What's $900 billion between friends?

Greens, labor leaders, and economists call for $900 billion recovery plan 3

Muckraker: Grist on Politics

Campaign for America's Future today released a "Main Street Recovery Plan" [PDF], laying out wha the group hopes to see from the Obama team. The plan calls for investments of at least $900 billion over the next two years, including $100 billion in green investments.

"Central to the plan should be investment in green technology, reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and addressing the rising threat of global warming," says the plan.

CAF outlines six areas of green infrastructure in need of those funds: "retrofitting buildings to improve energy efficiency, expanding mass transit and freight rail networks, constructing 'smart' electric-grid systems, increasing capacity for generating power from wind and solar energy, and developing carbon capture technologies and next-generation biofuels."

The report emphasizes that $50 billion "should be considered a minimum and could be expanded if appropriate plans can be rapidly developed."

The group hosted a presser today on the plan, which included University of Texas professor and economist James Galbraith. Galbraith, who is among the lengthy list [PDF] of economists, academics, labor leaders, and green group heads who have endorsed the plan, noted that the economic recovery package should be as large as possible. "The risks are all on the side of being too cautious," he said.

He also emphasized the need for infrastructure and green projects: "Economic recovery in an existential crisis like this means actually building a new economy. For that, we need investment -- to restore our roads, rails, transit, broadband, and water systems, to build parks and museums and libraries, to protect the environment."

Kate Sheppard is Grist’s political reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. naught101 Posted 9:14 am
    09 Dec 2008

    in relative terms...Just for anyone else who wanted to put this in perspective, Wikipedia says that the US economy "was estimated as $13.8 trillion in 2007".
    In other words, this $900 billion is about 6% of the total economy (same as the economic bailout package), and between 1/3 and 1/2 of the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Sounds like a good idea to me...

    check out http://www.envirowiki.info, the knowledge database for environmentalists and activists.
  2. mwildfire Posted 11:36 am
    09 Dec 2008

    no probit's a lot of money but if we just cut off the Pentagon, we'll have plenty for constructive pirposes, and get double bang for our buck because every dollar the Pentagon doesn't get is less orphans, widows, destroyed buildings, etc.
  3. JMG's avatar

    JMG Posted 4:17 am
    10 Dec 2008

    Nice warningWAPO has a nice warning that pouring lots of cement -- in addition to being terrible for the climate -- is probably a poor recovery strategy.
    http://is.gd/b1xk
    This is even before we consider that if all we get is more auto infrastructure, we'll end up worse off than we are now -- another day older, deeper in debt, importing more oil ...

    The 5% Project



    Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement