Tomato concentrate

Time to slice up the tomato industry? 2

What happens when a few large buyers dominate a market?

Anyone who keeps up with my posts -- still there, mom? -- knows what's coming next: The buyers gain the power to dictate to dictate terms and conditions to sellers.

For farmers, the results of concentrated markets are devastating. As a few giant companies like Smithfield and Tyson came to dominate meat packing, they managed to drive down the farmgate price of chickens, pigs, and beef cows.

As a result, hundreds of thousands of farmers were driven out of business. Survivors took on debt and scaled up, in a desperate attempt to make up on volume what they were losing on price. The result: vast animal factories known as CAFOs (concentrated-animal feedlot operations), with their abysmal environmental, social, and animal-welfare records.

I often focus on meat to illustrate the ills of market concentration. But as this post from the Ethicurean's excellent Mental Masala shows, things are just as bad in produce markets. Riffing off an article in the San Francisco Chronicle, Mental invites us to consider California's mighty tomato-processing industry.

Here are some highlights.

  • Before World War II, California produced 20 percent of the nation's processing tomatoes. Today, it produces 95 percent. Commercial tomato processing outside of California has essentially disappeared -- even though tomatoes can be grown in all 50 states.
  • California's processing tomatoes are machine-harvested, an innovation that developed after the Bracero "guest worker" program ended in 1964, closing off a major source of cheap labor.
  • In the 1960s, 4,000 California farmers grew processing tomatoes. By 1973, when investments in mechanical-processing equipment had becmme necessary to remain profitable, there were fewer than 600 growers. Today, 225 farms in California grow nearly all of the processing tomatoes consumed in the United States.
  • In tomato-intensive Colusa County, just eight growers have 25,000 acres in production. That farm size -- more than 3,000 acres per operation -- would not be out of place in Iowa corn country.
  • Given these vast monocrops, pests and diseases are a huge problem and require regular application of poisons. Each year, the California Department of Food and Agriculture sprays malathion to limit bug damage on tomato fields. Malathion, an organophosphate, is nasty stuff.
  • Growers of processing tomatoes receive 3.5 cents per pound for their goods.
  • Three companies -- Heinz, Bayer CropScience, and Monsanto -- sell 90 percent of the seed for the crop. (Heinz claims to be the "the market share leader in North America and the world.")
  • Growing these tomatoes is extraordinarily capital-intensive. "Long before harvest time, growers will have $2,700 dollars per acre invested in diesel, seed, labor, water and chemical costs," the Chronicle reports.
  • The industry is extremely water-intensive: each acre needs two-and-a-half feet of water.
  • The article contains surprisingly little information about the processors themselves. But according to this source, a single company -- Morningstar -- owns 30 percent of the tomato-paste market. Heinz claims to own 60 percent of the ketchup market.

Grist food editor Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. Follow my Twitter feed; contact me at tphilpott[at]grist[dot]org.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. justlou Posted 11:11 pm
    04 Dec 2008

    A Stab at an ExplanationTom,



    Tomato solids are higher in sunnier CA than in the more humid Midwest and East.  Higher solids mean a higher net yield of tomato paste (=higher profit).  

    Foliar plant diseases are more difficult to manage in areas of higher rainfall and humidity.  So, more pesticides would be applied in the humid regions than in dry growing areas of CA.  

    Processing plants which utilize tomatoes are basically assembly operations now compared with the old days when production was much more vertically integrated and dependent on local production of fresh raw ingredients.  Rather than sourcing all of their ingredients locally they now rely heavily on outsourcing of more stored or preprocessed frozen ingredients produced remotely. So, frozen tomato paste produced in CA fits the need very well. Also,  market forces have driven the few remaining food processing companies to manage costly inventories by utilizing more JIT, or Just In Time production.  So, instead of filling warehouses with unsold cases of soup for instance, production can be geared more closely to what is actually selling at the time.  


    So, the numbers as you listed do look daunting, but this giantizing is the way of the world. I am not defending it.  I do not think it is a sustainable by any means but I can't think of much in our way of living that is.  
  2. Tom Philpott's avatar

    Tom Philpott Posted 12:03 am
    06 Dec 2008

    JustlouThe factors you cite explain why California would have a large tomato-processing industry -- say, 20 percent of the total, as it did in the '40s. but 95 percent? think of all the canneries around the country that have folded in the past 60 years, and all the little boxes that have been plunked down on prime farmland.

    Victual Reality

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement