When does additionality matter? Part 4
The carbon offset market needs additionality 2
Adam Stein is a co-founder of TerraPass.
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
ids Posted 12:08 pm
13 Apr 2008
Between the extra transaction cost and the uncertainty endemic in offsets, the immediate solution to any additionality quandary is to agree polluters in covered sectors not be allowed to use offsets to get out from under a cap, as found in Lie-War. Offsets should be strictly voluntary for those wishing to act responsibly in an additional way, not a black hole for a covered polluter to hide.
Waste Not A steamy greenwash to global warming
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200805/recycled-steam
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 1:30 am
14 Apr 2008
In other words, don't force additionality tests on all carbon reduction mechanisms. Keep them on the carbon offset market but not the cap and trade market. The carbon offset market (your business) holds potential to reduce GHG in addition to that achieved under a cap and trade market and it needs additionality tests to keep everyone honest. We need to keep the two ideas separate. The requirement to prove additionality would strangle cap and trade with red tape.
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink