EBJSCIENCE’s Recent Comments

• Click here to view comment in original post

  I don't appreciate your sarcasim and arogance and I don't trust anything on Wikipedia. I will take your advice and search for myself, so I don't have to deal with arogant individuals like yourself. Sorry to bother you.On "Global cooling" scam debunked yet again posted 1 month ago 17 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  MANYMANY2- That was too funny. But if you live in Canada, it might not be too bad a thing. I used to live in Minot, ND and that place could use some warming. I often tell stories to my kids how miserable the winter were and the summers were on tepid. I tell kids that it was 9 months of winter and 3 months of spring.On "Global cooling" scam debunked yet again posted 1 month ago 17 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  DTROM4, Thanks for the web site. I reviewed several of the articles and study and they state that their belief is that increasing levels of CO2 are causing some of the warming, but, I looked at a study on pollutants and it appears that black carbon particles from burning coal is a greater contributor to increasing temperatures than CO2. I think it is more important to use our energy & resources to reduce the use of coal than to try and pass a cap & trade tax on CO2 which I think will do more to make a certain few individuals wealthy than to reduce global warming. I don't know why the environmentalist refuse to look at nuclear plants to produce electricity, thereby perpetuating the use of coal to produce electricity. There are some risk to Nuclear power, but if global warming is so dangerous, then I think it is worth the risk. We have not had a nuclear plant failure in 30 years or so and the technology is getting better. Why is it we (Americans) are building nuclear plants in India and other foreign countries, yet we have not built one in America in a long time. If I remember right, we only produce 15% of our electricity with Nuclear power, yet France produces 90% of their electricity with Nuclear power. We are missing the boat and the rest of the world is passing us by due to our unjustified fear of Nuclear power.On "Global cooling" scam debunked yet again posted 1 month ago 17 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  What I see is that the statisticians that move it one year or the other are doing the same type of analysis that they say the global cooling scientist are doing. I am looking the the data for the past 100 years so I can look at it myself and not depend on one side or the other to cherry pick the data for me to make their point. I am a free thinker and want the true data because both sides have a agenda to push. Can you point me to a site that has the actual data of temperatures for the past 100 or so years?On "Global cooling" scam debunked yet again posted 1 month ago 17 Responses

• Click here to view comment in original post

  I have a question, what did the analysis of the statisticians say. All you state is that it did not show global cooling, but did they say it showed a upward trend that would lead them to believe in global warming. It sounds like it looked flat. If it does not show a upward trend them maybe we need to rethink the assumption that there is global warming. Unless we are honest about the data, then we loose all credibility. Is there any way I can see the data that was presented. I am not a statistician, but I have a degree that had a lot of statistics in it. I would greatly be interested in looking at the data and how it was collected myself.On "Global cooling" scam debunked yet again posted 1 month ago 17 Responses