cmarkged’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  1500 year SOLAR DRIVEN cycle

  There is evidence from tree rings, ice cores, isotopes and many others ALL OVER THE WORLD, which hilights a 1470 year +/- 500 years cycle, including the unnamed cold period before the Roman Warming, the Roman Warming, the Dark Ages cooling, The Medieval Warming, The Little Ice Age and The Modern Warming (which started in 1850, BEFORE ANY DOCUMENTED CO2 INCREASES.) Warming causes the release of carbon dioxide, as carbon is held in the sea, which is the reason for the lag between CO2 and temperature increases.

  However, you might say there is no solar cycle of 1470 years. True, but there is a cycle of 87 and 210 years, which are factors of 1470. Human global warming activists with beards say that water vapour is the major greenhouse gas. Climate models can not yet model clouds. See the fatal flaw? The water vapour in the climate models can not turn into clouds, and so it just lingers in the atmosphere. Each extra increment of CO2 has less effect.

  I ask this. The Kyoto Protocol is dead and was never going to work, because all that is happening is that countries above their limits are buying off however much countries below their limits are below it. Whether or not "greenhouse gases" are responsible for global warming, surely, instead of trying to reduce CO2, we should be using the technology we already have to prevent or lessen the "disastrous" side-effects of global warming.

  To try and reduce CO2 emissions, crops are going organic. Organic crops have half the yield per acre than nitrogen fertilised crops. To convert all our fossil fuels to wind power would take up one quarter of our landspace. Can you see? The loss of life from trying to prevent global warming will be far, far greater than the (supposed) loss of life from global warming.

  So, in a nutshell, I have presented evidence which disproves the greenhouse theory, and then, assuming that the greenhouse theory is correct, says why reducing CO2 emmisions is not the correct plan of action. So mr gullible scientist who wrote the above article, shave off your beard and get real. Global warming is moderate, most probably beneficial, and, most importantly, unstoppable. On 'It's the sun, stupid'--Very bright, yes, but not getting brighter posted 2 years, 7 months ago 18 Responses