Johnny Cool’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Personal Abuse of TVMOB

  Yeah, I have.

  Let me first say that I am a Climate Change sceptic. But I am not anti any-one. I am happy to believe either For or Against IF they can convince me. So far neither party has.

  I came across this website after reading TVMOB's (someone's abbreviation above) letter to John McCain. Must confess I had never heard of him so Googled his name to see if he was real and stumbled here.

  As far as the arguments above are concerned. There seems to be more personal abuse in the Pro climate change mob than TVMOB. I am not interested in personal abuse or the Monty Python characterisation above which is pretty unrepresentative of some-than can present such a comprehensive paper.

  As far as debunking is concerned the maths lost me on line one and statements like:

   "Did you spot what he just did? If you assume that there is no delay in warming (which is wrong) and McKitrick is right (which is also wrong), then you get a low value of sensitivity"

  is bebunking? You gotta be joking.

  One of the debunks actually said "Here I confess to sharing a concern with Monckton."

  OK, I looked at the Wikipedia thing and was convinced that TVMOB stuffed up here and changed the entry about the "reported" £50,000 libel ( I guess it could have been "reported" some-where or maybe it was wishful thinking). Al Gore is also known to have corrected a few untruths. I cannot see anything wrong with editing your own Wikipedia biography and that one misdemeanour seems to be the only one. TVMOB does not come across to me as an habitual liar.

  I think Black Wallaby has a point, cut out the personal abuse and stick to the facts or if they are facts, make them more convincing.On Viscount Monckton, a British peer, says his paper was peer-reviewed by a scientist posted 1 year, 1 month ago 8 Responses