Bottled-water companies would have to disclose the source of their H2O under a bill that has passed through the California legislature and awaits the pen of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The bill would require companies to list the minerals, chemicals, and bacteria present in bottled water, as well as whether it came originally from a well, aquifer, spring, or plain ol' municipal reservoir. In other water news, the U.S. EPA has issued revised national regulations that strengthen requirements for testing tap water for lead and require utilities to notify customers immediately if water supplies are found to be contaminated with high levels of the heavy metal. The new rules will "help get the lead out and keep it out of our drinking water," says EPA water guy Benjamin Grumbles, whose way with a cliché is nearly on par with his delightful name.
Into the Drink
California may require labels on bottled water, EPA strengthens lead-in-water regulations 3
-
Posted 5:08 PM on 27 Sep 2007
-
Posted in
-
Read More About
- California,
- EPA,
- health,
- news,
- regulation,
- toxics
Related Stories
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success
‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
Vikingsson Posted 12:07 pm
27 Sep 2007
I can't help but notice the lip service to the quality issues of tap and the lead in water/toys scare. If it makes the propaganda machine then tell me how much you care. Then do little or nothing to give me a better product.
Simple labeling is want I want though. Now if I could read a label that told me if this product was genetically modified I'd be even happier.
:)
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 4:04 pm
30 Sep 2007
One would have thought that a basic, top-priority task of the EPA was to be vigilant over the quality of the country's public water supplies. So now we are told that adequate regulations are not even in place? Gewalt. This is part of what Thomas Friedman was writing about yesterday, when he said that the US is no longer the world's Gold Standard regarding even simple infrastructure. He said that when he flew recently out of a European airport home to a US airport, it was like leaving the world of the Jetsons and entering the world of the Flintstones.
As for the proposed legislation in California, yes indeed, certain basic information should be printed on bottled water: the nature of the water source, where it is and who owns it.
But I am not sure we need to have very detailed information about "minerals, chemicals and bacteria." Some unusual substances characteristic of a particular source would need to be noted, as well as anomalously high quantities of some more ordinary substances; the water-quality experts could figure that out. But it would seem to be impractical and unnecessary to try to be exhaustive. (So to speak: that is a pun that all those latinists out there will get.)
Permalink
cmbryant1 Posted 3:10 am
02 Oct 2007
foodkarmaalert.blogspot.com
Permalink