Delay And Deny’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  With all the discussion about What we burn or consume for energy we don't seem to talk much about the Where. For solar panel advocates, there is a model where every house has a rooftop collector, and another that says big solar farms are better. These advocates seem neutral as far as the ownership of the production mechanism. Because of the obsession with CO2, many of the problems of traditional pollution have been neglected. For example, a recent study showed that most of our nations schools are near highways, and so children are exposed to noxious streams of fumes from autos. While enviros spin their wheels arguing about carbon credits, they fail the public, who would benefit in their cities and towns from an immediate conversion to hydrogen. With a hydrogen, we can manage the initial production from hydrocarbon sources and sequester the by products, until we switch to the Nocera process using only solar and renewable sources to generate H2 from water.On Is "we're going to burn the coal anyway" an argument for carbon sequestration? posted 5 days, 20 hours ago 40 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Rural low population states are the future. The city is obsolete. Technology now allows familes to free the grid and high taxing Democrat machine. Live free! Vote Palin 2012.On How 7.4% of Americans can block humanity's efforts to save itself posted 1 week ago 8 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Latest Gallup poll shows people now preferring Republicans to Democrats 48% to 44%. Looks like Climate Gougers have bilked the public a bit too much...On We have met the deniers, and they are us posted 1 week ago 147 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  Imagine if you could live life without being hard wired to a "grid" (whether smart, dumb or middling). Imagine being able to build or drag a pre-fab house to some remote acres, plop it down and begin living there? What would you need? Well, you'd need energy. No problem. Wind and solar can generate hydrogen, which can be used to power the house, and to power your vehicle (like an emissions free Hummer, so you don't need roads). How about communications? Get a wimax antenna and Internet away. How about water? That's always been a hard one...but now you're telling me you can capture it from mist! Even if you do choose a spot near water it might not be potable. No problem...if you're using a hydrogen fuel cell, the by product is water! So you can electrolyze some brackish or mist water, make hydrogen and when you use it in the fuel cell, pure water emerges as the "exhaust". A complete self sustained eco-system on your little acres of land.On Peru slum goes cutting edge as 'fog catcher' posted 1 week ago 3 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  "the BMI effect regarding the minimum wage were more pronounced among high income earners rather than among low income earners. " Soooo...you're saying what? I don't understand this article and I got 750 on the reading part of the SATs. Somehow a minimum wage job makes you eat fast food, which makes you fat, but rich people are eating fast food and they're fat too?!? Here's something that does interest me though...fast food is no longer cheap! To get one of the supersized meals "with all the amenities" can sometimes end up costing 6 or 7 dollars. Well, I just went to my favorit Thai place for lunch and had a heaping plate of Jungle Fried Rice for $7. See, it's all about choices. I've actually been seeing food prices at my local Top Food come crashing down...for meats in some cases by half. I cook a lot at home, and you can make lots per person for way less than even fast food per person. In fact, one of my problems is I'm a good cook and live alone, so I end up eating 3 or 4 portions and could lose a few pounds...however, it's all "good cholesterol"...right?On How the 40 year drop in the minimum wage helped cause obesity posted 1 week, 2 days ago 3 Responses