Asteroid Miner
The Basics
- Name: Asteroid Miner
Asteroid Miner’s Recent Comments
Click here to view comment in original post
#1 source of CO2 is COAL fired power plants
How do coal fired power plants get ahead of transportation [cars
and other vehicles] in carbon emissions? Gasoline, diesel fuel,
etc. are half hydrogen. For example, octane is C8H18. To figure
out what fraction of the energy is from burning the carbon, you
have to look up the heat of formation of carbon dioxide and the
heat of formation of water. It takes 1 carbon to make one CO2,
but it takes 2 hydrogens to make 1 H2O. You can do the
arithmetic and apportion the energy between the carbon and the
hydrogen. You have to subtract the energy required to break
down the octane into atoms. It is easier to remove the hydrogens
than it is to separate the carbons, so the energy subtracted gets
apportioned too.
Coal is almost pure carbon, except for the URANIUM,
ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel,
Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron,
Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium,
Manganese, Vanadium, Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium,
Molybdenum and Zinc that are coal's impurities. Even though
transportation uses more energy, coal fired power plants put more
CO2 into the air.Transportation isn't even the second largest CO2 emitter.
Industrial processes are. The largest CO2 emitter of the industrial
processes is concrete making even though the energy used is less.
The first step in concrete making is heating limestone [calcium
carbonate] to drive off the carbon dioxide to make calcium oxide.
Coal is burned to make the heat, but the limestone is the greater
source of CO2. Other industrial processes include steel making,
metal casting, etc.The easiest way to make the biggest reduction in CO2 emissions
is to convert all coal fired power plants to nuclear. So get over
your paranoid fears of all things nuclear and get it done.On Researchers find corn ethanol, switchgrass could worsen global warming posted 1 year, 9 months ago 111 ResponsesClick here to view comment in original post
Extinction of Homo Sapiens
October 2006 Scientific American
"EARTH SCIENCE
Impact from the Deep
Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not
asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions.
Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions build once again?
By Peter D. Ward
downloaded from:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00037A5D-A938- ...
....................Most of the article omitted......................
But with atmospheric carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm
and expected to accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900
ppm by the end of the next century, and conditions that bring
about the beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place. How soon
after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction? That is
something our society should never find out."Press Release
Pennsylvania State University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, Nov. 3, 2003
downloaded from:
http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/prPennStateKump.h ...
"In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and
the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper
levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide
catastrophically. This would kill most of the oceanic plants and
animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would
kill most terrestrial life." That extinction would include humans.www.astrobio.net is a NASA web zine. See:
http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&n ...
http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&n ...
http://www.astrobio.net/news/article2509.html
http://astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name= ...
These articles agree with the first 2. They all say 6 degrees C or
1000 parts per million CO2 is the extinction point. The human race goes extinct.The global warming is already 1 degree Farenheit. 11 degrees
Farenheit is about 6 degrees Celsius. The book "Six Degrees" by
Mark Lynas agrees. If the global warming is 6 degrees
centigrade, we humans go extinct. See:
http://www.marklynas.org/2007/4/23/six-steps-to-hell-summ ...On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 ResponsesClick here to view comment in original post
Coal contains URANIUM
Reference:
OUR NUCLEAR FUTURE:
THE PATH OF SELECTIVE IGNORANCE
by Alex Gabbard
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, TN
Selections from the 19th Annual Conference
SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
March 14,15,16, 1996
Nashville, TennesseePublished by the
SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
1996
Edited by Jack D. Arters, Ed.D.
Conference Director
The truth is, all natural rocks contain most natural elements. Coal
is a rock. The average concentration of uranium in coal is 1 or 2
parts per million. Illinois coal contains up to 103 parts per
million uranium. A 1000 million watt coal fired power plant
burns 4 million tons of coal each year. If you multiply 4 million
tons by 1 part per million, you get 4 tons of uranium. Most of
that is U238. About .7% is U235. 4 tons = 8000 pounds. 8000
pounds times .7% = 56 pounds of U235. An average 1 billion
watt coal fired power plant puts out 56 to 112 pounds of U235
every year. There are only 2 places the uranium can go: Up the
stack or into the cinders. Since a reactor full fuel load is around
11 tons of 2% U235 and 98% U238, and one load lasts about 10
years, and what one coal fired power plant puts into the air and
cinders fully fuels a nuclear power plant.
Compare 4 Million tons per year with 1.1 tons per year. 1.1
divided by 4 Million = 2.75 E -7 = .000000275 =.0000275%.
Remember that only 2% of that is U235. The nuclear power
plant needs ~44 pounds of U235 per year. The coal fired power
plant burns coal by the trainload. The nuclear power plant
consumes U235 in such small quantities yearly that you could
carry that much weight in a briefcase.
U238 can be bred into Plutonium and Thorium can be bred into
Uranium. We can fuel our nuclear power plants for
CENTURIES just by extracting uranium and thorium from coal
cinders and smoke.Coal is almost pure carbon, except for the URANIUM,
ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel,
Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron,
Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium,
Manganese, Vanadium, Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium,
Molybdenum and Zinc that are coal's impurities. Coal smoke and
cinders are commercially viable ORE for the above elements.Chinese industrial grade coal is sometimes stolen by peasants for
cooking. The result is that the whole family dies of arsenic
poisoning because Chinese industrial grade coal contains large
amounts of arsenic. Coal varies a lot. You have to analyze it not
only mine by mine but even lump by lump.
On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 ResponsesClick here to view comment in original post
CO2 Sequestration Worse than Yucca Mountain
Al Gore's Live Earth Pledge has a fatal flaw: "the capacity
to safely trap and store the CO2." There is no safe way to
confine trillions of tons of CO2 at high pressure for ever.
For Ever is a lot longer than the 100000 years that people
want nuclear "waste" to be stored. The CO2 WILL
leak out and suffocate millions of people. CO2 is denser
than air and displaces air at ground level. CO2 has caused
suffocation in Africa. See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/1155057.stm"Cameroon's 'killer lake' degassed"
"More than 1,700 people died after deadly gases spewed
from Lake Nyos 15 years ago. "
"In August 1986, the lake released a cloud of carbon
dioxide which hugged the ground and flowed down
surrounding valleys to suffocate thousands of local villagers
and animals.The rare phenomenon also occurred at Lake Monoun in the
same volcanic zone two years earlier killing 34 people. "The CO2 storage facilities proposed by Al Gore, besides
being prone to leak, will be a target for terrorists. A
terrorist has only to cause a leak to kill more people than a
nuclear bomb would. Leaks are very easy to cause in high
pressure containers. CO2 storage is a silent disaster
waiting to happen.The pledge Should read: "I will learn enough about nuclear
physics so that I will no longer be paranoid about nuclear
power. I will advocate the replacement of coal fired power
plants with the newest nuclear power plant designs."I [Asteroid Miner] have no financial or other interest in
nuclear power and no connection with the nuclear power
industry.It is HOT CO2 that goes up smolestacks. Being hot it is
less dense so it goes up and disperses. Stored CO2 is cool.
A gas gets colder as it leaks out from high pressure to low
pressure. That is the secret of air conditioning. CO2 at
the same temperature as air is denser than air because CO2
is a heavier molecule than N2 or O2. The cold CO2 will
stick to the ground and suffocate people and other animals.
No other gas is required to explain the deaths in Cameroon.
Here in the US, more CO2 will leak out into areas with
more people, so the death toll could be in the millions.On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 ResponsesClick here to view comment in original post
Recycle nuclear fuel
Yucca Mountain contains an enormous supply of nuclear fuel that
should not be wasted.
We don't recycle nuclear fuel because spent fuel is valuable and
people steal it. The place it went that it wasn't supposed to go to
is Israel. This happened in a small town near Pittsburgh, PA circa
1970. A company called Numec was in the business of
reprocessing nuclear fuel. I almost took a job there, designing a
nuclear battery for a heart pacemaker. [A nuclear battery would
have the advantage of lasting many times as long as any other
battery, eliminating many surgeries to replace batteries.] Numec
did NOT have a reactor. Numec "lost" half a ton of enriched
uranium. It wound up in Israel. The Israelis have fueled both
their nuclear power plants and their nuclear weapons by stealing
nuclear "waste." It could work for any other country, such as Iran
or the United States. It is only when you don't have access to
nuclear "waste" that you have to do the difficult process of
enriching uranium, unless you have a Canadian "CANDU"
reactor or a British Magnox reactor, both of which run on
unenriched uranium.
Numec is no longer in business. The reprocessing of nuclear fuel
in the US stopped. That was the only politically possible solution
at that time, given that private corporations did the reprocessing.
My solution would be to reprocess the fuel at a Government
Owned Government Operated [GOGO] facility. At a GOGO
plant, bureaucracy and the multiplicity of ethnicity and religion
would disable the transportation of uranium to Israel or to any
unauthorized place. Nothing heavier than a secret would get out.On Edwards puts the coal issue into the Dem debate posted 1 year, 10 months ago 20 Responses