Over the Humpback

Some big whales no longer in trouble 6

There's bad news and good news from the world of marine megafauna. The bad: Almost a quarter of the 80 types of whales, dolphins, and porpoises are in trouble, with nine listed as "endangered" or "critically endangered" by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Entanglement in fishing gear poses the main threat. The good: Thanks to a global hunting moratorium, humpback, common minke, and southern right whales have thrived enough to be downlisted to "least concern" by the IUCN. "The large whales, the commercially important ones, have for the most part responded well under protection," says IUCN's Randall Reeves. Norway, which along with Japan and Iceland has defied the whaling moratorium, called the IUCN report evidence that the ban should be lifted. Conservationists don't see it that way. "This strengthens our opposition to whaling," said Greenpeace's Frode Pleym. "While some species have started to recover, none of them are back to the levels they had before industrial whaling started."

sources:

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 7:36 am
    12 Aug 2008

    First Gorillas......and now this!
    If something big and cute doesn't go extinct soon, you guys are pretty much out of a job.
    Eventually, we'll all be building bird feeders for Spotted Owls in our backyards, once the Hydrogen Economy gets underway.
    Oh, and I'm planning a fishing trip -- to my seaside dacha on the Arctic Ocean...another few years and it will be teeming with salmon.

  2. Jason D Scorse's avatar

    Jason D Scorse Posted 7:44 am
    12 Aug 2008

    Environmentalists can't win this argumnent....if they rely on sustainability criteria alone. If a species isn't threatened with extinction and that's the only criteria for protection then the Japanese and Norwegians are correct that it's ok to kill many species of whales. Like I pointed out to 2 years ago:
    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/9/13/123759/733
    if environmentalists don't embrace basic notions of animal welfare then they have essentially no case against whaling.
    P.S. Jabailo- what rightwing institute pays you to provide us with all of this free comedy? I want to thank them for the laughs.
  3. Wolverine Posted 8:39 am
    12 Aug 2008

    Not True, JasonWhales are still all at very low numbers compared to before industrial whaling began, so there are still good arguments against whaling based on just the health of the species.  That said, it's true that we should also use humane arguments, such as not killing large animals for food.  If you can't catch it from shore or with a small boat, leave it alone.
  4. amc89 Posted 1:07 am
    13 Aug 2008

    consumptive wildlife activitiesIt's not just the whaling lobby that uses this notion of now that a species is somewhat recovered, it's okay to once again start doing the behavior that reduced numbers in the first place. The commercial seal hunters in Canada, the wolf hunters in the western US, commercial fur trappers, commercial fishermen and so on. This is why I'm always weary of initiatives by environmental groups like the Sierra Club to work with hunting groups and other groups promoting consumptive wildlife activities.  
  5. archigeek Posted 1:59 am
    13 Aug 2008

    Big Blue I would kill a Republican to see a blue whale. An animal that large and beautiful shouldn't be a sushi dinner or some Norwegians steak.
  6. Jason D Scorse's avatar

    Jason D Scorse Posted 3:24 am
    13 Aug 2008

    amc98...this is exactly my point. If you get into the game of the environment as nothing more than a consumptive resource you ultimately lose.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement