godfreye’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Will the Republicans be presenting pro-flat earth witnesses next?

  On House Republicans bring strange theories and wacky witnesses to climate hearings posted 7 months, 1 week ago 22 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Umbra says:

  High population growth is environmentally significant in areas with poor resource management, poor government, and poverty; it is also significant in areas with excess wealth and high resource consumption.

  Isn't that just about everywhere? I think that when future generations a hundred years hence look back, the issue of population growth will be viewed as one of the great blind spots among leaders today, even environmental leaders (though not all). True, it is closely connected with the status and extent of freedom enjoyed by women in society, but the latter is largely irrelevant to the ecological impact that population growth has, even if it is intimately connected to the social solution (yes, that's an intentional pun).

  On Umbra advises on population posted 7 months, 2 weeks ago 35 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Umbra says:

  High population growth is environmentally significant in areas with poor resource management, poor government, and poverty; it is also significant in areas with excess wealth and high resource consumption.

  Isn't that just about everywhere? I think that when future generations a hundred years hence look back, the issue of population growth will be viewed as one of the great blind spots among leaders today, even environmental leaders (though not all). True, it is closely connected with the status and extent of freedom enjoyed by women in society, but the latter is largely irrelevant to the ecological impact that population growth has, even if it is intimately connected to the social solution (yes, that's an intentional pun).

  On Umbra advises on population posted 7 months, 2 weeks ago 35 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Add Green Forest to the list

  I was also going to add Green Forest, which we buy by the case through a natural foods wholesaler.  Since you didn't include it, here are the stats:  100% recycled (40% min post-consumer content, so lower than 7th Gen), whitened without chlorine, hypo-allergenic, unscented.  For the 175-count box we pay $1.97 when not on sale, but that's by the case; not sure what they sell for retail.  The tissues subjectively seem reasonably soft and durable.On A nosy review of recycled facial tissue posted 10 months ago 10 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Add Green Forest to the list

  I was also going to add Green Forest, which we buy by the case through a natural foods wholesaler.  Since you didn't include it, here are the stats:  100% recycled (40% min post-consumer content, so lower than 7th Gen), whitened without chlorine, hypo-allergenic, unscented.  For the 175-count box we pay $1.97 when not on sale, but that's by the case; not sure what they sell for retail.  The tissues subjectively seem reasonably soft and durable.On A nosy review of recycled facial tissue posted 10 months ago 12 Responses