Comments Andrée Zaleska has made

  • To make this sort of thing worth reading--never mind reposting on Facebook--I also need more hot men. Love your avatar, Dave, but perhaps we could expand a bit--"Hot Men of Grist Who Make You Get All Hot Over Climate Change". (I have one here at home with a fabulous mustache--to go with the facial hair thread--to boot!) Or would that be just...silly? Not like the women.On Top 25 reasons to give a damn about climate change posted 1 week, 1 day ago 31 Responses
  • What would Lincoln do? Roosevelt? Churchill? Ghandi? Mandela? Vaclav Havel? Gorbachev? To worry about your own political future represents a huge failure of altruism in such a time of crisis. To ignore, deny or skirt the reality of climate science is reprehensible in a leader--and in a father. Greenpeace does have the slogan right: We need leaders, not politicians.On Mr. President: Time to quit fibbing and spinning posted 1 week, 6 days ago 11 Responses
  • 350 (Oct 24) was wonderful. So moving! It is the shot heard round the world, the first step, and it is already coming so late... For visions of a positive future we can look to Transition Towns (www.transitionus.org). But the hard part is still to come: Massive civil disobedience will be necessary to really startle our politicians and corporate masters. I look to Climate Ground Zero (www.climategroundzero.org) in West Virginia for inspiration: Fighting coal and mountaintop removal with the physical barrier of human bodies. Onward!On Toward the language of excitement, opportunity, and potential posted 1 month ago 3 Responses
  • Argh! The JP Green House will be ten years old by the time any of this "weatherization" money trickles down to us! It does not pay to be in the vanguard!On Weatherization will save us all posted 1 month, 1 week ago 6 Responses
  • Yes, my mistake. Temperature rise is usually measured in Celsius. I'll have Grist correct it.On Therapy on the Titanic posted 2 months ago 4 Responses
  • We can duck from reality behind a screen or a book, and in so many other ways. Ultimately, its a spiritual choice we make as we confront our addictions (I believe we all have addictions.) But right now we, as parents, are guiding our children's spiritual lives, so we make the rules that we think will help them. In the end, they're own their own.

    On The fight to save childhood posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 8 Responses
  • If I saw my child engaged in any activity to the exclusion of all others, it would set off a warning bell.  Certainly there have always been kids who read constantly, and they are often disguising shyness or social difficulties. I agree that doesn't bother people as much as the obsessive-gaming, but I think it probably should.

    I'm in agreement with you that there is nothing wrong with gaming, inherently.  You could also say there nothing wrong with alcohol or drugs, inherently, in moderation. It's the pattern of the behavior that warrants scrutiny.

    On The fight to save childhood posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 8 Responses
  • I'm convinced our response is not excessive; in fact I think the Saturdays-only policy is quite lenient. The child in question does not use the internet for anything but gaming. He prefers computer-games over all other activities, including real games, sports, and social interaction with others. At age 9 he cannot ride a bike or swim or play any sports at the level of his peers, because he has devoted himself so totally to computer games. There are many children like this, and I think we are looking at a form of addictive behavior that we, as parents, need to take responsiblity for while our children are still minors. Eventually, his choice of activities will be just that--his choice--but right now we have authority and influence and I think its our job to help him enjoy more of the world.

    On The fight to save childhood posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago 8 Responses
  • Something an old friend said always comes to mind when I consider family size: "If you can parent well, then you should have as many children as you want."  While I do think we should all consider keeping our families small and enlarging our sense of community to compensate, I think that those of us whose true vocation is parenting can only bring more good into the world.

    On Ask Umbra on big families posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 48 Responses
  • Let's talk offline--we have some thoughts, and some experience, in how to do outreach, and we also have a grander scheme to connect projects such as ours under a Green House Network of some sort.  You can reach us at greenhousejp@gmail.org


    A&K

    On Blood, sweat, and vision: The JP Green House in its ugly duckling phase posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago 3 Responses
  • I am with you, absolutely. You allude to my greatest source of motivation: the need to do the work of activism, protest and simple-living for the development of our own souls, as well as those of all other living beings. We don't know what the future holds. There may be more... (I teach my sons this as an antidote to their fear and despair, as well as my own.)

     

     

    On Can we make it? posted 2 months, 4 weeks ago 4 Responses
  • Better no bill than a bad bill. I'm not upset by the delay: more protest and conflict, and a harder look at the reality of the science are necessary before this thing can have any teeth at all.

    On Senators foresee climate-bill delay posted 3 months ago 2 Responses
  • Good work! Come visit us in Boston at the JP Green House and we'll find you some youngsters to talk to.

    On Expedition to link students in support of climate action posted 3 months ago 1 Response
  • I see your point--and why be so negative, right?-- though I have personally been sarcastic about No Impact Man and his ilk.  What bothers me about them--even Thoreau--is the time-limits they set on their projects. As with dieting, small, incremental and permanent changes are more praiseworthy. But they don't make such entertaining books and movies.

    On No Impact Man, Elizabeth Kolbert, and the civic sphere posted 3 months ago 5 Responses
  • Good to see you here on Grist, Adam. While I quite agree with your analysis, and I believe in telling the truth as it is laid out by Hansen and his colleagues (Ken is the son of a chemist and I am the daughter of a molecular-biologist; science is our bottom line), I cannot, as a parent, wholeheartedly espouse your approach. Despair is paralysing, it's a bitter pill I will not feed to my children. 

    The great activists of the world have held firmly to hope as a strategy and a spiritual discipline. We must offer something more than the grimmest version of "the truth", and humble ourselves with the reminder that we can never really know the future. I currently admire two trends in the world of climate-realists: one is the Transition movement (www.transitionus.org) to create sustainable local communities; the other is the growing number of people ready for action--see the new Beyond Talk initiative (www.beyondtalk.net) for civil disobedience around climate change.

    Here's Ken's unofficial motto:  "It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere." We know what we have to do.

    See you jail, my friend!

    On The fallacy of climate activism posted 3 months, 1 week ago 100 Responses
  • Good Lord, Let's not bring sex and Woody Allen into this! How much more complicated can we make our ethical dilemmas!

    On Puppies and bunnies and carnivorous eco-curmudgeons posted 3 months, 1 week ago 7 Responses
  • I would definitely want to learn how to kill rabbits properly, if we did this. I have a really hard time boiling lobsters, for example--even though I know they are not endangered and are a good seafood choice--because I think they have a horrible death.

    This is all pretty much theoretical--I don't think we will be raising rabbits, because our children and our neighbors find it so reprehensible to kill anything that cute. I was just riffing on the irony of us all keeping dogs and cats and feeding them inhumanely raised and slaughtered meat, and eating such meat ourselves, and then being horrified at the thought of eating a bunny rabbit.

    It's so hard to weed out every last bit of hypocrisy from your life, and then when you do, you're a crank and nobody wants to listen to you.

    On Puppies and bunnies and carnivorous eco-curmudgeons posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 7 Responses
  • I have paid dearly to remain in the walkable city neighborhood of my choice--Jamaica Plain in Boston: 3 house-purchases over the last 15 years averaging 50-75k more than a similar house would cost in neighboring Roslindale (which is not on the subway). The savings has been to my nerves, in being able to have only one family car and drive it only 7k miles/year. I have acquired a tough, cyclist's road-rage in that time--but good calves as well.

    To buy a house in a neighborhood that is not only walkable, but properous, with good schools, was impossible. Around here that would be Brookline, with condos around 500k.

    No regrets--JP is home.

    On Would you pay more for walkability? Should you? posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 7 Responses
  • Activist CEO--

    Our household is blended, and there are 3 children with 4 parents. That's one less, right?

    That being said, I found the decision to have children was totally unaffected by any sort of reason at all. And once they're here, you can't beat yourself up with thoughts of all the damage you did by having them without going crazy, or inflicting some kind of subtle abuse on them. Honoring creation means us too.

    I find myself more susceptible to the argument that one shouldn't bring any more children into this world because we cannot guarantee them a safe future. Ken and I faced that difficult decision last year, with an accidental pregnancy. Painful choice.

    On Should Kuba have a puppy? posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 19 Responses
  • Is an honest position towards the needs of the earth ever compatible with wealth?

    I don't find these people terribly interesting. Like all wealthy philanthropists, their charity is easy--much easier than that of a single mom with three kids who tithes to her church, for example.

    On 10 green royals posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago 5 Responses
  • Well, wasn't that fun! I'm Kuba's mom, weighing in here with a few extra details.

    First of all, let me assure you all that Kuba is as green as super-green algae. He's the oldest of our three, and the one most aware of our emperilled eath. He's the one with the perfectionist, judgemental personality that needs to make life "right". He even fought himself on the whole dog thing, once we explained that pets do contribute to the problem of global warming and resource overuse.

    But he's an animal lover, fond of running and wrestling and games with balls, so the fact that Kuba seems to be a perfect fit for a dog was hard to deny.

    There will, of course, be no puppy. It will be a shelter dog and a mutt. These are some of the compromises we've made, with Kuba's input.

    And this blog is all about the compromises we make between doing the right thing for us, and for the rest of the planet. A reductionist logic takes us quickly to "we never should have had kids", and then to "we should just hang ourselves". I've found that people quickly stop listening to anyone who goes that far.

    Expect some cute dog-and-boy photos around X-mas!

    Andrée

    On Should Kuba have a puppy? posted 3 months, 3 weeks ago 19 Responses
  • Wow, this is simultaneously my dream home (including so much of what we want for the JP Green House but cannot afford), and a total affront to my simplicity ethic. I don't believe anything like this can be offered to the world at large, and so it cannot be considered sustainable. Facinating example to use for discussion and debate though!

    On Is this a green home? posted 4 months ago 21 Responses
  • Katmainomad,

    You are right -- the invasives get a foothold in the parts of our environment already disrupted by humans.  The problem is--and you allude to this--that there is less and less pristine nature to hold ground against them. 

    I also agree that the earth itself does not care what form the future takes.  Life's only clear intent is to further itself, and weeds have as much "right" to do so as any other plant, animal or human.  They are evolution's victors, after all.

    I also do not believe that God cares what form the future takes--or cares whether humans survive as a species.  One of our great self-delusions is to think that God protects us.  But I do believe in the Divine.  But that's a post for another day.

    And oh yes--breaking news! -- WE HAVE A FOUNDATION!  It was finished last week and looks great.  All things now seem possible.

     

    On You and me and a billion tiny spores posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago 6 Responses
  • It's an interesting discussion about herbicides.  My kneejerk reaction is also "of course we do not use herbicides".  But is that really the obvious moral response?  Would a little Roundup, appropriately and minimally applied, really be worse than letting a non-native plant threaten native flora?  I'm not at all sure...

    What I believe is what I'm told by experts: There is no effective herbicide against a serious Vincetoxicum invasion.  The slow and steady methods of suffocation (depriving of light, really), burying the upper parts of the plant, pitting strong native plants against it, and patiently mowing over and over again seem both safer and more effective.

    (Oh, and spores is actually a synonym of seeds.  I liked the word better because it implies wispy floating things, which they are....)

     

    On You and me and a billion tiny spores posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago 6 Responses
  • Hang in there Katma in Anchorage!  It's not supposed to be easy.  Embrace the mess.  Remember that you are doing the right thing in a time of moral inertia.  Keep us posted on your project.

    Andrée

    On Fighting climate chaos with a hammer and a heart posted 5 months, 1 week ago 4 Responses
  • Janet, Excellent analysis and a very fair presentation of the problem of the misuse of the "commons" of our atmosphere.  It's right to think of our debt to the poor, when so much has been made out of the monetary debt of the poor countries to us.

    Andrée Zaleska

    JP Green House

    www.jpgreenhouse.org

    On To reach a climate agreement in the near future, countries must look into the past posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago 4 Responses