Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Victual Reality

Risky Business

Thoughts from a small farm during the midwinter lull

By Tom Philpott
10 Jan 2007
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Before I became a farmer three growing seasons ago, I lived in Brooklyn, N.Y., and reveled in the array of top-flight local produce available from mid-spring to late fall. Long about January, though, a kind of local-food withdrawal would set in.

Winter on the farm.
Frosty, with a chance of failure.
Photo: iStockphoto
By this time of year, the legendary produce aisle of the Park Slope Food Co-op would be given over mainly to dull vegetables trucked in from the mega-organic farms of California, Arizona, and Mexico. My beloved Clinton Hill CSA -- which introduced me to the community-supported agriculture model now in use at my own Maverick Farms -- was hibernating. And the usually bustling Grand Army Plaza Green Market would be operating in shell form, frequented by shivering diehards like me and a few dairy, meat, apple, and egg vendors.

I have to admit, while tending my winter braises and pining for spicy salad greens, I gave little thought to what was actually happening on the farms that sustained me during the growing season.

Now I know: Winter is the planning season on a small-scale farm, the time to sort out budgets, seed orders, and marketing plans, and figure out who's going to do what and when. Recently, while engaged in that process, I've been pondering lessons I've learned since coming to the farm that I wish I had known back when I was an urban local-food enthusiast.

One lesson I've learned viscerally: Small-scale farming is an inherently fragile process. In the summer months, farmers' markets across the nation bustle with vendors selling gorgeous produce at prices well above the factory-farmed wares sold at supermarkets. Surveying these vivid and life-affirming scenes, it's easy to assume that here in the U.S. we've managed to create a robust economic model for small-scale farming.

In reality, the economics of small-scale farming -- even close to booming markets like New York City -- are dismal. Large-scale industrial farming replaces human labor with energy-intensive machinery and health-destroying chemicals; the small-scale farms that supply the nation's burgeoning green market scene generally reject those methods, and are much more labor intensive. That means that the premium you pay for an heirloom tomato might not be covering its real cost of production.

Anecdotally, I know that the great bulk of small-scale farms operate on the following model: One spouse runs the farm, while the other one holds a full-time off-farm job, securing such luxuries as health care and retirement benefits and anchoring family finances. In my area, the off-farm spouse typically works in the public school system; in New York state's Finger Lakes district, which supplies New York City with some of the finest produce available there, the state prison system supplies farm families with gainful employment as guards.

USDA numbers back up my observation: According to a report [PDF] issued early in 2006, the average farm with annual sales between $10,000 and $99,000 -- which describes the great bulk of farms geared toward local markets -- had an operating profit margin of negative 24.8 percent in 2003. Off-farm work -- whether as a schoolteacher, a prison guard, or a weekly food-politics columnist -- papers over the difference.

Big Risks, Small Rewards


Before I get a spate of triumphant emails claiming that small-scale farming doesn't work because it's an economic disaster, and should thus be scrapped, consider this: Farming has always been an economically vexed activity. Every spring since the birth of agriculture 10,000 years ago, farmers have deposited little pellets in the ground and crossed their fingers. You never really know what's going to come up -- or whether flood, pestilence, drought, or some other calamity is going to wipe out your efforts.

As Richard Manning shows in his Against the Grain: How Agriculture Has Hijacked Civilization, human history since agriculture's emergence has been regularly marked by famine, or periods when the economics of farming collapse and people starve.

According to one comforting fantasy, large-scale, chemical-intensive farming -- which has been providing a steady supply of cheap food for as long as most people can remember -- has resolved agriculture's economic dilemmas.

There are at least two problems with that statement. First, in historical terms, industrial agriculture was born yesterday. For just five decades now, we've devoted the great bulk of our arable land to an agriculture that supercharges yields not by carefully building fertile soil, but by dousing it with synthetic fertilizers and pesticides while relying on an ever-narrowing genetic basis of plant and animal varieties. There's absolutely no reason to believe such practices can sustain themselves over time.

Secondly, farmers' earnings have plummeted since industrial agriculture's rise. Surging yields have meant steadily dwindling prices for farm goods, forcing farmers to "get big or get out," in the notorious phrase of Richard Nixon's USDA secretary, Earl "Rusty" Butz. But to "get big" and get outfitted with the latest yield-boosting technologies proffered by seed and equipment conglomerates, farmers have to take on ruinous debt loads and watch their profit margins plunge.

If small-scale farm operations look mainly to off-farm work to supplement incomes, their large-scale counterparts look to Washington, D.C. The government doles out about $20 billion per year in farm subsidies; the largest operations, which according to industrial-agriculture dogma are the most efficient, capture nearly all of that money.

So let's be straight: Agriculture is and always has been a tough racket. Societies support it because people like to eat.

The question is how to support it. The new Congress will soon begin cobbling together the next farm bill, the five-year plan that dictates federal food and agricultural policy. I'll turn my attention to that topic soon.

For now, as farmers and consumers await the next growing season, remember that while all farming is economically precarious, small-scale farmers operate without much of a safety net at all. They're subsidized not by the government but rather by their own and their families' off-farm labor.

How can you help? One way is to join a CSA. By buying a share in a farm's harvest now, you're injecting cash into a farm at a time of year when little other money is coming in and seeds need to be bought. And you're sharing in the inherent risk that farmers take every time they drop little pellets into a field and cross their fingers.

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Got a question about where your last supper came from?

Grist contributing writer Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (9 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

farming and teaching

Thanks, Tom, for yet another elegant and evocative essay.  There is something solid, beautiful and satisfying about that division of labor: one spouse teaches, and the other runs the farm.  My understanding is that the conventional American school year, with its long vacation between mid-June and the beginning of September, was originally designed to accommodate farming families, who needed to have their children help out during the growing season.

"Prison guard" has associations of a less happy sort ...

By the way, has your growing season been noticeably growing longer, what with global warming kicking in?  Are you planting earlier?  Do you count on larger harvests?

I do not think my husband has heard of the Community-Supported Agriculture program, but I believe he would be interested.  He is a devoted customer at the farmers' market that is set up a couple of days a week here on Broadway, between 114th and 115th Streets.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Risky Business

Thank you for this eye opening article.  I come from a farming family but was never part of the "big" decisions.  Recently after the passing of several of the large shareholders, talk of selling began.  It breaks my heart to think of it and have asked if we could try to put together a group of other family members to try to buy out the others. Hence I have been researching different farming models.  I was curious if the loss (24.8%)you quoted included food provided to the family from the farm.  

Sell energy Joey

Biogas from manure and farm waste, wind and solar energy producing income by selling kwhs into the grid can make farms profitable again.

That can support a switch to rotational grazing and eventually to organic farming, using the organic fertilizer from the waste digestor.  

It's the new wave.  Here in wisconsin 25% of dairy farms have gone to rotational grazing.  And a substantial movement to biogas energy sales is underway as well.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

risky biz

Farming is a riskey biz only for small/family farms. The huge subsidies given to the Agribiz farms,at taxpayer's expense make their work easy. If you take away the artificial price supports that Agribiz gets, organic/family/small farm practices are actully more efficient and economical...and the benefits to both the environment and the health of all of us are priceless.  We all need to be aware of and to support all of the alternatives to Agribiz and to make Congress change the Farm Programs to truly reflect who needs supports and who doesn't. As usual Tom, great essay!  

we are all a part of the web,what we do to the web, we do to ourselves
Changing growing season

The USDA has updated the hardiness zones to reflect a warmer climate.

At least one of the regional flower societies (think "Best in Show", but with daffodils) is considering moving shows to earlier in the year because of the earlier spring.

Ionizing radiation in organic farming?

Sorry to hijack the thread, but a friend of mine asked me (knower of all things organic, presumably) why, specifically, ionizing radiation is not allowed in organic farming.

I assume that, given the holistic intention of organic farming to promote healthy soil, plants, animals, etc., radiation of any form is simply considered "bad."  But is there any specific reason?  A loss of nutrients in food?  Damage to soil?  Etc.?  Not sure how historically that rule came about, so thought I would ask our learned Gristmillers and see if anyone knew.  

Thanks,
Kaela

ionizing radiation

High-energy radiation might be okay for plants that are destined for the plate right away, but I can see two major causes for caution here:

(1) Radiation causes genetic mutations (ask a farmer in Southern Chile), so if a fertile seed happens to be irradiated and then germinate, who knows what kind of frankentomato might emerge.

(2) If any of the organic matter becomes chemically active, it might (at best) kill vitamins or (at worst) be actively harmful to ingest.

You may as well be trying to sell screenplays...

A friend of mine and I were discussing whether there was any endeavor beside screenwriting that was less sure of a successful result given the amount of hard work and tender loving care goes into it. I said "Yes. Farming." Not that that was much comfort to either of us.

ways to make a small fortune...

...but only if you start with a large one:

#1: Train horses, especially ones that cost a fabulous amount of money (because they're always the ones who require the most expensive special treatment).

Of course, screenwriting (well, writing in general) and training horses are the pursuits of a relatively leisured society, while farming, well, isn't.  I think farming still "wins".

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
Poor Taste, by Tom Philpott. Why The Economist's recent assault on "ethical food" missed the mark.
Feeding the Beast, by Tom Philpott. It's time for a real "food vs. fuel" debate.
Elite Eats, by Tom Philpott. Locally grown food shouldn't be just for those with cash to spare.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks