a national high voltage power grid and renewable energy and organic ag subsidies. Then the clear solution would be non-polluting renewable energy. The bottomline next quarterly earnings focus of corpoRATS would dictate a switch to renewable energy. An EU style pollution permit giveaway cap n' trade scam will do what it has done in europe, allow market manipulators to bubble trade pollution permits while discouraging investment in renewable energy, electric transportation, ground source heating/cooling, and organic ag. The president sees the world ruled by corporate power and asks what we can do to get some kind of wedge into the corruption to begin to split it up. Progressives ask how can we end corporate corruption yesterday. It's our role on the left to push the administration to pursue reform, and in the process make the president seem moderate. We are the bad cops, he is the good cop. Our problem is that we just don't have the numbers and media profile to credibly claim that status as the force behind the throne. On the other hand teabaggers driven by corporate lobbyists get a spotlight many times their actual strength. It's a problem, how do we get noticed without the kind of massive demonstrations common in France (for instance). Whenever french students, farmers, or workers need something they take it to the streets and take over the media. We evidently do not have that kind of commitment on the part of our progressive forces. If we did, Obama as the good cop could get us a pretty good compromise with corporate power. We can't even get enough people to organize and oppose teabaggers taking over townhall meetings. Is it wimpy leadership or ambivalent troops or both? How do we fix it and man up like the french people do? Maybe we need to ask them. "Freedom fries" indeed! It turns out french patriots beat american patriots at every turn.On ‘No compromise’ faction attacks climate bill posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago 104 Responses
- Thanks Tim, it's the latest renewable energy distributed generation and storage technology gleaned from Grist and other sites around the internet. Smart grid distributed computing that regulates the whole system using fractal mathematics might just reduce the need for storage and backup to a very low level anyway. A study reported on here on Grist by Gar Lipow explains why increasing the numbers of wind and solar sources in diverse areas all together with a grid tends to cancel fluctuations in energy input from different sources. That's where a national high voltage low loss power grid comes in. It statistically eliminates fluctuations without storage or backup. Another way to smooth the power supply is to adjust demand. A distributed smart grid will do that as well. Those superconducting storage systems might not be needed very often, but their beauty is they can supply a huge amount of power quickly when it's needed. The problem now is not scientific or technological, it is educational and political. People have no idea all these technologies are ready now and could be installed everywhere given a firm commitment of financial and political resources. If media stays in the dark and keeps viewers and readers in the dark, this new energy economy can't get going. Keep talking about it.On Lester Brown speaks sense on the food/climate crisis posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 12 Responses
- You said it DrPam! The hormone mimicking pesticides and herbicides and antibiotic resistant microorganisms evolving way beyond the speed of medical science to keep up might be causing even greater cost and harm than the GHG from soil killing, carbon stripping chemical fertilizer. Are current medical costs due in large part to these mainly unrecognized disease contributors? I think robotic organic agriculture can cure the climate and chemical ag related human health problems without cutting food production or raising prices. Renewable energy, electric trains, buses, trucks, and cars and ground source heated and cooled buildings can stop GHG. But to reverse the worst effects of current GHG levels, that are already seemingly inevitable, the soil will need to store carbon again. That 20 foot deep prairie soil that was first plowed a century and a half ago and is now nothing more than a thin layer of toxic chemical dust blowing away on the drought scorched wind, thanks to chemical ag, is where the excess CO2 and methane and nitrous oxide in our atmosphere can be stored. All returned to biomass and the biomass returned to the living soil ecosystem. Solar powered robots providing just the right amount of water and organic fertilizer and soil ammendment directly to the soil around each plant can make this happen without turning humanity back into manual gardeners desperately laboring for sustenance. There is a hopeful aspect to the high over head of chemical ag, it means that organic ag employing mass produced robots can beat it on cost. Withdraw the chem subsidies and divert them to organics and it would happen quickly, but I fear we will have to labor on against the big ag lobbyists to get it going, on a small local scale. Naturally once it's proven to reduce cost and boost productivity big ag will pretend they invented it and go mega-huge with it. So it goes. Even that's hopeful for the climate. Big business can cover the earth with organic ag in a few years if there is mega profit to be had. Meanwhile we brave pioneers can trek on to try and capture 10% of the market with organic local ag. It's an adventure!On Illinois points the way to food system reform posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 9 Responses
- Compressed air storage that uses heat storage and solar furnace heat seems to be cost effective storage, as does backup batteries in homes and buildings, storage distributed throughout the grid. A smart grid can use distributed storage and generation to stabilize the system. For instance, a farm biogas fuel cell generator backing up the local renewable grid, feeding on biogas from local farms and municipal sewage systems, and landfills, and using natural gas if biogas runs short. That's distributed generation that relies on stored biogas/natural gas. With a national high voltage power grid that interacts with these local and regional grids, the power can be smoothed with almost no fossil fuel use. Only in emergencies would natural gas be needed. Normal power outages due to storms, on the rise now with climate change, can be better dealt with if homes and buildings have backup batteries and their own solar panels. In a grid slamming hurricane, local gas stations and stores can still operate with their backup power. Katrina escapees could not buy gas or food, all the gas stations and stores depended on grid power to operate. The storage method of the near future could be superconducting electromagnetic energy storage. It has been used by our local utility here to buffer papermill industrial loads for over a decade. Larger scale superconducting power rings that act like light speed flywheels are a distinct possibility now. The ceramic/metal superconducting material is supercooled to zero resistance, energy is added when sun shines, waves roll, or the wind blows. Then it is withdrawn electromagnetically as needed. With a 300,000 volt direct current regional power grid, with these energy storing rings located along the route, absorbing the 300,000 volt power as needed and supplying it back to the grid as needed, the whole system acts like a huge distributed battery. That's oil, natural gas, and coal replacing power, with energy dollars going to local farmers and solar panel owning utility customers. Solar and wind are both good on farms, with big building roofs for solar and fields for large wind machines.On Lester Brown speaks sense on the food/climate crisis posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 12 Responses
- University ag extension programs ought to be created to encourage farmers to take advantage of organic farming to eliminate overhead related to chemical fertilizer and herbicides and pesticides. Right now a farmer will not get a crop loan, crop insurance, or ag subsidies if he does not farm chemically. That has to change to switch to local organic food and carbon sequestering soil. The whole financial underpinning of farming needs to be redesigned to halt and reverse the climate effects of GHG intensive chemical ag and make farms key energy providers for this new renewable energy economy. Wind, solar, and biogas power from farms, along with wind and wave power off our coasts, and solar power from suitable roof locations and over parking areas, conducted over a national electron superhighway, a national high voltage direct current power grid, powering electric trains, cars, and trucks, could stop the eternal flow of cash offshore to oil rich, problematic areas of the planet.On Illinois points the way to food system reform posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 9 Responses
- I wish Lester would push a national HVDC power grid along with electric rail, it can be buried alongside rail corridors and under interstate highway medians. With a national low loss, buried, high voltage direct current grid, the areas of the country with excess renewable power can supply the areas with a momentary or long term deficit of wind, solar, or biogas electricity. That nearly eliminates the intermittency/storage problem with renewables, statistics have proven that. Organic agriculture and biodigestion of the waste stream to backup the grid with biogas and switch from GHG intensive chemical fertilizer to organic fertilizer that builds soil in order to store carbon is the way to actually reverse GHG concentration in the atmosphere. Renewable energy can halt the increase of GHG, but it takes a massive global switch to soil building organic fertilizer to stop the worst effects of the high levels of GHG already acumulated. Lester does need someone to help him make these issues more palatable to the media. Dave and Lester are both wrong on pricing carbon, carbon taxes can't pass congress and neither will real cap and trade, as it will be interpreted by media talking heads as a "new" tax. Only fake, giveaway cap and trade (much like fake health insurance reform is a giveaway for the insurance industry) as has happened in Europe, where industry gets free permits to pollute, can pass congress. That creates a new scam trading venue in carbon permits for international con men, a bubble making non-solution for GHG. Given the recent revelations on fossil fuel and nuclear power subsidies, it's clear that diverting these subsidies to renewable energy, in the form of a national HVDC power grid project and subsidies for organic agriculture and waste stream fertilizer/biogas power generation is the tax and revenue neutral way to go. No new taxes, no new debt!On Lester Brown speaks sense on the food/climate crisis posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 12 Responses
- Great Rob! Glad to hear the school already uses gardening. Now just imagine solar power/greenhouse installations on the southside of community buildings or malls too. And farmer's markets all year round in the mall with real farmers selling frozen produce off season and greenhouse veggies. I think this would really boost traffic in winter as shoppers bask in the sunshine and enjoy the greenery. Even mega-city skyscrapers could have the south face become a vertical greenhouse farming space. Apartment dwellers with gardens? We are talking about a niche market that could grow to 10% pretty quickly. And that's enough for commercial viability, even if the other 90% keep shopping at walmart. If walmart follows its current strategy it might even adopt some version of these greenhouse installations in a few years?On Ask Umbra's video advice on making lunch matter posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 8 Responses
- Umbra can you do a video on schools where growing lunch is part of the curriculum? Are there any yet? Seems like a good way for kids to connect with nature, symbiotically. I know CSA people who would be happy to make this happen. Schools ought to have big greenhouses built into their south walls, with big gardens and compost piles just outside those greenhouses. The energy harvested could lighten their utility bills. Organic ag and eating and solar electric/heating should begin in kindergarten.On Ask Umbra's video advice on making lunch matter posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago 8 Responses
- I really like algae and yeast cultivation for a permanent cure for hunger Howell. The algae feeding the yeast so that all the amino acids and vitamins can be produced. With this kind of "soylent green" no people would be needed as feedstock. Feed in biodigested biomass derived fertilizer, sunlight, water, and out comes perfectly balanced ready to eat or dry and store...food. This is already scientifically and technically feasible, maybe someone like Dean Kamen, with his water purifier design for the whole world, could make an algae/yeast nutrition device that fits with the water purifier. The solar collectors for growing the algae would add to the water purification capacity through solar evaporation. There is no technical or scientific reason for hunger or thirst anymore, it's all financial and political.On Scientists identify "safe operating space for humanity" in seminal Nature study posted 2 months ago 20 Responses
- Great news Joe! Even though I'm not a big fan of Time. It actually contains at least one error or lie per sentence. But it does represent the very spleen of MSM (Fox represnts the bowels). This means that all the great recomendations you have made have at least been noticed And those recomendations are radical! At least as radical from a renewable energy GHG climate change respect as Van Jones' political fauxpaus were. Aren't you glad you didn't get inducted into the Obama administration? One question: do you agree with me that a national HVDC super grid, funded, built, and operated by the US government, just as the federal highway system is, would be the key step to replacing fossil fuel with renewables and halting GHG climate change?On Time magazine names me one of the 'Heroes of the Environment 2009' posted 2 months ago 2 Responses
- Ahhh...you meant Chuck Heston, right? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070723/On Scientists identify "safe operating space for humanity" in seminal Nature study posted 2 months ago 20 Responses
- This is why wind and solar energy is not enough. Organic agriculture and water conservation, which can go hand in hand, need to be added to the energy re-evolution. On the cultural values front a basic shift from quantity of consumption and possesions as a measure of fullfillment to...quality of life as the measure of success. Fewer humans, and that smaller human population living in a symbiotic state with nature. Soil nutrients need to come from the waste stream and the water we use needs to be cleaned up and reused over and over.On Scientists identify "safe operating space for humanity" in seminal Nature study posted 2 months ago 20 Responses
- I believe Prius is advertising a solar powered ventilation fan that keeps the car cool in the sun. That would tend to eliminate the outgassing fairly quickly. I'm guessing that one of these solar fans long available for boats would fit into any new car. Here's a strange alternative, put a rebuilt 4 cylinder motor in your SUV. You'll go slower and save gas. A 4 cylinder truck motor/transmission will power your old SUV, try a Toyota. The motor mounts and drive line will need work. And you will need the auxillary parts from a 4 cylinder Toyota truck, radiator and so forth. How much would it cost? Not as much as a new car. And no outgassing, of course the solar ventilation fan is still a good idea anyway as it saves air conditioning energy.On Ask Umbra on that new-car smell posted 2 months ago 3 Responses
- Once again this shows that shifting "incentives" (tax breaks) and subsidies from fossil and nuclear energy directly to tax breaks and subsidies for renewable energy, especially a national high voltage direct current power grid, could be done without raising taxes or cap and trade. It's a tax and revenue neutral path to national energy security and economic revival. And energy security and economic recovery is THE way to avoid anymore oil or energy/resource caused wars. Here's another thought, maybe if we didn't import oil from regions that support and harbor terrorists, we could remain a free society, where extraordinary restrictions are no longer needed. No more multi-faceted long national emergency for anti-constitutional forces to justify their push for official state kidnapping, torture, and murder. That's got to be a good thing.On Fossil fuel subsidies dwarf clean energy subsidies; Obama wants to eliminate them posted 2 months ago 13 Responses
- One key program would get free market investment behind this new energy economy. A national HVDC power grid that gives solar and wind power investors access to customers all over the country. Cancel these oil wars and invest the cash savings into that project. Get the power of capital behind clean, renewable, cheap energy. Like the intersate highway system, this project needs government leadership. It is more impoortant than climate legislation.On The clean-energy investment agenda posted 2 months, 1 week ago 6 Responses
- Fractal theory is what applies here, and in the flow of electric power as well as the flow of traffic or the curvature of market supply and demand. A few simple principles of interaction between each fish in a school of fish, expressed as fractal rules, make the school of fish move in patterns that no supercomputer could emulate. But a bunch of simple computers, with simple rules, interacting over a network can smooth out the power flow or the traffic flow. The same way a school of fish moves together. Human input to these systems is the organic part of the distributed computing system. That gives it all a lively quality. No one ignores the lively unpredictability of others, they use that response to go with the flow. Symbiotic interaction instead of deterministic central control. Control is the illusion. Hehey.On The social life of traffic posted 2 months, 1 week ago 1 Response
- Is this the start of social networking hive mind distributed organic computing fractal green re-evolution? Ok then, now we are getting somewhere. Bring on the green army (human) ants, all connected diectly from device to device, making censorship impossible. Now a million people can walk through the center of a city, non-violently making their point. All directed by the wireless hive mind. They can flow around barriers, much like a real colony of army ants does. It brings non-violent protest to a whole new viral level, assaulting the heart of the beast that is civilization. Mother nature showws the way with bees and ants. Let's adopt their tactics.On Thousands send Global Climate Wake-Up Call to world leaders, leave messages posted 2 months, 1 week ago 2 Responses
- Any wind farm projects along the coast? Wind/wave powered desalination might transform local economies, aquifer salinization is one of the under reported effects of climate change. Heat pump distillation coupled with solar heat storage driven by waves or wind wouldprovide an inexpensive renewable water supply. That extra water could green local farming areas that could support economic progress. Populations will be also displaced by drought and ocean rise aquifer contamination. And by flooding in other areas where climate change increases rain, flushing contaminated water into river front communities. Those areas would be better able to weather the storms with wave/wind powered safe water. Water bourne disease is the top killer on the planet. I wonder how many of the buildings along the coasts are built to last over a few decades? Maybe all coastal habitation ought to switch to the Dutch design. They build houses on concrete barges, when water rises so does your home. More temporary habitats can be tents and trailers, and easily moved smaller homes. Isn't land ownership key here too? As sea levels rise the coastal home owners lose their land. Where do they go? Maybe onto a home on a barge?On Morocco's unique vulnerability to climate change posted 2 months, 1 week ago 1 Response
- There is one way to catch up. It involves government planning and investment, the chinese advantage, and free market economics, our strong point. China's secret is that they mix capitalism with socialism, exactly what Europe and Canada does too. We need some FDR/Eisenhower style public investment, like the TVA, rural electrification, and the interstate highway systyem (the socialist part of the political equation); in order to bring Teddy Roosevelt trust busting to restore a free market (the capitalist part) in energy. A national high voltage direct current power grid would put us back on the leading edge of innovation. It would attract solar, wind, and biomass/waste stream energy investors and manufacturers. A solar farm in the desdert southwest or a wind farm off any coast or on the great plains would pay great dividends if the power could be sopld across the continent. Like wise great return on investment could be realized for storage, from superconducting electromagnetic energy storage on the HVDC grid, to batteries in individual homes and cars. Storage throught the smart grid would have a quick payback period. Systems for billing and crediting individual energy accounts over internet on the power grid would be developed, a wholw new industry of smart grid switching and billing would be developed. Fractal distributed computing controlling distributed generation and storage. We can still lead if we invest like we did in the TVA and interstate highway system and other national projects. A national HVDC power grid will facilitate electric rail and under highway recharge strips so cars and trucks can charge while they drive. This is how public investment has grown our economy in the past and the way it can do it now and in the future. Don't worry about China, cheer on their green efforts, keep to the public investment we need. Build it and they will come, investors in renewable energy, electric transportation, and all the technology it takes to make it happen. Make the US power grid the test bed for HVDC smart grid technology, the way a few cities here, Boulder and Austin, have become smart grid test cities. That's the one government investment of say 20 to 40 billion per year that could yield great gains in a few years, 20% wind and solar for the national grid would be right around the corner. That public investment would bring on 10 times the investment dollars, and in time that would soar until tax dollars coming in more than pays for the initial public investment.On China is leaving the U.S. in the dust as it surges ahead on clean energy posted 2 months, 1 week ago 14 Responses
- Stop the Age of Stupid! Imagine an electron superhighway circling the planet, so everyone everywhere can tap into solar panels and wind power. The Sun never really stops shining, it's just earth rotation that makes it seem that way. And the wind never stops blowing everywhere at once. Biomass rich regions, with farming and forestry, have biogas to backup the other renewable sources. So what if it's financially impossible to construct a global power grid? It is feasible to construct continent sized HVDC power grids, and that would be enough to get the reliability needed. Compare the cost of continental power grids to the cost of rail and highway systems. Did those systems pay for themselves many times over in economic growth and increase in the standard of living? What if continental power grids are used to electrify rail and road travel? To head off the "stupid" trend, "smart" needs to come forward. A smart way to measure bottomline outcomes of generational national investment like this is over decades, not over the next business quarter or election cycle. This film highlights the longer picture. Maybe it would be informative to look at how other generation spanning investment decisons, like the one to build the interstate highway system, attained consensus. It just doesn't make any sense that the economic disaster brought on by fuel based energy and it's manipulation and wars over it, can ever be cured without switching to renewable energy.On Climate doomsday film 'The Age of Stupid' still hopeful, says director in video interview posted 2 months, 1 week ago 9 Responses
- Who knows more about cars than Leno? Now could you get Warren Buffet driving the Focus on the show Jay? Ask him why he is investing in BYD motors in china, the first mass production plugin hybrid automaker, instead of backing a merger of Fiber Forge carbon fiber manufacturing technology with a US electric automaker like Tesla? As the big three become 2 or maybe even one, why not fire up a replacement right now? Ford, GM (chrysler), and Fiber Forge/Tesla? Maybe Fiber Forge could even supply carbon car bodies to replace steel in Ford and GM cars and trucks? Buffet and Leno could talk about this with some real knowledge of how things work, from the bolt by bolt restoration of a century old electric car to the investment of billions in the latest technology.On Ford goes Hollywood to tout electric cred posted 2 months, 1 week ago 3 Responses
Ad nauseum, good point bio-d! It's easy to forget it's a real informal fallacy. Repetition, a main feature of the "big lie" tactic.
"Death panels" and "clean biofuels" and "drill baby drill", oh my. It's scary in the deep, dark rhetorical swamp.
The false dilemna fallacy provides great distraction. "We're better than tar sands!" Hehehey.
Luckily big mass production scale money is going into electric cars, rail, and maybe even trucks sometime soon. It is looking like a trend now, all-electric urban cars, buses, trucks, and plugin hybrid suburban/rural vehicles.
Can we get an HVDC national electron super highway built, like the interstate highway system got built in the past century? It's a new century, let's all holler real loud and insist on it. A renewable energy powered century. Our nation, mother earth and all life, including humans need it. How about following the lead of that radical president, Eisenhower.
If we build it ...solar, wind, biogas, storage, electric transportation investors and manufacturers will come.
On Are biofuels really worse than Canadian oil sands? posted 2 months, 1 week ago 13 ResponsesAnd algae in the snow is fed by what? The minerals and nutrients in the dust, blown onto the snow.
On The end of welfare water and the drying of the West posted 2 months, 1 week ago 7 ResponsesWhen will water conservation be taken seriously? Drip irrigation, waste water recycling, no water flush composting toilets, and air pressure/water mist cleaning and washing.
And raising cattle where no irrigation is needed to provide forage. If it's too dry for grass it's too dry for cattle. That business is a victim of climate change because drip irrigation will not work on grazing land. Growing feed crops with spray irrigation is too costly in terms of cash and water to ever pay its own way. Subsidies of scarce cash and water are better spent elsewhere.
$$ spent on water conservation and water applied only to crops where drip irrigation and maybe soon, robotic organic agriculture, that has the potential of using even less water than drip irrigation. Organic agriculture that builds healthy soil and uses mulch to reduce evaporation losses, and saves waste stream water with biodigestion, allowing it to be used for irrigation safely, free of pathogens.
On The end of welfare water and the drying of the West posted 2 months, 1 week ago 7 ResponsesSean, I see the goal of an HVDC national supergrid would be similar to the goal behind national railroads, interstate highways, and the TVA-type WW II power projects. National economic growth and financial security. The foundation upon which modern nation/states stand. The crumbling of that foundation, signals the fall.
The loss of economic growth due to imported/price manipulated energy has shaken our foundation badly. It has us in 2 (3? soon) wars in a region that is known as the "graveyard of empires". These wars have already cost multiples of what a national HVDC grid would.
The goal of climate cure will also be helped out, but putting a price on pollution, contamination, and waste treatment, along with a national grid, will make solar, wind, storage, cogeneration/efficiency, biogas, plugin hybrid vehicles, and electric rail much cheaper. Solar investors can build a power plant in the hottest solar area, then sell it all over the country. Local power companies can store it, then sell it to customers when they need it.
The goal of climate change remediation ought to go down a different legislative route, gradually making dirtier energy pay it's own way in terms of damage done.
Sure legislate a path, to acheive the goal of a firm, indpendent, and stable energy economy to base our prosperity on. Pave the way for dirty coal and nuclear plants to sell their power too. But make them pay. Then let the national energy market, running over the national grid, compare and shop based on price.
Investment will rush into wind and solar. When the national power supply is 20% wind/solar in a few years, storage will start to pay good dividends, maybe even farm based biogas will compete.
I don't think pricing carbon alone will build a national supergrid, like the interstate highway system it needs government investment and direction. But pricing in the true cost of the damage done by fuel based energy, including loss of growth due to periodic price spike impelled recessions, will restore free market efficiency, the real free market way.
On How much energy does the U.S. waste? posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 14 ResponsesVery good job pointing out the gains Joe.
We will have to settle for that. Memorize this article and keep repeating it to your rebellious green progressive friends everyone.
These are dark days for any kind of "global warming" based initiatives. Only around 10% of US know or care about these issues, and politicians know that. It makes any support of green legislation very dangerous in terms of smear campaigns coming into this next congressional election season.
We progressive voters will never be satisfied with anything our reps can do about our concerns. We will probably support a third party in 2012. And even being seen talking to us is dangerous for them.
Loyalty is not a quality of progressive green voters, we mainly vote on issues. The really faithfilled voting population are the loyal ones. That's who politicians need to pander too. So let's not be too put out by the sudden negative "'tude" towards us on the part of the people we campaigned for and helped elect. Just get ready to fight a naderite progressive third party effort that could lose congress or even appoint a bush-clone. President Palin? Who likes the sound of that? Cheney and bin laden, actually the whole bin laden clan.
On Sure Obama got off to a good start, but what has the green FDR done lately? posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 2 ResponsesThere's this political problem in the way now Sean, CO2 or waste reduction just won't get any kind of support from congress, forget subsidies for that. Terrified politicians are running away from any identification with the anti-"global warming" crowd as fast as they can.
On the other hand, a national HVDC project can be justified from the point of view of job creation and economic competition. How do we compete with very low wage, no pollution control nations? Dependence on imported energy that is manipulated by multi-national corporations and nations that have an axe to grind with US, will never work.
Education, R&D, and technology, those are our traditional advantages. But without the capital we once had, we need something that the TVA and other hydo-electric projects brought to WW II war production. Low cost electricty, it made the aluminum for planes and the enriched uranium and plutonium for the bomb.
The path to unsubsidized, inflation fighting, foreign fuel free, renewable energy is a nationwide electricty super highway system. Then let the free market work, a project that restores free market competition will be palatable to beckscrement-phobic politicos. Solar, wind, biogas, efficiency/cogeneration, and energy storage will be competitive.
Even the nuke-u-ler crowd can build more nukes in the southland where the majority of the populace actually welcomes contamination as a sign of prosperity! (hehehey) Then sell their extra kwhs all over the country.
The problem now is borrowing the money to get that national electrical super grid built.
Financial market regulation might stabilize this economic recovery and get international investment dollars. China just signed a contract for 2 gw of solar panels from First Solar. They've got cash and know where to put it. Their BYD plugin hybrid has Warren Buffet's $$, 10% of the company so far and he wants to buy more.
Will they invest in our future too? Let's hope so. But why would anyone invest in an economy based on wall street kleptocracy, with a federal reserve controlled by that kleptocracy via a revolving door of trading "bank"/fed officials? To paraphrase Bush the first "Doesn't seem prudent". Re-regulation has to precede further public borrowing for a national HVDC smart grid.
Re-regulation looks deader than dead right now. But it's a hard issue to smear with beckscrement. part of the nut wing's big propaganda campaign is villifying wall street/fed corruption. This is going to be interesting.
Meanwhile a campaign for zero-carbon footprint living is probably the best alternative for the 10% who actually care about climate change. We will labor mainly in anonymity, unless mass production takes over and propells our favorite green ideas into the mainstream.
Large national change can only be based on economics now, climate change arguments have been permanently smeared.
On How much energy does the U.S. waste? posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 14 ResponsesI guess the question I should ask now Sean, is what would make people, individuals and corporations invest in efficiency and renewable energy? Safe, secure above average returns on their investments, of course.
How to get those returns? Sell the power and/or realize savings on energy bills. Long distance transport is necessary to connect buyers and sellers. Government could build that, an HVDC smart grid, that would be analogous to the interstate highway system.
This could also allow a good return on investment in storage. Investors woiuld back solar, wind, biogas, or storage where it was most cost effective, solar in deserts reghions, wind on the plains or coasts, biogas in farming areas, and storage like compressed air in underground caverns or solar thermal in sunny areas or battery and thermal storage in buildings.
That's where government investment ought to go, into a national HVDC smart grid. A utility company here could invest in solar in Arizona to sell power to customers here. No time to waste, what the tVA was to the last century, an HVDC smart grid could be to this century.
On How much energy does the U.S. waste? posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 14 ResponsesIs coal fueled electricty 1/3 the cost of natural gas fueled electricty in terms of fuel cost alone?
If so could combined cycle natural gas powered CHP electricty cost the same as steam turbine coal electricty due to the higher efficiency of the gas powered cogeneration?
As conversion from coal to natural gas ocurrs, could the supply/demand market rise in the price of natural gas be offset by conservation and renewable energy? It is much easier to fire up a natural gas fueled backup power plant to smooth solar and wind power supply variations, than it is to use coal for renewable energy backup.
If solar and ground source heating of buildings replaces natural gas heating, could natural gas consumption remain the same even as it replaces coal as a grid power generation fuel? How much biomass based natural gas (biogas) could be wrung from the waste stream?
On How much energy does the U.S. waste? posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 14 ResponsesThis is a great issue to follow Umbra's advice on and mellow out. Support full reproductive and other rights for women, then let them make their own decision.
Don't even whisper about forcing population control, and certainly never ever mention eugenics. That's just flat out insane. With advocates like mr. burr we don't need enemies. Shunning is called for of anyone expressing these extremely offensive views.
Lead by example, then let your kids, friends, and the culture decide. Quality beats quantity. Better to have fewer people living within the means that our biosphere provides without damaging it, than trying to outpopulate other national, ethnic, or religious groups as seems to be the human cultural norm so far.
Time to change that regrettable history or perish as a species. Women will decide rightly on this, the survival of mother earth and quality over quantity if given the freedom they ought to have. It is powerful patriacal cultures that insist on limitless population growth to provide endless consumers and fodder for the war machinery. Free women, we can all trust them to do the right thing.
The ocasional 12 child mom will be balanced by one ot two child moms. No problem. And let's not make the 12 child mom feel bad either, that won't help anyone.
On Ask Umbra on big families posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 48 ResponsesDistributed cogeneration, excellent! It goes better with distributed storage, battery storage in homes, factories, buldings, and on farms that offsets demand and renewable supply peaks. this also provides emergency power and can store rooftop generated solar power.
Distributed cogeneration like this would really rule with a 50% efficient solid oxide fuel cell to convert the natural gas or biogas to electricity. There are a few breweries that use these to produce electricity now from biogas made from brewery waste. The breweries use the waste heat from the fuiel cells to make steam for use in cleaning, cooking, and heating.
But the waste heat at 800 degrees can also drive a turbine generator to extract another 25% of the energy in the gas. The remaing waste heat can still heat domestic hot water and buildings.
That's a total electrical conversion efficiency of 75%, about 4 times the efficiency of the VW gas engine driven generator. 1/4 the fuel for the same amount of electricty/heat. That makes even natural gas cost competitive with coal.
The problem with the lower efficiency design employed here is that hot water and building heat supplemented with ground source heating and solar cogeneration (heat and electricty from the same solar collectors) does not need nearly the heat energy to back it up. this system supplies too much heat and 1/4 the electricty. They ought to go back to the drawing board and install simple batteryt storage and ground source heating and solar cogeneration in most buildings. Then in larger buildings, farms, and factories install the solid oxide fuel cell/turbine cogeneration in say evety 50th building as backup for the rest of the community grid.
Larger buildings, farms, and factories can more easily utilize the waste heat from this form of cogeneration. Renewable energy works better together, with a smart grid, and distributed cogeneration and storage.
Why no attempt at superconducting electromagnetic energy storage yet? Europe is lagging behind our local utility here, they have employed SMES on a small scale for decades. With large scale storage coupled directly to a 500 kilovolt DC super grid, a region would have it's own combination renewable energy transportation and storage. These syutems linked across continents would make fossil fuel power and nuclear power completely obsolete.
On Home power plants project unveiled in Germany posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 3 ResponsesAnother barely noticed milestone! But look at the capital behind this, mass production could make these cost competitive. No more NIMBY objections once megawatt floating wind can be located out of sight offshore.
Now wave power should be added to this same platform. It could double the output.
Furthermore think of the protection for coastal marine life from international factory fishing. A whole string of these can block huge miles long nets used by these ocean life killing operations. That will also protect local fisheries and fishermens' livelihoods.
These are the liberty ships of this antiwar renewable energy re-evolution. Every shipyard should be humming, producing these as fast as liberty ships were produced for WW II.
On World's first floating wind turbine starts up in Norway posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 1 ResponseGood thing you didn't join up Joe.
Of course we all new the coalies and oilers were behind this all along. That commie/truther BS was so the media would do the dirty work for them. Good job ABC.
But what's really funny? think back to the mega crimes commited by the bushies and how they were impossible to get rid of, and even when one was convicted his sentence was commuted. Hehehey.
Now that's comedy. Rupert must be slappin' his knee over that one.
On After Van Jones resignation, Glenn Beck to go after 'other radicals' posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 3 ResponsesWell dan, Obama is speaking in a few minutes. Will he go on to brainwash american kids tomorow? How can real americans let this happen? Do you want to see poor Glenn Beck cry?
Way to let your country down.
On Talking about Van Jones posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesThanks, it was invented a couple years ago by someone else. It will take more beckscrement to get any kind of backlash.
This is what we are going to get. No healthcare reform, no ban on pre-existing condition exclusion, no cost control, no law against insurance companies dropping anyone's coverage at will when that person gets sick or is injured, no regulation whatsoever. Just as has happened with financial markets, banks, and credit card companies. No real climate legislation or green jobs and manufacturing. Expanding war in afghanistan, spilling over into pakistan.
Will that wake people up? Doubtful. We won the election, but lost the battle for change. Propaganda won again. Face facts, only 10% of the population is interested enough in politics to support reform. Of any kind. this has always been the case. Ocasionaly an accident happens and some fake reform is instituted.
This doesn't even look like a fake. Just a plain sellout. Why would Van Jones want to be part of that?
On top of that, a gubenatorial candidate in idaho threatened (joked about?!) assasination of the prez in public and got away with it. Along with all the other public threats that have been ignored like cadres of militia gunmen outside Obama events, it is pretty clear that the presidency has become a mainly ceremonial position.
The powerful radio talker/fauxnews propaganda machine has encouraged the assasination of abortion doctors. With complete impunity. So now they slyly encourage ( gunmen outside rallys with "the tree of liberty..blood.." quote, featured as heroes) the assasination of this president with impunity? Yep.
Fear of assasination and it's inevitable aftermath, open fighting in the streets. With all the guns out there, it won't just be like the rodney King riots. it will be opposing racial gangs well armed. With the police unable to stop it. This is what the administration fears even more than for the safety of the president and his family. Complete chaos, with winger militia and street gangs fighting it out in the open.
Maybe Obama will invade iran to take the heat off? I wouldn't be surprised at this point. He could just hire halliburton to do it. Hehehey.
On Thoughts on Van Jones' resignation posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 37 ResponsesDid Van jones take his supporters' (my) advice in resigning, or was this a forced "resignation"? How would he have gotten anything progressive through this administration? Not gonna happen. It is like me trying to activate the local party here, run as it is by former reagan 'pubs.
Anyway, it is the right decision. Good for you, now you can get back in the fight.
Now the question is this. Should a campaign to get a total advertiser boycott of the steaming pile of beckscrement continue? Or is it better for progressive reform to have as many idiots like beck, palin, "joe the plumber", drug limboob, o'really(?)... and so forth in prominent media roles as possible?
Have they effectively extended thier own wing nut status into ABC news now that Jake Tapper and others decided to give the truther BS credibility? I think so. The further the wing nut rant enters the so-called main stream media, the more people will realize how polluted that "stream" is with wing nut contamination. Do most MSM producers still have Drudge up on their computer screens 24/7? Most likely, but now add worldnutdaily to those screens too. What's next Jake? Birthers on the weekend talking head shows?
Will only 5, 6, 7...dollar gas, millions more family medical emergency bancruptcies/foreclosures, and expanding the oil wars get reform back on the public agenda? It looks like it. Let the beckscrement flow while rome burns, maybe enough of US will get sick enough of it to demand reform? Otherwise we the people are set to enter sleep mode again.
(Hehey, very funny. The local control freak reaganites here use ALL CAPS too. They even talk in ALL CAPS)
On Thoughts on Van Jones' resignation posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 37 ResponsesDid Van jones take his supporters' (my) advice in resigning, or was this a forced "resignation"? How would he have gotten anything progressive through this administration? Not gonna happen. It is like me trying to activate the local party here, run as it is by former reagan 'pubs.
Anyway, it is the right decision. Good for you, now you can get back in the fight.
Now the question is this. Should a campaign to get a total advertiser boycott of the steaming pile of beckscrement continue? Or is it better for progressive reform to have as many idiots like beck, palin, "joe the plumber", drug limboob, o'really(?)... and so forth in prominent media roles as possible?
Have they effectively extended thier own wing nut status into ABC news now that Jake Tapper and others decided to give the truther BS credibility? I think so. The further the wing nut rant enters the so-called main stream media, the more people will realize how polluted that "stream" is with wing nut contamination. Do most MSM producers still have Drudge up on their computer screens 24/7? Most likely, but now add worldnutdaily to those screens too. What's next Jake? Birthers on the weekend talking head shows?
Will only 5, 6, 7...dollar gas, millions more family medical emergency bancruptcies/foreclosures, and expanding the oil wars get reform back on the public agenda? It looks like it. Let the beckscrement flow while rome burns, maybe enough of US will get sick enough of it to demand reform? Otherwise we the people are set to enter sleep mode again.
(Hehey, very funny. The local control freak reaganites here use ALL CAPS too. They even talk in ALL CAPS)
On Thoughts on Van Jones' resignation posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 37 ResponsesMy twitter rant on this steaming load of MSM-enabled (coal lobbyist) becks-crement.
That's all this load deserves, a bunch of barely coherent tweets. You'll notice now cheney is predicting another 911. if it happens he can say he told you so and return to power. Would saudi billionaire wingnuts like that outcome? I think so.
Anyway, that's enough of that. let's talk about who in this administration ought to get the axe. Rhambo, he is selling us out on healthcare reform, that just came out in the release of "secret" emails he sent reassuring his insurance industry sponsors.
Will this traitorous creep get 100 million as a lobbyist the year after he is ejected from government? or will he get 100 million from each sellout? on healthcare, climate legislation, financial industry re-regulation, credit card company regulation...and on and on. because he will betray us over and over and over..that is clear.
What sort of filthy blackmail does this sewer rat have on Obama that he hasn't been fired already? Or is Obama ok with the sellout? only time will tell. Our party has been taken over by raygun repubs. We thought we won? Nope. It was a nice fantasy though.
Can Van jones bypass Rhambo and get us green jobs anyway? Highly doubtful, just resign and rejoin the battle van. The real basttle, because nothing is being acomplished in this administration. Is Rhambo really Rove in a mask? Probably. Corporate power won this last election.
There is one person we can still trust, Howard Dean.
On Will Glenn Beck bring down Van Jones after all? posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 47 ResponsesMy twitter rant on this steaming load of MSM-enabled (coal lobbyist) becks-crement.
That's all this load deserves, a bunch of barely coherent tweets. You'll notice now cheney is predicting another 911. if it happens he can say he told you so and return to power. Would saudi billionaire wingnuts like that outcome? I think so.
Anyway, that's enough of that. let's talk about who in this administration ought to get the axe. Rhambo, he is selling us out on healthcare reform, that just came out in the release of "secret" emails he sent reassuring his insurance industry sponsors.
Will this traitorous creep get 100 million as a lobbyist the year after he is ejected from government? or will he get 100 million from each sellout? on healthcare, climate legislation, financial industry re-regulation, credit card company regulation...and on and on. because he will betray us over and over and over..that is clear.
What sort of filthy blackmail does this sewer rat have on Obama that he hasn't been fired already? Or is Obama ok with the sellout? only time will tell. Our party has been taken over by raygun repubs. We thought we won? Nope. It was a nice fantasy though.
Can Van jones bypass Rhambo and get us green jobs anyway? Highly doubtful, just resign and rejoin the battle van. The real basttle, because nothing is being acomplished in this administration. Is Rhambo really Rove in a mask? Probably. Corporate power won this last election.
There is one person we can still trust, Howard Dean.
On Will Glenn Beck bring down Van Jones after all? posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 47 ResponsesDoes the rejuvenation of soil as a carbon sequestration mechanism constitute geo-engineering? If it were acomplished globally with a wholesale shift from chemical ag to organic fertilizer from waste stream biomass it could be, and actually would remove enough GHG to equal other geo-engineering schemes. Consider the elimination of nitrous oxide (300x the GHG effect of cO2) from chemical fertilizer and the reduction of methane (20x the GHG effect of CO2) emissions from chemical fertilizer run off bio-reacting with cellulosic biomass in soil and wetlands.
Natural prairie soil stores 1.8 tons of CO2 per acre per year. Going organic with ag soil and restoring conservation land to its former sequestration rate might do it, actually reverse global climate change.
And the biogas produced through waste biomass digestion and organic fertilizer production could backup a 100% renewable grid, while offsetting 20 times the CO2 from the biogas energy production.
Overlooking the possibility of using wind/wave powered low cloud formation for not only reflectivity, but also for rain and snowfall increase in strategic areas like glaciers, tundra, deserts, and ice caps, is a striking omission. Think of deserts flooded with rainfall and greenery, turning all that CO2 into soil carbon sequestration potential via a huge increase in photosynthesis. And consider the artic summer, with 24 hour sunlight, with an extra thick ice cap, tundra, and glacial cover of snow from low cloud formation during frigid winter. That's huge reflectivity during the hottest solar absorption season in the most delicate climate for ice melt and feedback methane release.
The total potential is huge, and fuel less with wind/wave powered floating "ships" that can be directed to take advantage of weather paterns to maximize these effects of rain/snow fall.
I would rather see renewable energy backed by organic ag and biomass recycling as a fix, but if we are too late, the low cloud solution seems feasible and the lesser of geo-engineering evils.
I've got to point out though that mother nature most l;ikely will use geo-engineering as drought and ice melt sets in. Land is rising in alaska as glaciers melt and the countervailing force of the weight of ice is removed and magma pressue pushes relentlessly upwards. There are signs that volcanic activity will ocurr due to the loss of aqifers in drought and glacial mass. Yellowstone's hot springs and geysers cool the rock capping the magma bubble, and the weight of the water hold the cap down.
When/if aquifer water evaporates from the area and is not replenished by rainfall will the supervolcano erupt? Will that cause years (as in 1816) or deacdes with no summer, thus cooling the planet into a mini ice age?
On Geoengineering schemes shouldn't be dismissed out of hand, scientists say posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 9 ResponsesThere's only one cure for low wage exploitation of farm workers, Robotics. And it makes organic farming possible without a lot of human labor too. And organic farming is a major part of stopping human GHG induced climate disaster. Ag robots can run on renewable electricty and work 24/7, zipping up and down the rows tirelessly.
So let's retire the "foodprovider" and his fossil fuelish tractor and his favorite chemicals and his GMO roundup ready seeds and fertilizer imported from russia. Time for a well deserved vacation, his efforts have been appreciated in the past, but have been shown to result in over half of human caused GHG.
Put the farm workers who are layed off back to work building, maintaing, and operating the robots. at much higher wages, with much better working conditions.
Foodprovider, in the words of your sainted angel from alaska, "tha(i)ks but no tha(i)nks". We can't afford your bridge to climate disaster and chemically induced genetic mutation and antibiotic resistant disease.
On 'Time' was right about cheap food--but forgot farmworkers posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 10 ResponsesGood heads up on cage-free eggs, what a scam.
I am considering worm farming to provide extra protien for chickens. Plus rotational foraging with moveable quarters. Could mown forage be dried & frozen for winter chicken feed? Ther's got to be a way around feed store bills and contamination, without paying for organic feed.
On UPDATED: The cruelty of industrial egg-riculture -- plus a tasty recipe for your local pastured eggs posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 10 ResponsesFire, precursor to desertification. The feedback loops of GHG released by fire and less carbon capture due to the loss of greenery and increased solar heat absorption by blackened landscape; all point in that direction, deserification.
But the article hits on a much more immediate bottomline consideration: namely, the sheer cost of not only fighting fires, but the loss of all those homes and comminuities. It devestates the local economy.
The cost of renewable energy re-evolution pays for itself many times over in economic growth and the cancellation of energy cost related inflation to our standard of living and financial security. Business cycles manipluated by oil producing nations and corporations are extremely destructive to our financial well being, as we all now well know.
But just the cost of fire fighting and insurance losses ought to give a bottomline conclusion to the climate change debate. Fix it or go broke from the disasters alone, it's really just that simple. Can even the simpletons in boardrooms and government halls realize this and act in time? Maybe not. We are evidently talking about people who are dumber than duuhbya, palin, and "joe the plumber". Yow!
On Global warming, California, and wildfires posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 20 ResponsesYep, distributed generation & distributed storage.
This is how conservation fits in. What are the really big building electrical loads? Heating and cooling. If heating is done with solar then stored and cooling is done with ground loop fluid circulation those loads almost dissapear. And by using heat storage the sun can do water/home heating directly.
Home heat storage for the big loads and backup battery storage at home for emergencies and demand/supply offset timing. Plugin cars can also be used to offset solar supply and demand.
Gar, I think CAES with solar furnace thermal salt storage is more efficient. Maybe a secondary refrigerant powered turbine generator could still capture waste heat from the CAES solar thermal system? that would maybe boost total efficiency and cut cost per kwh of 85% capacity factor electric power. then fill the other 15% with biogas/natural gas in a solid oxide fuel cell, with the waste heat powering the CAES turbine.
On Enabling wind, sun to be our main power supplies posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 5 ResponsesExcellent article! The focus on cost and capacity factor is really on the mark. Adding solar furnace molten salt storage and/or geothermal heating to the CAES system might eliminate most of the natural gas use. Then maybe waste stream biogas could make up most of the extra power needed.
Especially if the waste stream biogas were first used to generate electric power in a solid oxide fuel cell. The 800 degree waste heat from the 50% efficient fuel cell would then be used to heat the CAES compressed air before it enters the turbine generator.
Then of course when natural gas was needed it would also be used in the fuel cell turbine system, at many times the efficiency of the turbine system alone. Add in an HVDC national power distribution system, smart grid technology, and backup battery storage in homes and buildings, that also stores electric power from building mounted solar, and it all fits together.
And it would be much more reliable than a central generating power grid, the kind we have now that shuts down in storms, sometimes for weeks. Each home, neighborhood, local area, and region would be independent. But connected through the smart grid so power could go from where there was a surplus to where it is needed.
Could you maybe write an article on superconducting magnetic energy storage? Wisconsin Public service here in northern wisconsin has been using it on a small scale for decades. The superconduction technology used in high energy physics research provides all the necessary data to scale this technology up to local and national grid size.
Let's get the government funding flowing to do this yesterday! But employ CAES with solar furnace and compression heat storage coupled with biogas/natural gas fueled solid oxide fuel cell powerplants backing up wind/solar through a smart grid.
A good plan, the SMES R&D goes on, it can be added later on, making solar our main energy source. A 600kv HVDC power backbone acting as a kind of national battery, with large scale SMES plants along the supergrid located regionally, to make independent loops. Finally, perfect reliability without any combustion.
On Enabling wind, sun to be our main power supplies posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 5 ResponsesThat lower cost affordable design would be better, and harvesting extra power only to use it in energy wasting electric resistance heating, while blocking solar radiation that ought to be used for heating instead, really makes this kind of a foolish design. All flash and no substance. Too bad, but that apparently is a large part of the culture of silicon valley startup land.
Better to send that extra 8 kw capacity back into a smart grid, and use cogeneration for water and home heating. And ground source cooling.
Really these youngsters make this whole effort very compelling, but they need better direction. Form follows function, maybe a good principle to remember, straight from the forebears of organic architecture. Organic architecture really ought to be green shouldn't it?
My sense is that it is the ivy leaguers in their academic towers moved to silicon valley that need a wakeup call, maybe the more progressive green students could help with that? Nothing wrong with a 440k 800 ft2 house. But real green ought to be around 44k for a truly green 800 ft2 organic home.
On California students take Refract House to Solar Decathlon posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 5 ResponsesIt looks like the rasor technology takes a minimum of 100 degrees difference between the hot/cold sources. 55 degree cooling in a ground loop would take a 155 degree road or roof surface. That probably wouldn't work most places in the US. 50 or 60 dgree difference is probably more likely. Could energy be extracted efficiently with that lower termp difference?
Evidently not with rasor's present design. Could it be possible with a different design or do the laws of thermodynamics conflict with efficient extraction from that lower heat range Ocean thermal operates at the lower range, so I'm assuming it might be possible. But would it be cost effective?
The old National Lampoon "dipping bird" power generating system comers to mind, hehey.
Dave's calculation that 3 times the national energy consumption would be possioble with 15% solar cells, neglects rooftop collection. So maybe with rooftops tooand solar cells mounted over parking lots rather than in the road surface, 100% of electric power could be had, without actually putting cells in the road surface? Add in wind power and conservation and the whole thing works with a national HVDC power distribution system and local and regional smart grids. Then back up local grids with waste stream biogas powering fuel cell/turbines.
So the whole "miracle" of a renewable smart grid really is practical, without solar roadways. And the organic fertilizer byproduct of biodigestion can take the GHG out of agriculture. But the solar roadways would be fine, if they can be made practical.
On Could we replace the nation's pavement with solar panels? posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 30 ResponsesIt looks like 5 of those firefly oasis batteries will will equal a gallon of gas in terms of range for a plugin vehicle. A 40 mpg vehicle will get 40 miles from 5 of these batteries. The retail price is rumored to be around 500 bucks a copy.
Figuring maybe 60 mpg from an ultralight aluminum frame/carbon fiber plastic car, 4 batteries would be enough. At under 1000 dollars for batteries, manufacturing level wholesale prices, it seems that around 14k retail would be possible for a plugin hybrid. BYD in China says they can mass produce their plugin hybrid and sell it for 16k. It has a standard steel frame/body, way heavier and more expensive than need be.
The lighter car would also be safer. And it would need far less hosrepower, making the backup generator lighter and smaller. Fiberforge already has the carbon fiber mass production technology. Firefly has the batteries. Electric drive companies already make the power systems. All the components are made right here in the USA.
Why can't we buy them at car dealers already?
On Big Blue dreams of a big green battery posted 3 months ago 4 ResponsesI think it will be lead atoms imbedded in a carbon nanotube structure, with good old reliable lead/acid enhanced by 4 or 5 times the energy density of old fashioned lead/acid batteries. And over 1500 charge cycle life.
Hydrogen stored in a nano-tech zinc hydride base might come along too someday, but lead/acid with nanotech will most likely rule the roads inb the short term, the next 10 years or so. Lead/acid is dirt cheap, no shortages like lithium or platinum for H fuel cells. Mass production, cheap basic materials and plugin hybrids could be sold for 12k retail at a profit. that will finally kill the infernal combustion nightmare.
On Big Blue dreams of a big green battery posted 3 months ago 4 ResponsesThere is a somewhat cheaper and more practical way to do this, get solar energy from the roads, thaw ice on the road without salt (eco-friendly safety), and later when/if solar cells can be adapted to road surfacing economically, they can go over this other energy capturing system.
Plastic tubes would be inserted in existing and new roads, a heat circulating fluid would be pumped through the road surface tubes when it is hot from solar radiation, then the hot water would go into a genearating system similar to Rasor technology's closed cycle turbine generator. It uses refrigerant gas to power the turbine, so that even 140 degree water can power it efficiently.
The refrigerant can be condensed with underground source cooling, then in winter the pump can reverse and circulate ground temperature (55 degree F) to melt snow. Resistance heaters, the method suggested in the article would be to power intensive, it would kill the efficiency of the solar system.
Once the black road surface was melted off, and ythe sun sahined after a storm, the heat turbine system would powerr up again. In winter refrigerant from the turbine could be cooled in colder winter air, improvibng the efficiency of the turbine system even with a cooler road surface. It's the temp difference that produces the power.
If solar cells can be developed and tested, they can be installed over the heat collecting road surface. Then solar PV/heat turbine generator solar cogeneration, coupled with road way ice melting, could cover a lot of the road and parkinbg lot surfaces, more in hotter, more solar intense areas of the planet. This could be used on large building roof surfaces too. Here's another major stimulus area.
Not to mention that ground source building heating/cooling could be run off of these same systems in roads and parking lots and on roofs. Would it power the whole grid? Along with wind power and conservation i believe it would.
On Could we replace the nation's pavement with solar panels? posted 3 months ago 30 ResponsesThis is the best way to move the discussion along:
I see three big challenges for the sustainable-food movement as it scales up: 1) soil fertility—in the absence of synthesized nitrogen and mined phosphorous and potassium, how are we to build soil fertility on a larger scale?; 2) labor—sustainable farming requires more hands on the ground; who’s going to work our farm fields, and at what wages?; and 3) access—
Namely, solve these issues with orgaic ag. The nitrous oxide, methane, and fuel related GHG emissions account for over 50% of human caused GHG, this is well known to us, but will never be accepted by the AEI crowd.
First, we build soil fertility by recycling the waste stream using biodigestion and extraction of fertilizer from urine. Instead of bare ground between crop rows we grow nitrogen fixing green manure crops like alfalfa that are then added to the fertilizer biodigestor, before or affter being fed to animals. This cover cropping also helps suppress weeds and protects soil from erosion.
Second, the labor issue. We mechanize organic farming with renewable electric powered robotics.
Third, access-cost. We lower cost through mass production of organic food, with robotics.
Technology is really the solution. Not the chemical ag biotechnology, just plain old silicon chip, photo electric eye, wireless internet, human programmed farming technology. The robotic farmer knows where it planted each seed, it knows what plants and insects are supposed to be growing in the farm plot and which aren't. It knows how dry the soil is and how much liquid organic fertilizer, or mulch, or extra water each plant needs. And it does all the watering, weeding, mulching, fertilizing, and harvesting. Under the direction of actual farmers.
As the robotic equipment is perfected and mass produced, the cost goes ever downward, it runs on unlimited solar/wind power. The cost of chemical ag, dependent on fossil fuel and mined inputs goes ever upward.
On An 'agri-intellectual' talks back posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 49 ResponsesHere's a good way to understand what the 2 dollar per watt solar cell price point mentioned in the link means. Each watt of cell capacity produces around 3kwh of power per year. At the retail price for electricity of 11 cents per kwh, that would mean a 6 year payback for the solar cells. 33 cents per year times 6 years is aproximately 2 bucks.
After 6 years your electricity would be free.
A coal or natural gas plant costs close to 2 bucks per watt, but it never pays for itself in savings like solar does. Why? Because the cost of the fuel is always there. Not only that, the cost of the fuel always rises with inevitable shortage and price manipulation. And the cost of GHG climate change and pollution always increases too.
So you get what you pay for, ever cheaper electricty costs as wind and solar pay off their intial cost, or ever increasing prices for energy and the inflation it produces at the very base of the economy. Devaluing the currency and value of other elements in the economy like human labor, invention, and initiative.
On Solar is getting cheap posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 14 ResponsesCongratulations Ed! Great caption, you deserve the win.
On Caption needed! UPDATE: Caption found posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 21 ResponsesThe figure I found was around 5.4 % veggie to meat protein conversion for grass fed beef. That's around 19 to 1, 19 parts veggie protein to 1 part meat protein output. Efficiency is around 30% for eggs. Milk is the most efficient.
Of course almost all egg and milk protien output is eaten by humans, with beef the percentage consumed by humans is lower. We like the better cuts of meat, hot dogs are not as popular. A lot of the beef protein goes for dog food. Some is even fed back to cows!? These factors kind of wreck the raw 5.4% efficiency figure and put the ratio around 30 to 1 or more.
Good point on invertabates though, insects, worms, and so forth. The compost to worm to chicken to egg pathway is very efficient and great on GHG sequestration. Free range chickens also convert grass and insects.
Go organic grass fed and eat less meat, more eggs and milk, and more veggie protein. That's a recipe for carbon sequestration in the soil and protein efficiency. The health benefits of shunning antibiotic, hormone, and herbicide/pesticide laden meat, dairy, and poultry products are priceless.
On Debunking the meat/climate change myth posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 92 ResponsesMcCain is a big nuke-u-ler power backer. I suspect his bill will go that way. He won't allow nuke waste to be transported through his state, but he likes nukes, go figure.
On John McCain (R-Ariz.) posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 2 ResponsesExcellent article Lou. The mercury issue is very encouraging. Now can we find organic farm raised fish, catfish or otherwise? Organic feed is expensive, that is hurting organic dairy farmers lately.
Would anyone take a chance investing in organic fish farming? Interesting article topic, maybe I'll blog it up.
On What's the dish on farm-raised catfish? posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 9 ResponsesExactly Joel, life depends upon living soil and it is being killed with chemicals and blowing away in the wind, a toxic dust storm where the biosphere used to root.
And it also sequestered enough carbon to make up for our fossil fuelishness, before much of it was destroyed.
By using biodigestion of the waste stream for energy backup for a solar/wind powered grid, thus eliminating human energy based GHG, and using the organic fertilizer from the biodigestion to eliminate chemical fertilizer and revive the soil, we could actually reverse this ongoing GHG climate distater.
And revive the economy. And end oil and other energy resource wars forvever. Then we could afford healthcare, education, foreign food aid (instead of bombs), science, conservation, and financial security. Fix the soil, fix our world. Simple.
On The thread on which civilization hangs posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 4 ResponsesYep Anil, it is strange how simple most of this stuff is and also how difficult it is to get it mass produced. Electric cars, fuel cells, solar cells, wind machines, biodigestors, electric trains, batteries, all invented anywhere from 100 to thousands of years ago.
Given a benevolent dictatorship it would be child's play to reconstruct the energy and agricultural economy into a renewable organic form that not only canceled human GHG but actually reversed climate disaster with carbon sequestration in soil, wetlands, forests, and prairies. Everything needed to get it going already exists, except the will.
Now where's that ring of power, hehehey.
On Debunking the meat/climate change myth posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 92 Responses- Whoops, I keep remembering more stuff Ken. A layer of heat tubing under dark south facing siding/roofing or solar electric panels, can be used to collect heat to store in concrete building mass and heat storage. A moderate temperature storage salt like sodium sulphate decahydrate stores many times the heat per volume, and all at the phase change temperature of the salt soltion, 90 degrees for this compound I believe? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_sulfateOn The amazing promise and many challenges of passivhaus construction posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses
- Consider this too Ken: another technology just appearing on the scene is heat envelope heating/cooling. It involves transporting ground heat (at 55 degrees F) in heat tubing with a transport liquid or air circulation around the insulated space in a home, underneath the exterior siding/insulation board and on top of the attic insulation layer, air could even be circulated in the outer window glaze layer. The home space sees 55 degrees to lose heat into (or cool down from in summer), just as a bermed earth underground home would. Vastly cutting the heating load, compared to below zero winter temps. Instead of living in an underground cave home to save heating/cooling load, you bring the ground temperature up around your conventional home. Solar/wind power can propell the circulated fluid from underground coils up around the interior insulated space and back around underground again. The colder/hotter the weather, the faster the liquid or air is circulated.On The amazing promise and many challenges of passivhaus construction posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses
- I am assuming the heat recovery ventillation system incorporates a Lossnay air A Ken? Just wanted to mention it in case, strange but true, this groundbreaking system, based on the design of wolf and polar bear breathing through their fur, is unknown to many LEED focused engineers/architects. These also save "coolness" during air conditioning season. http://www.mitsubishielectric.ca/en/hvac/erv/benefits.htmlOn The amazing promise and many challenges of passivhaus construction posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses
- The crucial factor here is that dog ownership teaches humans empathy. That is especially helpful for teaching young children how to someday become good parents. That is why children should have puppies to raise. Dolls won't do it. Dog ownership also tends to prevent people from starting a family out of pure loneliness, a poor excuse for adding more humans to our already overburdened biosphere. Dogs have a smaller carbon footprint than people. Instead of grinching out on kids having pets, it would be better to shift our whole energy and agricultural economy to eliminate human caused GHG and restore soil carbon sequestration with organic fertilizer from recycled, biodigested waste biomass. Like dog poo, and human waste, and farm waste.On Should Kuba have a puppy? posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 19 Responses
- There was an article on grist about a biodigestor to produce cooking gas and organic fertilizer installed on a farm in costa rica Anil. Very nice system, it used a big plastic bag in a trench with a pipe to the stove. I think if all our biomass waste stream were turned into biogas and organic fertilizer/soil ammendment the carbon sequestration in revived living soil ecosystems would actually start to turn GHG climate disaster around. There is a simple invention that uses suction to remove waste from the home, either human or kitchen waste, it keeps the biodigestion outside, simultaneously providing the inside flushing (waterless) toilet people insist on here. Farm waste is the really big biomass source for biodigestion though. A side note: it would be really great if the mega-wealthy individuals/groups who littered the high mountain glaciers in your region with human waste and trash made an effort to install biodigesting toilets for their expeditions and haul all that trash away to be recycled. Maybe they could even use solar/wind power and biogas to power their radios and cooking and oxygen generators to prevent the buildup of old batteries and oxygen cylinders? This is something they owe mother earth and the mountains.On Debunking the meat/climate change myth posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 92 Responses
Volcanic thermostat: evidence of land rising in Alaska and Yellowstone where glacial water & ice is waning indicates that volcanic activity might increase with climate change. Extended drought and glacial melt due to human produced GHG could trigger a catastrophic event like the volcanoe induced 1816 "year without a summer".
Could a decade without any summer be triggered by multiple volcanic eruptions over that decade? How much would that cost humanity? How many lives would be lost, how severe a depression causing huge financial losses, and how much disruption of life as we know it could occur?
Should we listen to science and act now, creating a huge economic boom from the new energy economy, or should we listen to faithbased hollering in the service of big energy corporate power?
Let mother earth's volcanic thermostats start erupting and we are in a world of hurt. But maybe exxon's stock will go up in the meanwhile. I say screw exxon & halliburton & that oil company funding the "dick armey", and the politicians they rode in on.
On “Can you PROVE to me that global warming is being caused by mankind?”* posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 25 ResponsesThe living will section was inserted by a republican. AND it lets you specify your own care preferences at the crucial moment. Duuhbya signed a bill as Texas governor that prohibits anyone to disconnect life support as long as the patient can pay for care. No one can decide to end your suffering if desired, not your loved ones, your doctor, not even you. You are kept going regardless, like Terry Shiavo.
This Texas law also specifies that once you cannot pay for care, the hospital can disconnect you from life support, regardless of your wishes or your condition.
A living will lets you decide before hand, regardless of ability to pay, under what conditions you wish to be disconnected from life support. Doesn't that seem to be a better, freer choice than having the hospital disconnect you? Or forbid disconnection if you can still pay? The hospital corporation thus drain the assets of someone in a terminal coma (the administrator gets a bonus for each patient disconnected?), leaving nothing for loved ones to inherit. An elderly spouse for instance, is left homeless as the hospital corporation takes their home.
The reason their needs to be a periodic review is that changing health and personal perspective might warrant that change, and once you are terminally ill in a coma, those voluntary changes can't be made. Does that explain this better than effnews talking points or palin's "death panel" assertions? Doesn't that Texas law sound like a hospital administrator "death panel"?
As far as being "mandatory", the decisons in the living will you choose is up to you. You can even specify, let the hospital administrator decide, if you are a truly faithbased worshipper of the former prez.
These healthcare lobbyist talking points spouted by idiots like palin only confuse in order to manipulate the gullible.
On Glenn Beck: Van Jones is a communist intent on, er, creating private sector jobs posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 31 ResponsesVegetable protein versus animal protien: it is undeniable that vegetable protein production emits a fraction of the nitrous oxide (emitted by chemical fertilizer, 300x worse GHG than CO2), methane (emitted by fertilizer interacting with stored soil and wetland biomass), and CO2 (emitted by fossil fuel related inputs and burning biomass to clear land to grow crops), compared to the equivalent animal protien produced with commercial ag. Put 30 units of veggie protein into a cow and you get one unit of animal protein in the form of meat. Milk and eggs take less veggie protein.
Over 50% of human produced GHG is due to chemical agriculture. Go organic with biodigested waste biomass and organic fertilizer, rotational grazing, and robotic organic agriculture, powered with solar/wind electriciuty, and that GHG nearly dissapears. Whether vegetable or animal food is the final product. And the biogas produced can back up a renwabley powered smart grid that charges electric vehicles, powers electric mass transit, and powers ground source heating/cooling as a substitute for fossil fueled heating/cooling. That eliminates most of the rest of human produced GHG.
By reviving soil sequestration of carbon with organic agriculture, climate change can even be reversed. If we support farmers like Coleman with local organic community agriculture maybe the changes necessary to halt climate disaster will happen in time. If we keep on eating agri-chem meat it won't.
So pay 8 bucks a pound for local organic meat, instead of 2 bucks a pound for chem meat, then eat 1/4 the meat you usualy eat. Your budget comes out even, your health is boosted inestimably, and your conscience clears. Substitute for the protein lost with organic eggs and dairy products, but once again eat less of them to compensate for price difference. Fill in the rest of your dietary protein with veggie protein like beans, corn, and so forth.
Oh yeah, and cook your food yourself instead of paying for food cooked by disgruntled minimum wage workers at fast food restaraunts. Another big plus, far less bodily secretions in your food! hehehey.
On Debunking the meat/climate change myth posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 92 ResponsesBoth brocolli and muppets can be turned into ethanol, with enough subsidies!
On Caption needed! UPDATE: Caption found posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 ResponsesYeah Dave and Alida and anyone else who is interested email me, iieo@hotmail.com
Or you can check my tweets or my blog too, feel free to comment on my blog, no registration necessary. Or tweet me @amazingdrx.
I have a lot of stuff on water conservation, prevention of aquifer contamination, and GHG prevention with waste biomass biodigestion, organic fertilizer, and biogas energy as a backup for solar and wind powered smart grids. Also robotic organic agriculture that uses pinpoint liquid organic fertilizer/watering.
Also on domestic water conservation, no water flush suction operated composting toilets and Bucky Fuller's fog gun air pressure/water mist cleaning and washing system.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 47 ResponsesBeck is a national treasure, like paliin, joe the plumber, drug limboob, "dick" armey, delay, duuuhbya, cheney, scalia, Kristol, Bachman (stomach turner in overdrive), O'Really, the manatee, douchey...
60% of southernors either think Obama is an illegal alien or they aren't sure he's really an american. We have one whole hell of a lot ofunsophisticatedhate based folkin this country. They should be well represented in popular media to remind the rest of us that we better keep fighting that trend and/or make plans to move to canada if/when they apppoint another president.
On Glenn Beck: Van Jones is a communist intent on, er, creating private sector jobs posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 31 Responses"And, my god, flouridation. Don’t forget flouridation"
They always go for our "precious bodily fluids". (video..General Ripper from Dr Strangelove on Flouridation)
Keith Olbermann has been doing a Dr Strangelove (Peter Sellers) imitation lately to satarize Lou Dobbs, hehehey.
On Glenn Beck: Van Jones is a communist intent on, er, creating private sector jobs posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 31 ResponsesIt would be nice to be able to believe GM, but I'm starting to consider the notion that maybe something like a merger of Fiber Forge and Tesla might be a better way to go for the US auto industry.
BYD in China already has a 60 mile range plugin hybrid, they claim it will sell for 16k with mass production. GM has hyped the Volt now for how many years? A design that has twice the horse power and twice the price of a practical vehicle. Warren buffet is betting on BYD, not GM, he bought 10% of BYD and wanted more, but BYD only let him buy 10%.
Raser Technologies (an american company) came up with a 100 mpg plugin hybrid Hummer, then GM sold the hummer brand to a chinese company 2 days later.
Even the palinite/joe the plumber nascar dad set is buying Toyota, Honda, and Nissan SUVs and mega trucks now, THEY don't even want american cars. The revived Ford Mustang is popular, but way too expensive. Does it go through transmissions one every year or so like modern Ford trucks?
I think it's time to cut taxpayer losses and put money into the cash for clunker arrangment, extend it by 500 bucks for every 5 mpg extra mileage over 30 mpg on the car purchased. All the way up to 60 mpg if you buy a pure electric car. Propping up an auto industry that will not reform itself isn't going to work.
This current bailout and bankruptcy should be the last. Then it's goodbye to GM and Chrysler, Ford will most likely commit suicide by incompetence.
The jobs will be saved if new auto companies like a merger of Tesla and Fiber Forge can be arranged. Parts suppliers can adapt to the new mode of plugin hybrid powered vehicles. Nissan and other successful electric car makers can expand manufacturing here to fill in the job gap created by the destruction of the Detroit monopolist oil salesmen.
A Fiber Forge modular carbon fiber hypercar with a Tesla drivetrain and much cheaper Firefly graphite foamed leasd/acid batteries could beat BYD on price, safety, and battery cost/life. This is the face of a new US auto industry, GM squandered its chance to put its logo on this new generation of vehicles.
Think back 100 years ago when the auto industry was aborning, on the order of 100 auto companies turned into the big three over the next few decades. How will this new auto industry evolve?
How will the old oil monpolist military industrialism take its defeat? Like ancient Rome with perversion and murder?
Check the latest blackwater KBR Halliburton scandals, war for profit based on lies, kidnapping, murder, child prostitution/sex slavery. A fitting end for Cheney's empire. Eric Prince had a special recreation area for blackwater krazy kristian korporate krusaders in iraq where they payed one single dollar for oral sex from a child sex slave. When they weren't murdering Iraqis at random because they weren't kristians.
On GM to launch plug-in hybrid SUV in 2011 posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 3 ResponsesWell no, that needed no debunking it is obviously a simple confusion. The CO2 is not emmited from the electric car, it is emitted by the power plant producing the electricity, no figures are needed to prove that.
You actually did just what I was inferring, proved that electric cars are responsible for a fraction of the GHG of gasloine powered cars, even if they are charged on our partially coal fired power grid.
The trouble with talking points constructed to confuse is that they usually end up confusing those gullible enough to swallow/regurgitate them. Hehey.
On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 ResponsesI couldn't agree more Alida, there are no real free markets without regulation. And this dioscussion is actually starting to feel like our interaction on the old Grist, a welcome improvement! Fine work indeed. Let's have more of this, if you all please, hehey.
Regulation would protect farmers and consumers from corporate excess. Our bottomline is quality of l;ife, theirs is the next quarterly earnings report. Let's resolve this conflict in our favor, it is our country afterall. To paraphrase duuhbya's statement on the constitution ("it's just a gaawd damn piece of paper"), a corporation is not a citizen with the rights and privleges we the people enjoy..it is just a gaawd damn piece of paper.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 47 ResponsesIf one payed a farmer 10 bucks per week for a cow share, then received 4 gallons of milk, that would work out to 33 cents per pound I believe? Check my figures. You could turn the milk into yogurt, butter, cheese and just drink the milk.
Farmers are going broke now with the price under 20 cents per pound for regular milk and under 30 cents for organic milk. I would pay more for local semi-organic milk, say 12 bucks per week for a 4 gallon share, it's still a great deal.
I think CSAs could make this happen, legally and safely. Furthermore, members who wanted pasturization could use CSA community owned equipment to do that. In my view only 10% of consumers would go through the effort to join a CSA like this and get most of their food this way. But that alternative would pressure the rest of the market to reform or lose market share. Not a bad result for society as a whole and CSA members.
Tie in monopoly fighting with a cleaner, safer, more organic (not necessarily pure organic), local food supply and the synchronicity might add up to a 10% market share in a few years.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 47 ResponsesGood points on the natural ecology of microorganisms Dave, you convinced me. I'm going to find some raw milk again. Might have to buy a cow-share, but so what? That's a fine option.
In fact Alida, due to the massive antibiotic influence on the food chain, commercially produced milk is more likely to contain very dangerous mutated antibiotic resistant microorganisms and the antibiotic residue tends to kill beneficial microorganisms our health depends upon. Germ research is conducted using sterilized growing media, is pasteurized milk an unintended sterilized growing media for the next dangerous diasease outbreak?
Since there is no regulation of food safety that is very likely. Milk left too long in warm temperatures, use by dates changed to cheat consumers, and completely untested milk products make it a perfect host for mutated microorganisms, modified by exposure to antibiotics in the food chain.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 47 ResponsesDebunking the old talking point about the GHG emissions of electric cars charged up on coal fired electricty is an endless task. Oh well, thanks for doing it again. But watch the thread, it will pop up again over and over.
Just as all the goofy anti-climate change talking points, the "birther" lunacey, and now the "deather" (the screwball claim that healthcare reform is designed to kill the elderly) mass insanity; this hogwash is endlessly recycled by the bottom feeding "teabagging" wing nuts and their lobbyist/effnews handlers. So it goes. Ignoring it is dangerous too, as we learned in the case of the Kerry campaign targeted by the swift boat big lie tactics.
Now will we ignore the meeting disruption by payed goons? I hope not. The time for non-violent response is now, today, at every meeting targeted by the "dick armey". Armey's lobbying firm is organizing and paying the thugs disrupting the townhall meetings on healthcare.
On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 ResponsesA plugin hybrid is the answer for us rural residents Joel, the Leaf could be one with only a backup generator. BYD already has a good plugin hybrid, for 16k when mass production ramps up. wareen Buffet bought 10% of this chinese battery and now automaker a few months ago. He wated a bigger stake, but they only let him buy 10%. Does Buffet do his homework (the most successful investor in history)? Uh yeah, probably wise to trust Warren on this.
But really the Leaf is great, as you say for urban/suburbanites (the vast majority of car owners, we rural americans are a waning breed), so we just get a model with a backup generator added, no problem. The time is NOW to retire the old infernal combustion vehicle and move to all electric cars, supplemented with backup generators for we few who need the longer range.
Even those who live within the 100 mile loop between charging ocasionally need longer range for trips or vacations, so dealers could provide inexpensive short term leases for backup generators that simply plugin to the electric car. This would be an excellent option for the Leaf, Tesla, and other electric vehicles. And who knows, maybe better fuel cell type generators that run on liquid fuel will come along as research progresses? Boeing has a nice one in R & D for backup power for airliners and as a power source for unmanned aerial vehicles like the Predator drone.
Investors in big oil might be well advised to switch to investing in renewable energy, battery, and electric/plugin hybrid manufacturing industries now. Or don't, just ignore Warren's track record (at your own financial peril), hehehey.
On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 ResponsesConsider this, even jabberwacky's (D&D) marvelous/magical hydrogen fuel cell might replace batteries given a nanotech storage lattice for hydrogen that stores the gas at near liquid density levels at ambient temperature/pressure. There is already a pretty good result in research on storing methane (natural gas, biogas) in a nanotech lattice in this fashion. A structure that holds a zinc atom in a carbon nanotube for instance, might just do that for hydrogen.
It could be stored as nanotech zinc hydride, which liberates the hydrogen gas with gentle heating. No deadly dangerous 3000 psi hydrogen hose needed! I still lie nanotech lead/acid for the near future, they are working on it in Iran right now. An unlikely location? The first battery, invented in ancient times, was discovered in the region by archeologists.
Even aircarft might be battery or biogas/hydrogen fuel cell powered given nanotech storage densities and a hybrid design that uses hybrid turbine/electric powered engines during the high power takeoff phase of flight. Microwave laser powering the takeoff and climb out phase might be possible too, with all electric storage power for the cruising phase.
On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 Responses- Yeah that does make the battery problem go away for the most part. Nissan can replace the batteries with the latest technology later on, wether it's an EEstore ultrcapacitor or a nano-tech lead/acid battery. More power to Nissan!! It's a practical business solution to the battery problem. I'm a big fan of lead/acid nano-tech, I think it will beat out the other technologies eventually. Firefly says their low tech graphite foamed lead/acid design has the potential for 5 times the energy density of their current battery. Nano-tech lead/acid could even surpass that. Imagine it if you will, lead atoms suspended in a carbon nano-tube lattice. Awesome potential!On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 Responses
- Good points on lithium ion batteries. I prefer heavier, cheaper, 2000 cycle graphite foamed lead/acid batteries. Namely the Firefly Oasis battery. sure it's heavier, but it is far easier and cheaper to save weight by substituting aluminum, carbon fiber, foam, and plastic for steel in vehicles. It is also much safer to drive vehicles like the Lovins hypercar, built with carbon fiber. Safety and cost ought to trump battery storage density in the case of cars. Then there is the strong possibility that nano-tech lead/acid can even approach the energy density of lithium ion anyway. Lithium has always struck me as being to rare an element to supply affordable storage for 100s of millions of vehicles. Carbon nanotubes and lead, easily recycled and plentiful seem a better choice for this application. And lead/acid batteries can be recycled safely, the fact that they often aren't is not due to the nature of the device, but more to a lack of environmental regulation.On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 Responses
Similar tactics are being used to stop healthcare reform. This time it is also taking on the guise of thuggery, with bullies hired to disrupt healthcare townhall meetings.
What sort of response would work against these hired mobs? In video of the meetings subject to bussed in troublemakers there was no solution, the shouting seems to have worked. I am recomending ice water in plastic sports bottles as a non-violent cooler for these shills.
Surrepticious application to the clothing of the louder disruptors might just work. it will shock and anger them, then if the pranksters with the ice water can get them to chase them, they just might be distracted long enough to let the meeting continue. It's a possibility. Get them outside and engage them in a chase and douse strategy. Maybe water ballons could even be applied once they are outside the crowd.
This non-violent approach mighjt be worth a try.
On Forged climate bill letters spark uproar over 'astroturfing' posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 16 ResponsesGreat news! Nissan was wise to avoid hybrid development. This vehicle could be easily converted to extended range with a backup generator for longer trips. Just when things looked darkest for the climate and th4 economy, inovation and mass production may rescue us from fossil fuel, it seems more and more likely.
Ignore the wing nut trolls, reality will always be a stranger in this crowd. Don't expect reason from the reason-less.
On Nissan unveils 'Leaf' electric car posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 21 ResponsesI guess that's why the new grist has an ignore function? But who needs it? it's better if readers see the general incompetence of the wing nut talking point crew. In the grand tradition of palin, "joe the plumber", duuhbya, and reagan himself, no facts/no brains no problems.
They live in a magical realm of imagination where gaawd speaks through them. Their next big move? Mega churches on militarty bases funded by taxpayers.
Meanwhile chinese state owned industries take over manufacturing the new energy economy. Turning US into the new UK, failed empire begging for loan extensions, selling off all our remaining assets to keep our consumptive lifestyle going. Mao is grinning over at tricky dick nixon as they basque in their molten lava hot tub in hell, hehey.
On EEStor CEO says game-changing energy storage device coming by 2010 posted 3 months, 4 weeks ago 30 ResponsesYou know the military industrialists would love to have a laser that would shoot down missles, small enough to fit in a drone plane. EEstore might make that possible, along with a solid oxide fuel cell turbine. Boeing was working on a fuel cell drone powerplant. the missle shooting laser they have now only fits in an airliner sized plane.
How much useful green technology is suppressed by military secrecy? How much of that is by design to prevent a new energy economy from replacing the old oil/coal military industrial monopolies?
On EEStor CEO says game-changing energy storage device coming by 2010 posted 3 months, 4 weeks ago 30 ResponsesI think a battery/supercapacitor hybrid would be best. Like the flash in a camera. The batteries charge up the capacitor and it provides a big current flow for a short time.
Electric vehicles could use a 5 min super capacitor storage for hi-power acceleration/hill climbing. But the main storage capacity would be in cheaper batteries.
If EEstore announced that approach, maybe it would be real. Do they really have UL approval? This might be verifiable independently. The lockheed connection means defense projects, and that means sececy. If this device is being used to power the aircraft mounted laser for instance, that would classify a lot of the company's activities. A convenient smokescreen for scammers, or it could be legitamate.
There is another reason for secrecy, anyone leaking information who has stock in the company could be accused of insider trading.
But here's a very bizzare possible(?) reason that this might be a scam, and explain the defense department secrecy. As long as EEstore sits out there on the time horizon, always a year from mass production, any other storage company, battery makers for instance, will have a hard time raising capital.
If real, EEstore's breakthrough could make battery companies worthless overnight. A smart way to stop electric cars is to block battery investment, rumors of EEstore secret success do that. Did cheney give EEstore their lockheed contract to put a monkeywrench into the green car business? Hehehey, america loves a good conspircay. Who killed the electric car? Not GM? The evil lord cheney of haliburton? Mwhahahaha...
On EEStor CEO says game-changing energy storage device coming by 2010 posted 3 months, 4 weeks ago 30 ResponsesNo human infestation of planet earth, no history. We are but a moment's blight upon the biosphere. dig this crazy mother earth diary idea. Each "day" in mother earth's diary is equal to 365,000 years. We techno-humans who are wrecking the climate and killing the oceans occupy only a few minutes at the end of one of those days.
On Obama admin should bring defense and climate funding into balance, argues a new report posted 4 months ago 11 ResponsesLots of individual wing nut-tizens around in the summer internet doldrum season, or are they just more noticeable? Look out wackos, Janet reno is coming back! That's the rumor, she will head a super-secret agency under homeland security with gold/gun sniffing dogs to round up you domestic terrorists. Your buried stashes will be confiscated under raygun era forfieture law, and you will be specially extradited to terror supporting nations for expert, unlimited torture, under bush era official state kidnapping, torture, and murder policy.
Reap what you sow oh mighty survivalist lunatics!! Hehehehey... burp...hehehey
On Unsolicited advice about organic beer for the Obama Beer Summit posted 4 months ago 7 ResponsesMore beer! This is a good trend, talking up local organic beer and peace, love, and understanding. Have a beer with your antagonists. I just did this last night, had some Leinekeugels Sunset Wheat (note the blueberry top note) with Palin/Beck fans.
This is comedy at it's finest, humoring the birther/deather (deather = the "Obama's socialist medicine will kill old folks" crowd) palinite legions with real beer. Even though Leine's is now a corporate beer it retains the family legacey. With a bit of coriander.
The palinites drank 6 beers a piece, I had three, hehey. Desperation? i guess they figure chain smoking and chugging a 6-pack is a good way to get ready for armageddon?
Still, it would be better to have a nice coriander, blueberry top note organic home brew, but after all the work of grinding the malt, sparging, fermenting, and bottling would I want to share it with people who hate Obama and heart Palin & Beck? Clearly bud light is good enough for them, hehey. Which proves Obama is a man of the people.
ps. Best to chant "Socialism, socialism..we want socialized medicine!" when the haters get too astringent. Very funny.
On Unsolicited advice about organic beer for the Obama Beer Summit posted 4 months ago 7 Responses- It is fantastic that Tesla has survived. How will they do with competition from plugin hybrids? BYD is coming on fast and their family sedan will be 16k retail with mass production. Tesla could easily make any of their models into a plugin hybrid with a backup generator. Cut the battery range down to 60 miles and the generator weight would be cancelled by the lighter batteries. Could Tesla match that price point with mass production? With maybe a modular carbon fiber design like the RMI hypercar? There would need to be some creative thinking at Tesla and maybe someone like Buffet to fund the merger of Fiber Forge with Tesla. But US auto manufacturing could still be number one again with technology like this made in america.On Tesla speeds past financial troubles, opens retail stores across country posted 4 months ago 11 Responses
Well maybe it is worth a fight Dave. I used to buy raw milk right from a farm and make my own butter, it was great. The milk certainly tasted great. i nevcer got around to making cheese though, something I'd like to try. I had no idea of the history of the problem with mash feeding, it is coming back again from ethanol fuelishness.
Legalize it!! Wisconsin ought to do it too.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 4 months ago 47 ResponsesWe are now borrowing around 0ne dollar for every gallon of fuel we import in order to pay for our current oil wars. The interest on the debt incurred is adding to that dollar per gallon exponentially. We are on the wrong side of compound growth.
We can either replace imported oil with renewable electricty or become a debtor nation that will never recover.
On Obama admin should bring defense and climate funding into balance, argues a new report posted 4 months ago 11 ResponsesGiven the amount of used equipment out there at bargain basement scrap prices, local farmer/consumer coops can easily meet legal standards for dairy processing. Here in Wisconsin there are cooperative cheese factories with all the equipment needed, individual cheesemaker/farmers come in and do a batch of their particular specialty cheese all in stainless steel legal food processing facilities without the cost prohibitive over head.
The resulting cheese can then be sold by the cheesemaker at reasonable prices/profits directly to consumers. Could similar models work with other dairy products? And even with eggs and meat and frozen, smoked, or canned food? Yep. The expertise and equipment is out there, unused thanks to monopoly gaming, so put the people back to work. Retirees advbising part time with younger workers learning the trade.
No neeed to fight the unwinnable battle against food industry "safety" concerns, that are really all about monopoly games. Besides which, even one lawsuit over injuries from raw milk, even one that was a fake incident funded by industry lobbyists would kill the coop movement.
Better to avoid this obvious trap. People can actually get raw milk by owning their own cow, even if they pay a farmer to milk, feed, and care for the cow.
If coops could capture 10% of the food market, it would scare the food industry into at least an appearance of reform. There's a movement stirring. Local, organic, and real cooperatives owned by producer/consumer members.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 4 months ago 47 Responses- Hmm, spam made it into comments, and a remark on the spam. But my comment on the story was somehow lost? Welcome to the new Grist, hehey.On Tesla speeds past financial troubles, opens retail stores across country posted 4 months ago 11 Responses
Compare this level of expansion to the ramp up of WW II war production. If wind power were expanded as quickly as war production was, how long would it take to lower the unemployment rate to pre-recession levels?
Now add in all the other manufacturing and installation of solar, smart grid, ground source heating/cooling, electric commuter rail, and plugin hybrids. The demand is there, chinese and european industries are busy meeting that demand, wouldn't it be a wise choice to at least match the competition?
At the pathetically slow rate of investment and expansion we have now, we are flushing our economic future down the drain. Apparently that is aok in the board rooms and halls of government. The rats who hide behind faux patriotism are only in this for themselves, they are turning US into the UK. A has been on the global stage.
Would it be too jingoistic to promote new energy economy investment & manufacturing as a a way to compete peacefully with the rest of the world? Climate concerns have turned into wing nut talking points, thanks to scientifically illiterate media. No one is wading through climate arguments except a few wackjobs and die hard climate campaigners like Gore and Romm. Not exactly electrifying to the average reader! Rhetorical sominex in fact.
The way to get this energy re-evolution going is the same way WW II war production was pushed, national security, this time around to prevent war and economic disaster. The debt built up by oil wars and paying for oil itself will destroy US unless we become a first order manufacturing nation once again.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On Even with economic headwind, U.S. still adds 4,000 MW of new wind — and a dozen new factories posted 4 months ago 2 ResponsesOnly direct marketing from farm to consumer can stop this. An organic movement in all types of food would benefit from this fix. Coops are the answer, real coops, not the bastardized versions that exist in most places now.
Farm market/coops with member producers and consumers could fix our food system by cutting out the middle men who monopolize and manipulate and bankrupt farmers.
Think of these coops as similar to a coop model in healthcare. They might only get 10% of the market, but by providing an alternative they would stabilize prices and stop manipulation. When agribizz got too far offtrack, more farmers and consumers would join coops, threatening the corporate profit structure and scaring the manipulators intro backing off.
But just until the coops stopped growing, then the whole system would swee-saw more gently with reasonable boundaries, instead of suddenly going over a cliff.
On [UPDATED] Sen. Bernie Sanders cries "monopoly" in a collapsing milk market posted 4 months ago 47 ResponsesYes Emily these oil and other fuel wars are endless, because of the nature of fuel, namely eventual scarcity. Renewable energy is different, there is a virtually endless supply. Only the devices necessary to convert renewable sources to useful forms is in short supply.
But that can be cured with mass production, then instead of energy prices rising with time/scarcity, energy prices stabilize as the dewvices become less expensive and more efficient. This is a much better energy economy from an inflationary picture. And also in terms of preventing monopolization and manipulation of energy prices.
Chinese industrial policy seems to have grasped this reality already. How long will it take our leaders to act to catch up? Maybe too long? Tesla motors, google, and others seem to get it, including warren buffet, with his investment in BYD plugin hybrid.
On Obama admin should bring defense and climate funding into balance, argues a new report posted 4 months ago 11 ResponsesDrop food and green technology...instead of bombs. Much cheaper and a much more effective foreign policy.
On Obama admin should bring defense and climate funding into balance, argues a new report posted 4 months ago 11 Responses33,000 ft2 of bioreactor would make 20,000 dollars worth of ethanol per year. How much would the bioreactors cost? @20 dollars per square foot, the return on investment would be 30 years.
Could the cost be brought down with mass production? Or would the cost be even higher, even up tp 50 dollars per square foot?
How many miles of travel in an electric car would an acre of solar panels provide per year? How many miles would an acre of bioreactor ethanol provide if it were burned in an internal combustion vehicle?
How much would the solar electric miles cost compared to the ethanol based miles? And finally, are there enough acres of rooftops and non-arable land available to even mount enough bioreactors to support our internal combustion transportation economy?
I know there are enough rooptop acres and wind farm locations to supply the miles we need with electric transportation.
The dodge of recycling CO2 merely provides an excusae to keep burning coal and other fossil fuels. Going plugin hybrid should no longer be delayed, especially by tenuous experiments like this.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On Mass. startup uses biotech smarts to take the corn out of ethanol posted 4 months ago 2 Responses- From http://synchronofile.com/?p=204 : The Fog Gun appears in Dymaxion World illustration 88-92 but not in Inventions. Dymaxion World, Buckminster Fuller’s Universe and other sources quote Fuller claiming that while in the Navy he was able to clean grease off his hands by the mist eternally surrounding ships at sea. The fog gun was a means of directing atomized water under pressure for hygiene purposes. The fog gun is mentioned in Fuller’s 1938 book Nine Chains to the Moon. Dymaxion World claims the fog gun was tested at the Institute of Design in Chicago in 1948 “and subsequently at Yale and other universities.” In these tests a one-hour “massaging pressure bath” used one pint (.47 liters) of water. In session 11 part 2 of Fuller’s 42-hour lecture “Everything I Know,” Fuller claims professional dermatologists were consulted in researching the fog gun. Dymaxion World continues by saying “If fog gun bathing were done in front of a heat lamp, [all the effects of bathing] could be effected without the use of any bathroom. Since there would be no run-off waters, tons of plumbing and enclosing walls could be eliminated, and bathing would become as much an ‘in-the-bedroom’ process as dressing.” Buckminster Fuller’s Universe claims the test of the fog gun found it to be “a completely satisfactory system of cleansing, which, in fact, caused less damage to skin than ordinary soap and water. Thus, another significant artifact was created and left until a time when future generations would require it.” Has that generation arrived?On Ask Umbra's video advice on saving money (and water) in the toilet posted 4 months ago 12 Responses
Ethics investigations and expensive litigation on the governor's salary? Thi(a)nks, but no thi(a)nks. She needs big fauxnews money and speaking fees and book advances..oh my. Now she'll have the time and resources for her and bristol to go for the double mother/daughter octomom title!!
Sarah&Bristol+16!! That's the road to the white house.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On So long, Sarah! posted 4 months ago 22 ResponsesWow! Lots of comments. all it takes is a picture of palin? Hehey. Summer internet doldrums.
Deny this palinophiles: who ever manufactures the new energy economy will hold the financial purse strings. That is looking like it will be China right now. Do you all want to have chinese state corporations to hold the mortgage on your children's future? Hehehey.
The chance to save US capitalism is here once again. Will delayers&deniers prevent that? It looks like it.
On Sarah Palin, George Will, and Potemkin debates posted 4 months ago 21 Responses- Consider another factor: only a fraction of the world even has plumbing. It is much more feasible to provide them with these water saving water&waste; systems. Chinese industries will jump on technology like this mass produced for emerging economies. That will lower the cost further. Even people off the grid and municipal plumbing can flush and shower with low power/low water use suction flush composting and fog gun washing. The much smaller volume of water can be filtered and transported from a local water source or rain water with a very small solar electric or hand pump. Likewise for compressed air for the fog gun. In this case green tech makes for a plumbing system that costs orders of magnitude less than standard plumbing, sewers, & wells. And that increases the speed of adoption and quality of life for the people in these emerging economies. Either we here in the US start manufacturing these products or others will, our best business plan as a developed economy would be to organize local distributed manufacturing, where we use our knowledge and capital to help out and then get a nice return on our investment. Create local jobs from Peoria to Pakistan with customers for the products generated by the business. Rather than colonialists or neoconman corporate feudalists, who mainly specialize in exploitation and weapons trading, and starting (maintaining endless) wars based on lies; why not try to act a little more like google-style capitalists. Do well by doing good. A few pennies profit from each water system or solar system, instead of huge windfall manipulated profits from resource war. This is sustainable business, based on knowledge, invention, inovation, and competition. If you risk capital and develop a better product that people want to improve their quality of life, then your profits are deserved.On Ask Umbra's video advice on saving money (and water) in the toilet posted 4 months, 1 week ago 12 Responses
Maybe Dylan Ratigan will start to report on new wave google-style capitalism and how the planned capitalist chinese economy is beating so-called "free" market US capitalism? It seems possible, we'll see if it's really a new kind of cable business oriented format.
Pragmatic idealism at work in China's economic miracle?
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2009/7/20/4261344.html
On Silicon Valley VC sees bright future for green tech -- and a need to engage policy makers posted 4 months, 1 week ago 6 Responses- The other part of this water conservation strategy is to go to Bucky Fuller's "fog gun" for washing and showering. It cuts water use by using a compressed air stream misted with water/soap. It has the potential to save 90% of domestic water use. Washing machines and dishwashers can use fog gun technology too. Water issues are sewrious enough alone to necessitate these sort of water saving systems. Energy/GHG savings add to the green side of the financial equation.On Ask Umbra's video advice on saving money (and water) in the toilet posted 4 months, 1 week ago 12 Responses
- Well of course it would take bigger systems in large buildings, but they do have bigger plumbing systems already. Many city sewer systems are in dire need of very expensive upgrades. This sort of system would be cheaper. Once the water is removed from waste, and much of the mass itself, it occupies a fraction of the volume. And without the flushing water the whole system transports much less mass. Sure retrofitting the whole country would be costly and time consuming, but that's a lot of jobs. Payed for with perpetual water, $$, and energy savings there ever after. A relatively small tank, less than half the size of a rural sewer tank would compost a years worth of waste before needing pumping. Larger tanks would be installed in larger buildings where all the waste would be transported by suction/gravity. A large skyscraper design in China proposes to biodigest waste to power the building with methane. This degrades the waste to an even slighter volume&weight;. Producing organic fertilizer.On Ask Umbra's video advice on saving money (and water) in the toilet posted 4 months, 1 week ago 12 Responses
It's great to hear this discussion raised again. How about some exposure of waste stream recycling/organic agriculture and soil carbon sequestration now? Prairie and wetland sequestration are huge potential sources of GHG savings too.
A recent "Real Time" with bill maher featured Montana gov brian schweistzer touting coal fired carbon capture and sequestration under ground, almost unopposed by the rest of the panel. We need to come out strong when these schemes come up, and make it clear that coal CCS is worse than useless. And that forest, prairie, and wetland sequestration and industrial scale organic ag, and soil carbon storage are the real methods for reversing climate disaster.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On What Role for U.S. Carbon Sequestration? posted 4 months, 1 week ago 3 Responses- This whole topic tends to be offensive, hehey. Let's face it, in order to go waterless and compost/recycle our waste, it has to be just as automatic as a regular flush toilet. That has happened already. But has been barely noticed by any media anywhere. There are several systems that use air pressure (kind of like the tube system at the drivein bank) to move the waste out of your bathroom, using only air, and into the composting toilet tanks, outside your house. A service can even come in and remove the composted waste for you once a year or so. And it's all much cheaper than regular urban/rural sewer systems. Then there are the other huge advantages of keeping hormones, antibiotics, and GHG out of our environment. Waterless flushing using just a shop vac type blower on a composting sewer tank outdoors, with a flush button on the toilet. Suction power! Urnie and solids can even go in separate containers. That allows the best recycling of each waste stream. Urine is easily dried and can be collected and processed into zero carbon organic fertilizer to replace GHG intensive oil based fertilizer.On Ask Umbra's video advice on saving money (and water) in the toilet posted 4 months, 1 week ago 12 Responses
Thanks Jessica, wouldn't one think this would be obvious to business observors? Google has had huge success with their new mode of capitalism. Do the founders even care if the emp;oyees end up owning the company? I bet it would be their most fervent hop when they go to their reward(s).
This bends the whole standard capitalist model of nepotism, feudalism, and endless war around into pragmatic idealism. The founders, driven to do what they do for the sheer creative joy, giving into a zen model. "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"? How about "Zen and the Art of Capitalist Creativity"?
Adopt eastern philosophical principles, mix liberally with capitalism, make an earth saving, empathy friendly, financially secure, global cultural re-evolution. Auuuum.
And maybe follow "the oracle of Omaha's" lead and start working with the chinese people to get the change we need. isn't buffet really midwestern zen? He has been that way a long time. Taking traditional rural values, the zen of the prairie, right into the halls of power.
Warren buffet buys into BYD motors, the chinese plugin hybrid maker:
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2009/5/25/4200114.html
On Silicon Valley VC sees bright future for green tech -- and a need to engage policy makers posted 4 months, 1 week ago 6 ResponsesI think this is exactly the problem, he is "no tree hugger". Only a real tree hugger can properly allocate the VC funding. People actually want to sacrifice, they want to be green, and help save the climate and stop oil wars.
Google did not succeed, does not succeed with his philosophy. Find the companies that approach the new energy economy with a style like that of google, google's smart grid approach, for instance, then you will find and hopefully invest in them at an early stage.
Google represents a new mode of capitalism, corporations that do well by doing good. These will be the green (tech) giants. That's what I'm looking for and blogging about, the new energy economy monsters. Googles of the future.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On Silicon Valley VC sees bright future for green tech -- and a need to engage policy makers posted 4 months, 1 week ago 6 ResponsesGreat video. I think robotics have great application in organic farming. Insect repellant/resistant plants placed in with crops, strip cropping, nitrogen fixing mulch crops like alfalfa between rows, muclching, pinpoint watering/organic fertilizer, robotic planting, harvesting, insect capture, and weed removal: all these applications acomplished with a renewably powered programmable robot would boost organic farming productivity far beyond chemical ag.
And vastly lower costs at the same time. Furthermore all the huge GHG releasse related to chemical ag would be eliominated (over half of human GHG is ag related).
A vast manufacturing base would be created, replacing the chemical, oil, and agribizz industries and huge, costly subsidy programs that are now involved in monopolizing the food supply. Healthcare costs would drop as dangerous substances are removed from the food chain, like antibiotics, hormones, pesticides, non-nutritive additives that boost obesity, and herbicides.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
The good jobs produced by the robotic farming industries and farms could replace those lost in conventional ag, chemical, and oil industries. Huge energy sources would be opened up from organic waste stream biodigesation and fertilizer and energy production. There is a whole new industry in itself, backing up renewable energy with waste stream biomass recycling.
Ask a college engineering team to work with their ag students on this, start a contest among schools as in other engineering challenges. simply managing a small garden with simple robotics at first, then on to planting..all the way to harvesting. Why not? or should we let chinese students pioneer this alone? Why shouldn't ours be onboard this re-evolution?
On As farmers battle weeds 'conventionally,' the chemical treadmill speeds up [UPDATED] posted 4 months, 1 week ago 9 ResponsesUsually those who write headlines do not read the articles, as seems to be the case here. Meredith specified the ofensive network.
Local/organic ag is at around a 50% demand level and under a 10% supply level. That's why walmart is taking notice and carefully gtreenwashing their image.
When supply of local organic food begins to rise, prices will drop and we are off to the races. Since over 50% of human caused GHG is due to chemical agribizz, it's a race to sabe the climate too. Plus a waste stream recycling organic fertilizer system also supplies clean backup biogas/fuel cell cogeneration energy for a 100% renewable solar/wind/water powered grid.
On Monsanto targets public radio to spread false biotech messages posted 6 months, 1 week ago 30 ResponsesWe plumbers (pro/am) implore you! No dye please!! That stuff is disgusting and stains the hands.
Best to give a link ot two to composting toilet articles in this sort of piece though. Stop the sludge!
On Which natural toilet-bowl cleaner wins with a flush? posted 6 months, 1 week ago 10 Responses"Give hydrogen a fair shake, it deserves it."
Take your own adbice, all I'm seeing in your comment is failed talking points. Defeated here in the past over and over again.
On California plans no exit from hydrogen highway posted 6 months, 1 week ago 39 ResponsesGreat article Todd! this really is the kind of technology that will work, they need to cool these with liquid and collect the waste heat. Solar cogeneration adds efficiency.
10 sun concentrating collectors have reached 38% efficiecy in NREL testing. triple the power output per area of collector with 1/10nth the silicon, that is a winning combination if it can be done practcally.
There is a better way, that adds cogeneration for water heating and mounts behind windows, or under glazing mounted on a roof. thi needs minmal tracking and can be firther enganced with solar tracking mirrors reflecting extra solar power opn the collector.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On In solar biz, simple and cheap are keys to success posted 6 months, 1 week ago 3 ResponsesA ground source heat pump system that runs on off peak power and a battery system to run low power devices onpeak, with a few solar panels, would really beat the payback period of this system. then as more solar panels are added it would eventually become fossil fuel free.
The cogeneration system will rely on fuel, and fuel always follows a shortage price curve that tops inflation. The heat pump/solar alternative makes free fuel less heating permanent after the payback period. Fighting energy cost inflation and GHG.
Solar cogeneration would really boost the efficiency of the wgole project, harvest the geat as well as electricty from the solar panels.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On Two homeowners, one monster, and a cutting-edge power source posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago 6 ResponsesYep, well said! To quote the article:
Critics of EVs note that plug in vehicles, by contrast, have a long way to go as well, because much electric power still comes from highly polluting coal plants.
Sorry nope. A very old talking point, refuted over and over here.
Electric vehicle advocates dispute that, saying their cars can be plugged in at night in homeowners’ garages, to take advantage of burgeoning solar, wind and other renewable sources during off hours.
Wrong again! but consistent.
Hydrogen is made from foassil fuel, with the CO2 emitted into the air. Or it is made from water with electrolysis using the same electrical sources that charge EVs, very inefficiently.
Plugin hybrids have the potential to eliminate 90% of fuel use and power cars from a 100% renewable grid, as that transition is made. BUD in China has a 16k 60 mile battery range coroola style vehicle inmass production right now. hydrogen can't get there from here, or anywhere.
(one has to wonder about the scientific/technical expertise of the editor of this piece)
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On California plans no exit from hydrogen highway posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago 39 ResponsesI peed on the Gen. Douglass MacAurtur pine in Nicolet National Forest decades ago. It burned in 2001. Very sad!
Let's hope the Obama administration reverses the kind of "free" market duuhbyaist regime forestry policy that sees our parks and forests as industrial operations.
On If it's Yellowstone, leave it mellow-stone? posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago 1 ResponseThe trouble with dismissing this nonsense is that it is the tip of the iceberg.
For instance: Up until about 15 years ago, foamy pollution was evident just below the papermill dam here on the Wisconsin River. How was it "cleaned up"? large golding tanmks were installed to mix the contaminated water exiting the plant with river water, so the foam would not be evident in the much diluted effluent. A fake fix.
But legal! Why? Because pollution is measured as a percentage of water/air, and industry has virtually unlimited water use. This green (stream) washing has been repeated 10s of thousands of times across the country. Did it help stop pollution?
Joe Barton claims that concentrating the breath of 1000s of runners constitutes pollution under point-source rules, but obviously the runners breathing as on any normal day, not in a group, creates the same total amount of GHG.
So spread the nat gas drill rig pollution all over western ground water and it's ok? But having it come from one point source like a refinery would be regulated? or dilute nuclear waste in ocean water and it's harmless? We have work to do to defeat this creative bioshpere destruction in the name of the corporate bottomline.
How to really stop industrial pollution and GHG? Instead of greenwashing it.
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=amazingdrx
On Barton worries that EPA will regulate runners posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago 5 ResponsesBarton has watched too much Colbert,hehey. "Say it ain't so joe",palin.
On Barton worries that EPA will regulate runners posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago 5 Responses- Vinegar! It kills the bacteria that produce the smell, without harm. Just use vinegar! More Kate! The camera loves her.On Ask Umbra on how not to sweat your deodorant posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago 6 Responses
It's great stuff turanga! All we need now is a translator. Hehey.
Here's a tip Sean and wonk squad, try to explain this from the point of view of taxpayers, farmers, consumers, and small business owners. What regulatory change will pay us (a reasonable rate) for the renewable energy we sell into the grid from our solar panels, wind machines, and biogas energy plants? Which rule changes will allow us to drive around on electric "fuel" instead of oil obtained through murderous wars based on lies and support of tyrants like Saddam.
We really want to know so we can get our legislators onboard the renewable energy change wave. Thanks again wonks!! Keep fighhting for real free markets. Instead of this status quo fossil fueled nightmare that is killing the climate and the economy.
On Energy efficiency vs. neoliberal economics posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 28 ResponsesLook out if walmart buys BYD, auto showrooms at walmart? They already sell tires and do oil changes. Obama could encourage walmart to build US auto factories. This whole ethanol scam, and other scams to keep gas guzzling going flies in the face of a real free market hurricane of change.
Electric "fuel" costs the equivalent (in miles driven per dollar) to 70 cents per gallon. If you have solar panels on your home or garage electric fuel would be free, after a few years payback period. Detroit and the oil industry is fighting a losing battle, do we want our economy to go down with them?
Wouldn't it be better to make GM and Chrysler adapt? Than make US all bankrupt? We own their sorry asse(t)s now.
On Electric cars get better mileage posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesIt looks like BYD has won the battle, 16k and a 60 mile range. But will consumers ever be able to buy them with scams like ethanol in the way?
On Electric cars get better mileage posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesSo is this car! The BYD plugin hybrid with 60 mile battery range for 20k. Maybe 16k after production ramps up?
Why didn't chrysler make a deal with BYD? Make these cars here.
On From Uranus to You're Welcome posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesMy latest tweet:
amazingdrxbeat me,burn me,eat my shorts? http://bit.ly/sQ6po AND save the planet?
On From Uranus to You're Welcome posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesGreat article Catherine. As the comments indicate, it got to the stinky heart of the matter. You might want to do an article on Bucky Fuller's Dymaxion bathroom.
Dymaxion Bathrooms are to be equipped with "Fog Gun" hot water vapor showers that use only a cup of water to clean hygienically without soap. Remarking that "Nature had designed humans to separate urine and excrement. Both are valuable chemistry, and should be collected for further use,"
A new system that solves the transport issue of human waste to the composter, waterlessly, is now available. It's basically just a shop vac blower mounted on the outside compost containment. A simple fo-it-yourself system could be constructed with an inexpensive shop vac and a few 55 gallon drums, plastic ones last longer and are lighter.
Our ancient design sewer systems waste a scarce, indespensable commodity, fresh. clean water, to transport waste. Thus contaminating the water. Composting toilets can't use water flushing as it would interrupt the composting action. With this waterless vacuum flush system waste is transported out of the house/apartment into a composter. This can serve even huge buildings. Although with skyscrapers anaroebic energy generating biodigestion is called for. A proposed building in China uses the methane from waste to generate a large propostion of it's electricity.
Anyway, the point is that water free composting toilets that allow the convenience of indoor plumbing and the comfort and utility of dealing with composting and waste removal outside the home are now available. Coupled with bucky's "fog gun" these have the potential to reduce domestic water use by 90%.
Oh and check this urine to fertilizer demo on video! Bucky's system separated urine for processing, this same suction system would remove urine to a separate collection tank for dessication and either onsite or remote fertilizer conversion.
http://twitter.com/amazingdrx http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
On For some eco-pioneers, solving the sludge problem means getting their hands dirty posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 7 ResponsesAnd technically these underwear may actually be edible? In case of apocalypse, eat underwear. Oh I gotta tweet that.
On From Uranus to You're Welcome posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesVery nice Sarah! Now these are shorts or underwear? Or both? this is a good story to tweet! I think I will. http://twitter.com/amazingdrx
On From Uranus to You're Welcome posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 14 ResponsesPipes and more pipes,hehey. Luckily Bucky Fuller already solved this problem. In fact urine separating toilets are in operation right now. The volume of urine and feces is so small once the water is evaporated, and this type of toilet uses no water for flushing, no pipes are needed for human sewage, it can be collected in dry form a few times per year.
Then the gray water needs no pipes either, it can water the lawn or garden.
All that's left is storm sewers and industrial waste water. Industrial waste water can be recycled at the factory and storm drain water routed to settling and recycling ponds.
This whole system, along with Bucky's air pressure water spray washing/showering invention (that reduces water use by 90%), will cut water use drastically.
Oh, how to break down drugs in urine? First the solid fertilizer is separated by a simple chemical procedure, then the remaining contaminated mixture can be biodigested over and over until bacteria completely disassemble the offending compounds.
On Businesses struggle to profit from sewage sludge posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 7 ResponsesOnce the whole waste stream is boiled down to sludge it's toxic, no way around that.
So separate it, early on. Urine is contaminated by drugs, but it can be converted to organic fertilizer and the drug compounds can be broken down. Feces can be digested along with fiber waste to make energy and fertilizer. The oil and chemicals in storm drains that is so very toxic needs solar furnace treatment to become harmless.
Mixing it together really makes a toxic mess, wether it's burned, buried, or whatever.
On Businesses struggle to profit from sewage sludge posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 7 ResponsesThere it is, the patern is complete. But what solution is right?
Biodigesting the waste stream, turning all that disease breeding open waste into safely processed clean energy backup power (for wind/solar) via the smart grid. With GHG canceling organic fertilizer as a valuable byproduct.
Animals ought to be raised in clean, humane circumstances with waste removed to biodigestors ASAP. It is being done sporadically all over the world. The important thing to take away from this. Organic agriculture/biogas energy yields GHG free energy and a safe food chain. Free from dangerous chemical compounds and diseases.
CAFO needs to go, to yield to local organic lower intensity agriculture, with people relying on more vegetable protien. meat consumption cut by 75% would be a good long term goal.
On A terrific NYT piece on Smithfield and the globalization of pork posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 3 ResponsesAnyone remember being lectured here on the scientific method, at length ad nauseum? Any of you experts here to review this self regulated science? see any possible problems? hehey.
On Smithfield: don't worry, we're testing our Mexican hogs for swine flu posted 6 months, 3 weeks ago 3 ResponsesWell those cows are really sacred to corporate feudalists i think heather, they who are no longer named, or rather misnamed. Neo-liberals. Neoconservatives are the corporate libertarians. Revisionism has expunged that hated word, neoconservative.
But good response! How to get consumers to invest in renewables/conservation, seeing is believing, am i right? You see your neighbor saving money/energy so you do it too.
DR is saying that carbon pricing won't do it?
I think he believes in a massive WW II war production like effort to manufacture electric trains, plugin hybrids, ground source heating/cooling, solar, wind, waste stream biogas,and smart grids? But, only a commercial wave can get this climate cured. Take the jeep, a very popular vehicle to this day. started out as a government contract for WW II. A long strong commercial demand for a brand started under government contract. A free market wave spurred by government.
So divert the subsidies going to oil, gas, coal, and chemical ag industries and direct it to get this manufacturing going, with government contracts. A few million plugin hybrids over a few years, for instance. Then neighbor to neighbor it spreads until everyone is plugin hybred and solar paneled. like the frisbee or the bic lighter, that's how free markets work. Runaway consumer demand.
blog: http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog twitter: http://twitter.com/amazingdrx
On Energy efficiency vs. neoliberal economics posted 6 months, 4 weeks ago 28 ResponsesGreat job Maria! I would have helped out but I stopped posting here in frustration a while back. Waiting through 4 interminably slow page refreshes, then losing the comment 50% of the time, compared to twitter,it is too stressful to battle the same old talking point corporate apologist quietism couched in supposed scientific objectivity.
Lawrence will gladly wait until the verdict is in, but then will he accept the connection between viral evolution and human, pig, and other animal waste consumed by pigs? This was the same old story with the avian flu from china, now long forgotten. The scientific connection was made but is now of little interest to media.
The answer is, no. Lawrence won't admit he was wrong. He won't have to. By the time the science is done, blocked all the way by smithfield, it's mexican partners, the mexican government, lobbyists, and corporate lawyers, he won't be interested anymore. kind of convenient. Thanks for shaming me into the difficult task of commenting on the neo-grist (hehey, a tribute to DR's obsession with neoliberalism).
blog: http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog twitter: http://twitter.com/amazingdrx
On Jumping to conclusions in health matters may have adverse side effects posted 6 months, 4 weeks ago 15 Responses- grist staff and friends/contributors (like me) get on twitter and tweet the search trend up to number one! this swine flu story is huge. include "grist' in every tweet, then follow the trend here. http://search.twitter.com/search?q=gristOn Swine-flu outbreak could be linked to Smithfield factory farms posted 7 months ago 62 Responses
- Grist twitter search on a steep uptrend on news of Philpot's BBC swine flu interview http://search.twitter.com/search?q=grist tweet along!! link back here to grist article(s).On Swine-flu outbreak could be linked to Smithfield factory farms posted 7 months ago 62 Responses
- This article really went wild on twitter tom. check this better way to follow and comment on grist articles. links back to grist help drive readers here! http://search.twitter.com/search?q=grist this comment section is not getting any better. Twitter is a natural for grist commentors.On Swine-flu outbreak could be linked to Smithfield factory farms posted 7 months ago 62 Responses
- http://search.twitter.com/search?q=grist check it out, the hip hop way to comment/interact around grist articles. no discouraging, slow, glitchy site in the way. Many times the people!!On Russell Simmons on harnessing the power of hip-hop to change the world posted 7 months ago 5 Responses
- A great way to interact around grist articles: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=grist much easier/faster to tweet than comment here. And you get more feedback. It also helps bring more readers here to Grist. win, win, win for planet earth.On Tidbits from the first day of the Energy Efficiency Global Forum posted 7 months ago 2 Responses
Outstanding Tom, thanks. This story is developing, but i'm pretty sure it already proves biodigestion of the waste stream and organic ag is the solution. It also argues for local agriculture and small business food processing and production, as opposed to multinational corporate chemical hormone antibiotic GHG intensive GMO industrial ag.
More as this develops. @amazingdrx
On Swine-flu outbreak could be linked to Smithfield factory farms posted 7 months ago 62 ResponsesIt looks like any cost placed on carbon will be easily avoidable, enough permits can be given away. in which case it will be mainly symbolic. But symbolism is bettetr than nothing. maybe it will put investor and consumer confidence into renewables.
Meanwhile subsidies and government investment can be the practical contribution to the new energy economy. Let the CEOs have their cap & trade security blanket.
Of course just because industry will avoid paying for carbon, they will still charge customers, pretending to pass on the supposed tax. So it goes, a lot like our ailing healthcare system. Which charges prices that include unecessary insurance costs drummed up by citing lawsuits, that are never payed out. Monopoly capitalism leads to kleptocracy.
On As House digs into climate bill, debate focuses on costs to American families posted 7 months, 1 week ago 3 ResponsesFine statement Bill. Thanks to Sen.Nelson, who we in wisconsin are especially proud of, I hear loons nearly everyday. And see eagles. And hear and just ocasionally see wolves.
What would have happened withouy him and his creation, Earth Day? I like grist, even after this new, improved bastardization, but compared to nelson and his legacey, it doesn't compare at all. on any scale. Sorry grist. it's the truth. Probably best to remember that when dissing Earth Day.
On Screw Earth Day? Not so fast posted 7 months, 1 week ago 3 ResponsesGood comunique from the real world, thanks once again Sean!
Actually Todd, "radio waves" is a misnomer. A microwave laser beam powerful enough to ionize the air would be necessary to transport the power efficiently to ground. and that would atract massive lightning bolts that would vaporize the ground receiver. Not to mention the microwave laser would vaporize any birds or aircraft crossing the beam's path.
Your e-solar story was great! and there are so many uncovered green stories, like the smart grid projects popping up all over the country. Biogas from farm waste, solid oxide fuel cell/turbine power plants, superconducting electromagnetic energy storage, and so many other barely covered new energy economy stories, that mass delusional media ignores. Read back into the grist archives todd. Especially the comments, get some new ideas please,
why did you think it useful instead to cover this idiotic space solar stuff and the geothermal drill story? Both ridiculous? keep up the better work you did in the e-solar story. Sorry to be harsh,but the ice caps are melting, time is a wasting and you are blessed with an exceptional forum, use it!
On California utility bets on space-based solar power posted 7 months, 1 week ago 11 ResponsesBecaise pursuing the same biotechnology and expecting different results is insane? just a guess.
I know why i oppose agri-chem biotech monocrop ag. I have to guess on the broad popular objections.
Bio-acumulation of toxins, drug resistant disaese evolution, GHG emissions, soil carbon sink destruction, aquifer destruction, hormone related disease, tasteless food, obesity, slave working conditions, mass starvation, the list goes on and on.
On Vilsack: biotech will solve our ag problems posted 7 months, 1 week ago 6 ResponsesBiotech?no no no. It can't save the climate and feed the human population of planet earth.
Organic tech agriculture? yes it can! With no fossil fuel GHG spewing fertilizer and fuel. Robotic organic ag for the developed world and human operated organic ag in the underdeveloped world. It's advantageous to cost, carbon sink, healthy soil, dust bowl prevention, soil erosion, water conservation, renewable energy backup with biogas from waste. And that backup lets solar and wind power the bulk of the economy.
Storing vegetable protien in a stable persistent form for famine emergencies is a very good idea. doing it to stabilize food prices might be more difficult,but maybe it's worth it. I think fighting monopoly chemical ag subsidies and encouraging organic ag might be a better way to get to the same end. And cure the climate doing it.
On Vilsack: biotech will solve our ag problems posted 7 months, 1 week ago 6 ResponsesNonsense like this would never have gone unchallenged in the old gristmill.oh well,check the archives.
The ironic part,just as main stream media starts covering green alternatives, like the msnbc interview of cisco and GE heads on the smart grid, the mutiyear task of bringing this stuff to their attention with our blogging efforts pretty much stops.
@amazingdrx
On Nuclear power making comeback, top energy officials say posted 7 months, 1 week ago 3 Responses- This reminds me of the Lovins' "cold beer" explanation, how the consumer gets the beer cold, with coal mining, coal power plants, power grid, to power a refrigerator...or a solar panel directly powering the refrigerator. The beer still gets cold. the solar method is obviously much better. Likewise with food, the consumer wants a satisfying, healthy, life fullfiling meal. Do it with ships, planes, trains, and trucks transporting the food all over the world, that is grown with chemicals derived from drilling and mining, and depleting and polluting aquifers in the process... or locally, organically grown and stored and preserved food. the fist model ruins human health and the planet's climate and the water and air. The second does the task with great green job creation and healthy eaters, it's pretty simple really from the Lovins" "cold beer" POV. A Walmart or an organic growers coop? About 10% of US are ready for the coop. So make it happen, maybe the other 90% will wise up? A cheese factory near here was bought by employeres after Kraft decided to shut it down, it won first place in world competition for Parmesan recently. That's what small scale capitalism can do. A lot of small capitalists, organic gardeners/farmers, locally owned food factories, farm based energy producers, and renewable energy installers operating through local coop based marketing could be a successful model for an ag/food revolution. With lots of renewable electricity as a byproduct.On Toward a less efficient and more robust food system posted 7 months, 2 weeks ago 7 Responses
- There it is Jon: It's good publicity for the cause. No rant, no response. BTW where is Joe romm to defend his friend Friedman? Let's get a brawl going! Net brawl. #netbrawl http://twitter.com/amazingdrxOn An apology and an explanation for Friedman posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 22 Responses
- It's difficult to get over excited about cap and trde or carbon taxes. The prospect of real financial reregulation is just as unlikely. Our only hope to save the climate now is a green energy economic boom. that looks likely. Tom amd David fiddling back and forth really won't make much difference. mass production and mass adoption of renewable energy could make the difference. Economic confidence is returning, now we need investment in all the well identified solutions. A tempest in a teapot while the polar ice caps melt? Not very effective. http://twitter.com/amazingdrxOn An apology and an explanation for Friedman posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 22 Responses
- 30 billion in old energy economy suibsidies, that's the "tax" Obama takes in his budget. An untax. that can then be diverted to green job creation. Some sort of cap & trade or dividend,could actually give some market and investor relief. A final plan that can be largely avoided will set investors and traders at ease. Just as with reregulation of market trading, a toothless, feelgood plan will replace fear of givernment regulation, with food old raw GREEED! How so? Investors and traders will be greedy enough to send markets on a tear. Afraid of missing a raging bull market.On Somebody hide Tom Friedman's ball posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 46 Responses
- Go get her Lisa! hint at a recall election, ask her to sign a recall petition! hehey.On Bachmann again calls for revolution against climate action posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 6 Responses
Use her full title Kate, bachman (stomach) turner in overdrive. A recall election, that's the cure. But is it better to leave her alone and wait for 2010? I thnk so.
Maybe we will even see a Palin/Bachman GOP ticket in 2012? Yes!! Gibber jabbering wing nut fools, they help bring about change we can believe in. By alienating the electorate from the very causes they support. kind of ironic eyyh?
Meanwhile ice caps melt while they fiddle.
On Bachmann again calls for revolution against climate action posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 6 Responses- Great news kate! Thanks for the video. When Rachel and Robinson start delving into climate debate and policy on this level, mass media has officially started to challenge delay and denial. Now the wacky bachman (stomach)turner in overdrive weighs in, excellent! Has Flenn 'crybaby' Beck blubbered about carbon caps or taxes destroying america yet (sniff sniffle)? We are finally getting some traction here. So when will you be on with Rachel explaining this? Lobbying for you on twitter. Go get 'em! It's time the people we see around grist are seen on mass media. The scoop will out, nobody gets onto climate change stories, policy, and technology earlier than Grist (except some of us small fry, bloggers). twitter: http://twitter.com/amazingdrxOn Fellow Washington Post columnist challenges George Will's climate denial posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 1 Response
Great stove design, any video available of it in action?
"The other finalists were Carbonscape, a joint New Zealand/UK venture to fix biomass carbon by turning wood into biochar—a kind of charcoal that can be used as soil conditioner, buried as a carbon sink, or burnt as a highly-efficient fuel"
Wheeew, this points out EXACTLY what is wrong with biochar. Many misinformed people will believe that burning the biochar "as a highly-efficient fuel" will actually result in GHG savings.
twitter: @amazingdrx blog
On Kyoto stove wins $75,000 FT climate change innovation competition posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 17 ResponsesThese veteran gristmill skeptics have got it right. For instance,why not plasma electrically powered drilling, send a microwave laser beam down the pipe? it's less vaporwarish than this scheme.
Check Rasor Technologies low temp waste heat tapping refrigerant powered turbine generators, internet control ready and able to run on easier to tap low temp geothermal, stored solar thermal, and industrial byproduct heat using no water.
When geothermal steam adbocates tell me it's a "closed loop" traveling through underground rock fractures, I'm skeptical. Aquifers contaminasted or dissapearing down sinkholes might come next. Water it's a really bad idea to waste it generating power when it's not necessary. Wind, solar, and razor's turbine need no water. Biodigestion of waste actually recycles water.
Besides which this whole idea of renewable energy being unavailable in coal country is ludricrous. for one thing, coal is mined in West virginia and sold to China, everywhere is coal country. An HVDC national supergrid would make renewable energy available everywhere. Leave our earthquake prone mother earth be. No water/steam based geothermal.
twitter: @amazingdrx blog
On Drill, baby, drill posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 10 Responses- The Obama budget takes 30 billion away from old energy economy subsidies, corporate welfare for fossil fuel industries. Would a carbon tax or cap & trade raise that much? And if these options did raise that much, would they be politically possible? Would rebates to lower and middle income taxpayers eat most of the cash raised? 30 billon per year, spent wisely, would be enough to spur new energy economy green job creation. Stop debating over cap & trade (which is being scammed in europe by hedge funds) and carbon taxes, which can't pass a senate in "reconciliation" mode, and with dem coal state senators deserting Obama's green agenda. Subsidy diversion is IT! And it meets the goals of this article's title. "...Simple, Immune to manipulation, and politically palatable". twitter: http://twitter.com/amazingdrx blog: http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blogOn Myth: Unlike cap-and-trade, a carbon tax is simple, immune to manipulation, & politically palatable posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 44 Responses
- Various real and experimental solutions to air travel GHG are out there. High speed continental commuter rail powered by renewable electricity could cut down air travel by maybe 80%? New carbon fiber stamping technology could increase mileage and efficiency of existing aircraft designs. This technology, used by lovins' Bright automotive and Fiberforge in auto design could be applied to aircraft. A Boeing R&D project on solid oxide furl cell/turbine generator as a backup power source for airliners and a power source for unmanned Aerial vehicles, opens up the possibility of aircraft with hybrid fuel cell/turbofan engines, that could be operated at 4 yimes the efficiency of regular aircraft turbines. 1/5 the fuel and GHG per passenger mile. These could even be powered in the takeoff phase of the flight with runway induction power strips and/or microwave laser power transfer from the ground. It's possible top reduce air teavel GHG to under 10% of present levels. twitter: @amazingdrx blogOn Aviation industry proposing solutions to solving their global warming pollution? posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 2 Responses
yeah Eric good news! maybe if industrial factory fishing were curtailed fish populations would return? It's worth a try. How about if greenpeace rates the various fish products available, from mcdonald's to the local fish market? It might direct a boycott of industrial fishing? Food that tastes good but kills life in the ocean in the process, ought not create joy. But rather disgust. twitter: @amazingdrx blog
On Bittman takes a bite out of the ocean posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 20 Responses- A question from the UP of Michigan right on Lake Superior, excellent. The running grounds of Great Lakes Endurance's Jeff Crumbaugh, green race director of the year. Maybe I'll ask him this question next week at the Navarino Trail Run at Navarino Nature Center near Shawano Wis. I'll write back when I find out what he thinks, or better yet direct him to comment. Actually Umbra, an interview with crumbaugh on eco-friendly trail running might be in order! it would be unprecedented, perfect for the new Grist. He also raised funds from trail runs and had a solar and ground source heating system in the Navarino Nature Center. He held a trail run at Devil's Lake State Park last year,The Aldo Leopold Half Marathon, where we toured their new LEED certification leading solar powered building. lots of stuff to ask him about, including shoes and green. (check my tweets for links to Great Lakes Endurance and an article on Crumbaugh's green status) twitter: @amazingdrxOn Umbra advises on running shoes posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 6 Responses
That is how Obama is approaching energy policy, apolitically. Chu is on the right page.
Possibly the best arguments for a new energy economy are economic, in terms of green job creation as a stimulus and lowering reliance on monopolized fuel and manipulated markets,and lowering energy prices along with lowering GHG. Green energy is a positive for all parties concerned.
twitter: @amazingdrx
On Energy politics shouldn't depend on whether you're Republican or Democrat, says Chu posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 4 Responses- It matters not one wit what we object to,we are on "ignore". Hehey.On Welcome to the new Grist! posted 7 months, 3 weeks ago 106 Responses
oh so you want to hear a widespread delusion do you? Check the latest "Real Time" with Bill Maher.
Not once but thrice, a think tank wing nut repeats the lie, "solar costs 10 times what coal costs!", he wasn't challenged. Can we get that video excerpt and transcript and a rebuttal? It would be good.
@amazingdrx
On Myth: Pricing carbon will destroy the economy posted 7 months, 4 weeks ago 3 ResponsesYou're losing me here, 1/2 hr trying to get an avatar.I gave up.On twitter it took 5 min.
Yeah, bring back the old site.this one is a disaster to be avoided. Where do I put my twitter ID and blog URL so it can be accessed on my posts?
On Welcome to the new Grist! posted 7 months, 4 weeks ago 106 ResponsesDon't mix computers with cars
If you really want one on your battery electric vehicle to moniter the systems, use a laptop.
The demise of the ICE car was signalled by the unwieldy ultra-costly melding of computers and combustion to arrive at a few percent more HP, they haven't been used to increase mileage.
Would you like to be stranded on the road as frequently as your PC has a glitch? That's what you have with computer controlled internal combustion gas guzzling.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On Ford starts marketing campaign to emphasize fuel economy in new hybrid posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 9 ResponsesCollapse of world financial markets
Has reset the pecking order, to leave us at number one again.
When everything dissapears into a black financial hole, those with the biggest, baddest weapons rule. Just be glad we have a peacemaker in charge.
Our factory colonies, China and Korea, were on the rise, threatening to surpass us, but then crime happened, an 800 trillion dollar fraud. Ironically putting us back on top. The place where the fraid was researched and developed, over the reagan revolutionary deregulation decades.
The neoconmen (remember them? no one wants to admit they are one now?) came along with their crusade just in time to trigger the world into chapter 11, rescuing the marvelous supremacey of our western "culture" for a few more years.
In short: Cheney and friends knew we (the people) would bolt the fossil, chemical, nuclear, military-industrial corporate yoke if we had the cash to do that, so he decided he better help oil soar up and away to take the wind out of our sails. It worked! Hehey.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On A one-time cheerleader for hyper-consumerism lays down his pom-pom posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 16 ResponsesMore and more stuff
Growth doesn't have to consume more and more finite resources.
Growth, jobs, manufacturing, and investment can be aimed at using renewable resources to recycle the wasteful mess we already have made.
We need more and more renewable energy, organic ag, and energy conservation stuff. That's your source of economic growth.
The old sources, underground coal, oil, and minerals combined with the atmosphere and water of planet earth via combustion is a recipe for disaster on a global scale, the final end of growth of our current industrial so-called civilization.
The bacteria on the petri plate have about used up the growth medium with this DNA, time to find a new code that lets us go on growing in a new direction.
The new code: it involves using the free energy we get from the fusion reactor 9 minutes away as light flies, to recycle everything we have consumed and excreted to poison our petri dish.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On A one-time cheerleader for hyper-consumerism lays down his pom-pom posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 16 ResponsesBut...
Chapter 11 won't stop then JMG. None of them, auto makers, cable companies (charter is going 11), regional banks, or any corps(e) except AIG, Shitibank, and Stank of America. These too big to fail multinational banking, trading, and RICO scamming corps(e) are too big to fail.
They will take it all with them, then you and Jim will have your agrarian horse drawn feudalism that you masturbate over.
The course Lovins has already set out, over the last couple decades, is a much better scenario than you guys can come up with. I'll admit endless repitition on my part of various rescue plans following his and other similar precriptions.
To get the points he makes across that seems to be the only method that works. You use it to get your POV out here.
Corps(e) use it to get their lobbying across in the form of ads and think tank propaganda. It's a fact of mass delusional, reality avoiding human existence.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On CMU study suggests GM has wildly oversized the batteries in the Chevy Volt plug-in hybrid posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 37 ResponsesWell sure JMG
I'd rather see the old ones converted to plugin hybrids, and no new ones built, but that is virtually impossible.
I like the idea of electrified rail taking the place of new car manufacturing, car conversion could provide jobs for auto workers too.
It isn't likely unless a major depression sets in, and in that case we probably won't be building new trains either. Just scrounging, living off the old stuff and making do.
That might happem, who knows? But I'm not rooting for it. As much as I despise the consumption=happiness addictive culture.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On CMU study suggests GM has wildly oversized the batteries in the Chevy Volt plug-in hybrid posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 37 ResponsesCheck it Paul
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/08/frankli ...
Dig the crazy copper-ceria anti-fouling anode on this solid oxide fuel cell, it runs on just about any fuel.
Boeing is working on a solid oxide fuel cell that works on jet fuel for backup power on airliners and as a power plant for unmanned aerial vehicles.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On L.A. Times: 'Hydrogen fuel-cell technology won't work in cars' posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 77 ResponsesExpensive carbon
Whay made carbon fiber expensive in the past, the exotic element, Carbon? Nope.
It was limited supply and hand labor to mold it into shape.
Lovins' company, Fiber Forge changed that, now carbon fiber thermoplastic parts can be stamped out like steel.
Check it out.
It's how he envisions his Hypercar being mass produced, as a unibody from 8 (?) seperate stamped parts that glue together.
This is why I keep insisting that all the R&D has been done, now government needs to order a million of these cars. Auto companies will not take the leap on their own.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
On CMU study suggests GM has wildly oversized the batteries in the Chevy Volt plug-in hybrid posted 8 months, 3 weeks ago 37 ResponsesGet along JMG
Since we couldn't outlaw car production even if we all wanted to, wouldn't you have to get along with this compromise too? None of us want vehicles that are four time as heavy as they should