UPDATE: Thousands more people are now being employed in the "restoration economy" to clean up the oil spill. Jobs are just one more reason why we need a national effort to restore the Gulf ecosystem.
There's a new economy springing up around the country -- but it's operating almost entirely in secret. It's called "the restoration economy" and it's remaking America's landscape while putting millions of people to work.
This economy is devoted to restoring what's been lost: degraded forests, watersheds, oceans, cities, communities, buildings, transit -- and it's the product of a major turning point in our history that's been almost entirely missed by the press and politicians.
I recently had the opportunity to learn about this stealth green economy when I participated in a panel at the Good Jobs, Green Jobs conference about land and water-based jobs. In a telling sign, this panel (organized by The Wilderness Society's relentless JP Leous, one of the brightest rising stars in the environmental movement) was apparently the first in the history of the conference to focus on forest, land, and water based jobs (or as I like to think of them, the ultimate green jobs).
One of my co-panelists was Storm Cunningham, who in his seminal book, The Restoration Economy, revealed this major shift for the first time:
...But then, in the late 90's, I began noticing a miraculous new trend: a number of places -- both ecosystems and communities -- were actually getting better, some spectacularly so. Rivers that had been devoid of fish were teeming with them. Blighted industrial waterfronts were becoming gorgeous, lively, economically thriving public areas. Devastated, clear-cut hills were becoming forests again -- real forests, not just the typical tree farms that are devoid of wildlife. ...
During the last two decades of the twentieth century, we failed to notice a turning point of immense significance. New development -- the development mode that has dominated the past three centuries -- lost significant "market share" to another mode: restorative development.
Despite the fact that restorative development will dominate the twenty-first century, its phenomenal rate of growth has gone largely undocumented. This is hardly an unimportant transition: economic growth based primarily on the exploitation of new resources and territories is giving way to economic growth based on expanding our resources and improving our existing assets..
Why is it happening? Primarily, it's because we've now developed most of the world that can be developed without destroying some other inherent value or vital function of that property. The major driver of economic growth in the the twenty-first century will thus be redeveloping our nations, revitalizing our cities, and rehabilitating and expanding our ecosystems. We'll be adding health and wealth in a way that doesn't cause a corresponding loss of wealth elsewhere.
To put it in other words, today's economic potential isn't in the exploitation of untapped resources, but rather in the restoration of wealth (natural, infrastructural, community and otherwise).
For that reason and others, the restoration economy is dollar-for-dollar by far the best job creator of any economic activity. As I discussed in this post at Grist, investments in forest, wetland, and other land and water restoration creates 74 percent more jobs than ANY other economic activity -- more even that energy wind or solar, and more than five and a half times as much as investments in dirty energy sources like oil, coal, and nuclear. These are the ultimate shovel-ready jobs: for many of them, you really don't need much more than a shovel to get to work. Mother Nature provides all the capital you need.
You can see this restoration economy at work across America and around the world: in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest in Washington State, people are finding work tearing down dams and restoring streams, in the Chesapeake Bay, out-of-work watermen are restoring oyster beds to clean the water, and in Indonesia, people are returning destroyed rainforest to orangutan habitat.
At the panel, we delved into the politics of the restoration economy -- you can watch highlights from the discussion in this excellent brief video:
In summary, politicians are making a huge electoral blunder when they perpetuate low jobs creating activities like oil drilling and coal mining. One of the most important determinants of an incumbent politician's success is the health of the economy and the availability of jobs (others include whether a politician is perceived as being a strong leader and having integrity). Weakening a cap on carbon or diverting funds away from wildland restoration may please a few lobbyists, but as incumbents like Bob Bennett, Arlen Specter, and Blanche Lincoln learned recently, even establishment campaign donations will be far outweighed by voter anger fueled by a poor economy and a lack of jobs.
Of course the inverse is true too: because the restoration economy provides such a huge jobs bang for the buck, it's a Godsend for politicians. The more they invest in restoring forests, streams, and oceans, the better the economy will be and the more likely they are to get reelected.
In other words, green is the new electoral gold.
The real price of cheap Walmart eggs?
This New Agtivist wants to grow food in old K-Marts
How bad are the next few years going to suck? 


Comments
Post a Comment +
Thanks for the kind words and the excellent article, Glenn! I enjoyed meeting you at the Green Jobs conference.
Are you based in DC? If so, let me know when you'd like to get together, and I'll shove a beer down your neck.
[By the way: it's "Cunningham", not "Cummingham".] Cheers! - Storm
What is the source of income for the thousands of green jobs to which you refer? If it is tax money allocated to restoration activities, how sustainable is that? A sustainable economy depends on creating something of value for which others are willing to pay. I laud the restoration of rivers, mountains, etc., but don't we have to figure out how to produce goods and services for which others will pay? And when we identify such goods and services, rather than prevent their creation or conversion to something that can be sold and bought, shouldn't we find the best way to effect that creation or conversion for the benefit of everyone, including the entity that initiates that creation?
@DahlInAustin
Sure: some of this is funded by tax revenues, but the vast majority of restorative activities in urban areas is funded by private projects. The key lesson, though, is the leveraging effect. In Montana, for instance, they have documented that every $1 spent on restoring natural areas (like mine lands) creates 31.5 jobs and $4.5 in related economic activity. And, much of that cleanup is as least partially paid by the company that did the damage (such as ARCO in Montana). Each acre of urban brownfields that's remediated and redeveloped saves 4.5 acres of greenfields, so it's not just revitalizing the city, it's conserving greenspace and ecosystems. What's more, each public dollar spent on cleaning brownfields usually brings in $10 of private money to redevelop the site.
When I take the train south into New York City I am struck by the filth and destruction which is the view coming in. Buildings and entire city blocks are boarded up, breaking down and being useless. At the same time I am aware of the hundreds of thousands of homeless people, many of whom have skill sets which would be valuable to society, but most employers are reluctant to take on a person with no home address. A possible solution would be the reconstruction of the city's edges by a program of education and relocation of the work force from waiting for a government check to taking buildings down to be rebuilt as housing and commercial space. We can literally build a new city around the old one.
Another issue which is not spoken of much, but which I feel will be the most important problem in the future is how to deal with a potential raising of the ocean level by 20' or more. This would destroy the infrastructure of a city like New York or Washington DC. The subways would be flooded, the utilities would be flooded, the ground floor of most blocks would be inundated. The city will have to be abandoned and relocated! This will require tens of thousands of laborers skilled and unskilled. It will require a massive effort on the parts of the governments involved. Furthermore it will be happening while billions of people around the world are also looking for land on which to live and farm. Obviously the old models of government will be inadequate to the tasks at ...read more