MarioG’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Global Warming Hoax Unraveling at Warp Speed

  To see that the global warming hoax is unraveling at warp speed click on the following URLs, and weep:
  > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?ex= ...
  >
  http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzA5YjM2MzY0ZGI1OWIy ...=
  >
  http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=421572007
  >
  In the global warming debate, we have on the one hand serious scientists who look at ALL the data and do not try to fool us with speculative models of the future that fail all back tests of the past. On the other hand we have the greedy environmental charlatans, mainly to garner research grants that come more easily from alarming scenarios of the future, aided and abetted by the left wing media and left wing politicians. Like Malthus and Ehrlich before them they reap the social and economic benefits of being alarmists, whereas everyone moves on and forgets about them when they are consistently wrong years later.
  >
  Let me suggest you look at this issue based on an 8th. grade level of common sense and some minimal scientific facts that every schoolboy would know. Here are the questions you need to consider:
  >
  a) Did you know that in the mid-70's the concern by these same scientists was global cooling - something that never came to pass?
  >
  b) Are you aware that the models developed by these same scientists cannot predict the weather NEXT WEEK without revising their forecasts about 6 times a day between now and then? And they want us to believe models of the distant future?
  >
  c) Who was to blame for the global warming and cooling that took place a number of times throughout the earth's history - way before human industrial activity began?
  >
  d) Pray tell, who is to blame for the global warming on Pluto? [Wonder what those Plutoans are up to!]
  >
  e) If the environmental charlatans were serious, why did they exempt 80% of the countries of the world, including India and China, two of the world's fastest growing economies, which also have little or no environmental controls of any kind, from their bogus Kyoto Protocols? Isn't that like allowing people from these these countries, and Indian and Chinese kids, to pee in the public swimming pool while everyone from a westernized industrial country must go to the john?
  >
  f) Did you know that CO2 is only 0.036% of the
  earth's atmosphere, that most new CO2 is made by
  nature and most of it is neutralized by nature through photosynthesis? Even an 8th. grader without a calculator would know that this means that even shutting down all industrial activity worldwide is not going to change this miniscule % significantly?
  >
  g) Can such a miniscule percentage of the earth's
  atmosphere act as a "greenhouse"? Besides, when CO2 levels were in the 0.027 level for centuries global warming and cooling still took place, showing that the current relationship between CO2 levels and global warming is a correlation, not a cause.
  >
  h) Though there does seem to be a longer term global warming trend underway, did you know that the earth has cooled every year since 1998, using the same methodology for calculating the earth's temperature in both cases?
  >
  What is going on is really quite simple. The
  extreme environmental movement is the new home of the refugees from the discredited extreme socialist movement that all its previous major proponents have discarded on the thrash heap of history where it really belongs.
  >
  The goal of the socialist/environmental charlatans
  is to bring the western industrial economies down to the least common denominator. They failed to do so through the front door of communism and socialism, and are now trying through the back door.  Unfortunately, they seem to have co-opted the opportunistic left wing politicians and a willing and gullible left wing media and several greedy, unethical scientists raising false alarms in their incessant search for research grants.
  >
  Like Malthus and Erlich in the alarmist population debate they glean the benefits of alarmism whereas everyone moves on and forgets they were wrong years later.
  >
  On Come on, Drudge. You can do better posted 2 years, 8 months ago 15 Responses