By Our Power Combined

California utilities scuffle over cap-and-trade 3

California is well aware that reducing greenhouse-gas emissions is easier said than done. The state's attempts to craft an effective cap-and-trade system are causing infighting among public utilities and their privately owned counterparts. Public utilities, which source more of their power from coal, protest that they're going to end up paying out the nose to the state and seeing the money redirected into private utilities' coffers. That means public utilities will be lining private utilities' pockets instead of having money available to, say, boost renewable-energy capacity, they argue. But regulators say they don't intend to create a scheme that allows private utilities to profit off of public utilities' misfortune, and that polluters have to get used to the idea of paying for what they spew. "We have to reduce CO2 by 174 million tons by 2020," says California Public Utilities Commission President Michael Peevey. "But no one wants to face up to the cost. Everyone wants everyone else to pay."

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Wolverine Posted 7:55 am
    21 Apr 2008

    "Everyone wants everyone else to pay."Yeah, and everyone wants everyone else to reduce consumption.  There's no chance of any significant progress here unless everyone is willing to sacrifice something.  Of course, those who consume more must now sacrifice more by making greater reductions in their consumption.
  2. ian Posted 10:51 pm
    21 Apr 2008

    Cap 'n TradeThis is precisely why corporations and politicians prefer C&T to a carbon tax - because the big dogs get to pay the politicians to fiddle the fine print in their favor and hide the costs from the electorate.  A carbon tax (and import tariff) would allow for no such manipulation, and would be hideously obvious.
  3. Wolverine Posted 5:21 am
    22 Apr 2008

    Cap Without TradeHow did we get stuck with this hideous option to begin with?  (Wait, let me guess, it was the idea of big business.)  What would be best would be caps, with no baloney trading of anything.  Taxes don't work as well, because those who can afford them will still pollute.  That said, a carbon tax with no exceptions would almost certainly work better than this cap and trade garbage.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement