|
|
Poverty & the Environment: A Grist Special Series
|
|
Work in ProgressAlan Hipólito, creator of green jobs for low-income people, answers Grist's questions27 Feb 2006
Verde offers a helping hand in the form of green jobs for low-income folks.
Photo: iStockphoto.
Really it means that we had a perfectly reasonable and very frustrating realization: that low-income folks -- people who really, really need good and healthy jobs -- weren't really getting much of sustainable development's economic benefits. So we thought, "Damn if they're going to grow this economy without us."
Nursery employees receive family wages with benefits, work in a healthy and environmentally beneficial field, have year-round and full-time employment, receive job training, and have the chance for revenue sharing. They will also have the chance to become business owners, either through nursery ownership or through Verde support to establish their own landscaping and/or nursery businesses.
Hacienda CDC residents proudly display the fruits of their gardening project labors.
Photo: Hacienda CDC.
In 2001, while working at an affordable-housing provider named Hacienda Community Development Corporation, I participated in a fellowship, the Environmental Leadership Program. We had lots of conversations -- about diversity, environmental justice, the environmental movement's homogeneous demographic, etc. -- and it made me wonder what would happen if major environmental groups decided to prioritize those environmental policies with the best potential to deliver job and business opportunities to low-income and people-of-color communities.
Introduction to the series.
How environmentalism got its elitist tinge.
Photos of Louisiana towns battered by Katrina.
A look at the poultry farms ravaging the South.
How coal mining has scarred the hills of Appalachia.
A virtual walking tour of the polluted South Bronx.
More stories on poverty & the environment.
Spend your $.02
Discuss this story.
Think about a situation familiar to many Grist readers: a (city, county, state, whatever) council hearing on proposed new, stronger watershed-protection rules. On one side are the environmentalists, and on the other side the property-rights, wise-use types. For an elected official, this is a pretty standard debate.
What if a different group of people walked in -- the kind of people who (right now) don't attend council hearings on watershed protection -- and they said something like, "We like these stronger rules because they mean a better income for us and better lives for our families. Watershed-protection rules created this job I have right now -- a good job, with a good wage and benefits. I moved out of affordable housing, and one day, I might start my own restoration business." What would happen then?
|
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
![]() From the Archives
Guerillas in the Midst. Steve Frillmann, community-garden guru, answers questions.
Getting Evon. Evon Peter, director of Native Movement, answers questions.
Some Like It Hauter. Wenonah Hauter, director of Food and Water Watch, answers questions.
|
|