Hi Umbra,
I practically live on Lean Cuisine (that brand specifically -- they are frequently on sale for $2 each). In my community, the plastic tray is recyclable, as is the cardboard box. The only thing that goes in the trash is the film that covers the tray. Microwave time averages five minutes per entree. Total dirty dishes: one fork.
I have a friend who swears I'm a hypocrite -- that cooking is "better" for the environment. I maintain that more packaging goes into the trash when cooking, and certainly the stove is burning for a lot longer than five minutes. (I assume economies of scale for cooking in bulk at the Lean Cuisine factory, as well as delivery and packaging of their ingredients!) Then we have hot water and dish soap for all the cooking pans, plus tableware.
Am I a hypocrite? Would the earth be happier if I made my lemongrass chicken and cheese ravioli from scratch? I'll be hungrily awaiting your reply!
Finicky in Fitchburg
Dearest Finicky,
I came, I thaw, I contherved.
Photo: iStockphoto
I have no quibble with your household energy and waste calculations about Lean Cuisine vs. cooking a meal from scratch. Microwaves are very efficient energy users, it's great that you don't need to run any hot water to clean up, and the Lean Cuisine factory may indeed be quite efficient as well. When you look at it that way, cooking isn't particularly better. But I'm appalled that you wrote me this letter, which appears to be a sincere question about the environmental impact of your food purchasing choices.
I must simply be appalled at the lack of clarity in my own messages about food choices to my dearest readers. Plus I must laugh very hard, because you do have a point and I will say yes, you are keeping your home energy use lower through using Lean Cuisine. Lean Cuisine for everyone! I don't know why I didn't think of it before, really.
Let me attempt higher clarity about food purchases. When we are overwhelmed by the purchasing choices that surround us, we should take refuge in focusing on food, transportation, and home efficiency. These are three important categories in which our shopping and daily habits have a meaningful impact. Therefore, we should think through our food habits in an effort to refine them and refine ourselves as environmental citizens.
Food production can generate a lot of environmental problems, some of which I detailed in a recent column. For example, it's best to eat little meat because so much meat is grown in crowded, awful enclosures, and the resultant effluent is concentrated yuckiness dumped in streams and rivers. Plus the food fed to confined animals is corn or soy or other crops grown in pesticide-intensive systems. From use of petroleum to pollution of waterways to air pollution (by smell and particle) to human-health impacts, conventional agriculture is really smacking nature around.
Although I honestly don't know firsthand the source of foods used in Lean Cuisine meals, only giant farms could provide the consistency and volume of product required by the economies of scale you mention. Lean Cuisine is a Nestle product, Nestle is one of the world's largest food companies, Lean Cuisine Café Classic meals alone had $241.1 million in sales last year. At that scale we can be fairly certain your lemongrass meal comes from chicken shoehorned in with 25,000 other chickens at a giant stinky chicken farm run by a contract farmer earning poverty-level wages. Who knows about the vegetables, they could come from Mexico or Chile or California, and their very existence is likely completely dependent on fertilizers and pesticides.
Prepared foods such as Lean Cuisine all have this sort of history. It's just the way it is, the food system that has developed since the Second World War. Our food shopping dollars help to support that food system, but we can also help to create a different food system -- one with an emphasis on sustainability. We can see the impact of consumer food purchasing in the growth of the organics industry.
From an environmental perspective, reducing our participation in the conventional food system is a higher priority than recycling, than washing fewer forks, than dish soap. There are multiple ways to reduce our participation in the conventional food system. A few easy ones are to buy less meat, to make at least some organic food part of our diet, and to buy fewer processed food products.
I would never tell you to completely stop eating Lean Cuisine -- well, I would. But you seem to love it, so I won't. Just be aware that a recyclable package is no compensation for the food chain that brought you your meal.
Clearly,
Umbra
Comments
View as Flat
amc89 Posted 2:30 am
19 Sep 2007
Permalink
kayakpatty Posted 5:04 am
19 Sep 2007
They are a little bit more expensive than Lean Cuisine but the taste alone is worth it!
Permalink
wayneluke Posted 5:10 am
19 Sep 2007
I would also suggest eating more raw foods such as salads and fruit with your meals. This will cut down on your energy requirements as well.
As far as Whole Foods, it would be nice if they were everywhere but sadly most people in the country do not have access to one. Tesco's however is building 400 smaller stores (10-15 thousand sq. ft.) in California, Nevada and Oregon this year and they will carry similar meals.
Permalink
mckuhl Posted 5:42 am
19 Sep 2007
Permalink
julygreen Posted 6:53 am
19 Sep 2007
http://www.kashi.com/products/kashi_entrees_black_bean_ma ...
Although they may also use plastic containers.
Permalink
logocat Posted 6:56 am
19 Sep 2007
Permalink
truncoxx Posted 7:03 am
19 Sep 2007
Not only is it environmentally bad but it's not healthy in some aspects.
Permalink
Mary Gilbert Posted 7:46 am
19 Sep 2007
Permalink
frantique1 Posted 8:39 am
19 Sep 2007
Permalink
akbeancounter Posted 10:14 am
19 Sep 2007
stop useing [sic] that microwave...it changes the way your body utilizes the food.
It does, but that's only because microwave ovens, just like conventional ovens or hot oil, heat the food contained therein. Microwaving does the exact same thing that any other dry-heat cooking method would do. Specifically, it denatures proteins (including enzymes) and breaks down the cell walls in plants that prevent us from absorbing all of the vitamins present in the food. Yes, it destroys a few vitamins and shuts down enzymatic action, but it usually unlocks more vitamins than it destroys (especially in cruciferous vegetables), making them available for us to use. And those enzymes, they weren't going to survive the trip anyway.
For further information, I'd suggest the Ask a Scientist column on the Newton website, an educational resource site run by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Among other things, they say:
Heat, of any sort above about 50 degrees C pretty much destroys any of the
enzymatic activity in most foods. This will occur when one either cooks by
microwave of normal oven, simmering, frying etc.
as well as:
There is nothing special about the microwave; it is just a convenient way to heat food quickly. If you want to preserve enzyme activity in food, do not heat it.
-- A.
Permalink
AltNrg4U Posted 12:02 pm
19 Sep 2007
Umbra I want to specifically thank you for answering this question (and many others). You are able to address issue with a multidimensional view that you find in very few other places. This was also a question I have wondered about.
I want to also thank akbeancounter. Any scientific description I here from reputable sources have mentioned that microwaving food is not a problem. The page that you referenced at Ask a Scientist was fantastic, and I have saved it as a favorite as I am sure I will reference it for others.
Permalink
marylounoble Posted 7:55 pm
19 Sep 2007
Marylou
Permalink
michelefield Posted 4:19 am
20 Sep 2007
Permalink
fern36 Posted 2:26 am
21 Sep 2007
But to respond to one of the comments above, where in the world did you get the idea that coconut oil is healthy???
Permalink
dhwert Posted 3:05 am
21 Sep 2007
Preserving food is a must, if we are going to try to return to eating locally and in season. Unless we want to eat produce shipped from a different hemisphere, or only eat snow and storage vegetables all winter, some form of preservation is necessary.
Yes, all forms of preservation are fairly energy-intensive (drying might be the least -- another question for Umbra!), but since I don't want to be completely dependent on the food processing industry, I'll stick with my freezer, thank you very much.
Energy Use comparisons (Energy Star models); values are quick and dirty means that I calculated from their data. (fun with Pivot Tables)
Refrigerators (bottom freezer, top freezer, side by side): 496 kWh/year; 24 kWh/yr/cu.ft.
Freezers: 457 kWh/year; 29.6 kWh/yr/cu.ft.
Dave
Permalink
dhwert Posted 3:11 am
21 Sep 2007
http://www.westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/coconut-oil-stud ...
"In this study, virgin coconut oil ... had a beneficial effect in lowering total cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids and low density lipoproteins (LDL)."
"A few researchers have known for some time that a derivative of coconut oil, lauric acid and monolaurin, are safe antimicrobial agents that can either kill completely or stop the growth of some of the most dangerous viruses and bacteria."
Permalink
Beth Terry Posted 7:15 am
21 Sep 2007
The black plastic trays that Lean Cuisine and other frozen meals come in have a recycling "chasing arrows" symbol, but that does not mean that they are actually recycled everywhere. Here in the Bay Area, they are not recycled by any of the cities where I live or work or my husband works.
And just because an area accepts an item for curbside pickup doesn't mean that the item actually gets recycled either. Some areas will accept everything so that residents don't have to figure out what not to put in, and then whatever they can't sell gets landfilled.
It was very hard, but I finally gave up frozen meals altogether. You can read about my research and experiences trying to find "green" frozen foods here:
http://www.fakeplasticfish.com/labels/frozen%20foods.html ...
Permalink
wayneluke Posted 1:19 am
22 Sep 2007
Might as well launch the world's nukes if you're going to preach and absolutist solution to everything. You can advocate getting rid of things but in the real world people need to make compromises. We gave up other things so that we can keep the freezer because it is necessary for our lives right now.
Permalink
wayneluke Posted 1:28 am
22 Sep 2007
My freezer uses $30 a year in electricity. Need to proofread better without the benefit of an edit function.
Permalink
burntpig Posted 1:30 am
26 Sep 2007
we can argue all day long about the beneifits or cons of one type of purchased food or another, buy they all do help contribute to a system that inevatabloies causes harm to the environment and the biodiversity therein. growing food for yourself is beyond easy, and for the majority of the world, it is a fact of life. the ebst way to "reduce your impact" is to make no impact, grow your food, eat what you can grow. pretend that this imaginary system of life suddenly imploded upon itself and there were no stores selling food, would we all die?
anywho, please forgive my spelling. its just one of the ways i stick it to the man
Permalink
CyberBrook Posted 5:14 am
26 Sep 2007
Yes, we should eat more whole foods and fewer processed "foods", and we should also say yes to healthy, local, organic, etc. But we absolutely need to say NO to meat and YES to vegetarianism.
Aside from the MANY ethical and health-related arguments for vegetarianism, it is increasingly clear that the many eco-arguments for veg are overwhelming.
Eco-Eating: Eating as if the Earth Matters
http://www.brook.com/veg
Meat Eating and Global Warming
http://www.ivu.org/members/globalwarming.html
"The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future: deforestation, erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities, and the spread of disease."
World Watch, July/Aug 2004
"There is a direct relationship between eating meat and the environment."
Andrea Gordon, If You Recycle, Why Are You Eating Meat?
"If anyone wants to save the planet, all they have to do is just stop eating meat. That's the single most important thing you could do."
Paul McCartney
Permalink