MrOyster
The Basics
- Name: MrOyster
MrOyster’s Recent Comments
Click here to view comment in original post
Moister as in WATER
Boy your headline for this article couldn't have been closer to the truth! So many reasons have been given for the decline of oysters in Chesapeake Bay. Many of these reasons for the decline are very valid points. However, the most serious causes have their greatest impact during periods of high salinity, especially during times of drought.
Water that is too salty may have higher incidents of mortalities brought about by predation by large numbers of oyster drills (snails) which can quickly wipe out an oyster reef. Oysters in those same waters may have their shells compromised by boring clams and sponges (which also tend to avoid fresher waters) and by the oyster diseases MSX and Dermo.
While the oysters themselves can survive a very wide range of salinities, they thrive best where there is the correct mixing of fresh and salt waters. This is true throughout the world. Estuarine areas are their preferred habitat.
The Conowingo Hydroelectric Dam was finished on the Lower Susquehanna River in 1929, and was touted as being able to help nearshore oyster reefs better withstand freshets (minor flooding - sometimes lasting several weeks). It did indeed help do that, and many of those nearshore reefs prospered. However, being closer to the shore, they are also closer to pollution where harvesting is usually not allowed.
The most serious problems were to occur during periods of prolonged drought, where only the nearshore reefs would receive the necessary amount of the freshwater so vital for their survival. Oysters on the more distant reefs would succumb to predators and disease. The oyster fishery of the Chesapeake would fluctuate with the cycles of wet years and dry years. During wet years, reefs further offshore tend to thrive, during dry years, they die off.
This problem gradually became more and more severe as additional reservoirs were built on the numerous watersheds that supply the Chesapeake Bay with the freshwater that oysters need. Fishermen or watermen worked the reefs that remained to earn a living for their families. Some of these remaining reefs were most likely over harvested by the large number of fishermen the bay had faithfully supported in the past.
During the late 1990's, some progress was made in oyster recovery, I feel largely as a result of some of the smaller dams being removed in an effort to restore the anadromous striped bass or rockfish, which migrate upstream to spawn. (This and other species were also victims of damming the rivers.) A prolonged drought, set back these restoration efforts.
Granted, other reasons for the demise of oysters share the blame. For example, TBT anti-fouling paints for boats that were common in the 80's had very lethal effects on shellfish. These paints were reported to be especially effective on the larval stages of oysters. They worked too well so they were banned or heavily regulated. But oysters must have freshwater in order to survive. They don't need much. The damming of rivers many miles from the reefs is sure to have a cost. The Chesapeake Bay is just one area paying that cost. Think about that the next time you take a shower. On Despite efforts, Chesapeake Bay oysters still struggling posted 1 year, 5 months ago 5 Responses