Wherever you go, there you czar

Draft bailout deal calls for ‘car czar,’ ban on lawsuits challenging emissions standards 2

Muckraker: Grist on Politics

Congressional Democrats and the White House appear to have reached a deal on a $15 billion rescue plan for the auto industry, one that includes a ban on lawsuits challenging California's greenhouse gas emission standards and a call for a "car czar" to oversee the rescue efforts.

"The terms of any financial assistance under this Act shall prohibit the eligible automobile manufacturer from participating in, pursuing, funding, or supporting in any way, any legal challenge (existing or contemplated) to State laws concerning greenhouse gas emission standards," says the document.

The bill also calls for the creation of a "car czar" who would have "appropriate expertise in such areas as economic stabilization, financial aid to commerce and industry, financial restructuring, energy efficiency, and environmental protection." This individual, appointed by the president, would be granted access to all the financial accounts, records, and other data from the auto companies. The companies would have to receive the czar's approval for business transactions worth $25 million or more. Since the plan calls for a czar to be in place by Jan. 1, the individual would be appointed by President Bush.

They nixed plans to create an oversight board for the industry made up of cabinet secretaries from Commerce, Energy, Labor, Transportation, and the Treasury, as well as the head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

In this draft bill, Democrats have agreed to allow $15 billion in loan guarantees for manufacture of advanced technology vehicles -- a provision included in the 2007 energy bill -- to be used in the bailout. These emergency bridge loans would be distributed to General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford. Those funds are supposed to get the industry through until March 31, 2009.

"It may take more than $15 billion to get to March 31. But come March 31, it is our hope that there will be a viable automotive industry in our country with transparency and accountability to the taxpayer. We think that is possible," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) this afternoon. "But if they don't meet the conditions of restructuring, there is not going to be an endless flow of money to this industry, left to their own devices and the practices they have engaged in."

Via Ambinder, here's a draft of the bailout bill currently circulating the Hill.

Kate Sheppard is Grist’s political reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 3:33 pm
    09 Dec 2008

    Department of the Auto MobileI don't know about a "czar" but look at it this way -- there is a huge psychic blindness when it comes to the automobile and planners.
    It's the single most used machine in our country.  Millions depend on it.   It's more flexible than a bus, a train or a plane.   It can go in cities, exurbs or agrarian lands or wilderness.
    If done right, it can consume very little energy per person.
    Yet this all important "transit" system is treated like dirt by bureaucrats and plutocrats whose greatest dream is taking away as much personal liberty as possible and cramming us like sardines into 19th century trolley cars.
    I don't want a car czar to manage bailouts.
    I want a Secretary of the Automobile.  To give due respect to the technology.   "Auto-" -- the morpheme for self.   "Mobile" the morpheme for movement.
    A department to concentrate on these all important devices.  Not just "Roads" -- which are an important technology for todays cars -- but a department to support and nourish the devices themselves, to improve their safety, and fuel efficiency...but most of all to champion the idea of Personal Mobility...the cornerstone of American Freedom!
    (I also nominate Bob Lutz.)

    Texeme.Construct.Questioner
  2. Sam Wells Posted 1:48 am
    10 Dec 2008

    No Car TsarI don't like the idea of aggregating power in the hands of one man or woman to "call the shots" on the auto bailout. I would support a committee with a strong chairman, though.
    We've had "drug czars" and all kinds of similar failures along the way - and why on Earth we picked a term from the imperial days of Russia is something of a mystery.
    Just look at what happened with Secretary Paulson who tied to act as a "tsar" to fix the bigger bailout situation - some initial reports are that it is not working, the strategy shifts on a daily basis, and in fact some of the efforts may have ended up making things worse. Let's not repeat our mistakes...

    Onward through the fog

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement