Some of you may have missed it, as Odograph introduced it down in comments, so I thought I'd bring it up front:
Check out Walk Score, where you can plug in your address and find out how walkable your home is, on a scale of one to 100.
My old place -- a condo near the heart of Ballard in Seattle -- scored a 94. My new place, a house north of Seattle, just south of Shoreline, gets a 66.
I wonder if it knows whether you have sidewalks? Because that obviously affects walkability. We don't have any in our neighborhood, and it's a serious pain in the ass.
Comments
View as Threaded
wayneluke Posted 3:56 am
26 Jul 2007
Where I live, there is local shopping, even if it is not desireable. For groceries we have Wal-Mart Supercenter, a Food-4-Less (owned by Kroger's), a 99-cent store within a third of a mile. There are two movie theaters within half a mile. We also have a myriad of fast food from chinese buffets to your regular drive-throughs. We also have three stripmalls with smaller shops and some traditional restaruants in the same distance.
However, its 3 miles to the library and further to any park. Across the street it is bare soil that at one time was going to be a shopping district and more houses but those projects went bankrupt during the last real-estate bubble burst. We do have a city baseball stadium about half a mile away for the local minor league baseball team. However even though the city lists it as a park, it isnt.
What is interesting is my parents choose to live in a "recovering neighborhood" in the same city where new people are moving in and pushing crime out. The place is scary and there is always the sound of arguments with police cars constantly patrolling and helicopters overhead. However they got a 70, even though the walk-able stores include a 7-11 and a furniture store. They are closer to the library, performance city and the downtown boulevard (which the city designates as a museum) at only a mile away. Their nearest grocery store is well over two miles from their house though.
Permalink
Corey McKrill Posted 3:57 am
26 Jul 2007
This could also be a great resource for scoping out places to stay when you travel. Imagine checking out the website for a hostel or B&B and seeing a little icon on their homepage with their "walk score" on it...
Frequently asked technical questions about Grist's newsletters and website.
Permalink
wayneluke Posted 3:58 am
26 Jul 2007
The nearest whole foods store (the only one in town actually), is 4 miles away.
Permalink
Delay And Deny Posted 5:29 am
26 Jul 2007
I have actually resisted moving from my current apartment on Kent East Hill because it is located close enough to stores and transit lines that if needed, I can live completely without a car -- even though I could probably get more space for the money by living further "upstream".
We need to walk more. It has always seemed laughable to me that we (me included) will get in our cars, and drive to the 24 Hour Fitness, so we can get out and get on a treadmill or stair climber to...well, walk!
In all the plans regarding "transportation" we never, ever factor in walking. The page you listed is fantastic...but do our city planners every have the courage to create systems that factor in the average distance humans can walk.
Sure, the other-abled should have options such as door to door pickup if needed, but I have always imagined that if we could create a transportation system where we are allowed to space the stations as far apart as a mile, allowing for typical half-mile walks -- imagine how much money we could save, and imagine how much more extensible it could be!
John Bailo
Supratext:
Permalink
Montanaebiker Posted 5:37 am
26 Jul 2007
Permalink
Jon Rynn Posted 5:50 am
26 Jul 2007
Permalink
Andrew Dessler Posted 8:15 am
26 Jul 2007
Permalink
JMG Posted 2:51 pm
26 Jul 2007
Save the world: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 5% annually.
Permalink
maybee Posted 12:50 am
30 Jul 2007
Permalink
Quinn Posted 3:10 pm
30 Jul 2007
Permalink
ndunne Posted 5:30 pm
30 Jul 2007
NJD
Permalink
zacaroni Posted 11:42 pm
30 Jul 2007
Permalink