hayden

author

The Basics

hayden’s Recent Comments

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    Romm

    Romm: Freeman Dyson unified the Feynman and Schwinger versions of QED. He has forgotten 10 times more science than you ever knew. You have no fucking right to question him -- you have not earned that. You're just a scientific peon. Dyson is a legitimate scientist. So I suggest you shut up until you have proved yourself at his level.On NYT's Revkin gives Inhofe a pass posted 1 year, 10 months ago 66 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    targets

    States can set all the fucking targets they want -- they will never meet them. European nations have not met the targets they promised under the Kyoto Protocol. Why do you think the states will meet their targets? It's all just big bullshit. The quality of our lives depends on fossil fuel emissions, and there's no fucking way we will ever -- EVER -- reduce our standard of living. Who the fuck do you think you are? Not one of your mothers has reduced your standard of living, besides maybe screwing in an CFL instead of an incandescent. Big fucking deal. We will never -- NEVER -- agree to CO2 cutbacks. Those advocating it, like Romm, are idiots.
    On On whether to advocate weaker climate change bills posted 2 years, 1 month ago 10 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    hope

    And how do you liberals hope to enact the Boxer bill? You have no plan whatsoever -- none -- it's merely a number you have posited. You don't have the slightest fucking clue how to enact it. It's all just a meaningless guess and it will never, NEVER, come about. Why are you even wasting your time???? Why can't we get serious about this???On New WRI report compares climate bills posted 2 years, 1 month ago 9 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    1-2 F

    Matt G, 1-2 F does not make a difference on a bridge that undergoes 100 F of variation a year, and which has withstood significantly larger tempertures than it did on the day of its collapse. There is no evidence whatsoever -- none -- that climate change contributed to the collapse of this bridge. If you have it, present it. If not, stop the pointless and useless speculation. On The question must be asked posted 2 years, 3 months ago 16 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    Stupid

    > Did climate change contribute to the Minneapolis
    > bridge collapse?

    This is an absolutely stupid suggestion, and you people who are trying to blame every last pejorative happening on climate change are doing very serious damage to the cause.

    This bridge undergoes ~100 F in temperature swings every year. The thought that another 1-2 F is going to make any difference is really stupid, and just indicates your lack of scientific and engineering foundations.

    Shut up before you do any more damage to the real problem of getting the world to take climate change seriously.
     On The question must be asked posted 2 years, 3 months ago 16 Responses

View All
Advertisment
Advertisment