Cobbling together a delicious and easy summer dessert 0 Posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
Monsanto’s man Taylor returns to FDA in food-czar role 4 Posted 1 day, 3 hours ago
New group inspires teens to combat climate change 5 Posted 1 day, 3 hours ago
So, lots to talk about, but for now: I'm in a candidate forum with Barack Obama and he was just asked directly about coal. He dodged and weaved, said there would have to be a "transition," and that there would need to be "investments," etc. etc.
Unsatisfying.
He did, however, very strongly back the 80 percent by 2050 target, and backed a 20% national RPS. So there's that.
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/david_h_roberts.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
“Historic consensus” at G8 on climate change, says Obama
A Milestone: 100th Coal Plant Stopped
McCaskill says House climate bill will sink in Senate
Comments
View as Flat
ac5p Posted 11:19 pm
04 Aug 2007
Illinois has too much coal
For Obama to say the right things about it. It shows a lack of confidence in himself.
Permalink
justlou Posted 3:17 am
05 Aug 2007
Obama and Coal
It is difficult to imagine any of the candidates saying anything radically different about coal. So, Obama is positioning right in the center on this energy resource. Illinois has several new coal mining and power plant projects either in construction or in the planning stage as well as the hoped for FutureGen project it is bidding on. There is a huge constituency for coal in IL but I hear very little in the media here reflecting any adversary positions. Obama is on very safe ground with his position on coal and corn ethanol.
Yes, this is all very unsatisfying, but I don't think we are going to be hearing anything really visionary from any of the presidential candidates. The vision is going to have to come from the bottom.
Power down.
Permalink
ids Posted 8:04 am
05 Aug 2007
ILL Enviros
There's very little in the media reflecting the adverserial position of coal because the Ill Eviro's are very ambivalent about coal.
The Illinois Sierra Club new burning plant in Springfield IL is something they are happy with. The Clean Air Task Force is supporting a new 620mw plant in Taylorville. This on top of giving Peabody Energy rights for its first plant ever, on the Prairie State Energy campus, by the corrupt Governor Blagojevich (D), who was endorsed by Ill Sierra Club after this. No surprise there was one state Senate vote against giving FutureGen immunity from any unanticipated results in IL, and all else for, in a Democratic veto proof senate. Corruption is at its roots.
Permalink
odograph Posted 8:16 am
05 Aug 2007
democracy
The tricky thing is deciding when people are lying for someone's benefit. Sometimes politicians make happy talk and do nothing ... can I hope that ethanol and coal make happy talk leading to the election, but the right candidate will be lying?
What's that "cynically optimistic?"
Permalink
Ron Steenblik Posted 8:29 am
05 Aug 2007
Odograph
Does sponsoring, or co-sponsoring legislation that would mandate huge amounts of ethanol, or provide lots of subsidies to coal, count in your opinion merely as "happy talk"?
Permalink
odograph Posted 8:31 am
05 Aug 2007
serious
If it's a serious bill (and not one of those designed to fail spectacularly) then that would dash my cynical optimism.
Permalink
Ron Steenblik Posted 9:30 am
05 Aug 2007
Well,
Senator Obama heartely endorsed the pork-laden "Energy Policy Act of 2005", posting on his web site a summary of it gleefully speaking of the "goodies" it contained for Illinois.
And the Biofuels Security Act of 2007, which he co-sponsored with Senate heavyweights Lugar, Dorgan and Biden, looks pretty serious. It would mandate:
For "renewable fuel", read ethanol, or ethanol plus a bit of biodiesel.
Senator Obama also co-sponsored the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Energy Act of 2007 (latest status: read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources) and the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act of 2007 (latest status: read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance).
Permalink
justlou Posted 1:35 am
06 Aug 2007
IL Sierra Club and "Transition" Coal
From the State Journal Register (Springfield, IL):
Sierra Club objects to Taylorville plant
Coal-gasification facility designed to be less polluting
http://www.sj-r.com/News/stories/11813.asp
Permalink
GreenMom Posted 3:33 am
06 Aug 2007
Obama's state of knowledge...
I didn't hear Obama directly at YearlyKos (I was there, but chose a different candidate's breakout session instead)...but can I still hope naively that his dodging and weaving will end if and when he is no longer worried that he has to go back to being Illinois senator?
This may not be answerable, but by "clean coal", does he mean coal gasification (IGCC) plus sequestration, or either one individually? Does he know the difference?
Does he understand it isn't necessarily possible to retrofit IGCC? Does he understand that sequestration isn't geographically possible everywhere?
Does he really think either option is likely to be viable on a large scale any time soon?
It doesn't give me warm fuzzies about the state of his knowledge that he is still dancing around nuclear power either, just from a practical point of view...doesn't he know that making a dent in climate change with nuclear would require billions of dollars and god knows how many new plants...
Oy vey.
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 3:38 am
06 Aug 2007
I imagine he ...
... like many, many legislators, views subsidies for carbon sequestration as the price that must be paid to buy the assent -- or at least prevent the implacable opposition -- of Big Coal to measures that fight global warming.
As long as coal remains as powerful as it is -- and gets so little concerted pushback -- I'm not sure he's wrong.
grist.org
Permalink
GreenMom Posted 6:23 am
06 Aug 2007
That's true...
Maybe so...though isn't it the utilities that will pay for sequestration, not Big Coal...not that they aren't intertwined. I do take your point.
Permalink
WKB Posted 7:25 am
08 Aug 2007
Ooooh, that John Thompson
He was in Henderson Kentucky in June pushing an IGCC plant there. Clean Air Task FARCE, as my friend John calls it.
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 11:51 pm
08 Aug 2007
Yeap
And Richardson seems to like Coal as well.
As well as "Celwasik" Ethanol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOAE38havfw
All I have to say about that is:
http://greyfalcon.net/ccs
Permalink