Anybody know what's up with this? Seems too good to be true, and you know what they say about stuff like that.
(hat tip: reader Laurence)
Copenhagen talks ready for take off: 5, 4, 3… 0 Posted 1 day, 10 hours ago
Making buildings more efficient: rationalizing retrofit markets 5 Posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
This Friday, don’t just Buy Nothing—use nothing! 4 Posted 1 day, 17 hours ago
Anybody know what's up with this? Seems too good to be true, and you know what they say about stuff like that.
(hat tip: reader Laurence)
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
Clark Williams-Derry Posted 9:25 am
13 Jun 2006
"Take water and electricity, and we break it down through a very unique electrolysis process."
So the power doesn't come from the water, it comes from the electricity used for electrolysis. Sounds like a hydrogen flame of some sort. Probably nifty for lots of applications, and possibly more efficient for some applications as well. But not a new energy source. I'll eat my shirt if it is.
Permalink
ffletcher Posted 9:38 am
13 Jun 2006
Permalink
Icelander Posted 11:18 pm
13 Jun 2006
Is there something I'm missing?
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 12:27 am
14 Jun 2006
Found his site. Patenting the electrolysis of water and combustion of hydrogen and oxygen?
I think he's a bit too late on that. Most of us did that in chemistry class in high school.
Another scam is my guess. Where is that perpetual motion energy debunking site again? Oh yeah.
http://www.randi.org/jr/2006-05/052606action.html
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
ffletcher Posted 1:20 am
14 Jun 2006
Clearly not perpetual motion, that reliable sign of a fool, but no doubt patented, but I doubt it is the electrolysis of water. Burbank has a hydrogen filling station that uses electrolysis of water using a method patented by Air Products. I assume the patent is associated with the electrodes or how the voltage is modulated between the electrodes in response to the demand for hydrogen. If using tap water rather than demineralized RO water there would also be water treatment issues that one could probably patent.
Permalink
Clark Williams-Derry Posted 6:04 am
14 Jun 2006
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/11/hydrogenenhance.html
There also seem to be a bunch of "hydrogen boost" kits available on the interent -- caveat emptor.
Stll this is not about cars that run on water (duh), which is what the news story seemed to suggest. They still run on gas, but perhaps a little more efficiently.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 10:56 am
14 Jun 2006
Mr Kline is claiming 100 mpg. All based on mysterious new chenical bonds that are yet to be explained. And a device that even though he claims it is patented, that he presents no explanation for operation or a link to the specific patent.
And where can one buy his new welding system? it burns right through charcoal? Hehey. As Randi says on his site:
"Denny Klein is selling to FOX26 News in Clearwater, Florida, via their excited reporter Craig Patrick, as a system that will run a car for 100 miles "fueled" solely by four ounces of water! In the video, a hydrogen torch using "HHO technology" that Klein demonstrates, is described by ridiculous expressions such as, "hotter than the surface of the Sun," and we're told that it takes "only seconds to literally burn a hole through charcoal." Duh! Charcoal burns, dummy!"
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink