RisingTideNA’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Aren't you glad BP is a lead author (via their membership in USCAP) of the climate legislation in congress?

  On "Back to Petroleum": BP shuts clean energy HQ, slashes renewables budget, dives into tar sands posted 4 months, 1 week ago 4 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Protests target Environmental Defense's role

  Climate Activists Invade DC Offices of Environmental Defense, Daughter of ED Founder Accuses Group of Pushing False Solutions to Climate Change

  photos at: www.risingtidenorthamerica.org

  As the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change opened today in Poznan, Poland, grassroots climate activists took over the Washington DC office of Environmental Defense. The activists stated that they had targeted ED, one of the largest environmental organizations in the world, because of the organization's key role in promoting the discredited approach of carbon trading as a solution to climate change.

  Dr. Rachel Smolker of Global Justice Ecology Project and Global Forest Coalition read a statement, which said in part, "My father was one of the founders of this organization, which sadly I am now ashamed of. The Kyoto Protocol, the European Emissions Trading Scheme and virtually every other initiative for reducing emissions have adopted their market approaches. So far they have utterly failed, serving only to provide huge profits to the world's most polluting industries. Instead of protecting the environment, ED now seems primarily concerned with protecting corporate bottom lines. I can hear my father rolling over in his grave."

  The activists rearranged furniture in the office, illustrating how marketing carbon is "like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic."  Others held signs reading "Keep the cap, ditch the trade" and "Carbon trading is an environmental offense."

  Leo Cerda, an indigenous activist with Rising Tide Ecuador said, "ED wants to turn the atmosphere and forests into private property, and then give it away to the most polluting industries in the form of pollution allowances that can be bought and sold. Not only is this an ineffective way to control emissions, it is also a disaster for the poor and indigenous peoples who are not party to these markets and are most impacted by climate change."

  ED has been key in establishing the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a business consortium advocating for a cap and trade system with extremely weak emissions reductions. US CAP allows polluters like Duke Energy, Shell, BP, DuPont, and Dow Chemical to claim they are green while continuing with business as usual. In recognition, activists awarded ED the "Corporate Greenwash Award," a three foot tall green paintbrush. "We think this award is appropriate since Environmental Defense spends more time painting polluters green than actually defending the environment," said Matt Wallace of Rising Tide North America.

  Opposition to carbon trading is growing as it becomes apparent that market based schemes do little to fight climate change while helping corporations rake in profits. Earlier this year, over 50 groups came together in the US to denounce carbon trading in a Declaration Against the Use of Carbon Trading Schemes to Address Climate Change. Globally, hundreds of environmental, social justice, and indigenous groups have come together to oppose such market based initiatives as inherently unsustainable and ineffective in creating a just transition away from fossil fuels.On Greens go nuts at U.N. climate talks posted 11 months, 1 week ago 1 Response

• Click here to view comment in original post

  just like europe...

  >A cap and trade system would require offsets to >be additional, verifiable, and transparent (not |>double-counted as something else somewhere in >the system).

  right, just like offsets under Kyoto's and the EU's cap and trade system. Oh wait, those [the CDM] were often bogus too, as mentioned in the article!

  I'm sure someday they'll get it right, be patient: it's not like we're in a hurry to stop the climate crisis...

  carry on polluting, nothing to see here.

  www.RisingTideNorthAmerica.org

  On Bogus offsets merely ease emitter's remorse posted 1 year, 1 month ago 8 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Question to Ken

  Ken, I think this is a great essay, and was suprised you mentioned Rising Tide for criticism here since I think (?) you'd find most people active in our (100% volunteer network) agree with virtually all of what you said - perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't believe we fit with any of your criticisms.

  Were you were saying that our "program" [sic!] is too removed from "climate 24-7" because we believe that the environment can not be viewed in isolation of human oppression - especially when fossil fuel extraction and burning is involved?

  It would suprise me to hear that conflicts with your argument, but it's all I can think of...

  I just not sure what you were getting and and was genuinely curious.

  thanks for the article...

  www.RisingTideNorthAmerica.org

  On The Climate Policy Paradigm has reached its endgame posted 1 year, 5 months ago 21 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  How far we have to go...

  There is something striking about the coalescence of the energy bill and the meetings in Bali.

  Of course, one thing striking in both cases is with all of the progress (at least in terms of increased exposure and awareness to climate change and energy issues) how far we have to go...

  But what most of the environmental movement appears to be missing though is that the distance is not just about targets (reduce co2 a lot by this date, get us off oil): it's increasingly more about the devil in the details, socially, environmentally and even climate unfriendly crap that is supposedly being done to meet these aspirations, aspirations that we ourselves are driving.

  We say no to oil, so we they give us ethanol.
  We say reduce your carbon footprint, we get clean coal + tree plantations to offset it. Or nukes.

  And this isn't from the Republicans, nor just from the Democrats, this is just as much from the supposedly enlightened politicians in the EU, and increasingly from the environmental movement itself.

  I think Jihan Gearon, of the Indigenous Environmental Network said it best:

  "What scares me most about this [UN meeting] isn't that we came out of it with no targets or plan for post-Kyoto. It's that the atmosphere of the discussions seems to focus less on stopping climate change and more on how money can be made from the climate change problem, at the expense of Indigenous People."

  Or another observer this time from Via Campesina in Paraguay, relayed by
  Almuth Ernsting of Biofuelwatch:

  "If we hold up banners saying climate change kills and we want more government action, the very power groups driving the destruction, she warned, will cheer and might give us even more carbon finance or agrofuels. Instead, she suggested, we need to mobilize against the false solutions and for real, meaningful actions that will actually cut emissions and deliver climate justice...The time for marching for 'global action on climate change' without denouncing the false solutions and the drivers of climate change is over."

  I hope that we can all think seriously about our campaigning, and how a lot of messaging and actions plays right into the hands of polluters eager to capitalize on a public that is increasingly desperate for action, and politicians and energy companies more than happy to wrap up a greenwashed package of solutions for them.

  For more thought on this topic, see:
  http://www.altereconews.org/
  http://climatechangeaction.blogspot.com/2007/12/kyoto-mor ...
  http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071224/wysham
  http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/12/11/rigged/ (George Monbiot, it should be noted, bas by no means the first with this assessment, see http://www.oilwatch.org/)
  http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/13/climate-justice ...
  On Bali climate meeting goes overtime, drops specific emissions targets posted 1 year, 11 months ago 2 Responses