
How does the public go about reducing the amount of energy used in the home? -- Daniel Barker, Lakeland, Fla.

When it comes to energy use in buildings, conservation should come first -- way first. Many people want to invest in some cool new energy technology, and while supporting that product development is important, conservation is more so. In residential buildings, insulation and stopping air leakage is the biggest issue by far -- this saves energy (and of course money) both in winter and in summer. Depending on your building, good simple conservation upgrades include adding insulation, weather-stripping, replacing single-paned windows, and upgrading old appliances.

I recently toured a couple of straw-bale homes, and I got pretty excited about them. Have you worked on straw-bale construction? -- Mike Tate, Denver, Colo.

Many
ADPSR members are involved in alternative construction (or "natural building") with various materials, and I had the pleasure of working on a 25,000 square-foot straw-bale, low-energy winery project myself a few years ago. I hope to do more straw-bale work in the future; it's fun and fosters an optimistic attitude about how architecture can heal the world.

I'm wondering whether you think the prison-design boycott will have a net positive effect -- won't it just result in the prisons being designed by people who won't think about the environmental and human impacts of their buildings? It's not (alone, anyway) going to stop prisons from being built, so shouldn't they be built by people who might put in, say, green areas? -- Grace Burson, New Haven, Conn.

The problem with prisons isn't that they waste energy but that they waste people. Given the injustice built into the U.S. legal system today, we have the highest number of people in jail
per capita in the entire world and five to 10 times more than any other industrialized country. Most of these people don't belong in prison, and in any case, the problems people are in for won't be solved in prison anyway. We could save far more money by closing prisons filled with people in for low-level drug crimes and doing community treatment and diversion programs than by making prison operations more efficient or "nicer."
Prisons have been the subject of reform efforts basically since they were conceived, so I think that actually we need to get beyond the idea of the "better" prison. And boycotts do often work, for instance against apartheid in South Africa. ADPSR's
Prison Design Boycott Campaign is intended to draw attention to positive alternatives to prison, most notably the necessity for community development to give people more to live for and add to society, instead of degrading it. This is where most architects would rather be spending our time anyway, but the public funding for prisons basically usurps the funds that could go to affordable housing, better schools, community centers, job creation, etc.
In The Same Vein
Jail SpinAn interview with activists at the Prison Moratorium Project

What does the ADPSR prison boycott have to do with environmentalism? Why should I care about this as someone who cares about the larger issues of the health of the planet? -- Adam Weiss, Oakland, Calif.

As for the connection to the environment, I think the most important thing to recognize is that the same mentality that licenses the destruction of the environment is responsible for the U.S. policy of mass incarceration as well. This mentality privileges wealthy individuals (and the corporations they own) and tramples on those with little voice, from endangered ecosystems to people of color. I think to successfully challenge the inequality of the status quo, we must recognize the similarity of these situations and respond with a consistent message of equality, justice, and toleration for all, not just for the few. It is actually more possible to solve the environmental and prison problems together than separately. For
Grist readers who agree and happen to be architects, designers, or planners, I hope you'll take a moment to join the prison design boycott's
pledge campaign.

What advice would you give those of us exploring careers in green building? What educational background or hands-on experiences are most sought-after by employers? -- K. Kirkland, Seattle, Wash.

If you're looking for some education and you're willing to be patient, ADPSR is actually publishing in September a whole
guide to ecological building programs via our publishing arm, New Village Press.
As for skills, doing green design and green building doesn't get you off the hook for doing basic good design and construction. And in fact, a lot of green design strategies are just commonplace good ideas that the conventional design and construction process has forgotten about or cuts corners on. So be sure you learn the basics first and what it takes to do a good job, and you'll be halfway there. You can bring alternative materials to new employers more convincingly once you've shown that you are comfortable with the conventional materials they know.
As for more specific skills like building-energy modeling, make friends with good consultants in those fields (if that's not what you want to study yourself). Even relatively small projects require multiple engineers and other consultants; knowing who to work with and how to work with them is a great skill to have. Plus, us green-building folks are nice people, too!

Do you have any advice for dealing with zoning people and building inspectors who aren't friendly to nonconventional environmental alternatives? -- Jan Steinman, West Linn, Ore.

Building inspectors who are unfamiliar with these techniques can be a real obstacle (as can mortgage lenders, incidentally), although they mostly are serious about their role in protecting public safety. If only they put environmental safety on the same level! Various groups have support materials you can use to help building officials get educated, including the
Development Center for Appropriate Technology, the
California Straw Building Association, and
The Last Straw journal. There's also a variety of books on adobe, cob, rammed earth, straw bale, and other methods on the shelves.

My husband and I would like to build our own green home within five years, with straw bales, rammed earth, recycled shipping containers, or other such nontraditional building materials. Can you recommend a particular building material over others? Are there areas of the U.S. that you predict will be more open than others to accepting these buildings as "safe" five years from now? -- Katherine Wimble, Falls Church, Va.

Different alternative materials lend themselves to different goals, from minimizing energy use to sculpting your house by hand. Please note that the energy-saving benefits of the thermal mass of earth materials are sometimes over-hyped; they are mostly lost if the building exterior is not well insulated by some other material with a high insulation factor (like straw). In my experience, the West Coast, Southwest, and Colorado are the most receptive areas to these techniques, but even here it varies by locality. Many alternatives are applicable almost everywhere, and I hope their use and sophistication will spread!

A furor has come up in New York City that jeopardizes passage of a "green" municipal building law. The issue revolves around Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design standards and whether Sustainable Forestry Initiative standards should be added to the legislative language. What is the problem with SFI? -- Nancy Anderson, New York, N.Y.

One of the biggest differences between
Forest Stewardship Council and
Sustainable Forestry Initiative is that FSC requires third-party certification while SFI does not, so if a forestry company chooses to lie about its forest practices but sell its wood with an SFI stamp, no one would actually know. Because eco-labeled wood is more valuable, the incentive is there for forest companies to do exactly this; even President Reagan said "trust but verify." Another big problem is that SFI has less stringent standards for protecting overall forest ecosystem health -- for instance, clear-cut logging can be allowed under SFI.
But what gets me angriest is that SFI is a program created by the timber industry specifically to compete with the FSC standard in order to muddy the water for consumers and greenwash bad corporate behavior. The folks who drew up SFI could have spent their time working to comply with FSC and protect forests, but instead they chose to intentionally generate disinformation. They are wasting even their own time, and yet they ask us to believe they stand for conservation!
The latest published draft of
LEED version 2.2 seems to have again excluded SFI from counting for LEED points. I'm very happy that the
U.S. Green Building Council (publisher of LEED) has taken that stance; I hope this will help to resolve the issue for New York.

Here at the Northern Alaska Environmental Center we would like to set a good example, but it takes a lot of energy to survive in this climate, and we don't have too many options in terms of solar or wind power. Since our boiler needs replacing anyhow, we have been toying with the idea of a wood-pellet boiler. They burn pellets made from sawdust, bark, and other waste, and are highly efficient. Is this a technology you'd recommend? Are there others? -- Nancy Fresco, Fairbanks, Alaska

In commercial and industrial buildings, investing in energy-efficient lighting, or window treatments that will allow you to use daylight effectively, are great candidates for energy savings. Don't even think of solar panels until you've done these.
In an extreme climate like Alaska, extra insulation will really pay off -- you may even be able to justify triple-paned windows or re-cladding your building in an additional layer of rigid insulation if you compare these measures to your annual fuel costs. You will still need some kind of extra heater (although I've heard of demonstration houses in Scandinavia that are fully heated by a 100-watt light bulb!), and a pellet stove seems like a good idea. To get information about energy use, consider a Home Energy Rating Survey by a licensed energy auditor.

What information or resources are available for public planning commissioners and county supervisors on "retrofitting" existing residential communities that resulted from sprawl development of the '80s and '90s, in order to make these places more "green"? -- L. Miller, Springfield, Va.

Fighting sprawl is a huge concern both for environmentalists and the majority of planners. The
American Planning Association supports policies to reinforce existing urban cores and reduce sprawl. The
Congress for the New Urbanism has developed model codes for communities that want a "traditional" downtown. The state of Maryland is a real leader in
"Smart Growth" legislation and might have some helpful examples and staff people to answer questions. Even the Centers for Disease Control has published information on the
negative health effects of sprawl [PDF] and how to counter them. You should be able to get various resources from these groups. Good luck with rezoning; it's vitally important and a big challenge at all levels!