analyse’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Replacing nuclear with alternatives

  This is not technologicaly feasible at this time so why bother asking.  Maybe in 50 years.  If I asked "would you prefer to pay nothing for your utilities" I'm sure 100% would agree.  That means nothing. It's infeasible.  Solar, Biofuel, Wind, etc. have a small and growing role to play but nuclear is the 800 lb Gorilla who can get it done now and be dependable for the next 50 years.  France has been 80% nuclear for decades with no problems.  The question was obviously politically motivated by a "green" group.  Ironically one of the founders of Greenpeace now actively supports nuclear power as does James Lovelock the eminent British scientist. You can't power a world with 6 billion people without dependable power sources.On Three nuke-dependent communities vote for a nuclear phase-out posted 1 year ago 17 Responses