gorak’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Subject Matter

  The fact that skeptics of both theories use similar language in advancing their scientific opinion says nothing about the value of such opinions. For instance, two people calling different things "myths" does not alter the truth values of the objects they are discussing. If one of them is obviously not a myth, it says nothing about the validity of the other claim. If one of them is indeed a myth, it still says nothing about the other claim.

  And you must remember, that Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Darwin, Einstein ect... were SKEPTICS of the currently accepted scientific opinion.

  That doesn't say anything about the skeptics of global warming or skin cancer, but it should give you pause before you seek to overturn the skeptical workings of hundreds of years of the modern scientific method. On Similarities between the skin cancer and climate change 'scams' posted 1 year, 7 months ago 173 Responses