Asteroid Miner

author

The Basics

  • Name: Asteroid Miner
  • Email

Asteroid Miner’s Recent Comments

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    #1 source of CO2 is COAL fired power plants

    How do coal fired power plants get ahead of transportation [cars
    and other vehicles] in carbon emissions?   Gasoline, diesel fuel,
    etc. are half hydrogen.   For example, octane is C8H18.   To figure
    out what fraction of  the energy is from burning the carbon, you
    have to look up the heat of formation of carbon dioxide and the
    heat of formation of water.   It takes 1 carbon to make one CO2,
    but it takes 2 hydrogens to make 1 H2O.   You can do the
    arithmetic and apportion the energy between the carbon and the
    hydrogen.   You have to subtract the energy required to break
    down the octane into atoms.   It is easier to remove the hydrogens
    than it is to separate the carbons, so the energy subtracted gets
    apportioned too.  
       Coal is almost pure carbon, except for the URANIUM,
    ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel,
    Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron,
    Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium,
    Manganese, Vanadium, Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium,
    Molybdenum and Zinc that are coal's impurities.   Even though
    transportation uses more energy, coal fired power plants put more
    CO2 into the air.

       Transportation isn't even the second largest CO2 emitter.  
    Industrial processes are.   The largest CO2 emitter of the industrial
    processes is concrete making even though the energy used is less.  
    The first step in concrete making is heating limestone [calcium
    carbonate] to drive off the carbon dioxide to make calcium oxide.  
    Coal is burned to make the heat, but the limestone is the greater
    source of CO2.   Other industrial processes include steel making,
    metal casting, etc.

       The easiest way to make the biggest reduction in CO2 emissions
    is to convert all coal fired power plants to nuclear.   So get over
    your paranoid fears of all things nuclear and get it done.On Researchers find corn ethanol, switchgrass could worsen global warming posted 1 year, 9 months ago 111 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    Extinction of Homo Sapiens

    October 2006 Scientific American

    "EARTH SCIENCE
    Impact from the Deep
    Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not
    asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions.
    Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions build once again?
    By Peter D. Ward
    downloaded from:
    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00037A5D-A938- ...
    ....................Most of the article omitted......................
    But with atmospheric carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm
    and expected to accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900
    ppm by the end of the next century, and conditions that bring
    about the beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place.   How soon
    after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction?   That is
    something our society should never find out."

    Press Release
    Pennsylvania State University
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Monday, Nov. 3, 2003
    downloaded from:
    http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/prPennStateKump.h ...
    "In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and
    the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper
    levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide
    catastrophically. This would kill most of the oceanic plants and
    animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would
    kill most terrestrial life."   That extinction would include humans.

    www.astrobio.net is a NASA web zine.   See:

    http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&n ...

    http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&n ...

    http://www.astrobio.net/news/article2509.html

    http://astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name= ...

    These articles agree with the first 2.   They all say 6 degrees C or
    1000 parts per million CO2 is the extinction point.   The human race goes extinct.

    The global warming is already 1 degree Farenheit.   11 degrees
    Farenheit is about 6 degrees Celsius.   The book "Six Degrees" by
    Mark Lynas agrees.   If the global warming is 6 degrees
    centigrade, we humans go extinct.   See:
    http://www.marklynas.org/2007/4/23/six-steps-to-hell-summ ...On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    Coal contains URANIUM

       Reference:
    OUR NUCLEAR FUTURE:
    THE PATH OF SELECTIVE IGNORANCE
    by Alex Gabbard
    Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    Oak Ridge, TN
    Selections from the 19th Annual Conference
    SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
    March 14,15,16, 1996
    Nashville, Tennessee

    Published by the
    SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
    1996
    Edited by Jack D. Arters, Ed.D.
    Conference Director
    The truth is, all natural rocks contain most natural elements.   Coal
    is a rock.   The average concentration of uranium in coal is 1 or 2
    parts per million.   Illinois coal contains up to 103 parts per
    million uranium.   A 1000 million watt coal fired power plant
    burns 4 million tons of coal each year.   If you multiply 4 million
    tons by 1 part per million, you get 4 tons of uranium.   Most of
    that is U238.   About .7% is U235.   4 tons = 8000 pounds.   8000
    pounds times .7% = 56 pounds of U235.   An average 1 billion
    watt coal fired power plant puts out 56 to 112 pounds of U235
    every year.   There are only 2 places the uranium can go: Up the
    stack or into the cinders.   Since a reactor full fuel load is around
    11 tons of 2% U235 and 98% U238, and one load lasts about 10
    years, and what one coal fired power plant puts into the air and
    cinders fully fuels a nuclear power plant.
    Compare 4 Million tons per year with 1.1 tons per year.   1.1
    divided by 4 Million = 2.75 E -7 = .000000275 =.0000275%.  
    Remember that only 2% of that is U235.   The nuclear power
    plant needs ~44 pounds of U235 per year.   The coal fired power
    plant burns coal by the trainload.   The nuclear power plant
    consumes U235 in such small quantities yearly that you could
    carry that much weight in a briefcase.
       U238 can be bred into Plutonium and Thorium can be bred into
    Uranium.   We can fuel our nuclear power plants for
    CENTURIES just by extracting uranium and thorium from coal
    cinders and smoke.

       Coal is almost pure carbon, except for the URANIUM,
    ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel,
    Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron,
    Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium,
    Manganese, Vanadium, Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium,
    Molybdenum and Zinc that are coal's impurities.   Coal smoke and
    cinders are commercially viable ORE for the above elements.

    Chinese industrial grade coal is sometimes stolen by peasants for
    cooking.   The result is that the whole family dies of arsenic
    poisoning because Chinese industrial grade coal contains large
    amounts of arsenic.  Coal varies a lot.   You have to analyze it not
    only mine by mine but even lump by lump.
    On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    CO2 Sequestration Worse than Yucca Mountain

    Al Gore's Live Earth Pledge has a fatal flaw: "the capacity
    to safely trap and store the CO2."   There is no safe way to
    confine trillions of tons of CO2 at high pressure for ever.  
    For Ever is a lot longer than the 100000 years that people
    want nuclear "waste" to be stored.   The CO2 WILL
    leak out and suffocate millions of people.   CO2 is denser
    than air and displaces air at ground level.   CO2 has caused
    suffocation in Africa.   See:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/1155057.stm    

    "Cameroon's 'killer lake' degassed"
    "More than 1,700 people died after deadly gases spewed
    from Lake Nyos 15 years ago. "
    "In August 1986, the lake released a cloud of carbon
    dioxide which hugged the ground and flowed down
    surrounding valleys to suffocate thousands of local villagers
    and animals.

    The rare phenomenon also occurred at Lake Monoun in the
    same volcanic zone two years earlier killing 34 people. "

    The CO2 storage facilities proposed by Al Gore, besides
    being prone to leak, will be a target for terrorists.      A
    terrorist has only to cause a leak to kill more people than a
    nuclear bomb would.   Leaks are very easy to cause in high
    pressure containers.   CO2 storage is a silent disaster
    waiting to happen.      

    The pledge Should read: "I will learn enough about nuclear
    physics so that I will no longer be paranoid about nuclear
    power.   I will advocate the replacement of coal fired power
    plants with the newest nuclear power plant designs."

        I [Asteroid Miner] have no financial or other interest in
    nuclear power and no connection with the nuclear power
    industry.

    It is HOT CO2 that goes up smolestacks.   Being hot it is
    less dense so it goes up and disperses.   Stored CO2 is cool.  
    A gas gets colder as it leaks out from high pressure to low
    pressure.   That is the secret of air conditioning.   CO2 at
    the same temperature as air is denser than air because CO2
    is a heavier molecule than N2 or O2.   The cold CO2 will
    stick to the ground and suffocate people and other animals.  
    No other gas is required to explain the deaths in Cameroon.  
    Here in the US, more CO2 will leak out into areas with
    more people, so the death toll could be in the millions.On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 Responses

  • Click here to view comment in original post

    Recycle nuclear fuel

    Yucca Mountain contains an enormous supply of nuclear fuel that
    should not be wasted.
    We don't recycle nuclear fuel because spent fuel is valuable and
    people steal it.   The place it went that it wasn't supposed to go to
    is Israel.   This happened in a small town near Pittsburgh, PA circa
    1970.   A company called Numec was in the business of
    reprocessing nuclear fuel.   I almost took a job there, designing a
    nuclear battery for a heart pacemaker.   [A nuclear battery would
    have the advantage of lasting many times as long as any other
    battery, eliminating many surgeries to replace batteries.]   Numec
    did NOT have a reactor.   Numec "lost" half a ton of enriched
    uranium.   It wound up in Israel.   The Israelis have fueled both
    their nuclear power plants and their nuclear weapons by stealing
    nuclear "waste."   It could work for any other country, such as Iran
    or the United States.   It is only when you don't have access to
    nuclear "waste" that you have to do the difficult process of
    enriching uranium, unless you have a Canadian "CANDU"
    reactor or a British Magnox reactor, both of which run on
    unenriched uranium.  
    Numec is no longer in business.   The reprocessing of nuclear fuel
    in the US stopped.   That was the only politically possible solution
    at that time, given that private corporations did the reprocessing.  
    My solution would be to reprocess the fuel at a Government
    Owned Government Operated [GOGO] facility.   At a GOGO
    plant, bureaucracy and the multiplicity of ethnicity and religion
    would disable the transportation of uranium to Israel or to any
    unauthorized place.   Nothing heavier than a secret would get out.On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 Responses

View All
Advertisment
Advertisment